Datasets:

jaredjoss

/

jigsaw-long-2000

like 0

== Airstaff schedule == I absolutley do not agree, I think they sould be allowed as i put them on, i am not exactly telling anyone what time they are on just what shift they hold down and who they are. In my opinon wikipedia is wrong in this sense. I think they should be allowed because the jocks are the most important part of a radio station, without them most radio stations would not be where they are today. Take WRIF or WKQI in detroit there morning shows are the most popular in the market and it is kind of cool and go online and see who actually is on it. Another reason (which is kind of stupid to some people, but to radio people like me it

is kind of cool) is that it is cool to look back in the history and be able to see who was working there one or two years ago. Me being a radio buff, i keep track of some radio stations lineups and how they have changed over the years. Those are basically my reasons for keeping them, and I think the people who write the rules at Wikipedia are just ridculous. i don't get there logic as to why that can not be included. I am pretty sure not one radio station around the world, has complained because there jocks names are on it. and hell, it is not even an advertisment, I just dont get it. Anyway thanks (hope you understand why I want them on pages)

::::That mini-edit war was so stupid - so

does this policy, which is totaly anti-acedmic.

Barek, Thanks for joining the discussion. As I mentioned to Luigi, 'it's not nice to throw that [a person's time/efforts] away without a basic exchange of civility.' I asked Luigi to read before he/she hits the delete button, and then, to grant a New User a Deletion Discussion...neither of which are unreasonable requests in a global, grass-roots, 'free-information' forum; nor did they necessitate intervention from anyone other than the intended reader. What's more: this is not a new concern that I raise, or is it one that has not been raised by another more seasoned member of the WIKITeam prior to my commentary; to wit SionK's comments entitled

Your recent actions at Articles for Creation. Again, I respectfully requested that my article be restored to my personal Sandbox where it could be supported by media article references which cite the very same facts forwarded in my Article. But, THANK YOU for your objective, unbiased feedback; which, of course, you had the delicate sensibilities to frame in the most considerate and supportive of manners. I can only hope that the other members of the WIKITeam are able to interact with a bit more tact. After all, most humane individuals would agree that there is no need to kick an effort when it is already dead and moot.

" == Need for specific references == [Many of these authors claim inspiration from an infinite intelligence, which is referred to by different authors by various names. Wayne Dyer refers to this as ""The Source"" or ""Great Masters of the Universe"". Louise Hay describes it/them as ""some of the best teachers on the planet today."" The Hicks' refer to this same source as ""Abraham"", Esther describing it as ""infinite intelligence"" and Jerry saying that ""They are the purest form of love I have ever experienced"". Stuart Wilde says these higher beings of a superior intelligence are placed in a celestial dimension that

is at 90 degrees to us and follows the direction of transverse waves of light, the latter in accordance with concepts advanced by theoretical physicist Paul Dirac.] The paragraph above is from the ""Contemporary usage"" sub-section; it lacks specific references. When quoting living persons, we should follow WP:CITE#CHALLENGED and WP:GRAPEVINE. This paragraph could probably be deleted accordingly; however, there may be some relevance. The references should provide exact page numbers – as well – so that the statements may be verified. These improvements could help the article become a ""Good Article"". How close to ""GA"" status are we? Some thoughts, please. "

" == Ryūlóng / Powergate92 interventions == Hello Wanted to thank you for coming in and commenting. After User:Spitfire came in with at least another pair of eyes and had a fair point to make on definitions, I left this message, which is pretty much my rationale for handling things as I did (so I encourage you to read it as well). I'm open to any criticisms on it, but as rollback my options are quite limited and from similar experience the parties usually need just reminder of the 'big picture' and it dissipates. Out of safety I never say speak ""block"" in any way shape or form unless it's at least one step removed from

anything suggested, because I have not been given the trust to suggest as such. What you started from on questions is obviously more ground-level and what I should have grabbed for but I assumed basic reversion process wasn't in need of large review, and I'm sorry for over-simplifying the situation and automatically assuming too much of them both. It was nothing but best intentions on my part and I assumed there was not any specific editor objection as they had ample opportunity several times to chime in. Any advice welcomed... since it's ANI I basically assume admins read things over and comment where they feel things were discussed improperly... this seemed non-controversial. Cheers~ ♪ "

IF YOU ARE REDING THIS YOU SMELL LIKE A DOGS

SHIT AND A 92 YEAR OLD MANS DICK! ')

" :::::::::::I'm looking forward to the enlightened candidate that

says ""Shit, I'm high right now...."" ǀ "

" :: Indeed, I agree that it reflects badly upon me when I sink to your level. However, I have to defend my good name, you're apparently trying to slander/libel/whatever. I don't know what is the reason for that, perhaps some personal animosity or anything. I don't know and I don't care. I asked you to stay civil and remove the lies you spread. To no avail. :: You pointed to a citation in which I paraphrased the WP:VERIFY. However, you failed to provide citations for your accusation that I've been in the mood (lie), that I think I can state anything I like (lie), that everyone else must provide references to remove it (shameless lie). Nor

did you provide any proof that if you don't cite anything that says that it didn't happen, well he reverts you. It's a pack of lies, nothing more. Or perhaps you can find citations for that, just like you're finding a wiki rule prohibiting us from using various named for the same phenomenon? :: On a personal note, I wonder whether you've ever written any wikipedia article. From your list of contributions it seems that all you do is either spread German WWII views, nitpick or change single words to a large number of articles. Or perhaps you did under your previous name? Interestingly, your very first edit in wikipedia seems informative as well. // "

== ITN == We obviously got off on the wrong foot big time. By all means, I encourage you to nominate stories you feel are worthy of posting. If you can do so without making insulting comments about Americans, or how the story would be posted if it happened in the US, etc., we won't have any further problems. If you look at my actual contributions (I supplied a list in the ITN thread), you'll see 19/21 stories I wrote this year are not US-based items. Most of these would have never been posted if I didn't write the stories. I do read American news source (which believe it or not does report

international news quite well), but I also regularly check Australian, Indian, and South African news. Between these, I see most important stories - South America is the only region I rarely see stories from, which is due to my inability to read Spanish, not intentionally omission. In practical terms, I do more to combat systematic bias (in the news) than almost anyone else. As a measure of good faith, tell which which you'd rather I write - the vagina transplant story or the china water story - and I will write the article. Since I already wasted most of my evening arguing, it probably won't be tonight, but I will write the article.

:The only idiot is the person picking one, the idea

that it matters at all is the foolish one.

" ::::::Dammit, J.del, you know very well I can't

see U-tube from my PC... Bastard. ! "

Do it. Fucking block me. I don't fucking care. In

fact, I WANT to be perma-blocked. Do it faggot.

" :I suggest you read the notes at the top of this

page before you ask another stupid question like that. — "

You too shit head, but I'm going to

fucking live another 23 hours after that.

== justin carpenter == justin is the

definition of the following:stupid retarded borring gay

" Logicus to Johnuniq & Geuttarda: You are quite wrong JOHNUNIQ, as is Guettarda. There must be a point at which theories switch from bring ‘rejected’ to being ‘accepted’ if these terms are sufficiently well defined, such as in terms of unanimity, or a great majority, or simple majority of the scientific community, for example. And you clearly think there was such a point that was earlier than mid 20th century. But Darlington’s testimony suggests 1950 would be too early rather than too late. And it is not inconsequential to rationality theories of scientific revolutions whether we can

prove when it was, since dating should be in accordance with when the theory first proved itself evidentially over its predecessor(s) and competitor(s). Rationality theorists regard even a decade out as a counterexample. Moreover as the philosopher of science Imre Lakatos pointed out in his 1973 LSE Lectures on Scientific Method, :::::""...nobody to date has found a demarcation criterion according to which Darwin can be described as scientific."" [p24 Motterlini’s 1999 For and Against Method]. ::::And it seems this may still be the case. ;;;;So dating community conversions is important to identifying the logic of scientific revolutions. "

:::Wait Gay sex between 15 year olds - dosent

that mean he's accusing bully of containing child pornography?

== Inventors Note: == I have no further interest in VMSK whatsoever - commercial or otherwise. I only invented it. It should be noted that papers by reputable scientists continue to be published on the method. 76 are listed in the UNB Textbook, appearing as recent as 2009. I may be an unknowing character as alleged, but my hardware does work as claimed and the many reputable scientists who have published peer review papers confirm this. Bobier's methods can also be proven. ( Xg Tech., since they are in use.) The problem with the commercial acceptance of the UNB methods is in the filters. These filters are vector adding filters which have very low envelop group delay

- as opposed to conventional filters which have a group delay related to their bandwidth and Q. Vector adding filters can have a group delay as short as 1 IF cycle. Unfortunately they cannot be realized with digital filter equivalents. They must be built with crystals or LC resonators and hand tuned. This is too costly for mass production. The filter noise bandwidth can be as narrow as 500 Hz. Tomazic is correct in reporting the maximum bandwidth efficiency at baseband, or with conventional filters, is 2 b/s/Hz. This is not true however with RF modulated methods using vector adding filters. The Naye sayers should dig a lot deeper and get the facts straight. H.R. Walker

== Bad references == I removed two bad references and the text supposedly taken from them: *Ben Wener from the Orange County Register called the song to be deftly balancing the no-nonsense statements for the dramatic set she performed in the concert. ** *Clive Young and Steve Harvey from the International Pro Sound News called the song to be risky. ** First off, the grammar was terrible, and whatever words that were used by the notional authors were not in quotes. Second, the music reviewer Ben Wener of the OC Register did not write any article by that name, and did not

review the song Hey You. Here's what he was writing in July 2007: http://soundcheck.ocregister.com/2007/07/page/2/ It is clear that he wrote about Live Earth but not about Madonna or the song. Third, the Pro Sound News article does not exist. Clive Young really does write articles for PSN but not this one. Here are the PSN article from July 2007: http://www.prosoundnetwork.com/section/unsorted-news/73/page/326 Nothing like the cited article. These are part of the problems caused by Legolas2186 as detailed at . If anyone here knows of further referencing problems on Madonna articles, ones traceable to Legolas2186 expansions, please add them to the project page.

american football player love to drink. they also love alcohol in

the form of vodka cruisers . lets get fucked up.

==Hey wanker== Will you never stop erasing me? You

are violating my rights. I will violate your face

Unblock me you lying bastards here on wiki, nato's

bombing campaign has already killed thousands of innocent people!!

Hillary Clinton then decided to drop the middle name Rodham

because she is the biggest bitch this side of Wisconsin.

" == New Article Deletion == I noticed that you removed the new Morris Mohawk Gaming Group article that I created yesterday and redirected to the ""Bodog"" article. I would question this decision. Bodog is the trademark and, of course, deserves its place in the encyclopedia for its significant history in the online gaming space as well as other sectors. However, the MMGG is the operator of one of the largest online gaming sites in the world and is a significant player in the industry. I realize that the MMGG is mentioned in the Bodog article as a brand licensee, but the removed article presented considerable additional information that would not have been appropriate

on a Bodog article. I took great pains to ensure that the facts were accurately researched and properly sourced, including securing directly from the MMGG permission to post their logo, which took several days. Unlike PartyPoker or Full Tilt, the brand ""Bodog"" is not the equivalent of group actually operating and developing one of the more significant sites in a relatively controversial sector. By way of analogy, Ceasar's Palace has its own Wikipedia article, but so does Harrah's, the company that owns and operates that brand. I will wait for your response before seeking to re-post to be certain I understand the rationale for removal, but would ask that this be reconsidered. "

:And exactly who the fuck cares what some pile of electrons

in a video game is called? It has significance why?

== Peer Review == This Wikipedia stub on “Digital content” is much improved from its earlier version. This updated, enhanced version is better written, both stylistically and grammatically. The organization of the information is presented in logical order. There are three main topics – History, Types, and See also – with the discussion of Types divided into four sub-topics. This structure makes the article easy to read and understand. More importantly, the text reads neutral or as neutral as it can be. The stub’s lead section is informative with key points of Digital content highlighted definition, forms and types, and applications. The section on History is brief and concise, as well as balanced in

that it points out challenges, such as intellectual property rights and copyright, that need to be recognized and addressed. The links to other Wikipedia pages also are well justified, that is, they are good choices which seem reliable. The sixteen sources listed are definitely sufficient to support the article. There are a couple areas that could be developed further. First, it would be interesting to address in more detail the sub-topic “Digital Companies” since the ‘business’ of digital content is ‘big business’ though still a relatively new direction. Beyond the business angle, a more general discussion of the implications/consequences of the growth and development of digital content would add ideas for further consideration.

== Edit request from DickFuckButt, 23 August 2010 ==

miley cyrus is a pornstar she is a slut

" :I'm sure the phrase ""medically unexplained symptoms"" goes back a lot farther than the '70s...it's an easy enough series of words to put together in a medical setting. But we can't build an article about a random phrase, so the question becomes: When was it used to indicate a specific category of illnesses? I have no idea if Slavney was the first to do so or not, but I think that we're confounding the phrase with an actual category. A common phrase is probably not notable by Wikipedia standards; a medical category might be if it's in wide use. So I think we need to identify when this phrase was first

coined to refer to a category of illnesses and prove that it's actually noteworthy. Without an entry in DSM-IV or a similar medical reference, the notability of the concept really needs to be shown. Also, as someone else said somewhere, if it is considered a medical category somewhere, we need to identify if it's primarily a psychiatric/psychological concept or a broader one. Similarly, I think we're also confounding the category with related terms like ""somatoform disorder"" and ""functional somatic symptoms"". Unless the source itself says that in that particular text they're intended to mean the same thing, any assumption that another text is making the same assumption would be synthesis. "

This article is ridiculous. I was about to paste some quotes

as examples, but the whole fucking thing is full of it.

== WHAT THE F*&%, MAN! == Nigguh, don't you know that it

was the truth behind the dark ages, you son of a b*%

:Ya you herd the dooag. N o

putten shit on my page!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!gott that mtherfker!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

::::*Ha, well now you know! Don't break your hamster penis next

time you have sex, or Crisco will have to reenact it.

No he is not. He's Mr.Satan in the uncut dub. I

don't know where people keep getting this Hercule Satan nonsense from.

" == AlladinSE's opinions vs. facts == In italics: * ""Palestinian Jews constituted a majority in the areas designated to the Jewish state by the partition and desired self-determination."" - This is an undisputed fact, not Israeli partisans claim * Palestinian Arabs dispute this, and claim that heavy immigration in the years immediately preceding the Partition unfairly tipped the scales in many areas, and that the total territory assigned to the Jewish State exceeded proportionally the land alloted to the Arabs. - it was a UN Plan, the Arabs refused to even negotiate. The largest part of Jewish territory was Negev desert.

As for immigration, I guess we all should thank Nazi Mufti & Co. * It is noteworthy that no Muslim country holds a permanent seat on the powerful Security Council, and the vast majority of Muslim nations are poor third world countries, and this influence is disputed. Nevertheless, in terms of sheer voting strength in the largely symbolic General Assembly, this block represents about 1/4 of the delegates. - Sorry, I'm tired of this silliness. Show me any country that was as many times condemned as Israel. How does their alleged (see oil) poverty relevant to their voting strentgh? ←← "

" Since the matter appears to already have been settled, It's a little late for this: ::Stop changing animal names in Walking With Dinosaurs, Walking With Beasts, When Dinoasurs Roamed America and Sea Monsters! Since this is an ""Opening volley"", it would have been more effective to word it thusly: : Please stop changing the animal names on the following pages: Walking with Dinosaurs, Walking with Beasts, When Dinosaurs Roamed America and Sea Monsters. Or, for even more authoritative: :Please refrain from changing the animal names... ::It's very annoying! Can't you see references beside each animal!? You're making the articles less specified and less imformative! You... The

nicest thing I can say is you're making the articles worse! Just badly done, here. A far calmer approach would have elevated this greately. ""It's very annoying"" is jhighly subjective, and ""The nicest thing I can say"" is just a bland insult. This would have been A) more word-effective and B) more direct. :Your edits only cause detriment to the articles in question, as prior to your edits, the animal identities were fully cited. Please refrain from continuing these edits. An ""Or risk moderator intervention."" can be added if the need is felt. But I'm a writer, so, I tend to be nitpicky that way. "

" :Hi Yug, I left a note on the talk page asking for the refs. About your English, I really felt bad when I left a note saying it was not very good. To be clear, it certainly is ""good enough"" for conversation - I'm sure that we'd understand each other perfectly well if we were to have a conversation. But for the article, you frequently arrange your sentences incorrectly and some of the words that you choose are ""strange"". Obviously you are very intelligent - it seems that you have learned to speak Chinese? - but I get the feeling that you have not had a chance to use English in conversation much, is that correct? :Also, it seems that you want the article to reflect the fact that some of the statements

by those who oppose the protests are utterly and amazingly untrue. I don't know if the French use the phrase, ""You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink"", but that is certainly what we are dealing with in the US right now. People watch Fox news and really do believe what they hear. They think that a more liberal news outlet is controlled by commies, socialists, or whoever else their anti-God and Country boggie men are. It won't do any good to edit the article to say that ""Hannity, (for instance) was proved wrong..."", and besides that is stating a POV in the article. But if you have another notable person that refuted his statements in an acceptable source, we'll see what we can do? Best, gandy "

== TWL Questia check-in == Hello! You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access: *Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch. *When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia. *Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage,

the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. *Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources. Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer. Thanks! Delivered by , on behalf of

== Please put references into inline format instead of hard coding == I've done the first two references as examples of inline citation, and I hope I've inspired you to finish the project, since fewer deleterious mutations will occur in this article if you do the job instead of me. The hard-coded format which you have used for citations will lead to linkage disequilibrium in the list of citations within a few generations as mutations and recombination occur in this article. Since the rate of recombination in Wikipedia articles is high, this article will quickly mutate from a well-referenced article, which it is now, into a pseudo-article,

an article that is non-functional and cannot evolve into a better article. A pseudo-article is the final stage in the evolution of an article, before it is pruned from the encyclopedia. According to the neutral theory of Wikipedia article evolution, articles experience drift because most Wikipedia edits are neutral or even slightly deleterious. Don't let this article turn into a pseudo-article. Like me, you probably don't believe in intelligent design, but please intervene in the evolution of this article to make it possible for the article to evolve into a future version of the article, adapted to the changing Wikipedia environment. For more information, see Wikipedia:Inline_citation.

anonymous is not hackers we lied about this

we are stupid hoes that don't know nothing}

::::::::John's raison d'être is to be a poncey asshole who

has to have the last word. He should be ignored.

Shitty DRM - no one can stand the

bullshit especially Ubisoft put into their software.

" 12:47, 1 October 2006 *LOL @ Wikipedia Youve gotta admit, that video is pretty fucking funny... I still can't believe that this is STILL protected... kinda funny, really. A half a second bit of a parody's music video has basically perminately closed this section of Wikipedia. For everyone thinking about doing this vandalism, see what I just did in the sandbox: . That should satisfy everyone. — ::I found this page by rewinding the video a few times until I could see Atlantic Records on it. He's using a real screen shot on a Macintosh, but the big ""YOU SUCK"" is in the edit window, so it was probably photoshopped onto it. There's no way to actually make it displayed like that. Damn that

video is freakin' hilarious. 20px - == Sorry about that edit == Thought I press ""Show Preview"" ==Country music== I didn't see any need to clutter up the sentence, but if anyone needs a source for the reference to Atlantic Records releasing country music, in 1950 they released the single ""Why Do I Cry Over You?"" by Bill Haley and His Saddlemen, and a reproduction of the label can be found in the Haley box set Rock 'n' Roll Arrives by Bear Family Records. It would be interesting to find out whether this was the only country single released by the label as I know of no others (though I believe they did issue some rockabilly recordings later so I guess those count). "

poop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop

ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next time

Get a life and stop writing complete

rubbish on wiki 'benjet 13000 aircraft'

Hello, Randolphsleap, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for . I notice that one of the first articles you created appears to be an article about yourself. This is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally. The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate

to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *Tutorial *How to edit a page and How to develop articles *How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) *Simplified Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

::It is very messy, Yogesh. I, too, could get nowhere and I suspect it is a pov fork. We've long had issues with things like Ahir/Aheer, Yadav/Yadava that some scholars regard as being synonymous terms and others as distinct. We've also had the Mali issue crop up on the Saini articles and, periodically, causing all sorts of mayhem until the Orkut campaign or whatever dies down. If someone is just doing the basic synthesis - Mandorva = Rajput Mali - and then constructing a Mandorva article based on that synthesis (which in fact all the sources used call them Rajput Mali), then it will be easy to deal with; if Mandorva is indeed shown to be

a synonym then it is certainly the less common name and we could ask for indefinite protection of the redirect; but if the person who has been doing this stuff does in fact have a reasonable rationale somewhere then we need to hear it. In any event, Mandorva might itself be only one transliteration, so while searching for that reveals nothing, it doesn't mean that the core of what they are wanting to do is wrong. n other words, I'd rather wait and see for now but will try to ensure that the redirect stays in place until we have some sort of agreement here. So, add it to your watchlist and do that thing! -

" :Yeah, I saw you just remove that. I'm not

even sure what the fuck powercore is... ≈ "

dear losers who ban me for editing pages YOU

GUYS SUCK DID YOU KNOW THAT YOU REALLY SUCK

" :The debate we are talking about began in 1993 and abated by the end of the decade, thus I would consider it a ""prolonged, public, and heated"" disagreement"" and therefore think the word controversy is appropriate. The debate extended outward from academia and became a subject of national conversation because it related directly to larger concerns such as race, identity, and academic freedom. The debate spawned dozens of books, scholarly articles, and conferences and was consistently reported on in the press. A simple search of just the phrase ""Black Athena"" on JSTOR finds 642 scholarly articles published since 1987 when the book came out. The debate is, in fact, still ongoing. Lefkowitz published her

book History Lesson: A Race Odyssey in 2008 and Bernal published Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization: The Linguistic Evidence, Vol. 3 in 2006. This in spite of the fact that both Lefkowitz and Martin are now retired from Wellesley and teaching entirely. As a result, discussion of this particular incident is not as common as it was fifteen years ago. But that doesn't mean it was an inconsequential, minor or irrelevant. I hope you were joking about the YouTube videos. Just because a topic isn't the subject of a great number of videos uploaded to YouTube doesn't mean it is not serious or important and I'm sure you know that. "

My only amusement comes from its lack of reverting.

And the whomping a nigger bit, don't know why.

== zee german == motherfucker, traitor,

he changed for money, bastard, pig.

" Looking further into amendments to the infobox, can I suggest the following for dicussion: :Production 1967-2006 :: This is an article about the engine in heavily revised Rover form, so earlier production is not relevant or accurate. This is covered by the Buick 215 article. :Predecessor ::I have requested on the Talk page for the automobile engine infobox template that a new category of 'Designer' be added. This will be of relevance and value for many of the 20th Century engine designs, and in this case would permit the GM connexion to be referenced more accurately. I would propose: ::: ""Designer - General Motors (1959/60), Rover (1965-67)"". ::This could then facilitate the deletion of the

""Also Called Buick 215"" field, which is inaccurate. By that measure, the Triumph 1500 engine would be ""also called"" Standard 8, when the development in the interim years was sufficient for the engines to share almost nothing in terms of tooling or componentry. An RV8 is definitely not a Buick 215 - even the casting method was altered. This also adds to my above argument that Production should count from 1967 onwards, with the general purpose being to differentiate the Rover-ised engine from its design origins in line with what I believe is the scope of the article. ::How do we feel about that sort of change (provided Designer can be added to the infobox)? "

WTF So what if it's written in british english,

no need to spell things wrong. Fucking elitists bastards.

suck it fuck it fuck it suck it shag it duck

it fuck it suck it Deagle you are a motherfucker.

== Neyo-So Sick == Gotta change my answering machine now that im alone Cause right now it says that we can't come to the phone And I know it makes no sense cause u walked out the door but it's The only way I hear yo voice anymore It's ridiculus it's been moths 4 some reason I just can't get Over us and I'm stronga than this yea Enough is enough no more walkin round w/ my head down I dont a fool cryin ova u And Im so sick ov love songs so tired of tears so done w/ wishin u were still Here and Im so sick ov luv songs so sad and slow so why cant I turn off the radio Gotta fix that calendar I hav thats marked july 16 because scince theres

no more U theres no more anniversary Im so fed up w/ my thoughts of u and yo memory And now every song reminds me ov what used to b thats the reason Im so sick ov luv songs so Tired ov tears so done w/ wishing u were still here and Im so sick ov luv songs so sad and slow Why cant I turn off the radio oh leave me alone leave me alone stupid luv songs hey dont make me Think about yo smile and havin my 1st child Im lettin go by turnin off the radio cause Im so sick love so tired of tears so done w/ wishin you were still said Im so sick of love songs so sad And slow so why cant I turn off the radio X3

" ==Speedy deletion of Buffer Zone Laing== A tag has been placed on Buffer Zone Laing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice

was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. "

" == F***ing RETARD! == STOP SPAMMING MY USERPAGE!!!

I'M ABOUT TO FILE A COMPLAINT NOW! "

" == ""Spanish-Indian Wars"" == In § European discovery, founding (1671–1771), ¶ 3 is :By the 1740s, the Wood's River Land Company, represented by Col. James Patton, gained a large tract of land within present-day southwest Virginia. Part of the tract became Montgomery County and Pulaski County and was sold to Virginian, Anglo-Irish, Scots-Irish, and English settlers as a reward for their services during the Spanish-Indian Wars and other wars. The Draper and Ingles families were among those who built their homes between present location of the campus and the subdivision of Hethwood. This came to become known as Draper's Meadow by 1748. What are the ""Spanish-Indian Wars""? The mention was added at by an IP editor . There is no

such page on WP and almost no occurrence of that phrase, and very little of the kind to be found in a Google search. The timeline implied by the paragraph could fit with King George's War (1744–1748) or the War of Jenkins' Ear (1739–1748) (see French and Indian Wars), but the former did not involve Spain, and the latter was conducted almost entirely in the Caribbean and on the coasts of present-day Panama and Colombia. The closest thing I can find to Spanish and Indian involvement is the Invasion of Georgia (1742) from the Spanish colony of Florida, in which the defending British land forces consisted of ""900 Soldiers, militia & Indians"" (quoting the infobox). To discuss this, please me. "

"==Notability of Shane Rife== A tag has been placed on Shane Rife, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you feel that you can assert the notability

of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. "

(UTC) I was curious about the recipient of her charity, the Shalom Foundation. On Google there are several similarly-named charities and after a bit of research I found the right one. * Shalom Foundation | Home Page: http://www.theshalomfoundation.org/ * Shalom Foundation | Media about Sugarland: http://www.theshalomfoundation.org/files.php?CatID=8 * Shalom Foundation | Sugarland Press Release: http://www.theshalomfoundation.org/siteadmin/uploads/document/sugarlandupdatedrelease.pdf The press release can be used to back up / replace these references: * [25] CMT no longer links to that info. * [26] Dining Stars domain is 404 File Not Found. Although we can't use it without release, if you're interested they

also have a photo of Jennifer Nettles in Guatemala: * http://www.theshalomfoundation.org/siteadmin/uploads/document/stevejennifernettlesmariajoseandliliansfamily.jpg May I also suggest that a Wikipedia page be created for The Shalom Foundation and linked to in this article? PS: I went to Agnes Scott College with Jennifer and can attest that she's a really nice person. I'm a complete nerd but she was always friendly to me. Our Class of '97 won several Sister Class Song Competitions due to her excellent singer/songwriter skills. Jennifer's Senior Yearbook Photo (see also pg 5, 59, 63, 105): http://archive.org/stream/silhouette199793agne#page/74/mode/1up My pic pg 77. 01:41, 13 October 2013

:: Oh yes and you will burn in hell for

trying to steal Korean land. Fuck you you fucking Nip.

" ==Speedy deletion of C-side== A tag has been placed on C-side requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our

subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. , "

==Ironholds large penis== Mmmmmmmmmmmmmm Dickens Ironholds got

a bigger yummier penis love Lulu

" ::It's the meaning of the source we need to keep intact, not its wording (it's usually best to avoid a avoid a sources wording). We can word this however we want so long as the meaning is the same. If it's almost universally known as the West Bank, it by definition must be generally known as the West Bank, just as a billionaire must by definition be a millionaire. ::It is rather odd that the source uses both terms like that as ""generally"" is a much weaker term then ""almost universally"", but if the ""generally"" is not meant to take away from the ""almost universally"", it's totally redundant. If the ""generally""

is meant to somehow dampen or partly negate the meaning of ""almost universally"", the source is being very very unclear as to weather or not it's almost universally known as the West Bank, and we probably shouldn't rely on it for that claim (with or without the ""generally and""). Either way tough, the source supports that J&S; is generally known as WB, heck that claim barely even needs a source. ::There are plenty of sources out there anyway; it J&S; is almost universally known as WB (it sure seams to be: ""Judea and Samaria"" -wikipedia ""West Bank"" -wikipedia) it shouldn't be too difficult to find a source that clearly says that. "

working on a ridiculously pain-in-my ass website. writing

on bangles for a website that sucks.

cm punk someone said that use to had so much

sex and you penis was so smouth and cute

" It is impossible to truly understand the Hyles phenomenon without a discussion of the scandals and accusations that literally changed his ministry in the 1980's. While Hyles' followers have for years attacked those who would even bring the allegations up, 2 books, a major expose by a credible journalist and multiple media articles do not comprise ""innuendo"" and ""libel"". Hyles' son has been investigated for child abuse that lead to the death of a child. Hyles' son has a notorious record of immoral sexual conduct with a wide variety of women in multiple churches. Hyles-Anderson is indisputably an

unaccreditted college whose graduates are left with a largely unmarketable degree. These aren't ""un-neutral"" points of view they are FACTS. The fact that the Hyles' followers constantly monitor this page and remove any ""non-pro-Hyles"" information off of it says a lot. True thinkers need the whole story. It is just this kind of response that has lead many to conclude the Hyles adherents are trapped in a cultic system. For verification, read ""The Wizard of God"" by Victor Nischek, ""Fundamental Seducation"" by Attorney Voyle Glover or do a web search for multiple other articles and exposes on Jack Hyles."

:::::::I simply ask again. How stupid are the fans of this

TV show. The hatnote is only appropriate if they are morons.

:I assume you are right. Who the hell

gave it such a stupid meaningless name then?

" == Replaceable fair use Image:BillScheurer.jpg == Thanks for uploading Image:BillScheurer.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: # Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. # On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the

fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. "

::There is no support for reference to the newsletter that NEHGS refers to early in the discussions of Warren's ancestry. I can't support any references to that newsletter. It is not a primary document. It is not a secondary source. It is not a source, period. It is hearsay. It is not appropriate to go back and re-write all of these things that happened. NEHGS does not put any kind of credibility in that newsletter and just because one editor keeps pushing it does not make that newsletter important to this topic. The fact is that Warren has not provided one piece of documentary evidence to support her ancestral claims and that is what this article should clearly state. The point of this article is tell the issue,

as quickly as possible, and let the reader make up their own mind. It is not for us to re-write history or to interpret evidence or use the article to act as apologists for Warren. She made the claims, for several years, it became the topic of a campaign in Massachusetts and later was discussed nationwide. It is notable so it should be in the article. Editors need to stop saying, incorrectly, that it was a one time thing and that was merely raised by political opponents because the Cherokees that have raised questions and complained did not do it for political reasons. To push forward the premise that: (1) it was a one-time claim or (2) only political opponents cared about Warren's claims is old-fashioned POV pushing.

::;*Indeed! That will be a fun TFA. Is

there an International Penis Day yet? —

" == Copyright problem removed == One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.house.state.oh.us/index.php?option=com_displaymembers&task;=detail&district;=04. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see ""using copyrighted works from others"" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or ""donating copyrighted materials"" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted.

Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. "

Using your finger or a paper towel to rub in the

penicl, is always a good idea when trying to shade.

fuke you nigas asfgh jihgijfhgjfhgfkghfdgvhifgvhd bakhg

hjhgdj,hfgfgkjhgf hdghd jhgjgfj hdfgf jvhjgvhdvfg

Yup, it's a fucking bullshit prequel my ass nobody wants to

play as fucking ghost people want to see what happens later

Seems that Jimfbleak is treated like a king

and I'm treated like a fucking criminal.

How many failed marriages/de facto relationships has

this bloke had? What a goose.

":: I think it's arguable that the opinions of a person said by some of the editors to be using a sock should be disregarded. If Gabrielsimon has been determined to be a sock puppet by our Sock-smeller Poursuivaunt, David Gerard, or by consensus of administrators on WP:ANI, then I'll discount his vote. :: When I'm saying I think it's plausible that you're somebody's sock, and go on to say if that is the case I've counted your vote already, it's to illustrate that I'm trying to level the playing field. I know these votes attract socks, so I use a uniform criterion: 100 votes and one month (that's AND, not OR) and some other nonsense filters. If you

pass it, you're in. I discount your vote because, as it is plausible that you're a sock, you would probably have voted already. We have thousands of editors. If an article really needs to be deleted, some of those thousands of editors will come forward and ask for it to be deleted. There's no need for me to take notice of votes from very recent newcomers. : Now as to the content of the article-for the most part, I'm content to let the two dozen or so other people involved in the discussion to deal with that. If you can't agree among yourselves that something needs to be done to the article, then I call ""keep"" by default. "

HAFSA AHMED, 19, SHEFFIELD, BROOMHALL, AKA HONEY AHMED FACEBOOK

ME.. TWEET ME @HONEYLEMON3 ... I LOVE SEX! *ORGASMS*

" :It doesn't matter what I believe, or TVH believes. It matters what can be verified. The reliable sources give significantly more weight that Americans are citizens of the United States. Who are American, but those who have American nationality. Sure there are aliens who claim American identity, but that usage has less weight than that of the more common usage, regardless of what advocates for ""immigration reform"" want. The lead section gives both views weight, but does not give undue weight to the less common view that Americans are just anyone who happens to reside in the United States. The USCB does not determine who Americans are, that is not within their mandate, and

to construed that it does is WP:SYNTH at best. : :""...see your way...""? Sorry, nope. Not supported by reliable sources, either dictionary definition or otherwise. Otherwise, this article might as well be about all people who reside in the Americas (as some have advocated). That is not what this article is about. There are two articles about those who don't have American nationality who reside in the United States: Illegal immigrant population of the United States, Permanent residence (United States). Perhaps the latter article can use expansion by including demographics of those lawful aliens; I would very much support that. :Rather than change the scope of this article, work on improving those articles. "

"Farid Fadel Article == Dear Excirial reviewer, Greetings from Egypt! I have recently written an article about Egyptian artist Dr. Farid Fadel, however it did not go through. Here is the link you asked for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Farid_Fadel I made some amendments to have it written more academically, however I would appreciate more specific comments as to how I could make it ""wikipedia"" material. I would also like to include pictures I took of Dr. Farid Fadel's paintings but do not know how to do that. I assure you Excirial, Dr. Fadel is a worthy personage to have on wiki. His biography was included in the ""Who's Who"" of intellectuals published by Cambridge in 1988 and has been a key public figure in

Egyptian contemporary art (do google him and see his paintings). thank you for your cooperation and hard work. I look forward to hearing from you soon. yours truly, Dalia — Preceding unsigned comment added by • : Those last few edits are definitely an improvement over the last versions, and as far as i am concerned entirely took care of the tone and neutrality issue. A few extra newspaper sources might be a good thing though, since a few of them only make a trivial mention, rather then providing a bit more substantial coverage. Having said that i'll be leaving it to another reviewer to do another check, but so far it looks quite decent to me. , == "

== GAY IS WRONG == GAY ACTS ARE

STUPID SINS! STOP SUPPORTING THE GAY ILLNESS!

" ==RE:User talk:tjstrf== Rant on your own time. Thanks. :You can gloat on your own time as well. ::Nah, I'm fine with being wrong. With the number of edits I make, it's inevitable, and I'm more than willing to defer to others who I know have a background of knowledge in a subject. The Bleach pages have long histories of people going and adding their own incoherent incorrect ""translations"" for the terms though, so when we find such edits, we generally revert them on sight. If it turns out they are correct, we can afford to wait for evidence. ::However, I'm not fine with having my talk page covered in your infantile ""neener neener neener""ing. So, if you don't have anything

productive to say, our conversation ends here. Happy editing. ==Your recent edits== Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! "

:Thank you for your analysis, Proto; You are quite correct that I would offend others if I kept it up, but I feel that the standards are arbitrarily applied (not just on links to my site, but, as you have noticed, regarding other links used as sources). It is lopsided in the consensus, and I accept the consensus, even if I don't agree with it. (You saw my statements to that effect in my message above, I trust.) However, since this issue is about a broader issue regarding the citing of sources on the whole, i felt that the examples I outlined in the talk pages about a deletionist slant to be a point worth review. :Although I am very irritated that some others don't see it my way on all issues, my plans to edit much less are simply

because I am busy with other things. I certainly don't want to have any hard feelings with any editors if and when I decide to take a Wikibreak here shortly, not even those with whom I have disagreed, such as Calton, for example. :Well, thank you for writing back. A lot of work is out there to do on Wikipedia, but real life also has a lot of work for us. I hope that sets your mind to ease. After all, it is just one online encyclopedia; I think the worst that could happen to us now is a lawsuit against Wikipedia, but I have done my part to contribute; others will have to figure it out in the future if and when I do indeed cut back on my editing; Best of luck and blessings to you all.

:That's a really stupid distinction. It's very approximate and

both ways are fine to be sure. - /email

"::::B2C, you introduced the notion of meeting WP:COMMONALITY as a matter of degree. I, though, have taken is as a mere hurdle requirement. In this case, both spellings plainly meet that requirement, so it is reasonable to move on to other considerations. Here there are two: consistency within the article, and consistency between similar articles (a desideratum according to policy at WP:TITLE). The article is written in British English (for example with goitre, not goiter); so a spelling that tends the British way gives internal consistency. Do you find that other titles include semantically related forms beginning with ""iodiz-"", or ""iodis-""? I don't. I therefore think there is no

problem with consistency between articles, either. ::::As for the definition and individuation of words being a ""semantic"" matter, I agree. Of course! Much that is important in RMs, and in the proper reading of guidelines and policies, is inevitably ""semantic"". That is simply to say that we have to attend to meanings. Surprised by that? Alarmed? Now, WP:COMMONALITY refers to ""variant spellings"". It does not refer to ""distinct words that are exactly similar except in that they differ in spelling, along with differences that are minimally and necessarily consequent on that primary difference"". So the guideline is naturally to be interpreted in the way I show above. ::::Noetica "

" Returning to the fundamental premise, I see that the Zionism and racism forwards a misleading argument that I believe needs to be examined closely. I'd appreciate further debate on this point, as there are several issues at play. Here are the issues that I feel need to be addressed. # Zionism and racism uses a tailored definition of racism (that is at odds with the definition found on Wikipedia's article on racism) that omits ehnicity as a factor in racism. The use of this modified definiton creates a logical inconsistency, by which anti-Semitic behavior can not be considered racism without applying blatant double standards. To leave out ethnicity, Jews are not a race, and therefore can never claim racial bias against them.

# In the opening exposition of Zionism and racism, there are absolutely no claims made that Zionism is racist, only defense of Zionism from such claims. The reader is presented exclusively with only one side of the issue. A more appropriate title for this article would be ""Defense of Zionism from claims of racism"". # A large number of the claims that are made in this article are not referenced, and as such, contain the same WP:OR that would apply to someone articulating a furtherance of an argument. If pieces of an article are to be removed because they are not referenced, then should not the same rules apply to other pieces in the same article that are similarly not referenced? "

== Слова поддержки == * Уважаемый Алексей Николаевич! Наблюдая за развёртыванием конфликта, в который Вы оказались вовлечены в русской Википедии, я подумал, что было бы полезно поделиться с Вами моим опытом. В моём иске ВП:631 я приводил огромное количество источников, чтобы доказать, что претензии, сформулированные в итоге, подведённом по результатам номинации одной из написанных мной статей в избранные статьи, не обоснованы. Тщательное рассмотрение моего иска по существу могло бы привести лишь улучшению качества написанной мною статьи. Но когда было вынесено решение Арбитражного комитета, выяснилось, что не только улучшение качества статьи, но

и дальнейшая работа над ней невозможны, потому что необоснованные претензии к статье вообще не были рассмотрены Арбитражным комитетом. Вместо этого Арбитражный комитет постарался надёргать из моих высказываний побольше диффов, в которых можно быть усмотреть хоть малейшее нарушение правил Википедии, и вынес решение наложить на меня прогрессивную блокировку. Вот таким тривиальным, практически топорным способом разрешаются конфликты, возникшие на почве теоретических споров, в русской Википедии. Это означает, что в ней прогрессивные и бессрочные блокировки накладываются в первую очередь на специалистов, и всегда побеждает дилетантизм. Надеюсь, что мои слова поддержки помогут Вам не расстраиваться.

I hate this stupid so called intellectual discussion about

an evil man whose life has no meaning

::I'll ask him myself. I just met him and spent about

90 min talking about philosophical QM, so take that you faggots!

I disagree, I think it is standard practice. Nagorno-Karabakh is a region geographically and politically within the autonomous, independent and internationally recognized country of Azerbaijan. The region's population is mostly Armenian. On December 10, 1991, the Armenians from this region held a referendum and declared the region independent. To this day, the self proclaimed Nagorno-Karabakh Republic remains not recognized by any single country in the world, including Armenia. Yet both articles are still listed within the scope of both Wikipedia:WikiProject Armenia and Wikipedia:WikiProject Azerbaijan. The political and historical notability to an encyclopedia will not

end from the Azerbaijani perspective if the world ever recognized N-K as independent and, likewise, Armenian interest is also notable. Inclusion of the article into WPArmenia does not imply the region should belong to Armenia or the Armenian people. It's simply a topic that Azerbaijani and Armenian editors have knowledge of and can contribute to it. The article on Serbs of Croatia is no different. I agree with DIREKTOR that this is a touchy subject (it may be an understatement, actually) but the article's inclusion into WPSerbia is not politically motivated, it's encyclopedic.

EDIT: your new font is actually gay now that I think about

it, and so are you. Fuck your font, you're ruining Wikipedia.

===Encouragement=== I've seen your comments elsewhere and, if I didn't know it already, I can see you're a wee bitty pee'd off with your experience of Wikipedia so far. Don't be - stick with it. You learn by interacting with people already here and we all had to do it. My personal view is that we need many more editors who are brave enough to venture into articles concerning Irish nationalism and Irish republicanism, as well as articles on the various periods of troubles in modern Irish history. We need more neutral views from editors who are prepared to consider their input and make judgements about the neutrality of an article's perspective. For too long we had various factions of unionist and nationalist/republican

who did nothing but fight over articles to establish their own POV. That seems to have stopped now but as far as I can see there are far too many articles left on Wikipedia regarding the subject which are so badly written and so full of partisan comments. Irish Nationalism is one I looked at the other day - you'd think it was written by a 15 year old IRA supporter and that's not the right message to send out to people about Irish nationalism. Please do as I asked - e-mail me on Special:EmailUser/SonofSetanta and I'll start a dialogue with you that will guide you through the minefields and help you get much more enjoyment and satisfaction out of using the wiki.

== Pharmacokinetics? == What kind of article is

this? Can someone please fix that crap?

" It's not ""merely"" a single incident. A single incident can be significant enough to deserve one or more sections and sub-sections devoted to the topic. It's a professor using hate language and the consequences he faces for his actions. For the record, My Very Best wrote, ""I certainly agree with your last edit in this article and think all current refs are valid, such as that one included by you. Same with other refs, such as this,this, (same source) here and this, they also should be used. Main point here: these sources are reliable enough to source his own words, for example in his interview included by you."" and

""I must agree with MarshallBagramyan. Based on the discussion and sources so far, this article appear to be a case of self-promotion [1] by a marginally notable individual who is mostly known (based on sources quoted so far) for a genocide denial and ethnically motivated slander. There are multiple sources which are reliable enough to quote his own words on campus."" The issue of notability in this regard, that is, before My Very Best knew about his scholarly works, is irrelevant. His position on that section is clear enough and your allusion that this probably falls under WP:UNDUE and should be diluted is fallacious, to say the least. "

== Wikipedia == Wikipedia was created by raging

faggots who loved to bum fuck each other.

The term Liquid crystal. Is there any problem in very cold

temp of freezing the liquid. Or is that a stupid question?

" ==Speedy deletion of Oneaccess== A tag has been placed on Oneaccess requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our

subject-specific notability guideline for web content. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. "

:::And besides, it's people being stupid. It'd be

like linking to a ton of youtube.com videos.