Datasets:

cybersectony

/

PhishingEmailDetectionv2.0

like 2

https://www.sallyscottages.co.uk

https://ipfs.litnet.work/ipfs/bafybeif3xgfpgs4rt4mfksh7y2jo4dkiogxlljz7si5c5563vvkgy2pz64

https://www.weebirdy.com

https://www.lawyerlegion.com

http://www.madnitrading.com

https://semprecomalu.com/consulte-sua-fatura.php?cartoes=home&id=mjdmy2m0nwzknzqyoda2zwyyzda4yzm1ywmyzgi3otg=&the=theking

https://www.socanmagazine.ca

https://enter-start-43.firebaseapp.com/

https://www.sportkreis-bergstrasse.de

https://www.n1455.cn/

https://www.capacitymedia.com

http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/[email protected] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID------- Additional Comments From [email protected] 2002-09-21 16:36 ------- Hi David --I'm afraid this bug-tracking system is only used for the open-source SpamAssassin (the UNIX one ;). You need to talk to somebody at deersoft.com instead.------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel

https://www.tdk.gov.tr

https://www.navitime.co.jp

http://www.krediade.com

https://styygvbk6a.web.app/

https://sb41-g1-hs.firebaseapp.com/

https://www.pwc.com.tr

https://www.glaesernemanufaktur.de

https://www.cachirulovalley.com

charity sees the need not the cost . . . dear friend , as you read this , i don ' t want you to feel sorry for me , because , i believe everyone will die someday . my name is mr . reza abdulla , a merchant in safat , in ( kuwait ) i was married with two children . my wife and two children died in a car accident six years a go . i have been diagnosed with esophageal cancer . it has defiled all forms of medical treatment , and right now i have only about a few months to live , according to medical experts . i have not particularly lived my life so well , as i never really cared for anyone ( not even myself ) but my business . though i am very rich , i was never generous , i was always hostile to people and only focused on my business as that was the only thing i cared for . but now i regret all this as i now know that there is more to life than just wanting to have or make all the money in the world . i believe when god gives me a second chance to come to this world i would live my life a different way from how i have lived it . now that god has called me , i have willed and given most of my property and assets to my immediate and extended family members as well as a few close friends . i want god to be merciful to me and accept my soul so , i have decided to give alms to charity organizations , as i want this to be one of the last good deeds i do on earth . so far , i have distributed money to some charity organizations in the u . a . e , algeria and malaysia . now that my health has deteriorated so badly , i cannot do this myself anymore . i once asked members of my family to close one of my accounts and distribute the money which i have there to charity organization in bulgaria and pakistan , they refused and kept the money to themselves . hence , i do not trust them anymore , as they seem not to be contended with what i have left for them . the last of my money which no one knows of is the huge cash deposit of ten million seven hundred thousand american dollars ( u . s . $ 10 . 700 , 000 ) that i have with a finance / security company abroad . i will want you to help me collect this deposit and dispatched it to charity organizations . i have set aside only 20 % for you and for your time and also 5 % as miscellaneous expenses . reply me at your earliest convenience for more directives to my private email address : reza _ abdulla @ walla . com god be with you . regards , mr . reza abdulla

https://www.esparkinfo.com

https://www.distributed-systems.net

https://www.fishstripes.com

http://www.configlive.work.gd

https://www.copy.ai

remember me ? rupprechtnhk 54018 from aim would you reflnance if you knew you ' d save thousands ? we can get you lnterest as low as 2 . 19 % . fill out our small form below and we ' ll show you how . get the house and / or car you always wanted , it takes less than a minute of your time http : / / www . ez - rate . info / 1 / betty sue wasn ' t enjoying working .

https://digital.mobilekey.20-24-201-12.cprapid.com/syd/mitid/login.php

https://grposlte.web.app/

https://accountupdate9.godaddysites.com/

https://www.eritreaeritrea.com

https://confirm-open-messeges.match-member.workers.dev/

https://www.farmersdatingapp.com

Norton AD   ATTENTION: This is a MUST for ALL Computer Users!!!  *NEW - Special Package Deal!* Norton SystemWorks 2002 Software Suite -Professional Edition- Includes Six - Yes 6! - Feature-Packed UtilitiesALL for 1 Special LOW Price! This Software Will:- Protect your computer from unwanted and hazardous viruses- Help secure your private & valuable information- Allow you to transfer files and send e-mails safely- Backup your ALL your data quick and easily- Improve your PC's performance w/superior integral diagnostics!  6 Feature-Packed Utilities 1 Great Price A $300+ Combined Retail Value YOURS for Only $29.99! <Includes FREE Shipping!> Don't fall prey to destructive viruses or hackers!Protect  your computer and your valuable information and-> CLICK HERE to Order Yours NOW! <-Click here for more information         Your email address was obtained from an opt-in list. Opt-in MRSA List  Purchase Code # 312-1-010.  If you wish to be unsubscribed from this list, please CLICK HERE

empty

https://www.mcftech.com

http://www.limota.vn

http://www.advanced-ip-scanners.com

https://www.bbh.org

https://www.furninfo.com

https://www.mwdc.wa.gov.au

http://www.sgiff.com

http://saablu.com.br/lchxdkhfkw1h0tnxnshxdkhfkw1h0tnxnshxdkhfkw1h0tnxnshxdkhfkw1h0tnxlc/lchxdkhfkw1h0tnxnshxdkhfkw1h0tnxnshxdkhfkw1h0tnxnshxdkhfkw1h0tnxlc

https://www.michaeljstewart.co.uk

https://obetencredimaspromoabril.shop/

https://s.free.fr/9xiq9zcv

https://www.besttermitescontrol.com.au

interim summary : anthropoid linguistic ability in linguist 5-1467 ( 18 dec . 1994 ) , i posted the following query : ) douglas h . chadwick , in his review of kanzi : the ape at the brink of the ) human mind , by sue savage - rumbaugh and roger lewin ( nytimes book review , ) dec . 11 , 1994 , pp . 15-19 ) , says , ) ) ) . . . this goes a long way toward countering the complaint that language - ) ) using apes are merely responding to cues from researchers or , at best , ) ) learning rote behavior to get rewards without really comprehending the ) ) meaning of the words they employ . . . . part of the problem is that the ) ) authors are playing by rules laid down by their critics . it was rene ) ) descartes . . . who fashioned the longstanding paradigm of animals as ) ) automatons [ sic ] , incapable of doing anything other than mindlessly ) ) responding to whatever forces impinge on them . descartes insisted that ) ) animals cannot even feel real pain or pleasure , much less understand or ) ) remember the experience . . . . in our era , this tradition has been carried ) ) on by linguistics experts equally intent on preserving language and rea - ) ) son for the exclusive use of humans . each time an ape demonstrates ei - ) ) ther ability , the linguists set about redefining language and reason in ) ) more complex and confusing ways , erecting yet more artificial barriers ) ) for primates to hurdle . ) ) excuse me , is this something i ' ve missed in my seven years of grad school ) and subsequent four years of professional activity in linguistics ? are ) we deliberately engaged in a dastardly plot to deny our anthropoid cou - ) sins their birthright ? psycholinguistics has never been one of my fortes , ) but i certainly do n't remember anything in the introductory survey cour - ) ses i ' ve taken myself or developed to teach to others anything so much as ) hinting that it is an a priori assumption of the field of linguistics ) that language is the exclusive prerogative of homo sapiens , only that ) it 's an important part of the package that defines that species . ) ) i remember enthusiastically inflated claims made back in the 50 's about ) the forseeable progress in computer technology - - predictions as to how ) quickly we would get computers that could not only converse with us in ) real time in some given human language ( default : english ) but whop any ) human being in chess as well . as all ai researchers know , it soon became ) clear that these predictions were based in part on an oversimplified ) notion of what constituted language ( if i remember correctly , some ) premises were on the level of edgar rice - burroughs ' endowing his heroes ) with a 's pectacular ability to master alien languages ' that consisted of ) an ability to memorize a dictionary ) . and i understand that many claims ) about ' ape language ' , and the rebuttals from the community of linguists , ) have been at similar levels . but it seems to me that this is quite ) different from the scenario in which the academic linguist , threatened by ) the physical anthropologist , mutters , ' hmm ; so far we ' ve felt safe with ) this definition of linguistic competence , but this chimp has mastered ) that . we ' ll have to change the definition if we want to avoid miscege - ) nation ! ' , which is apparently what chadwick is envisioning . ) ) now , i daresay there may be individual linguists who do react this way , ) just as in previous eras there were scientists who would from time to ) time redefine the standards of what constituted full humanity . or civi - ) lization , or what have you , to maintain the claim that whatever it was , ) the native peoples of africa and the western hemisphere did n't have it . ) but i certainly do n't , and i ' m not aware of any of my colleagues that ) do insist , as the sectional headline in the nyt book review has it , ' on ) keeping language and reason for humans alone ' ( i ' m also a little be - ) mused at this conflation of language and reason ; language has never ) struck me as an entirely ' rational ' process ) , much less that , as chadwick ) and , by derivation , said headline imply , that as a professional class we ) are unanimous in doing so . ) ) i ' m considering writing a letter to the editor to complain about this ; if ) anybody else has already done so , please let me know . but what i really ) want to know is , what is the current general consensus ( if there is one ) of ) the field on this subject ? are the claims in the savage - rumbaugh & lewin ) book anent kanzi 's linguistic ability valid ? or is some further clari - ) fication in order ? is it just that some researchers in this area have ) a ( perhaps understandable ) chip on their shoulder ? or is there a real ) conflict between theoretical linguists on the one hand and physical an - ) thropologists and primatologists on the other on this subject ? first of all , david pesetsky did write a letter to the new york times , which was published in the dec . 25 issue of the times book review , and i refer all interested parties to it ( for some reason , i can't find my copy at the moment ) . secondly , i 'd like to thank the following scholars who got in touch with me over the holidays to discuss this issue , discussion to be summarized below : john h . chalmers ( non12 @ cyber . net ) dick hudson ( uclrah @ ucl . ac . uk ) massimo piattelli - palmarini ( piattem @ dipsco . hsr . it ) tom j . pulju ( pulju @ ricevm1 . rice . edu ) harold schiffman ( haroldfs @ u . washington . edu ) discussion proceeded along two logically distinct questions : ( 1 ) what is currently the most accurate assessment of the ' linguistic performance ' , ( and , by inference , linguistic ability ) of the anthropoids ? ( 2 ) why are such people as the gardners , savage - rumbaugh , chadwick , etc . so irritated at us ? on the first question , all of my respondents , as well as david pesetsky , seem to be agreed that the most impressive ' linguistic ' performance of chimps and gorillas reported in the literature is at a level roughly equi - valent to that of a human child of approximately two years of age , but that the anthropoids seem to be unable to develop beyond that stage . in particular , they show no evidence for syntactic structure , nor for any ability to distance themselves temporally or spatially from the referents of their statements . i received statements such as the following : ' the most successful of the apes have managed to reach more or less the level of children in the two-word utterance stage . the size of the lexi - con is about the same , as is the combinatory ability . ' ' the apes master a refined system of communication , and are capable of some abstract thinking , but lack the very fundamentals of human language ( recursiveness , structure-dependency , parsing into constituents , etc . ) . ' ' the chimps mostly have a lexicon , and a rudimentary syntax that lets them distinguish between actor and patient , but that 's about all . . . . the chimps ( a ) have no morphology to speak of ( b ) can't use displacement of the message ( i . e . , can't talk about the past or future , or something that happens / ed in another location ) ' [ at a venture , i would guess that they can't handle contrafactuals either . ] ' it is claimed that the ape " utterances " lack grammaticality or syntax . the apes can make the correct symbolic associations , but have no sense of grammatical patterning . in two and three " word " sentences , the order of the elements is variable and each element maybe repeated any number of times in any order and independently of the rest ( sequences like give banana give kanzi kanzi banana kanzi give , etc . ) ' one of my respondents , partly on the basis of hanns own occasionally frus - trating experiences resulting from the geographical proximity of an insti - tution presumably devoted to the 's tudy ' of anthropoid language , made some critical statements about the scientific methodology of some of this research . in particular , after referring to hockett 's 16 'd esign fea - tures ' of language , hann remarks : ' the proponents ' claim that [ chimps ] do have cultural transmission , because washo taught her son , does n't bear up under much scrutiny ; washo had to be rewarded to learn every sign and her son has not learned as many , nor passed them on to any other chimp . i see what the chimps learned as the equivalent of a pidgin ; but creoliza - tion never took place . ' which implies ( 1 ) that anthropoid ' language ' ac - tually corresponds to the skinnerian model refuted by chomsky in his fa - mous review as regards human language and ( 2 ) that it is not sufficiently ' natural ' to the anthropoids for them to feel motivated to transmit it successfully . some of my respondents addressed some of the wider theoretical and metho - dological issues relevant to linguistics implicit in this discussion . one opined ' that some dismissal of ape language research is partly , and unconsciously , motivated by a turf-protection instinct . we ' re all alrea - dy uneasy about the fact that there are certain subfields of linguistics whose importance we acknowledge but which we ' re not personally terribly well-versed in . . . . i think many theoretical linguists breathed a sigh of relief when terrace announced that [ the chimp ] nim had n't really learned human language at all . it meant that they did n't have to worry about mo - difying their theories to fit ape language data . ' another said , ' most linguists do n't really care ( at least not consciously ) about whether apes can learn language as such , but they do care deeply about whether lan - guage is " sui generis " and innate or not . . . . as far as linguists are concerned , we ' re divided over chomsky 's claim that language is a geneti - cally-programmed module , rather than an area of knowledge which is han - dled by general cognition . if apes can't learn language at all , that supports the chomskyan view ( which presumably involves some cataclysmic mutation say 100 , 000 years ago , or at least since we split off from the other primates ) . if they can learn some of it , we have evidence for ge - neral cognition ( where apes are presumably less well endowed than us , so you 'd expect partial success ) . ' in further discussion we agreed that this argument only held if we accept a 's trong ' version of the relevant dichotomy implicit in the innateness hypothesis , according to which human linguistic ability is overwhelmingly if not completely independent of general human cognition . i pointed out that even if chimps are demonstrably distinct from us on a genetic level they still share over 98 % of our dna . so even if they share some of our linguistic ability it might mean that they also share some of the distinc - tive genetic endowment that provides it . a more effective test would be on cetaceans or pachyderms , which are nowhere as nearly related to us as chimps are but which appear to have roughly comparable cognitive levels . if they also share a certain amount of our linguistic ability , that would indicate that at least that amount is probably dependent more on general cognitive ability than on any specific genetic endowment . if chimps , dolphins , elephants , whatever , can't master human language but have other modes of communication * not isomorphic * with ours but of * comparable com - plexity and flexibility * , then this would give us the opportunity to stu - dy how much of human language is necessary to the general phenomenon of language and how much is incidental and of relevance only to our species ; it might also enable us to talk about the ' innateness ' of human linguistic ability in terms that would not be offputting to geneticists . on the second question , the basis for the irritation towards academic lin - guists on the part of the proponents of anthropoid language , there was some consensus that they were working with an overly simplistic concep - tion of what constitutes language , and were offended that we refused to share it . typical were the following remarks : ' all the [ proponents ] of animal language , and of its continuity with hu - man language , assume that human natural languages simply * are * the result of communication and use . . . . the basic design of human languages is * not * dictated by use , and we can easily conceive of species that would possess a * radically * different design for language and would communicate just as well , if not better . ' ' the gardners et al . have an extremely elementary grasp of what is real language . they think that if they have a lexicon and bare syntax , that 's all there is . their other argument , that the apes have " real " sign lan - guage , is also pitiful . . . . the approach trivializes both oral languages and sign languages . ' there was , however , some acknowledgment that some of the ' blame ' for this state of affairs belongs on our doorstep . the ' trivialization ' just men - tioned was claimed to be due at least in part to inadequacies in state - ments by linguists in the 50 's and 60 's . one respondent in particular pointed to an inveterate tendency to try to identify a single , defining , characteristic as the sine qua non of human linguistic ability , rather than accepting the fact that such important distinctions are often proper - ly made on the basis of mosaics of characteristics . in particular , much research in anthropoid ' language ' has apparently focussed on the ability of chimps and gorillas to coin novel expressions , unanticipated by their human teachers / handlers , on the basis of a finite number of memorized ' lexemes ' and some basic combinatorial principles . this effort has suppo - sedly been motivated by early assertions by academic linguists that what distinguishes human language from all other forms of animal communication is its creative ability . when the gardners , etc . , demonstrate that their apes are capable of similar creativity and we then say , ' very nice but that 's not language ' , they are understandably miffed . in response to this , i think what is necessary is greater tact , humility , and honesty on all our parts . we need to admit up front that we ( or our predecessors ) have oversimplified in the past , and give credit to the ape researchers for helping to elucidate the issues . and we need to make it clear that what chimps , gorillas , and two-year - old humans share is in some sense a * rudimentary * linguistic ability , but not equivalent to what adult humans do . in short , we need to increase everybody 's awareness of the inherent rich - ness and complexity of human linguistic behaviour , which to my mind means we need to devote more time and energy to introductory courses in general linguistics ! harold schiffman reports some encouraging success in this direction with a course on linguistic anthropology at the university of washington . further discussion on the issues raised here is welcome , either in perso - nal communication with me or in general discussion on the list . i hope in the not too distant to be able to post a short list of references to published literature on this subject . best , steven - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - dr . steven schaufele 712 west washington urbana , il 61801 217-344 - 8240 fcosws @ prairienet . org * * * * o syntagmata linguarum liberemini humanarum ! * * * * * * nihil vestris privari nisi obicibus potestis ! * * *

https://www.whatmobileawards.co.uk

http://mateamask.com/

http://www.gandlog.com

https://seemly-gabby-almond.glitch.me/

https://www.yourmusicradar.com

https://www.cpbotha.net

https://www.a-digital-eye.com

https://www.extradeggendorf.de

https://www.cn-pellet.com

https://xn--assur-ameli-fbb.fr/

https://www.gtecsecurity.co.uk

https://www.zen.com

https://www.lauralemay.com

http://www.tylascountrygarden.com

https://sbi-222hgdv.web.app/

http://pancakeswap.pages.dev

http://www.andlache.com

https://www.bnm.gov.my

http://www.brandin.nu

https://www.um.es

https://www.justiceforharkat.com

https://www.trysil.kommune.no

https://hk3lu8ruwk.web.app/

https://www.ecok.edu

https://www.nerdycrochet.com

update your software visit us http : / / www . goodsoft 4 u . info / microsoft windows xp professional - 50 adobe photoshop 7 . 0 - 60 microsoft office xp professional - 100 microsoft windows 2000 professional - 50 adobe pagemaker 7 . 0 - 60 adobe illustrator 10 - 80 corel draw graphics suite 11 - 120 norton antivirus 2004 professional - 15 borland delphi 7 professional - 70 adobe acrobat 6 . 0 professional - 100 adobe acrobat 6 . 0 proffessional - 100 adobe photoshop cs - 80 system works 2004 professional - 40 microsoft sql server 2000 enterprise edition - 200 windows 2000 server - 50 linux redhat 7 . 3 - 200 office 2003 professional - 110 quark express 6 . 0 - 60 macromedia studio mx 2004 - 180 . 00 adobe indesign cs - 100 . 00 adobe illustrator cs - 90 . 00 easy cd & dvd creator 6 - 29 . 99 ahead nero v 6 . 3 powerpack - 40 . 00 symantec winfax pro vl 0 . 03 - 40 . 00 . . and more ! visit us http : / / www . goodsoft 4 u . info / waldo deposit celled interfere pardons exposing claimant pierson canvasses intrinsic euclidean treasuries openness norton stamp slurp looking tooler critiques boisterous hewitt bobrow swiss entreated pastes grades curtails doubting petted riverview fogarty flute juncture condemned

http://www.comexe.cn

http://metta-maskelloggiiin.godaddysites.com/

sorry for the delay - fqtfsqvb hello thanks for stopping by ! ! we have taken many new pics and made some hot new videos ! they are the most erotic we have done ! stop by and be our guest for oodles of free fun ! click here and enter we thank you for all your business in the past ! the haven

https://bafybeifstdsyuhzniptjhtumlkhxbxxmp24omu3kthjddy2hshd3xcae2q.ipfs.dweb.link/d1-sjs.html

https://dropbox6.godaddysites.com/

http://www.newsroom.cleansite.info

https://www.84rv.com

https://www.savingcountrymusic.com

https://www.gethooked.co.uk

https://sites.google.com/view/156qd4zf65zr1f0qsdjsdix/

http://www.nkanyezikubheka.com

https://www.emmylou.net

https://www.grapplearts.com

pgl unify training sally , bob fyi - nice note from the chicago office regarding the roll - out and training in unify . as you might know they are live on september 1 with unify . currently they are only pathing on ngpl but we expect them to expand to include both trunkline and northern border . they have elected not to edi until they get more comfortable with the system ( maybe for october business ) . we will continue to develop their staff on the use of unify through additional training as noted below - bob - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by robert superty / hou / ect on 08 / 31 / 2000 09 : 05 am - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - richard tomaski @ enron 08 / 30 / 2000 06 : 16 pm to : robert superty / hou / ect @ ect cc : laura luce , barbara g dillard / corp / enron @ enron subject : pgl unify training bob - just wanted to drop you a note to let you know that richard pinion ' s unify training secession was very sucessful . the pgl employees that he trained were very complementary of richard and they now feel confident that they will be able to use our system . they are already looking forward to his return visit in september . thankyou for your involvement with the chicago office and our implementation of the unify system . richard

http://www.mail3.wyeetacs.com.au

https://www.zavvi.com

https://www.pmdesign.com

https://www.bolsademulher.com

http://www.sysconmyanmar.com

indeed - there should be an agents directory on the Veritas CD - in the unix subdirectory there should be a file called be_agnt.tar which needs to be installed and configured. I am not sure - but I think that you may need to purchase a serial number in order to get this to work..Fergal.> -----Original Message----- > From: John P. Looney [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 19 August 2002 10:34 > To: Irish LUG list > Subject: [ILUG] veritas backup on linux ? > > > I've a solaris box & a windows 2000 box, both with DLT > drives, controlled by Veritas Backup. > > Can I install some sort of client on the linux box to enable > it to be backed up ? A browse of the Veritas site is a little > quiet on this front. > > Kate > > > -- > Irish Linux Users' Group: [email protected] > http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for > (un)subscription information. List maintainer: [email protected] > -- Irish Linux Users' Group: [email protected] http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for (un)subscription information. List maintainer: [email protected]

https://profilconsoledigital2023.firebaseapp.com/

https://fb-restriction-case-2893b.web.app/

https://www.thexking.com

https://www.palmsens.com

http://www.eblagh1-adliran.ml

http://www.cockzer.com.xsph.ru