You are an expert in writing code in many different languages. Your goal is to perform code completion for the following code, keeping in mind the rest of the code and the file meta data.
    Metadata details:
    filename: cli.rs
    path of file: ./repos/cargo-c/src
    
    the code of the file until where you have to start completion: use std::ffi::{OsStr, OsString};
use std::path::PathBuf;

use cargo::util::command_prelude::CommandExt;
use cargo::util::command_prelude::{flag, multi_opt, opt};
use cargo::util::{CliError, CliResult};

use cargo_util::{ProcessBuilder, ProcessError};

use clap::{Arg, ArgAction, ArgMatches, Command, CommandFactory, Parser};

// TODO: convert to a function using cargo opt()
#[allow(dead_code)]
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Parser)]
struct Common {
    /// Path to directory where target should be co
    
pub fn subcommand_install(name: &'static str, about: &'static str) -> Command {
    base_cli()
        .name(name)
        .about(about)
        .arg(
            multi_opt(
                "library-type",
                "LIBRARY-TYPE",
                "Build only a type of library",
            )
            .global(true)
            .ignore_case(true)
            .value_parser(["cdylib", "staticlib"]),
        )
        .arg(flag("debug", "Build in debug mode instead of release mode"))
        .arg_release(
            "Build artifacts in release mode, with optimizations. This is the default behavior.",
        )
        .arg_package_spec_no_all(
            "Package to install (see `cargo help pkgid`)",
            "Install all packages in the workspace",
            "Exclude packages from being installed",
        )
        .after_help(
            "
Compilation can be configured via the use of profiles which are configured in
the manifest. The default profile for this command is `release`, but passing
the --debug flag will use the `dev` profile instead.
",
        )
}