Tex, I must have entered something wrong. The data for the Radeon HD3400 on the Collatz project, that should be for "collatz v2.09 (ati13ati)", not "mini_collatz v2.09 (ati13ati)". I thought I had both on the list though.

Fixed it for next update.

You did have both on the list, but the other one was for a different card.

I think I found it AngryButcher.... put it in spreadsheet.... Did some other updates too.

And I learned a Celeron-D 2.533GHz chip is slower than my 1.6GHz Pentium-M laptop! Way slower!

LOL!

So I ordered a Pentium-4 HT 3GHz 1Meg L2 Prescott for $6 and a Pentium-4 HT 3.2GHz Northwood 512K L2 for $10 to replace the Celeron... see if one or the other works better... Not sure which one the old Mobo will support, but will use the Prescott if is works... otherwise the Northwood...

[edit]It looks like either I didn't have enough data for my T9600 SETI submission, or they changed their packet size/pps. There also seem to be two packet sizes. One that takes over 17k seconds and another just above 3k. Both are on project SETI@home Enhanced v6.03

Looking at my most recent history, below is what I'm seeing over the past 12 packets (two are the larger 17k second).

[edit]It looks like either I didn't have enough data for my T9600 SETI submission, or they changed their packet size/pps. There also seem to be two packet sizes. One that takes over 17k seconds and another just above 3k. Both are on project SETI@home Enhanced v6.03

Looking at my most recent history, below is what I'm seeing over the past 12 packets (two are the larger 17k second).

Give High/Low then. Seti finishes quick when nothing interesting in the data first pass, but runs more passes (gets longer) if there is interesting data. Sooo, instead of averaging, best to use High/Low values or else report Oddball Highs etc...