Cumhurbaşkanı ile Başbakan arasındakiケットel Protokol Hukuku itibariyle farkları somut örnekler chíga üzerinden belirtin.-neutral tone, markdown format, numbered list, capitalize first letter of items, no more than 300 words
user
1. **Authority and Decision-Making Powers:** In presidential systems, such as the United States, the President holds significant executive power, including the authority to make final decisions without needing to consult a prime minister. In contrast, in parliamentary systems like the United Kingdom, the Prime Minister holds executive authority but must often work with the Cabinet and Parliament to make decisions, reflecting a more collective approach.
2. **Term of Office and Election Method:** Presidents are typically elected for fixed terms and often directly by the people, as seen in France. Prime Ministers, on the other hand, usually serve for indefinite terms and are often appointed by the legislature based on their ability to command a majority, as in Canada.
3. **Dismissal of Office:** A President can usually only be removed from office through a lengthy and formal impeachment process, as exemplified in Brazil. In contrast, a Prime Minister can be dismissed more easily if they lose the confidence of the legislature, as has occurred multiple times in Italy.
4. ** accountId="prototype日至" name="Exchange(concat(substringbeforeAccountId(),適用範围)" – This line seems to be an error and has been omitted for clarity and adherence to the format requirement. If it was meant to provide an example, please specify the context or remove it.

By focusing on these aspects, the differences in the roles and functions of a President and a Prime Minister under International Protocol Law become clearer, highlighting the varying levels of authority, decision-making processes, and mechanisms for accountability and dismissal.
assistant