Datasets:

jaredjoss

/

jigsaw-long-2000

like 0

" 2013 (UTC) ::Not just difficult: impossible. Some contributions to that discussion hinge on distinguishing a ""language"" from a ""dialect"", a distinction without scientific basis. To quote Dialect#Dialect_or_language [refs & flags deleted, text abridged, bolding added; my comments italicized in square brackets]: ::*There is no universally accepted criterion for distinguishing a language from a dialect. A number of rough measures exist, sometimes leading to contradictory results. Some linguists do not differentiate between languages and dialects, i.e. languages are dialects and vice versa. The distinction is therefore subjective and depends on the user's frame of reference. Note also that the

terms are not always treated as mutually exclusive… ::*Language varieties are often called dialects rather than languages … [four causes listed] ::*Anthropological linguists define dialect as the specific form of a language used by a speech community. From this perspective, everyone speaks a dialect. Those who identify a particular dialect as the ""standard"" or ""proper"" version of a language are seeking to make a social distinction. … ::*The status of language is not solely determined by linguistic criteria, but it is also the result of a historical and political development. [Examples] ::See also Dialect continuum. :: 04:46, 13 July"

C ;L,XHIUOWIKJOIKMMNMM;PLM LPMDMLK MPOM CMPDK KSP KSDPOMDKO KKDNOPDLQS MMOKJF NMF[PVK DMLOVK[DK KDK KPPM MM

NPDMFV PSOLDLLLMFK,K VCPPPPPPPPPPPNKMBKJK[PM;KP[DVLD[ LK9I-PIPP;PO[=090-] #NHY6KDLOO[]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]PDKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKC,,,,,,,,,CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC LKCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCLKDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTYYYYYYYYUUUUUUUUUUUUJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXNJJJI0T[RL I HAT T8UP0=PO0OI1IKEKMJK9EIKOP0KFJPPI8IHYIEI8HUINYU F4GTEYYW26T6W4W6TY87GW7U180O8E890EW87G8E08E0E0IHYYTT6TE8U9OPEOIOOOOOO GFYUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH KIKKKKKKKKKKJFFFFFFFFFFFFFJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWEEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTYYYYYYYYYYYYYYUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIOOOOOOOOOOPPPPPPPPPPPPPAAAAAAAASSSSSDFGHJKLZXCVBNMHNJDJHUT4URU3HGDEGHY

" == Possible Category Misplacement == I believe that the placement of this article into Category:Integers is perhaps mathematically incorrect. The article gives reference to the ""historical"" Skewes' number (i.e. the 1933 upper bound proven assuming the RH), which cannot be an integer (or rational number, for that matter) which is implied by the fact that e is irrational. The article also speaks of a Skewes' number (in some sense) in which I believe there is very little reason to believe that the ""true"" Skewes' number given by the least upper bound for a violation of the defining inequality is an integer. It seems to me that it would be very odd and unnatural and

perhaps even disconcerting if the least upper bound (Skewes' number) was given by an integer exactly. For, while the prime counting function takes on only integer values in its range, the logarithmic integral function is continuous (even if defined around its point of discontinuity by the Cauchy principal value of the defining integral), and so moves through a range of values continuously except at prime arguments. This would seem to indicate that the chances of Skewes' number being an integer are pretty much nil. If this seems to be too picky, feel free to ignore me, but it seems to me that placing the article in the integers category would likely be mathematically incorrect. "

" == Deletion of Riktam Technologies == Dear Sir, I thank you a lot for the feedback that you have provided me about Riktam Technologies. And I would not recreate the content for Riktam Technologies. As of the comparison, I am very glad to hear that ""NO ILITY"" criterion is and was based on the REVENUES GENERATED. Probably this should have been put in the Authoring Guidelines and FAQs. So that innocent souls like me would come to know that Notability is infact a matter of Revenues and Wikipedia makes a note of only those Companies with their turn over in billions. Well the soul of the economic world is not revenues. I hope you agree with me. Importance of a

firm is dependent on several factors like business values and ethos, guiding philosophy, a responsibility towards society, and responsibility for tomorrow. They teach us not to compare entities that have differences in scales and scopes. Big firms, can operate at high revenues and turnovers, but can be least important and significant to the world around. Where as a small firm, might not be able to work in a scale of billions, but can have a tremendous impact on the society and civilization. I really thank you for sparing your precious moments, reading this, reading my article on Riktam Technologies, and spending your valuable mental energies in comparing us with Satyam Computer Services Pvt. Ltd. Thanks A Lot, Warm Regards, Aditya2you "

Mexican dickhead You and your family should die Fucking homophobic

cunt I will punch you in the face one day

" == Section entitled ""Quebec"" == There is a contradiction between the table, which is inaccurate in any case, and the paragraphs discussing anglicisms which follow. The table suggests that France french (""metropolitan"" French) when it is taught allows for anglicisms. This is not accurate. The table also suggests Quebeckers use fewer anglicisms - also inaccurate. The section goes on to state, in fact, that Quebeckers use a lot of anglicisms, and goes into quite a lot of detail. No one in Quebec uses ""fin de semaine"" in casual conversation, they use ""le week-end."" ""Parc a stationnement"" is ludicrous. Stationnement is

correct, and many Quebeckers use ""le parking."" I don't think the table adds anything. It should be deleted. ""There is, however, a movement which is trying to reintroduce the respectful ""vous"" - there is a movement seeking to enforce a more formal french language use, and eliminate ""Montreal street french"" or joual and other dialects. But it is not very significant. One group is here: http://www.asulf.ca/ The article needs a discussion of joual or at least a reference to the joual wiki page. There is an excellent reference web page here http://www.spl.gouv.qc.ca/fileadmin/400ans/timeline.html that outlines the development of french in Quebec."

"== Hal Turner == You are an idiot Everything the precvious edits are saying are true. He's as recently as 12-20-06 admitted he had brutally beat a hispanic man just for crossing in front of his house. This man is a Racist and Near Skinhead. You want to protect a NAZI Fine but remember by supporting him you are just making yourself an enabler of this man's HATE —The preceding unsigned comment was added by . :Please stop making personal attacks on me. Comment on content, not the contributor. -YOU REFUSE TO LET PEOPLE CHANGE IT. And if you can't stand someone insulting you then go cry Emo-Kid in a corner emo kid :I refuse to let people vandalise

it. I'm Not vandalizing. You refuse my evidence on the talk area. You seem to be blind in your support of a Racist who calls for violence. :No references say that. On Wikipedia, we do not allow original research. So Going to his website and screenshoting it directly is Original research? I can't post sounds so I can't post his DEATH THREATS he made and since he PURGED his archives to hide his trail :That is not proof. It says nowhere what you are saying. LISTEN TO HIS SHOW. He constantly throws out Ethnic Slurs and calls for Assault against minorities. :You have no proof. Wikipedia must have references, and you aren't adding any to your statements. "

. :This was bullshit. Meat from bullfights

is sold and consumed. I've corrected it

I'm really surprised they didnt just kill all

the blacks.. isn't that general nazi practice?

:::Is cunt the worst one you know? I know about three better

that that, but they are a secret, between me and my priest.

JACOB BLACK IS THE SEXIEST MAN EVER EXCICTED HE IS GREAT IN SEX

ALSO LOVE THAT BOY AND HIS BODY AND PRIVATE STUFF OF HIM

You can go fuck yourself, you and your retarded country. I

wish Osama kill of of you slimeballs and rape your women.

" == Replaceable fair use Image:Whittingham-bookcover.jpg == Thanks for uploading Image:Whittingham-bookcover.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: # Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. # On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by

finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. "

" == Self-deportation == I have opened a discussion of your edits at the above named article's talk page. You should participate. But first, if you would, you need to read a few pages of policy here at Wikipedia. I just perused the discussions here at your talk page and you really seem to not understand a very important principle that is outlined at WP:TRUTH. It does not matter a bit here at Wikipedia what you know, or even what you think you know. The only thing that matters is what you can prove. Wikipedia is not about original creation or synthesis of knowledge. Rather it is about reporting on what

others have written about a given subject. All material that is contentious is required to be verified by a reliable second party source. In short, that means that a college reporting on its research is not an acceptable source. A reliable journal writing about a college's research would be. See WP:RS. You also seem to be ready to place ""the race card"" right out of the gate. That is neither civil, nor conducive of discussion. See WP:AGF. I do not wish to discuss this article with you either here, or at my talk page; so please direct your comments on the article to the article's talk page. Thank you. "

And you, sir, are an idiot. Yours

intelligently, the Greater Einstein-Bayesian Theory of

==Unspecified source for Image:HerPrey.jpg== Thanks for uploading Image:HerPrey.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag

can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

HO MY GOSH BLAPZ BLAPZ WEN ME FUK DA GAL

ME GIV ER WONGA ZOOPZOOPZOOP GETME GETME SAFE FAM SAFE

" == Feuds within the music industry == The first sentence of the third paragraph reads: Morrissey have severely criticized fellow singers such as Madonna, David Bowie and George Michael. This should either read ""M. has severely..."" or ""M. has been severely..."" I don't know enough Morrissey trivia to know which. Either way, there're no citations given for the severe criticism. Perhaps the sentence needs to go? — Preceding unsigned comment added by • 10:41, 19 November 2006‎ (UTC) == Wilde == It reads that Wilde was a homosexual. He was not. He had a wife and children. He believed in 'Greek Love'.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Greek, homosexual love. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Of course Wilde was a homosexual you idiot, he was in Reading Jail for confessing to it; in court, someone asked 'Mr Wilde, put simply, did you make love to this man?' Wilde replied 'absolutely not, that is wholly disgusting; he is far too ugly' — Preceding unsigned comment added by 19:50, 9 November 2009‎ (UTC) == Tony quote? == Can I get a source for the Tony Visconti Quote about the next Moz album? — Preceding unsigned comment added by • 19:28, 11 August 2007‎ (UTC)"

==Explanation of dubious tag== When the series ended, there was a 20% increase in the number of people taking out life insurance policies with one provider, which was attributed to Rachel's premature death. fact tag This is stated in the opening text yet isn't cited. Further down a similar sentence is in place which is cited. This sentence is less vague and states that it was Tesco Insurance which states this. That isn't an impartial source and the statement isn't the same as the opening statement, hence as the claim in initially stated isn't adequately sourced. dubious This claim is highly unlikely for three reasons: 1. Given the audience figures, how many

people already had life insurance and how many disinterested customers there were, 20% seems improbable. 2. Any increase isn't necessarily attributable to the characters death. How many other news and cultural influences may there have been at this time? 3. It is really quite an extraordinary claim. I would want more evidence than simply the data from one insurance provider about their own sales before I would readily accept this claim. other Did Tesco heavily advertise during this episode? If so, how much of the sales increase is attributable to the story line and how much to advertising? Unless it can be linked squarely to the storyline it is a little irrelevant.

re-add it as if you can kick my ass or

something? please... and why dont you MAKE me leave?

== Unblock == Unblock that some studient are

dothis crap unblock beycause gqay fags edit shit

" == ""God Dayum"" == seriously, are we a bunch

of fucking niggers now? why is this even? "

" == Flooding of 2011 & other comments == Mention of the severe flooding of 2011 (Hurricane Irene followed immediately by Tropical Storm Lee) should be made as it was worse than 1955's flooding. It effected the availability of some crops in the US as well as their prices, onions and pumpkins spring to mind. Where I live, the fields a mile from the Wallkill were under four feet of water. And I don't see anything about continuing proposals for dredging by the Army Corps of Engineers to try to mitigate the flooding. The History section, 3rd paragraph, begins with: ""Settlers recognized the agricultural possibilities of the Drowned Lands almost as soon as they moved in."" This is

the first and only reference to the Drowned Lands. An explanation is in order at minimum and an article of it's own at maximum. The flood plain was formed from glacial activity, was it not? The depth of the black dirt is somewhere around 30 feet in places. I don't know the name of the soil type, but it's very peaty and holds water like a sponge, increasing the impact of the flooding on farmers. If only the Wallkill looked as pretty all along it's course as the photograph in the article, taken near Walden. Unfortunately, it does not. This article is much better than so many others for this area of the Hudson River Valley. Congratulations! "

" == Christ Wikipedia sucks == ""...

began to disagree over creative differences."""

:::::Emily lacks verification. She isn't important, bringing

her back last year was stupid.

" == April 2008 == You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest. Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation

encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability. If you are not ""notable"" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) "

== The Rev == Fuck You Buddy ) Mind

ur own damn business. Have a good one. ∞∞∞∞

== FUCK YOU NOBHEAD == image =

[[Image:Wilber.jpg|1000px|FUCK] | Two inch cock, hahahahahahah

" :The star atlas: ::*Will Tirion, ""Sky Atlas 2000.00"", Sky Publishing Corp., 1981, ISBN 0-933346-33-6. :has the great orion nebula between about: 5h 33m to 5h 37m; -5° 0' to -6° 5'. That's roughly 65'(RA) by 60'(Dec). If you include the northern cloud (1977), the Dec. goes from -4° 35' to -6° 5'. That would give roughly 60'(RA) by 85'(Dec.). For just NGC1976 (M42) I get 5h33.5m to 5h36.3m; -5°12' to -5°50', for roughly 42' by 38' (round to 45' by 40'). :On the other hand: ::*Roger W. Sinnott and Michael A.C. Perryman, 1997 ""Millenium Star Atlas"", Vol. 1, chart 278, ISBN 0-933346-82-4. :has the

nebulae (NGC 1977, 1982, 1976 and 1980) between about 5h 34m to 5h 37m RA; -4° 50' to -5° 55'. That's roughly 45'(RA) by 65'. Just NGC 1977 is the same in RA, but Dec. -5°15' to -5°40', for 45'(RA) by 35'(Dec.) :Personally I'd go with Tirion as it's more inclusive. If somebody has access to: ::*Hirshfeld and Sinnott, 1985, ""Sky Catalogue 2000.0"", Vol. 2. :That might be a better reference. Or maybe there's something in ""Burnham's Celestial Handbook"" that will serve? Anyway it looks like the listed dimensions are for the entire cloud, rather than just the emission nebula NGC 1976. — "

== nerds == Piss off niggerfuck i have more muscle

on my dick than you do on your arms

" == Robert Conley == I don't understand why Wikipedia content keeps removing the references of Robert Conley as one of the founders of NPR, and was actually part of the group that pushed the Public Broadcasting initiative through Washington. He & 4 others embarked on the journey to create the network with established stations in the 60s. Robert Conley, in fact, was also the original General Manager of NPR, and came up with the concept/creation of ATC. The fact the content has erased him is concerning - and disrespectful. Is it being controlled by those egos that are wanting the recognition? This was this

man's life's work. It needs to be corrected. All facts are within 40 Year NPR book, the Brodcast Hall of Fame, within cronicals of NPR materials, in cronicals on the Hill, and other reference points(including George Mason University, Foreign Press Corps, to name a few) AllInNews :What verifiable reference is there that says Conley is a ""founder"" of NPR? Without a verifiable source, such a claim cannot remain. You mention an number of possible sources, but you need to be a little more specific (i.e., page numbers, and if a print source is not available online, quotations from print source would be helpful). ≠ "

"Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for . I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: * The five pillars of Wikipedia * Help pages * Tutorial * How to edit a page and How to develop articles * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) * Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but many editors recommend that you [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account,

please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (98.88.165.186) is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! ==re The Ropers== OK, but the network hasn't started airing the show yet. The deal may yet fall through or something. Until then, I don't think we should include it in the article, per WP:CRYSTAL. "

::::Ip likes the idea of blacks stabbing

white jews (for racially motivated reasons), obviously.

:::I have provided the quotation which I paraphrased, and which was challenged. I have marked throughout the text a request that the numerous WP:NOR violations, where other wiki articles are paraphrased as sources, and primary sources are adduced which should properly be refracted through secondary sources ('The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose,' as Shakespeare reminds us, and the text is bedevilled by some editor(s) who have just quoted from the OT and NT to construct the argument, when nearly all of these quotations are subject to critical controversy. :::If anyone wishes to actually write the page according to authoritative secondary sources, they should begin consider starting by

familiarizing themselves with the following :::*(1) Douglas R. A. Hare The Theme of Jewish Persecution of Christians in the Gospel According to St Matthew, Cambridge University Press, (1967) 2005 :::*(2) Marvin R. Wilson Our father Abraham: Jewish roots of the Christian faith, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1989 :::*(3) Miriam S. Taylor Anti-Judaism and early Christian identity: a critique of the scholarly consensus, BRILL 1995 :::*(4) Paula Fredriksen, Augustine and the Jews: a Christian defense of Jews and Judaism, Doubleday, 2008 :::*(5)Anthony J. Saldarini, ''Matthew’s Christian-Jewish Community,'UChicago Press 1994 ::::The literature is vast, and far more complex and nuanced that this pathetic caricature would allow. So go to it.

":::: ""You can't present your claims as facts"". That I agree and that I am trying to establish here. Facst are not your claims Fadix. No double-standards here. Follow what you have just stated. Armenians proudly state that there was a struggle of independence since the late 1800's. These were written here by pro-Armenians as a heroic epic (Turks are always the ""others"" in the language, ""we"" are the Armenians and imperialists). I guess you were the one who removed them. Pro-Armenian historians try never mentionining these while trying to rule out Bernard Lewis and others ""provocation"" theses, but when you ask them why the Greek's

on the west were not relocated, they confess the ""mistake"" of Armenian nationalists who collaborated with Russians. You want proof of attacks on villages? But you don't believe Turkish archives. Then read the history of Dashnaks. Then go to Eastern Anatolia, go to Erzurum, Hasankala, Sarikamis, Van and listen to those people's memories. Observe the unwritten, but. Witness the tragedies of those people yourself. Not only the Turks, the Kurds also experienced the same tragedy. You accuse Turkey of denying the suffering of Armenians, but you're the real denier, you don't give a shit about the suffering of muslims in Eastern Anatolia, do you? "

:::: I suggest you take the time and look up each of the books on the list before you lay judgement upon them. If you believe any one of them is innapropriate go ahead and point it out. I have personally read many of the books on the list and I doubt that you will find a more thorough list of secondary literature on the subject of this size anywhere else. A should add that I used the WorldCat search engine, which as you might know searches the library catalogs of many of the worlds libraries. Again, the criteria for inclusion to the 'collection of essays' section were:

(1) recently published (after 2000); (2) collections of essays; (3) books that are available in over 50 libraries around the world. As for the 'prominent law scholars' section, I personally searched out all the books written by law scholars from the most eminent universities in the english-speaking world: (yale, harvard, nyu, uc berkeley, stanford, u chicago, columbia, oxford, cambridge): and then chose those books having to do with liberalism. The same goes for the philosophy section. : The PHD dissertations and the articles were not as deliberately chosen as the above mentioned lists. I am disposed to having them removed, if only for the sake of conciseness.

" :It was mainly the worship and statement sections, which said: ==Worship== ====Sunday worship==== Morning Prayer, Low Mass and High Mass services are held on Sundays. ====Daily worship==== Low Mass services are held daily. ====Holy Days==== Special services are held on certain Holy Days according to the calendar of the Episcopal Church. ==Mission statement== *The community is a progressive Anglo-Catholic Parish carrying forward the African-American heritage of St. Monica's and the catholic tradition of St. James' in our liturgy, worship and community life. *The community is an inclusive and diverse Parish. We are

multi-ethnic, open to all sexual orientations; multi-generational; and composed of single, partnered, married persons, and families worshiping together; *The community is committed to compassion and justice in our society; *The community values the way that the Episcopal Church (ECUSA) lives the Christian faith and the way we want to share it with the community. The community lives in congruence with the decisions taken at the 2003 and 2006 General Conventions. I know it was the bulk of the article, but it really couldn't stay. Other than that, the article was fine. '''''' "

Suggestions generated by an automatic JavaScript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. *The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.] *This article has no or few images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.] *Per Wikipedia:What is a featured

article?, Images should have concise captions.] *Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 675 km, use 675 km, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 675 km.] *This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 1(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.] *Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also .] You may wish to browse through for further ideas.

:The description is pithy, accurate, informative, relevant, and agreed upon by the authorities on the subject. Those 2 lines deliver more information to a person completely ignorant on the subject (that would most likely be visiting this page and not a specific tank) than the entire rest of the lead put together, which at present doesn't tell the reader what a tank is, or how it provides a direct fire role. If the lead were properly written and formatted it would include all the information in those two lines, however it's unlikely it could defeat the quote in terms of brevity or readability. I believe the quote would be a valid inclusion even

if there were some lack of consensus as to what a main battle tank is, but there isn't, which is just further reinforcement. I could understand the hesitation if it were a legal definition within the boundaries of a nation, like the definition of assault varies from district to district - but the CFE treaty has been signed by every builder of main battle tanks in the world, excluding the Chinese, who would probably agree anyway. It is an impeccably written piece of legislation that would be a valuable addition to the article in verbatim, even without the quotes, and sourced from a place as reliable as this just compounds the effect.

" to get this template > {| align=""right"" border=""1"" cellspacing=""0"" cellpadding=""3"" style=""margin: 0 0 0 0.5em; background: #FFFFFF; border-collapse: collapse; border-color: #C0C090;"" ! | |- | align=""center"" colspan=""2"" | |- ! | General |- | Systematic name | ? |- | Other names | ? |- | Molecular formula | ? |- | SMILES | ? |- | Molar mass | ?.?? g/mol |- | Appearance | ? |- | CAS number | [?-?-?] |- ! | Properties |- | Density and phase | ? g/cm3, ? |- | Solubility in water | ? g/100 ml (? °C) |- | Melting point | ? °C (? K) |- | Boiling point | ? °C (? K) |- | Acidity (pKa) | ? |- | Basicity (pKb) | ? |- |

Chiral rotation [α]D | ? ° |- | Viscosity | ? cP at ? °C |- ! | Structure |- | Molecular shape | ? |- | Coordination geometry | ? |- | Crystal structure | ? |- | Dipole moment | ? D |- ! | Hazards |- | MSDS | External MSDS |- | Main hazards | ? |- | NFPA 704 | |- | Flash point | ? °C |- | R/S statement | R: ? S: ? |- | RTECS number | ? |- ! | Supplementary data page |- | Structure & properties | n, εr, etc. |- | Thermodynamic data | Phase behaviourSolid, liquid, gas |- | Spectral data | UV, IR, NMR, MS |- ! | Related compounds |- | Other anion

Your wife is a slut. Her bedroom is

easier to get into than a community college

" ::""His career aspiration is to become

a Christian Preacher"" what a faggot!!!"

" == About the whole ""schaivo"" thing == (meant to be posted on the schaivo talk page, but then I went and got myself blocked) Ok, I give up. Just so you know, I didn't invent the first 2 uses of ""schaivo"" as a term, someone I know did, but I admit that the word isn't exactly widespread. I've had my fun with the veggie lady article, now I'll leave it alone unless I find something genuinely useful to add. To Veriditas, sorry for defacing your user page to make you seem like a pedophile homosexual jew-nazi. Just got frustrated with your persistence. I don't consider myself a ""genuine"" vandal, I

do make some uneccesary contributions now and then, but what fun would Wikipedia be without things like that? The spirit of Wikipedia lies in revert wars, vandalism, and personal vendettas. Or maybe its about people coming together to make a good, free, encyclopedia, who knows? To GordonWattsDotCom, my name, Uthar Wynn is the name of the master of the Sith Academy on Korriban in Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic. I'm going to get around to creating a genuine user page at some point with links to my sites (heres one right now:http://utharwynn.deviantart.com/) and other info. Glad someone enjoyed my schaivo contribution. Got myself a 24-hour block for this stuff."

":The ""supplementary"" sources were generally non-WP:RS sources, such as tourism sites and fansites, so those are no great loss. Further, a lot of those sites were just used to over-footnote really basic information. No matter how frantically you footnote ""Jordan's national dish[1][2][3][4][5]"" that doesn't somehow remove the credibility of other reliable sources stating it is found outside of Jordan. :So far as Politicizing a ""meal"" is not a good idea, it is you and not I who are politicising it. You're trying to turn a cuisine article into a Jordanian propaganda piece, which is just silly. There are tons and tons of gBooks hits

for ""mansaf Palestine"" and ""mansaf Syria"". If indeed it is only ""newly introduced to parts of the west bank"" (are you deliberately avoiding the word ""Palestine""?) please provide references stating this. So far as the statements that mansaf is used as a political symbol by the Jordanian government, yes it is primarily one anthropologist who's fleshed out a larger argument on that (that I can find on gBooks) but he's widely cited by others. And, ironically, your own editing behaviour seems to bear testament to how politically contentious a simple pile of rice and yogurt is. I fear we're seeing some WP:TIGERS here... "

(SPOILERS) This is a film about forwarding the cause of assisted suicide (eutha-nazia) and very little else. That should be clearly mentioned in the wiki article. Many think Eastwood is a nazi who wants all disabled exterminated just like the nazis did. Shame it got 5 oscars. I wonder what Mr. Superman would say about this movie? :Eutha-nazia? Sorry 'anonymous', but I think that this invented term is ignorant. Euthanasia means 'gentle death' and there was not very much gentle about the Nazi party. Please do not trivialise such a sensitive issue. There is absolutely no call to accuse Mr Eastwood of Nazism on the basis of this film. Oh! And by the way,

his name was Christopher Reeve. :The best I can do is to point you towards http://www.rogerebert.com which features long articles discussing the controversy surrounding this film, that can explain it better then I could. Also remember that this film is a tragedy, in the end there is little to be uplifted about (one is dead, the other will be haunted for life). While we're at it, let's attack Shakespeare for his support of witchcraft and regicide. Religious fanatics... It's wonderful that we, the rest of the world, are superior to you, in any possible way. I won't argue nor discuss anything with you, as I'm above all of you. I pity you, though.

== uren == uren is a liquid wich contains un

wanted liquids. uren leves the bodey thru the ass

:OK, Bill O'Reilly is a fool who hasn't a

clue what he's talking about. What's your point?

"Hello. This is about your comments to Tomananda on the Falun Gong discussion board. I do not know whether you cultivate Dafa or not. If you do, I really think some of your comments are awful, not at all the standard for a cultivator, and lack compassion. If not, then you may not understand many things about what is happening there, and I would understand more. For example, the tone of the remark where you suggested that Tomananda thought... here it is: ""Tomananda, is there perhaps some part of you that thinks Li Hongzhi's exposition on karmic retribution to be true? Forgive me for asking, but I am

under the impression that you are somehow scared out of your wits by what Li Honghzi said. I can see no other reason why you still confuse his disapproval with hatred?"" But even if you are not a cultivator, don't you want to say kind things to people, not provocative things, particularly on this sensitive subject? I am not sure if you are truly aware of the lamentable situation those beings are in. Falun Dafa teaches compassion for all sentient beings, and particularly under these circumstances where this individual seems genuinely distressed, I don't think its kind to say that. Especially if you know the truth. "

We should also add in there that he's

a pussy, and didn't want it with Eminem.

ok this is not true!!! hello means you are stuiped=

stpido!!! did you knw what is boobs in hebrew??? zizim!!!

" ==""fuck tart?""== Dude... the word is fucktard... (i know

we have similar names but i don't know this guy)"

:I'm trying. But it is really difficult with the insistance

on dragging up this NAZI bullshit all the time.

== New Picture == Is it really necessary yo

have a vagina in the picture? -King Toast

"]] :: Another excellent point IslandGyrl. Unfortunately the Honolulu Advertiser only has articles from 1999 on available online, so we can't state one way or the other what the editorial opinion pages held when Twigg-Smith owned the paper without looking at hardcopies. It would be interesting to look at the op-eds from before he sold the paper, and see if we could find an influence one way or another. That being said, have you had a chance to read his book? It seems clear that you don't agree with him on some of the issues, but I would guess that you might appreciate his tone in his book.

My shallow impression of his motivation is that he feels defensive, and isn't trying to oppress anyone. He seems genuinely hurt by the allegations that his grandfather ""stole"" something from the native hawaiians (I believe he mentions an anecdote about some young part-hawaiian child confronting him with that accusation). Since the crown lands were ceded to the U.S. and given back to the State Of Hawaii once we got statehood, not appropriated by his grandfather for his own personal benefit, I give some credence to his point of view. Perhaps there is some other evidence of greed and ill-gotten gain I'm not aware of though. :: [[JereKrischel|JereKrischel"

"::: I brought it up because this article used to mention this date from January 2005 through August 2010. It's not all that obvious that the date in 1592 could not have been observed. As 2015 draws near there may be some debate over which date is the best. If this were mentioned in the article it may correct any misconceptions people may have or get people thinking about what they are really celebrating. Some external references to the ultimate pi day in 1592 include: :::*""The ""ultimate"" pi day occurred on March 14, 1592, at 6:54 AM."" :::*""The “ultimate” pi day in history occurred on March 14, 1592, at 6:53:59 AM"" :::*""I doubt the celebration will be quite as extravagant

as the pi day of 1592"" :::*""Of course, if this were 1592, none of us would be celebrating something as frivolous as Pi Day."" :::*""Pi Day [is] March 14, 1592"" :::*""The perfect pi day was in 1592."" :::*""It’s been said the only real Pi Day was March 14, 1592."" :::*""I wonder if anyone paid attention in 1592 when the date was 3/14/1592 – a full on, “in-your-face” pi day."" :::*""Pi day was on March 14, 1592."" :::*""Some have dated the first Pi day celebration to March 14, 1592 at 6:53:58. This is incorrect."" :::*""The “ultimate” pi moment occurred on March 14, 1592, at 6:53 AM and 58 seconds."" :::*""...note that 1592 was a better year for Pi Day"" "

" ==Publication data== We need a source for 1973 and for Doubleday, including clarification whether that is Doubleday editorial department (as it should be) or Doubleday Science Fiction Book Club arrangement with another publisher, which is possible (and we should identify the other publisher). Bantam 1974 may be reliable for the paperback edition. But Bantam affiliation with Doubleday was in the future, i believe (eg, 1988 establishment of Bantam Doubleday Dell by the Bertelsman division Random House). ISFDB says first printing Jan 1975 WorldCat shows 1974 both Bantam US and Corgi UK. The truth may be 1974 copyright, 1975 issue. Or that may be a source of confusion for

some records of British editions only, as one record of a Corgi (British ppb) copy suggests concerning year 1974. One record of a W.H. Allen (British hc) copy gives date 1975, original publ. 1974 New York (and Bantam not Bobbs-M or Doubleday). WorldCat shows earliest edition 1974 Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, including a Book Club edition, name of club not specified. Library of Congress shows Bobbs-Merrill [1974], first edition not stated ISFDB shows earliest edition Bobbs-Merrill, Sep 1974, stated first printing ""from the Bantam edition's copyright page and ABE"". (I suppose that means two sources, both some Bantam paperback and some bookseller display at ABEbooks.com). And Dec 1974 second printing. "

" :: ah, darnit. And now you've reminded me that

I never added equine Tourette's to Tourette syndrome. "

== French overtures to Japan, 1883-5 == Hi , Thanks for that interesting stuff you have dug out on French attempts to cosy up to Japan against China before and during the Sino-French War. I'm going to search Albert Billot's L'affaire du Tonkin, the standard French diplomatic history of the Sino-French War, to see if he can add anything to your research. What I would like to do eventually is merge your new section into the existing section 'China's fear of Japan', and probably cut it down a bit. At the end of the day, France and Japan did not become allies, and I think it unbalances the main article to devote so much space to something that never happened. On the other hand, I've long

been wanting to create a new article, Diplomacy of the Sino-French War, and that would be the natural home for a discussion of French overtures to Japan. I'll try to get round to it before long. I'll get back to you after I've seen what Billot has to say on the subject. P.S. Nice photo you uploaded of French soldiers in Tonkin in 1888. P.P.S Can you spare a couple of minutes to do me another 'dioceses' template, 'Dioceses of the Syrian Orthodox Church'? Just change the title from the present 'Dioceses of the Church of the East template and scrap the illustrations, and I'll do the rest. I know how to edit existing templates but I haven't yet worked out how to create new ones.

== Shit down your throat == How about adding

that he actually did this too his mum?

"::::::::I thought you meant that actually, but how do you know if ""duty of care"" is always applied. You seem to think that some safe havens exist where ""duty of care"" does not apply. It is thus somehow god-given that substandard translations simply do not occur, just because it is a literary translation. And that automatically no damages could be litigated from another party. This is not the legal thinking of the 1990 ruling. The litigation risks still do indeed factually exist. ::::::::Tim Martin from above goes on to cite Byrne: ""Byrne nonetheless goes on to conclude that “…it would be unrealistic to interpret this lack of cases as proof that translators do not make

mistakes or that the issue of translator liability is not something with which we should concern ourselves. […] ..the implications of substandard translations must be treated seriously.” (Byrne 2007: 2)."" ::::::::Tim Martin, ""That seems to me a very sane and sanguine conclusion to draw. Perhaps the lack of litigation reflects translator skill and reviser acumen, but perhaps too it is just luck and lack of customer expertise. Either way, we should retain a healthy fear of translation errors in texts with a serious legal, political or commercial dimension — which account for most of what’s translated where I work and must surely account for a large chunk of most corporate and freelance workloads."" "

I HATE YOU. YOU GOT RID OF MY INVITATION TO

THE SANDBOX. GET FUCKED BITCH SLUT HORE HOE SKANK.

":I can't see how any of these would be meaningful here - I object to all of them. :The First Reference :1 - Actually, it's been shown that people fear what they aren't familiar with. PCs are great, Nuclear is feared in most places. I can't see how t would be useful anyway. :2 - Pre-TMI, that was true. Post-TMI is a different culture. :3 - Odd, I used nuclear fuel software named PANACEA. Seriously, safety isn't simple or easy. The electricity is the same, and capacity factors are now above 90% so it is reliable. :4 - The nuclear industry has an information network whereby incidents at

any plant are broadcast to every other plant with the intent that the same problem not occur twice. :5 - Each American has the option to vote for strongly anti-nuclear candidates. :6 - True, but choice-based is available now. :- :Second Reference :We already say ""likely would be less"" :- :Third Reference :The sarcophageus only covers the ruined Unit-4. The other units remain without containment buildings. :Containment never sealed off at TMI. :- :Fourth Reference :This reflects the current state of training and operations. Tech specs carry the force of federal law. And the Station Shift Supervisor can throw anyone off-site. : 3 July 2005 18:58 (UTC) "

" :::Busybody is certainly the word because you inserted your unsolicited tuppence-ha'penny worth into a conversation that did not involve you. I already explained the difference between an article and a talk page but if you wish to be obtuse to suit your purposes and refuse to acknowledge the distinction, I will not be drawn to repeat myself. You have misused the word ""troll"" entirely: a troll is one who deliberately makes provocative comments to stir the shit and create outrage. That is not what Sarah777 and I did; the tone was more like whimsy. Your idiocy that our brief remarks on the talk page obstructed discussion by others is more of your invented and self-serving sanctimony: Sarah777

explicitly left a comment that she was happy to have her offering deleted, while my remark was a mere one-liner, so your attempt to characterise these as ""obstructions"" and ""trolling"" is off-target and spurious. I know it is theoretically possible but do not believe that all of humanity reads my scribblings on talk pages but, again, you have adopted an obtuse attitude to avoid the point that I did not claim my conversation was ""private""; I said it was a conversation in which you were not a participant, which did not address you, and which was none of your business. I don't give a tuppenny damn what your opinion is of my remarks to others. — O'Dea "

::::The very reason young stupid Finncolts have been sent off to

shared summer pasture for more than half a century now.

Black men have extremely large penises and they all

are very stupid and they stink like shit

ssdqwphiuwefbhfwwbgjm clo j sd jik ,s d,

mdissfkj you mother fucking bitch ho whoireZ!!!!!

Thirded! Has this been copy and pasted from Cosmopolitan

or something similar? It's sub-magazine idiocy in places!

" :::::::::::So your claim is that typographical errors are on a par with factual errors? Which makes it a factual error in the second piece to say that Gorman didn't point out factual errors in the first piece when he did the functional equivalent by pointing out typographical errors? Is this a general principle, do you think? A source with misspellings is prima facie unreliable? Also, do you have evidence for your characterization of O'Dwyer's as a ""small newsletter"" and all the other stuff you said? It seems to me that it's quite a weighty publication in its field, given the number of citations of it in scholarly articles and monographs, an issue which you still

haven't addressed. Are not number and quality of citations standard ways to judge the quality of sources, rather than our own feelings about whether they should hire better copy-editors? Finally and, I guess tangentially, I wonder why you see the instant article as a ""hit piece,"" and why you think that's relevant to the first issue regarding reliability? Suppose arguendo that it is a ""hit piece."" That would seem to me to lend some weight to the second reliability issue, that is, that its existence weighs on the side of our dealing with a genuine controversy here. After all, the existence of ""hit pieces"" is to smoke as controversy is to fire, ce vrai?— "

the band called lockjaw SUCKS

ASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS. BIG HAIRY MONKEY ASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

" == Copyright problem removed == Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.iwcp.co.uk/news/news/cash-injection-for-lowcarbon-community-in-chale-30370.aspx. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see ""using copyrighted works from others"" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or ""donating copyrighted materials"" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will

be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. "

" :::::::::::::::I'm only implying that there may be space in the article for a description of conflicting sources, but that can't happen while suppression of the whole dispute is being attempted. As to the ""read"" vs ""interpret"" thing, I didn't mean that one ""only needs to be able to read"", but just that some things take interpretation, but other things can be read pretty directly from WP:PRIMARY sources (whose use, consistent with policy, isn't ruled out). :::::::::::::::Were there any changes in the constitutions? Yes, the wording did change. :::::::::::::::Would I say that it was insubstantial? Pretty much, as the mentioning of Serbs together with other nations instead of on their own

is, perhaps, symbolic, but, by itself, can have no juridical effect. :::::::::::::::Why would I say that in the light of several sources claiming otherwise? Because some of the sources make no precise reference to the Constitution parts that changed; some mix up the 1990 Constitution with the 2001 amendment by talking about ""national minorities"" in the context of the 1990 Constitution; some, even though they were presented as such, simply make no such claim, but instead claim things like that there were ""practical"" changes (discrimination, which can happen regardless of constitutions) but no obvious juridical change in rights. These are things that put the reliability of the sources into question. "

== Dink the little motherfucker == Is this

parody notable enough to be included here?

"==GA Review== :This review is transcluded from Talk:Taking Tiger Mountain (By Strategy)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. It is an interesting article. I did some copyediting, which I hope you do not mind. Feel free to revert anything I did. The problems I see are mainly with the sometimes clunky wording. I will add comments below. — ;Comments Examples of problems with prose: *""the album has a more conventional sound, with everything somewhat off kilter"" - could you clarify this? *""For guest drummer Phil Collins, Eno had previously helped Collins' group Genesis

with their album The Lamb Lies Down on Broadway. When Genesis front man Peter Gabriel asked how they could repay him, Eno replied looking at Phil Collins that he needed a drummer. Collins played drums on ""Mother Whale Eyeless"" as repayment."" - this needs to be reworded so that it fits in with the rest of the paragraph. *""Taking Tiger Mountain (By Strategy) overall has been described as sounding more upbeat and bouncy than Eno's previous solo album, and that these sounds disguise the more sinister themes and subject matter that Steve Huey of allmusic described as ""subdued and cerebral""."" - This also needs clarification or rewording. — "

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::Shut up. I am sick and tired of

being one of the targets for your rants.

No. We can't just add unsubstantiated, made-up shit

to articles to appease you. — ''' '

" == Edit request from 98.163.70.126, 29 December 2010 == The last paragraph of text in this article is incorrect and misleading; the error is clearly visible by reading the author's cited reference, which is Reference Number 8. The last paragraph of Wikipedia text contains additional wording which is not contained in the Reference source; also, this author-added verbiage promotes a misinterpretation of the original Reference/Source because the added words convey a different meaning than is contained in the Reference text. Please change text in the last paragraph to remove specifically the words ""in order to CAUSE

vaginal flatulence"". The cited Reference reads: ""If you have oral sex, tell your partner not to blow air into your vagina. This could force air inside you, which could cause an air embolism. Air embolisms can cause permanent brain damage and even death to a pregnant woman and her baby."" You may note that the author adds the words ""in order to CAUSE vaginal flatulence"". These words are not contained in the referenced source, and they convey a different meaning to the reader. Reference Source: Wright, Janis (2004). Pregnancy: Prenatal Care. American Family Physician. http://www.aafp.org/afp/20030915/1165ph.html. samski476"

" :::::::::::::No problem: your reaction was quite understandable given that definition of the word. That wasn't what I meant when I said ""misquote"". I apologize for not following my own advice and clarifying the definition of ""misquote"" earlier, which might have saved a lot of time and trouble. I should have known to do that. As I sometimes say, one benefit of my giving people advice is that sometimes I follow it myself (whether or not anyone else does). And I apologize for saying things using the word ""misquote"" which could easily be interpreted as accusations of things you didn't actually do. :::::::::::::I would now like to change the heading ""G-Dett has misquoted

Jayjg"" on the workshop page. Would it be an improvement if I change it to ""G-Dett has mischaracterized what Jayjg said""? You might want to suggest different wording. (I realize you still may not agree with the statement, though, and I might not necessarily accept wording you suggest.) I assume this part is OK since it doesn't use the word ""misquote"": ""G-Dett has stated that Jayjg said things, which were inaccurate representations of what Jayjg actually said"". I'm not sure whether I should change the heading ""G-Dett cautioned about quoting"", perhaps to ""G-Dett cautioned about assertions about Jayjg's position"". I'm also going to reply to your comment on the workshop page. ☺ "

:I'm going to play the idiot card instead: she's

dating a catholic. Therefore you are an idiot.

== Margita Bangová article == I am new to the Countering Systemic Bias group & just saw your poat re: the Margita Bangová article. Unfortunately, the discussion was closed and a decision to keep was made before I had a chance to make a comment about this horrendous article. I just looked at the articles 18 references which are relied on heavily throughout the article. Of the 18, only 4 are legitimate, and one of those four does not even discuss material from the article it cites. Of the remaining 14 references, 6 claim to be linked to articles from the Toronto Sun, but are not. 1 reference is accessible for a fee of $12. 3 are linked to opinion/editorial works. 2 claim to be

linked to the Toronto Sun, but are actually linked to a blog site. The final 2 are links to foreign, untranslated text, presumably Chezc. Are there any next steps? I'm going to post a version of my post to you on the CSB talk page and see what happens. Perhaps, if the article can not be deleted, then maybe we can edit the article so that it is at least encyclopedic. A quick view of the talk page indicates to me that the article has been hijacked by editors with a definate POV who are bent on disrupting the editorial environment to further their own agends. I do not want to take on this project alone. Can I count on you to help out?

Stay out of Elmhurst! It's horrible.

NOBODY speaks english! Filthy people too.

" == Compromise == Would anyone have a problem with keeping the current arrangement (Johnson in the title, Ocho Cinco in the text) until consensus can be reached? - :Yes. Having title saying A and text saying B is just messy and unencyclopedic. Both the title and the text should read the same name. I would immensely prefer it stays Chad Johnson until we're week or two into the NFL season and we see what Chad is predominantly called by the media, and then fix the article accordingly when consensus backed up with sources is reached. I am, however, perfectly willing to help transition the article to Chad Ocho Cinco

if he is indeed called ""Chad Ocho Cinco"" or ""Ocho Cinco"" by the majority of journalists and broadcasters, but I would like to see reliable sources calling him Ocho Cinco before we change the article. My feeling is that the guy is named Ocho Cinco, and whether you think it's dumb, or you think he's an attention whore, that is in fact his name. If you enter ""Chad Johnson"" in the search bar, it's goiung to direct you here anyway, so what's the big deal? And another thing: Why is the page titled ""Chad Johnson"" and yet he is referred to as ""Ocho Cinco"" all throughout the page? , "

:: Thanks again for your suggestions and edits. As I understand it, the criteria (see WP:GA?) and process for selecting good articles are a bit more flexible than featured articles, and any editor can carry out the review. To address the previous peer review: ::* I went through and tagged 3 of the 4 articles tagged as registration warnings by checklinks with the subscription required template. I also checked the redirects, and they are all open (although the national academies requires registration), and include a link to PLoS via the DOI resolver. I figured that was ok, but I can replace the url with a direct link if necessary. ::* I've tried to bracket some sections

(like bioinformatics) that were largely based upon one or two review articles with citations at the beginning and end of paragraphs as suggested. Again, I'm new here, so if its necessary to increase the citation density it'd be no undue burden to do so. If you could point to a passage or two so that I know what you mean, it'd be a help. ::* I expanded the end of the biofuel section a bit to specifically mention the leafcutter ant fungus garden metagenome, with links out to the larger system and its mutualism. ::I hope I didn't overlook any. I probably should have explicitly replied on the PR, sorry if that was poor form.

The creator of mega bloks revealed last saturday that he likes

nice big juicy boobs and that he totally copied Lego.

== Trench (mistake) == A trench is a type of

shit or depression in the ground. Um offensive mistake anyone?

=== {{Quote box | quote You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.'' | source = Thank you. | width = 20% | align = right }} A tag has been placed on User:LussanaProductions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as

well as the guidelines on spam. If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of User:LussanaProductions and leave a note on the article's talk page''' explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.|

==Tvtropes suck== Tvtropes is the worst

website ever! That horrible Fast Eddie!

" :The lead I propose is: ""catharsis {etymology} refers to the purification and purgation of emotions (especially pity and fear) through art or to any extreme change in emotion that results in renewal and restoration. This minimal version is in accordance with canonical encyclopedic definitions such as ""catharsis, the purification or purgation of the emotions (especially pity and fear) primarily through art. In criticism, catharsis is a metaphor used by Aristotle in the Poetics to describe the effects of true tragedy on the spectator"" (catharsis (criticism) Encyclopedia Britannica) or ""the purification and purgation of emotions (especially

pity and fear) primarily through art"" (catharsis, Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia Of Literature), and with several sources that contain such statements as ""The theory of catharsis has a disarming affinity with the expressional theory, since it emphasizes emotion, asserts a change in emotion as a result of aesthetic operations, and concludes on a note of freedom in relation to the emotion"" (see A. Berndtson (1975), p. 235) or ""Catharsis in Shakespearean tragedy involves ... some kind of restoration of order and a renewal or enhancement of our positive feelings for the hero"" (R. Levin (2003), p. 42). "

She's a little self obssessed and self righteous

bitch that's all I think. - Me.

" :::::::I hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate

hate hate him. D I can't access the website. ( "

" == Mediation on Harold Pinter == Hello! I appreciate your being really upset about the criticism directed at you personally in the comment you are referring to. Unfortunately, this is not the first time there are comments directed at a person during this debate. First off, let me assure you that I am in no way creating a picture of you as a ""bad guy"" because of that or any other comment made. There are lots of frustrated people here, and what I am hoping to do is help people get rid of some of that frustration. This does of course not mean that uncivil behavior towards you or anyone else is acceptable. Regrettably, I have seen tendencies towards this sort of thing in the Talk page from

way before, so it might take a while to clear the bad air, as it were. I will try to consult with other people who might have ideas on how to tackle the problem laying at the bottom of all this frustration in a way that doesn't make any of the parties feel attacked. I ask for your patience in the short run, so that I hopefully can make a difference for everyone in the long run. By the way, I was very happy to see that you took the time to thank for her recent changes, I sincerely believe that communication between you and her is the key to defuse the current situation. That showed extra effort on your part, which did not go unnoticed. Thank you. "

" == November 2008 == You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest. Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation

encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability. If you are not ""notable"" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) | "

For fuck sake, the article should not be considered

for deletion, are you stupid? - Jonas Vinther

== Headline textanyne with a right fucking mind

knows that this is not christain rock ==

" :Well you're ""sources"" are crap - because you've yet

to link one, and you were wrong on Youkilis. "

" Uh, who are you? Other than the person

who actually spelled out ""fuck"" on your page"

Obama is anti-gun yet campaigned to protect firearm

rights.... now he's doing the exact opposite. Liar!

== Hi Nerd! == You are a SUCKER! You live in

VaChina! and i have a message for you: {[BLEEP]} you

YAY FAGGOTS FAAAAGGGGOOOTSSS ARE AWESOME YAY YAY YAY FAGOT FAGOT

FAGOT AWESOME FUN YAY YAY FOR FAGGOTS! YAY YAY YAY!

== Uncle Dick == Dick.... wow what an appropriate

name for someone like you. edit bunny. pmll.

" ::Did Obama call a political opponent a ""cancer"" and a

""bitch,"" or laugh out loud when someone else did? "