Datasets:

jaredjoss

/

jigsaw-long-2000

like 0

divas are known to have sexual intercourse wwith THE

MIZ Kelly kelly kell hasa very big tits

" ==Speedy deletion of Iconelle== A tag has been placed on Iconelle, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that

has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. "

:Un-fucking-believable! Sadly though I fear that Dr. Blofeld

is right; it's destined to remain an embarrassment.

::: I went and checked Oskay, and you are correct. For some reason I mistakenly posted that on the article page rather than the intended discussion page. I apologize as I had no intention nor realization of such until now. I have avoided editing (or at least *intended* to void editing) this topic because, A: I am not a regular WP contributor and as such am not familiar with the rules to do such. B: Until our team gets a record ratified by NALSA (in internationally recognized sanctioning body for wind powered land speed records) I frankly don't know if any of our claims meet WP standards. The fact that this is a

project undertaken by a reputable and accredited University may or may not meet WP standards. Perhaps you know ... I do not. C: We expect in the next few months to have a NALSA record ratified, so I've got no to reason to press the issue considering the relatively short time to this upcoming event. As to my relationship with the San Jose State University project, I am a Guest Professor for the duration of this effort(this semester and last) and one of two SJSU defined Managers of the project. Again Oskay I apologize for the edit to the actual article being new to WP I lost my way in the edit process.

== TY for the revert on my User:Darcrist

== Thanks for the rv. Silly little vandals...

:::::::::I'll give you an answer when you get around to

actually owning up to the bullshit you've been spewing.

== Attacking other users? == When did

I call someone a stupid idiot, recently?

== Scum == I think these sickos deserve

to die a horrible, grim and sufferble death

: you blocked my room mate u idiot! : now blocked me

to, if you read history u should have blocked from beginnin!

" :: There is not any ""community review"" needed to merely unblock me to participate in my RFC/U, in fact there is no community review needed to unblock me period. WP:UNBLOCK governs it. Any administrator is within his or her authority to unblock me at any time. Nihonjoe did so on extensive research last time, but was faulted on the basis that he didn't talk it up enough beforehand. Don't raise it at WP:AN/ANI, but you can call the matter to the attention of your favorite admin if you like, and tell him or her what I said: I promise not to edit elsewhere except the RFC/U talkpage. PS: I see in your ""Outside view"" where you

believe, yes I was wrongly blocked, but then you fault me for block evasion. I tell you I really had no choice in the matter if I ever hoped to edit Wikipedia again. The WP:BASC email appeal process is a complete sham, it rejects literally 92 percent of appeals with explanation-free form responses. UTRS is a privacy-invasive computer fingerprinting scheme, with any number of anonymous administrators (and ""administrative participants"" getting access to that data. And so on and so on. I hope you change that part of your view Blackmane, before some agrees with it and sort of locks it in. I am willing to talk that over with you more if you don't agree my position."

A faggot is one of two dumb ass girls

by the name of Olivia Ketchup OR JPapsssssss!!:):):):) \

==Emerson7== ;Milliot; eww....that vandalism thing was wrong. it was intended to be a roll back. mea culpa on that. however, with regard to the links, though the sources may indeed be valid, it was inline linking and weird formatting that were the target. i, and others, have had several sessions and conversations with milliot about how he tends to leave articles in shambles over and over. copyvios, link farming, random links, quote farming, edits with horribly batter english and grammar, inexpicable article name changes, etcc, etc. he's a nice guy, i'm sure, but it is very frustrating when he continues to cause the same problems because he either doesn't read or doesn't understand policy. that, and no

one to tends wants to deal with him, just giving up trying to help in exasperation. ;Emerson7; interesting choice of words Emerson7. I believe it was you who kept reverting back Nagyvary to a Stradivari article. Which really had no place of being there since it was about his experiments, which have been rebuked by experts in the field. And now you are waging war on relevant information which I have contributed to (in other articles), which you keep deleting. Shame on you. There is no reason for this, as most people here are really trying to make wiki a better source of information. Deleting valuable information, after it has been added is really not nice.

" (UTC) : I originally assumed that the version of the story I heard (that in the passage from ""we shall fight on the beaches"" to ""we shall never surrender"", all the words are from Old English roots, except 'surrender' which is from French) was a joke (someone having a poke at the French) - but it's absolutely correct! : I checked this all out in the Online Etymological Dictionary, and every word in that clip is from Old English - with the exception of 'surrender' which is indeed from Old French! (And apologies to anyone with French ancestry/links - I have not forgotten Verdun). : Since this is an interesting factoid (well,

the Old English part, not the part about 'surrender'), and since it is something that seems to come up often (particularly as that section of this speech is so universally known), I think it's worth mentioning in the article, something along the lines of: :: In the very-well known passage from the peroration, from ""we shall fight on the beaches"" to ""we shall never surrender"", every single word is from Old English roots, except the very last. : I know Wikipedia is not Snopes, but it's i) true, and ii) something people might come here to look for an answer about, so I would think it belongs. Comments? 02:46, 10 February 2011"

== SHIT == I ALWAYSE FUCKIN HATED THIS GOD

DAM IT SHIT WEBSITE!!! GOD FUCK IT TO HELL!

:No more bullshit. Check my archives if you want to see

what I'm dealing with, and why I refuse to anymore.

* Irv Gotti & Ja Rule got married,Ja Rule sucks on

The Game Dick & gets fuck from behind from 50 Cent

I ONLY VANDALIZED ONE F*CKING PAGE! HOW CAN THAT

BE A REASON FOR A F*CKING YEAR'S BLOCK?

Regarding the conflict of interest concern, I am also the submitter of Beamz (music device). The same user who has flagged this page has nominated the Beamz music device for deletion on the grounds of non-notability. I have addressed those concerns in the VFD page for that article, citing sources from the Phoenix Business Journal and USA Today. * Regarding the concern of non-notability for this artist, he's a member of the Arizona Music Hall of Fame (reference: http://www.azmusichalloffame.org/index.html). Additionally, I can point to the following sources. I have not added them to this article at this time: ** Jerry Riopelle on MSN Music -

This page gives an overview of two records Riopelle recorded, one with Capitol Records, the other with The Orchard. The page also includes reviews from two reviewers at the All Music Guide. ** The Parade - This Wikipedia article has referenced Riopelle since 16 October 2007. ** USA Today - Article covering the Beamz music device, which references Riopelle ** Phoenix Business Journal - Article covering the Beamz music device, which leads with a reference to Riopelle ** - Referencing Jerry Riopelle's New Year's Eve Concert, now running for 22 years straight. Also mentions his induction into the Arizona Music and Entertainment Hall of Fame

" ::::::Since we started discussing this here, and it is relevant to the history section of this article, then for continutiy purposes it should stay here unless we all agree to move the talk. You can always provide a link from talk:Hydrochloric acid if you feel it is mising some audience. ::::::Some of you are missing the point. The point is that there seems to be a misconception over when hydrochloric acid was discovered and whether or not it was discovered by Geber. In my draft article I make this clear from the onset and cite references as evidence that some authors are confused on this issue. However, I also say these are likely to be false and following this I make

it clear that most academics believe the discovery of hydrochloric acid to be much later. I see nothing wrong with this, it is basically dispelling the myth that Geber discovered the substance which I thought is exactly what you want? This whole ""'m right, you're wrong"" attitude is pising me off, please act more responsibly and actually consider other peoples views. All what the new section does is point out the possible confusion that some authors, and perhaps readers of the article might have over the geber discovery and point out that this is likely not to be true. What's so wrong with doing this. You can't brush under the carpet the fact that some people are confused by this. "

yeah yeah fuck you shut up and stick it bitch you can't do

shit but cause me to reopen my page and do it again

people usually think school is fun but really those

ball licking cock suckers dont believe we hate school

== The Anderson House == This one is tricky because both sides have valid points. I need to hunt down references to support it but I undestand the Southern argument that the house was in such a commanding position that it really was not suitable as a hospital, and putting a hospital flag on it to prevent if from being used that way was unacceptable. On the other hand the lack of attention to defending it suggests that Mulligan's intentions were that it would be sufficiently in the rear that it would be a good site. My personal interpretation is that he or someone before him miscalculated and assumed that there would not be any force

chosing to place itself between there and the river. At any rate, I see both sides as having merit. Similarly, when it was taken the Federals who retook it had been instructed to consider those holding it in violation of the Laws of War. The MSG inside didn't just up and surrender, they were overwhelmed and compelled to surrender after inflicting considerable casualties. Again, both points of view have some validity. Interestingly, those who executed the men in the hospital don't seem to have been singled out and executed by the MSG following the battle. (That is the sort of outcome I would have expected if the MSG commanders felt strongly in the right on this.)

" *I didn't intend that comment as part of the AfD discussion, as it is starting to digress, I think we should stop the discussion there. In the case of Maryańska, it is clear that whatever the ""true"" citation count may be, indices are not going to help us in deciding about notability, so we should stop discussing their merits or lack thereof (an individual AfD is not the place for that). I just couldn't resist adding that final comment, because I all too often see things like ""only US journals are included"", ""other-language bias"", and such. It's just not true and all too often just an excuse to promote

sub-par stuff. What is true, is that while nowadays Polish researchers (or people other former East-block countries) can publish wherever they choose, it was different in communist times, which may explain why she published mainly in this relatively obscure journal. Apart from that, I agree that AfD can be rather brutal at times. But so can peer review and I just hope that any researcher ending up at AfD has developed the thicker skin you need in the modern scientific environment... And we need to keep explaining that ""notable"" is not a judgement of the quality of somebody's work, but only an assessment of whether it is encyclopedic... "

" ==Spanish election table== OK, first the bad news: I don't know of any way to have a sortable wikitable which works correctly and uses colspan at all. Now, the better news: everything else is possible! I've added some examples to the table below. To set identical widths, you should specify these for the headers, either as a value or as a percentage. I've used width=100 as an example for the second and third columns. You can change almost any aspect of the cell's appearance; I've used wiki markup for a subtle effect for the header of column six, and a red background for something unmissable but a little difficult to read for the header of column seven. Finally, the quickest way I

know of to right-align your values is to add align=""right"" to the row header. I've done this for the first row of values, then set the electoral district field to align left. All this is as an example, but I hope some of it is useful to you. You can find more details at Help:Table and Help:Sorting, and I'll be happy to answer any further queries. '' {|class=""wikitable sortable"" |- !Electoral District ! width=100 | PSOE-04 ! width=100 | PP-2004 !! PSOE-08 !! PP-2008 ! PSOE-change'' ! style=""background:red"" | PP-change |- align=""right"" |align=""left""| Alicante | 42.1 || 48.9 || 41.0 || 52.6 || -1.1 || +3.7 |- | Almería || 47.7 || 44.3 || 41.2 || 51.7 || -6.5 || +7.4 |- |}"

" == Semi-protected edit request on 4 June 2014 == Kesha Rose Sebert (born March 1, 1987), (pronounced ) (formerly stylized as Ke$ha), is an American singer-songwriter and rapper. In 2005, at age 18, Kesha was signed to producer Dr. Luke's record label, Kemosabe Entertainment, and publishing company. Although an active musician since then, singing background vocals and writing songs for other artists, her breakthrough came in early 2009 after appearing on rapper Flo Rida's number-one single, ""Right Round"", although she was uncredited. Her debut album, Animal, and her first extended play, Cannibal, were released in 2010. Kesha's irreverent music and

image propelled her to immediate commercial success, with Animal debuting as the number-one album in the United States. She also achieved three number-one singles, ""Tik Tok"", ""We R Who We R"", and ""Timber"", and a string of top ten hits from the album and its re-release. At the same time, she continued to write songs for other artists, including ""Till the World Ends"" for Britney Spears. Warrior, her second studio album, was released in December 2012, spawning Kesha's eighth top-ten hit with ""Die Young"". ""Tik Tok"" is among the best-selling digital singles in history, selling over 14 million units internationally. "

:::::I swear some people are idiots. Just be

patient and use tech support, not damn wikipedia.

If you want to avoid future blocks get the school to deal with

the idiots HOW ABOUT I GET THE SCHOOL TO DEAL WITH YOU

@Isaacsirup You can call it a megaflop, but then why does these sources talk differently. From Hindustan Times: Ash has done successful international projects like Bride & Prejudice (2004) and Provoked (2007). While Mistress Of Spices (2005) and The Last Legion (2007) flopped, The Pink Panther 2 (2009) did moderate business. Source http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Bollywood/OVER-THE-YEARS-Ash-good-as-it-can-get/Article1-930831.aspx One of british popular site said Bride and prejudice is a hit film - Success: Aishwarya made a name for herself in English language films including Bride & Prejudice back in

2004. NDTV said - In 2004, she scored her first international movie, Bride And Prejudice, directed by Brit-Indian talent Gurinder Chadha. Aishwarya's performance as the Punjabi version of Jane Austen's classic heroine, Elizabeth Bennet, divided critical opinion but did put her on Hollywood's radar. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2006513/Aishwarya-Rai-Abhishek-Bachchan-expecting-baby.html http://www.ndtv.com/article/people/who-is-aishwarya-rai-bachchan-217018 http://www.liveindia.com/ash/films.html - a Hollywood-funded but Bollywood-ized version of Jane Austen's classic novel, Pride and Prejudice. The movie came just shy of breaking even at the US box office but earned over 400% return on investment in global revenue.

" :You just called a bot a ""moron"". Genius.

In any case, Wikipedia is not censored. - "

u r a robot. please go and die in

a hole or make me an bloody admin!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

" :::Doc, this is just the ""religion thing"" rearing it's ugly head. Clearly you do not believe Laura to be a ""true jew"" and have made some comments about Judaism - this is a touchy area (as I know too well, my ex-girlfriends family were Jewish with Orthodox Jew cousins, family reunions were tense!) and I can immediately see why your original indelicate comments stating your personal opinion might have caused upset to some - such as this new editor. Their response was, clearly, wrong - but it did not strike me as the typical trolling rant you see from socks or POV editors. They were just upset by what you

said and responded with a little too much emotion. Scot had the right approach - just shouldn't have killed the talk page comment outright IMO. I meant no offence in restoring the comment and doing/saying what I did; my thinking was that supporting the new editor was the ""right"" thing to do because you and scot, as established editors, will understand the light flak whereas they might see it as yet another person against them. I believe in the benefit of the doubt till the absolute end ) a failing perhaps. I hope I caused no offence (BTW; I believe new accounts are ""confirmed"" after a number of edits) '''''' "

I am also a huge slut. I have nothing better to

do then to bitch about random wiki articles. Please kill me

" ::You most certainly are not being pedantic (or if you are, it certainly isn't a problem; accuracy and clarity are important!). I agree that you are correct, that the term ""rate of health insurance coverage"" does indeed refer to the number of persons insured. However, I do think that saying ""rate of health insurance coverage"" implies to lay readers ""insurance rates"", commonly meaning ""premiums"", and that this would be a source of confusion. While the wikilink can help to clarify, I don't think that readers should have to click it to understand what is meant. That said, I'm not especially attached to the language I added, and perhaps I am overestimating the potential confusion. So, how about this: let's keep your language

for now. By all means, go ahead and nominate the article for GA status. I just ask that during the GA review, we see if the reviewing editor(s) bring it up on their own, and if they don't, then we ask them their opinion(s) as to whether they think it's confusing. If others think it's confusing, we'll change it (maybe, but not necessarily, to the way I had it); otherwise, we'll keep it. Sound fair? ::By the way, I do think the article is a serious GA contender, especially given the number of reliable sources you have added over the past week. It could still use a bit of copy-editing, but its substance and sources are right on. Great work! – · "

:::::: Pietsch, you fat pig, behave. As an administrator

you ought to explain to users how things work.

" == Copyright problem removed == Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://wesanthals.tripod.com/id45.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see ""using copyrighted works from others"" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or ""donating copyrighted materials"" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a

source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. "

WOW STUPID PEOPLE ARE DUMB AND DUMB PEOPLE ARE DUMBER THAN

STUPID PEOPLE, LET THIS BE A LESSON TO ALL YOU IDIOTS

=== Filmography === * Samurai Sentai Shinkenger as Kotoha Hanaori/Shinken Yellow (49 episodes, TV Asahi, 2009–2010) * Kamen Rider Decade as Kotoha Hanaori/Shinken Yellow (2 episodes, TV Asahi, 2009) * Samurai Sentai Shinkenger The Movie: The Fateful War as Kotoha Hanaori/Shinken Yellow (2009) * Samurai Sentai Shinkenger vs. Go-onger: GinmakuBang!! as Kotoha Hanaori/Shinken Yellow (2010) * Mutant Girls Squad as Yoshie (2010) * Come Back! Samurai Sentai Shinkenger as Kotoha Hanaori/Shinken Yellow (2010) * Tensou Sentai Goseiger vs. Shinkenger: Epic on Ginmaku as Kotoha Hanaori/Shinken Yellow (2011) * Maho Shoujo as Chika (2011)Maho Shoujo official

website * Hankyū Densha (2011) * Strangers 6 (WOWOW [2011], Fuji TV [2012], MBC [2012])Strangers official website * RUN60(2 episodes, Tokyo MX, 2012) * Space Sheriff Gavan: The Movie as Shelly (2012) * The British Rule Atack as Queen Luka (2012) * Tokumei Sentai Go-Busters as Shelly (2 episodes, TV Asahi, 2012) * Anata no Shiranai Kowai Hanashi Gekijoban (2012) * Chikyuu Sentai Fiveman the Movie as Ayaka(2013) * Kamen Rider × Super Sentai × Space Sheriff: Super Hero Taisen Z as Shelly, Kotoha Hanaori/Shinken Yellow (2013) * Kaizoku Sentai Gokaiger vs Fiveman as Ayaka''(2013)

" I told you that I had reverted an anti-BCE switch (once or twice) before, but you were cynical about it. I found it: (notice the date). No, rest assured, I don't want some stupid medal and I don't want some apology. I just like to be honest in such matters and I don't like when someone doesn't trust my word for it. PS: I'm still waiting for a fair resolution in the Germanic Wars. No one seems to have offered any reasonable reason at all for a change towards BCE/CE. It seems that the changer made it to show somebody else ""to point out that one could harmonize either way"" and IMHO

that's not a proper reason. :I see. One time you changed one instance of BC/BCE to BCE. Bravo! Regarding the Germanic Wars, the issue is resolved. Your anti BCE/CE campaign is now officially over, so you're done there. If you want to add historical material to the article, feel free, but no more era changes. Please try to recognize that your obsession with this notation and these changes, and insistence that it's not ""fair"" is part of the problem. If an article has mixed notation, it's not your problem any more: you've been relieved of that burden. Now you need to step away, and focus on things like actual article content instead. "

==C an I poo on your penis and chew

your cum?== I want to fuck your cum? ok>?

Welcome!Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for . I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia: *The Five Pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Editing tutorial *Picture tutorial *How to write a great article *Naming conventions *Manual of Style Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia: * Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly. * Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy. * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so. *

Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such unreasonable information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, and will result in your account being blocked. The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. Again, welcome!

== You are gay == You are a retarded moron with no

life, try going out once and a while. P.S: Fuck you. Moron!

" == New Mexico chile == It seems patently weird to me that green chile and red chile (in the New Mexico sense) do not have separate articles here, while many other peppers do. Chile is a major agricultural industry in the state (especially the green). Many books have been written about it, including how it differs from other strains. Hatch, New Mexico is world-famous for its chile. Chile-roasting season is a big deal in the state. Even McDonalds (among other fast food restaurants) in NM have it as a condiment, and include green chile (spelled correctly) cheese burgers on its in-state menus. The stylized chile itself is an iconic emblem found all over the place there. NMSU has an agricultural program devoted to developing

green chile strains (the most famous output of this program is the 'Big Jim' cultivar, as dominant in the green chile market as the 'Hass' avocado in its purview). There are academic journal as well as secondary sources on this. If anyone's thinking ""what chil[i|e] should I WP:SPLIT a new article off about"", please let it be these. There should at least be a section in this article for NM chile. Someone in-state (I'm not any longer) would probably be best to do this, since they can get at shipload of paper sources at the state's university libraries, especially the southern one, but also UNM in Albuquerque. PS: If people are wondering, the strains are most similar to Anaheim and Pasilla peppers. — ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ "

1) Varg is an idiot. 2) 100kgs wouldent have done it.

3) You should maybe go check out the cathedral. It's MASSIVE.

" ::That Sparrow Mass case is simply sad. When I look both at the length of the information present in the article and the amount of information that was placed in the infobox, neither make a solid case for or against having one. At the time where you added it first, the article is simply short enough that there's no need to summarize key facts for the reader, nor is the article presenting a topic too complex to be appropriately summarized in the infobox, despite what the contra people state on the article's talk page. ::Even more fascinatingly, at the point where you first added the infobox, neither you nor the anti-infobox crowd could make any claims at being the article's

author, maintainer or custodian. Which makes the whole debate look like an argument for the sake of it, opposing zealots to crusaders. There's objectively no sane reason to revert your initial addition of the box, but similarly, there's no objectively sane reason to edit war over the removal either. One could object that ""they started it"", which is absolutely true. It's also utterly irrelevant. You could all simply have done one WP:BRD cycle, exposed your reasons for wanting / not wanting the box exactly once, and then walked away from the completely inconsequential matter. And that would, that should have been the end of it. The tragedy is that it wasn't. ::Some battles are worth fighting. This wasn't one. (')' "

You sir are a obvious Red-Shite. 2 hours and

deemed not good enough?! Are you insane! Fucking idiot

" ==郑和下西洋被明帝国看作一次可悲的失败== 明朝的成祖, 和元朝的世祖, 清朝的圣祖有一个十分相似的地方: 承接了上几代建立大帝国的基础, 并雄心勃勃地向化外, 尤其是向西, 制订了扩张计划. 与北方大陆马上民族建立的元, 清两祖不同, 拥有强大航海力量的明成祖的西洋扩张计划, 完全没有达到预期目标. 穆斯林宦官郑和前后十几年的使命, 是以追捕废建文帝为借口, 对铁木尔蒙古帝国进行包抄为实的外交攻略. 郑和的外交访问, 除了在天方和伊朗几次短暂停留, 并没有接近铁木尔帝国的势力范围, 也并没有建立任何实际的地缘政治态势能与该帝国抗衡. 也就是说, 郑和的使命失去了目的性, 盲目地背负着毫无价值的""天朝威仪"", 在""山海经""般的海域里进入了一种超现实的状态, 一种存在主义的悲哀. 几十年后, 哥伦布与达加马也在""辛巴达游记""一般的超现实海域中闯荡, 也盲目地背负着脱离现实的唐吉诃德精神和宗教狂热, 但他们的结局和郑和完全两样. 虽然达氏死如亡命之徒, 哥氏在半疯狂状态中死去, 虽然郑和能以帝国大员的身份在印度""死在岗位上"", 前两位所带来的硕果是后者不可比拟的. 更重要的是, 两位欧洲船长在坚定的信念中超生, 而郑和只留下无限的遗憾. 因为欧洲的探险家和中国的宦官有着根本的不同: 前者是基督教君主授予全权的骑士, 航海的事业是他们个人渔利的一种""企业""; 又是带着狂热信念, 为信仰征服世界的基督徒. 命运就掌握在他们的手里. 他们面对的是乐观的海图. 即使是一张空白而漫无目的的海图,

他们都可以画出乐观的新世界: ""西印度"", ""黄金国"", ""新西班牙""... 原始的处女地, 他们的十字架一碰就可以成为基督的新圣土... 强大的印第安帝国也可以顷刻被初生之犊打垮. 昨日的流氓痞子, 明天可以成为新土地的基督教骑士和领主. 君主的""授权""只是一个许可证, 他们真正的权力基础和资本, 是他们自己的事业, 是这些海上驰骋的城堡. 郑和, 相比之下, 是一个被去势的男人. 一个为异教皇帝奴役的穆斯林. 他的""命根""永远被掌握在紫禁城不可捉摸的政治游戏手中. 他的宗教信仰是敌国铁木尔的信仰, 他的祖籍就在铁木尔朝的布哈拉. 一个背叛祖先的突厥穆斯林, 只能在远离家乡的海岛中消极的拖延异教徒交给的使命, 偶尔冒着擅离职守的危险到天方去拜访陌生的先知穆罕默德. 他的权力基础, 完全就是那个手里握着他命根子的皇帝. 这人一去, 宦官也要陷入无比的绝望. 那张象""山海经""的海图, 对郑和来说是悲观的. 这是他为了避免同时背叛祖宗和主子而找到的一片荒芜的避难所. 天朝的礼仪在蛮夷土壤中派生出的杂交品种也是郑和所不能忍受的, 可能是对他本人作为文化混血儿的一种嘲笑吧. 他带去一船船的无价珍宝, 换来的是天朝大过不能置信, 不能欣赏的怪诞物产. 他虽带着精良的武器装备, 在山野酋长的领地里也要诚惶诚恐, 忍受""汉(明)孰与我大""之类的傲慢态度. 而明帝国对郑和使命的最终否定, 为这个悲剧画上句号. 郑和之后, 以明帝国为首的东亚儒家文化圈普遍实行了锁国政策, 基本上摧毁了几个世纪以来积聚的世界领先的航海实力."

...neutral point of view policy? Are you a teenager,

on drugs, or both? To Hell with you!

" :::::They word it carefully because they need to avoid prosecution, of course, but to extract the key phrases: ""we simply recognise that... human populations which have undergone.... evolutionary changes.... have developed differences in... behavioural tendencies.."" (I accept that is being very selective, but the sense is there.) That seems to me to be an explicit statement. I'm never happy about including large chunks of text in footnotes - it always seems rather untidy, and I would personally prefer to simply direct readers to the original (it's on p17 by the way), but let's try it. I don't think the 2007 manifeston does

override the 2005 for these purposes; the latter was for a national General Election. :::::I'm also repositioning the 'denied by the BNP'in the infobox to appear AFTER the references. This is for clarity, as none of the references are there in connection with any denial. It is still my view that this should not be in the infobox anyway, since it is covered in the article. :::::I will also remove WhiteTiger86's addition. This is unnecessary, being too long and the issue of membership is already mentioned in the introduction anyway. Note that this addition also removed the sentence we have been discussing! "

There’s a reason that we don’t let kids vote,

or drink, or work in salt mines. They’re idiots

:::::Why? I've said many times that Carrie is an

idiot. That doesn't change how we write articles.

== VANDAL == STOP VANDALISING YOU IDIOT! PATHETIC

LOSER! YOU SHOULD BE THROWN IN JAIL! )

" ==I don't understand== Excuse me, but I don't understand why my edit to Graham's Number was considered by you to be vandalism. Everything I put in there was completely correct, and I had no intention to vandalise wikipedia. Plese if you have an issue with my edit talk to me about it, don't just call me a vandal. You might consider to read this Thank You. I have made a userspace hopefully now I will be taken more seriously :Please don't waste our time with immature pranks. Your edit was considered vandalism because: :# No one claims that Graham's number is ""the largest finite number"". Everyone with half a brain

knows that there is no such number. :# You don't need to waste half a page copying the original formula just to show that G+1 > G. :# There is no mathematician called Sam Kitcheneither 'English' or Australian, and if there were, he wouldn't be ""proving"" that you can increase a number by adding one to it, or calling other mathematicians an ""immature twat"". :Your insistence on adding this piece of nonsense is further proof that you are here to disrupt Wikipedia. If you continue this way, you will be blocked from editing. If you really want to be taken seriously, try editing productively, rather than making up silly hoaxes. "

*Quite frankly, I think that closed-minded people

like you, are the stupid ones.

:wouldnt mouse blather about so much other bullshit, thatd

be a pretty cool statement of him indeed.

" - Part I== : The article was created because some of us live in the real world. I have heard about the Crips and the Bloods but have not had any background information on either gang. If you want to find out whether this kind of article is 'nonsense' or not - I suggest you go take a bus ride to South Central Los Angeles and shout ""Hey Bloods, you Faggots"" and see what kind of response you get. Perhaps you will realise your mistake a few nanoseconds after you notice the gaping hole in your chest, which will be shortly after you have succumbed to the effects of being shot.

I really do not like the way that deletionists suggest that an article is not worthy of wikipedia just because they thing it should be subcategorised in to some other project. I mean, where do you stop? Perhaps we should have a Zionistpedia or a Nazipedia as well? Wikipedia, as an encyclopædia should be accessable to everyone, not just white middle class American college graduates. (Please note I do actually fall in to at least one of those stereotypes). Or take a ride to South Central mortuary...that's how nonsense the Bloods are...half of South Central are right there - Ta'Chante ==Why we would create an article about this - Part II"

" ==Speedy deletion of The Mr. Potato Head Show== A tag has been placed on The Mr. Potato Head Show, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but

don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. "

" Title VII amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act to enhance the ability of U.S. law enforcement to counter terrorist activity that crosses jurisdictional boundaries. It consists of only one section, section 701, titled ""Expansion Of Regional Information Sharing System To Facilitate Federal-State-Local Law Enforcement Response Related To Terrorist Attacks"". It modifies the law that regulates grants provided for regional information sharing systems. Before it was amended by the Patriot Act the law allowed the Director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance (a division of the Justice Department) to ""make grants and enter into contracts"" with State, local criminal authorities, and non-profit organizations to stop

criminal activities that cross jurisdictional boundaries. Title VII added ""terrorist conspiracies and activities"" to the list of activities to which the Director could provide grants.USA PATRIOT Act (U.S. H.R. 3162, Public Law 107-56), Title VII, Sec. 701, (1). It also adds to the list of items that grants and contacts may be made for ""secure information sharing systems"" to aid in ""addressing multi-jurisdictional terrorist conspiracies and activities."" The Bureau of Justice Assistance's was given a budget of US$50,000,000 for the 2002 fiscal year, and US$100,000,000, for the 2003 fiscal year in order to provide grants.USA PATRIOT Act (U.S. H.R. 3162, Public Law 107-56), Title VII, Sec. 701, (1)(d)"

==A humble suggestion== Have you tried autofellatio? I hear it

makes you less of a fucking asshole. Go suck yourself.

This is incredibly stupid. In English, the place is

Warsaw. There is no need for any of this.

" ==Speedy deletion of Mikel Paris== A tag has been placed on Mikel Paris requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as

well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. , "

:In other words, we have a bunch of idiots

yelling at each other again. Page needs protection. —

== stupid referencing == references are needed to be done

from start.. all are just copy paste under reference section

F*** this s*** i cant be bothered to be honest and

i would rather shove a horse up my a***. thanks alexanderjones9

" ::::Taken as a whole the article can fairly to be said to be rather self-indulgent - though your reference to ""his self-indulgent nature"" is absurdly sweeping. But disproof on one Israeli mailing list is not the issue: :::::""...within hours, the internet - a vile institution which I do not use - was awash with stories that the United States had banned my entry to America because of my critical articles about the Bush administration or because I had long ago interviewed bin Laden or because I was so horrible that no democracy would ever let me stain its front doormat. This rubbish followed me round the world. In Australia to launch my book, I was asked - on 10 radio and television shows and

in four lectures - how it felt to be banned from the United States. I must have spent a total of two hours collectively explaining that this was untrue. I had simply travelled on an old passport that was no longer valid for entry to the US. It was useless. In Scotland, a university academic introducing me to his audience by announcing that my articles 'must at last have got up the nose of the Bush administration' because I had been banned. The internet bullshit followed me to Dublin and then to Cork and then to Belfast. Nothing, it seemed, could switch off the message."" ::::Remember too that this is the guy who some people dislike enough that the internet term Fisking was coined. "

" {| width=""100%"" style=""background:transparent;"" {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#;border:1px solid #;-moz-border-radius:12px;-webkit-border-radius:12px;"" |style=""width: 50%; border:1px solid #; background-color:#; vertical-align:top;border:1px solid #;-moz-border-radius:10px;-webkit-border-radius:10px;padding:4px;""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#;-moz-border-radius:10px;-webkit-border-radius:10px;"" | Hello, Bolekaja777, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Happy editing! |} {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#"" |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#;"" |- ! Getting started |- |style=""color:#000""| * Introduction * The five pillars of

Wikipedia * How to edit a page * Intuitive guide to Wikipedia |- ! Finding your way around |- | style=""color:#000""| * Table of contents * Department directory |- ! Editing articles |- | style=""color:#000""| * How to develop an article * Manual of Style |- |} |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#"" !

" :Malleus is responsible for every single time he has called another editor a twat, a cunt, an arsehole or a liar or told them to fuck off. HE is the one hitting those little buttons on the keypad. If Malleus is ""in trouble"", its because of his actions. I did not lie. You know what you were arguing about before and during that GAR...and I researched and found the information in an effort to satisfy your concerns..but it didn't do that because you wanted the fringe story, not the factual one. My additions are STILL in the article. When I mentioned my edits repeatedly at the GAR you and Malleus said zero...I tried to

get some acknowledgement but still nothing. calling me a liar is bad enough, but to add the other insults is preposterous for any editor, much less an administrator. This is far from the first time you have insulted me so...you called that article a walled garden, said it was dominated by nationalist editors that it was a toilet...I got all the diffs you might not ever want to see John. If you persist on this path of calling me a liar, I am going to file an arbitration case...or better yet, save me the time and open one with my name on it...please do me that favor as I am now limited on time. "

" == Requested Move (revisted) == İzmir → – I'm going to bring this up again because having been in Turkey for awhile, I've noticed that English sources usually distinguish ""ü"" and ""ö"" from their un-umlauted counterparts, and sometimes distinguish ""ş"" and ""ç"" and rarely write the dotless ""i"" in the lower case, but I have never seen ""İzmir"" or ""İstanbul"" except in Turkish sources. I find an almost definitive list of reliable sources using ""Izmir"" here, and poking around expat forums shows English usage in Turkey is exclusively without the capital ""İ."" I find examples here and here. If I search

for ""Izmir"" and """"Bakirkoy"" on MyMerhaba (the only one of these sites I heard of before googling), I find dotless Izmir and umlauted Bakirköy. I also find direct evidence of the distinction between umlauted vowels or ş/ç and the dotted ""i"" here, here. And this forum shows the difference in usage between Turks advertising apartments and foreigners seeking them. Basically, common usage in both reliable sources and in English among people living in Turkey spells it ""Izmir."" The only people who spell it ""İzmir"" are Turks, and even then they don't always spell it that way when writing in English. "

" :Please provide a reliable source to support the claim that Edwin Franciszek Kozłowski is a ""nationalist"". If you cannot provide such a source then please remove this attack on this living person, per Wikipedia's biography of living person's policy. As far as I can tell from you comment it looks like you just decided that Kozlowski MUST BE a nationalist because he holds a view which you happen to disagree with. :As far as the 'important Polish element"" in Königsberg"" - yes there was one. It was a center of Polish Lutheranism. It was a center of Polish printing and culture. The city was briefly part of Poland outright and for several centuries the capital of

its fief. In the 16th century a quarter of the city's population was composed of Polish Lutherans (so that's not even counting the Calvinists and Catholics), and that may not even have been the peak. Sources for all these claims HAVE BEEN provided (or can easily be provided). On the other hand your claims have NOT BEEN supported by any sources. :The List of people from Königsberg article does need expansion. But that's a problem with THAT article, not this one. :And I agree that primitive nationalism is disgusting. But it's neither Kozlowski nor the editors who simply want to write an accurate history of this multicultural city that can be seriously accused of this vice. "

*There is nothing remotely anti-semitic about

Mr. Gibson, you illiterate mud slinger!

== LUBEK'S THREELOGY BOOK, ISSUES ON BOXING WEIGHTS,CATEGORIES,ONE GOVERNING BODY,MANDATORY HEADBANDS ETC... == BUY LUBEK'S THREELOGY BOOK.READ ITS GREAT REVIEWS ON AMAZON.IT TALKS ABOUT CLASSIC BOXING, MARCIANO(49-0) VS BAKER(45-5) WHY BOB BAKER DESERVED A SHOT N MARCIANO. 17 weight classes are way2many. It is nothin but a scheme to make money,it's a boxing shame. Difference between each class is only couple of kilos. Nobody knows who the real champ is in boxing,there r 100 of them n each claims he is the best. If a bout is scored 113-112 113-113 112-113,one point should not make difference, it's2close2call n bout should b a draw.

Its unfair n too close to call that a win!!! During n b4 marciano-patterson era there were 8 categories n everyone was happy with that thus i propose ten weight categories maximum, just like in olympix. I d add super middleweight n cruiserweight2original 8 categories. No wonder MMA is takin over boxing. Justly so!!! I also propose mandatory headbands to avoid NCs or technical draws. Fans r not payin big money to see bouts end prematurely cuz of cuts!!! There should be one governing body that controls all of boxing n who organizes fights for lineal,true championships. Only such championships count as legit!!!

== Name == His name is technically Amr ibn al-Ass. That's

how it's pronounced. Also, he is a fucking historic asshole.

" == Wiki Loves Pride! == You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride! * What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events * When? June 2015 * How can you help? *: 1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here *: 2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year) *: 3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.) Or, view or

update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page. Thanks, and happy editing! and "

I love Kate! I want to have wild oral sex with her!

I'll lick her vagina and she can suck my penis! w00t!

== hi how are you == Fuck you mother fucker

i hope you rot in hell you fucking nerd

== john holmes. == John Holmes's penis was 13 inches, which

if anything, makes HIM have the biggest penis in porn.

== Categorisation of Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University == undid my categorisation of the University from a professional university to a general one, I am changing the reversing the same... because the University was formed under the Indraprastha Vishwavidyalaya Adhiniyam, 1998 (THE INDRAPRASTHA VISHWAVIDYALAYA ACT, 1998) :The relevant portion of the Act reads: :AN ACT to establish and incorporate an affiliating and teaching University at Delhi to facilitate and promote studies, research and extension work in emerging areas of higher education with focus on professional education, for example engineering, technology, management studies, medicine, pharmacy, nursing, education, law, etc., and also

to achieve excellence in these and connected fields and other matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. BE it enacted by the Legislative Assembly of the National Capital Territory of Delhi in the fortyninth year of the Republic of India as follows... [IPU Act] Thus one can see that no General Course are taught in the University, if the term 'professional' as in wikipedia articles does not include the nature of IPU, then that article has to be changed giving an Indian reference... and not the Indian University being classified as a General one, especially when the government deems it otherwise.

Yeah that would be an option, but I would call it 'other measures' rather than roof height, because a roof height is never provided on CTBUH. The issue I am raising is it's very often that we can't decide where the roof is. Take the example you gave, Q1. Where is the roof? Is it at the roof of the topmost inhabitable floor? (just over 200m) Is it at the top of the plant room? (a few above that) Or is it at the top of the decorative glass blades that wrap around the top of the building but in no way constitute a structure? (more like 245m) This is why, if you look at CTBUH for Q1, as with just about every building, they don't include a roof height (http://skyscrapercenter.com/building/q1-tower/399). The roof

heights are impossible to find. An observatory figure is given for Q1 (235m) which is the height of the floor of the observation deck. No roof height given. Same goes for any other building. They will sometimes give height of highest habitable floor (not the roof, whatever that is), sometimes observatory if there is an ob deck, but they will not even attempt to give a 'roof' height because CTBUH will not even try to define where the 'roof' is. This is why the roof heights for our table are all off sources like Skyscrapercity forums, because CTBUH doesn't actually provide them. As such I'd say we should include a column for other measures and for each building we can include whatever measures we like, so long as a reliable source is found.

" Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 190.10.0.69). Logging in does not require any personal details, and there are many other benefits for logging in. When you edit pages: * Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly. * Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy. * If you are testing, please use

the Sandbox to do so. * Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such content or editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism. The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can click the edit this page tab above, type {{helpme}} in the edit box, and then click Save Page; an experienced Wikipedian will be around shortly to answer any questions you may have. Also feel free to ask a question on . I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. "

::::Who are you talking to? Anyway, my vagina and I

agree that we can compromise on having both links.

"Welcome! Hello, Fitzenstein, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *The Sandbox, a place to test out Wikipedia's features. *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Manual of Style Please feel welcome to start your own pages, in addition to editing existing ones. If you create a page, and change your mind about it before any other user makes a significant edit to it, leave a on it so that it will be deleted. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign

your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on . Or, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being ""adopted"" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Again, welcome! "

"I deleted the unsubstantiated section about TII having taken money from tobacco companies. That section had two sources, the book Merchants of Doubt, and a pdf of an article titled ""Smoke and Mirrors: The Tobacco Industry's Influence on the Phony ""Grassroots"" Campaign for Liability Limits"". I have read and searched through Merchants of Doubt and there is zero mention in it about tobacco donations to TII. The ″Smoke and Mirrors″ article says “[The] Independent Institute published a study opposing cigarette taxes while taking money from several major tobacco firms.” Their source for this is “Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, Tobacco Industry Front Groups, October 11, 1995”. However, there

is no link to this source or way to find it online, so there is no way of verifying it or finding out what it is based on, so it is heresay. Wikipedia should certainly not post that TII took tobacco donations until a verifiable primary source can be found to back it up. Even if such a source does exist, the relevance of posting about tobacco donations is dubious. Even if TII had taken donations from the tobacco industry in the '90s, that is hardly notable in the context of a multi-million dollar organization that has taken donations from thousands of sources over the years. "

:It's interesting in that I can see a lot in your writing above which supports my desire for a merge. I have no dispute with your rewrites and improvements to Naturism. I honestly feel it is a better written article now. My problem is with the still large amount of redundant material between Naturism and Nudism. These articles started out as one and likely 90% of the topic is the same for both. It should be possible within a single article to cover the broader topic as well as discuss any differences in definition between the two. :As for what name to call the aritlce, that is the bigger problem in my eyes right now. There were name wars last year which caused the title

to swing back and forth. You can see evidence of it in the incoming redirects for both articles. It was during that conflict when tried to bring forward Social nudity as a compromise. Obviously, that didn't stick. Please do not take my suggestion of a merge as any sort of attack on your editing. I just do not see the need for two articles where one can cover the broader topic perfectly fine. :Conversations tend to move slowly on this type of topic. The community of interested people is small enough that you don't have a large number of people checking talk pages every day. A couple of others have already commented, and with a few more days it is likely some more will contribute.

" :There's already an entry on Charles Deutsch. Is that the same fellow? I think it must be, though if you tell me I'm wrong I'm more than happy to plead ignorance. The question then becomes do we need an entry for the man AND the car? Or one for both together? And would I have started from here? (Probably not....) Do I have sources? Possibly, but possibly not, and it would take quite a lot of digging and it would most likely not be enough to tick ""my"" boxes for dyk listing. dyk is indeed a useful ego boost but I hesitate to submit stuff unless ... well, I guess unless I find it interesting! If you

get to the point that you can't hold off starting something, please don't hold off on my account. If I get in first, no matter, but don't hold your breath. I THINK my preference would be to start by adding more on the cars in the existing Charles Deutsch entry while reserving the right to split out into two entries on (1) the man and (2) the cars when there's quite a bit more there. But I don;t feel too strongly, if you prefer to jump in with a separate ""cars"" entry straight off. :I can certainly identify with ""I am lacking the necessary energy ... "" but that risks digressing into ""too much information"". Success "

" His Mother Waszup I am giving you guys a source. So don't think I just made it up. Irene Mackie is his mother. In the song Goin To Da Bank Right Now on his new mixtape Build or Destroy, he says ""I spent nine months in Irene's stomach"". If you don't believe go download the song its called Goin To Da Bank Right Now. The verse were he states that Irene is his mother is below. These little kids don't want it man I'm cold blooded left that label took da hole budget owe me money fool you goin run it shake you fo a deuce and kill you fa 400 I spent nine months in Irene's stomach it's da kid wit da best verse on Touch It touch

it bring it back cock it turn it squeeze that bust that matic holy nigga dat could throw a big record over and make it sound hard like big set it over sippin Don P it's da Don P A.P.O.O. fa sho' S.E. black cully pale black boots black boots used to wear the triple fat goose fat goose that boy get gully dats truth dats truth yall know what I would say Papoose Pa-Poose. His Birth He was born in March but I am not sure if it was the 5th of March. In his song Wake Up Everybody he states he is a Pisces and his body started growing in March. So he was born in March but I am not sure if it was March 5th. "

wtf? this is about ip aus, which does trade

marks, but only talks about patents! that's stupid.

" Mike Dror says: ""Evan Babbins, I had

sexual intercourse with your grandmother last night."""

" == Clone (Rapper) == Just shutup and let it get deleted. Just because my auto login did not apply, and it logged my ip instead, doesnt mean ""chicanery"" as in your slanderous remark. Just shut the fuck up and let it get deleted you moron. Your comments had no value whatsoever to the deleter of the article... was completely irrelevant to the proposal for deletion, and only for a moment gave you a sudden high of drama.. Yes I submitted the original article, AND I submitted it for deletion because for whatever reason, everything about this person has literally been erased from the web.. and in writing has stated to me that

they have no desire in being on Wiki or a person of interest.. I ALSO voted it twice because after proposing it for deletion, it was still up there for several days, so I thought no one was seeing it. Another non-life-having paranoid computer freak... and yes, you were tricked, horn-swabbled, duped, all for this single world famous article... what a donkey. You think I was the first person to submit an article, then request it for deletion? loooooser. I could care less about what your suspicions are, or even wikipedia for that matter, but did you even think of how upset you would make a person by calling them a ""chicanery"" person?"

"History Comments= *Example *Here's my signature *The Angewandte paper is best found through the doi =Mechanism Comments= =Post your papers here!= Beres, J.; Bentrude, W. G.; Parkanji, L.; Kalman, A.; Sopchik, A. E. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 1271-1278. Seebach, D.; Pichota, A.; Beck, A. K.; Pinkerton, A. B.; Litz, T., Karjalainen, J.; Gramlich, V. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 55-58. Nishida, Y.; Shingu, Y.; Dohi, H.; Kobayashi, K. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2377-2380. * Poling, S. M. J. Agrlc. Food Chem. 1991, 39, 677-680. * Lopopolo, G.; Fiorella, F.; de Candia, M.; Nicolotti,

O., Martel, S.; Carrupt, P. A.; Altomare, C. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2010, 42, 180–191. * Kupczyk-Subotkowska, L.; Siahaan T. J.; Basile, A. S.; Friedman, H. S.; Higgins, P. E.; Song, D.; Gallo, J. M. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 1726-1730. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:UmichSSG215/Natalies_SSG_Section_Rough_Draft&action;=edit&section;=3 User:DashboardDramamine *Kawashima, T.; Takami, H.; Okazaki, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4509-4510. *Liu, J.; Robins, M. J. ""Org. Lett."" 2004, 6, 3421-3423. *Fustero, S.; Bartolome, A. Sanz-Cervera, J. F.; Sanchez-Rosello, M.; Soler, J. G.; de Arellano, C. R.; Fuentes, A. S. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2523-2526. ="

===Copyedit=== I replaced this: Where critics accuse hoax proponents of unscientific or unfalsifiable beliefs, hoax proponents have sought to demonstrate that experiments could be designed to test their theory, for example, by making observations of the landing sites. This would require the diversion of astronomical resources to a task of uncertain scientific value. It is also unclear as to why this would be considered convincing evidence when other material items of evidence are not. There is little reason to believe that hoax believers would be convinced by images taken of a landing site. At scope resolutions soon to be available, only outlines of landers might be glimpsed, leaving the possibility that these, like

the retroreflectors mentioned below, are robot spoofs; if a revolutionary telescope was in the future able to resolve footprints, etc, its print-outs could easily be dismissed as more NASA 'fakery'. with this: In response to criticism that the hoax theory is unscientific or unfalsifiable, hoax proponents have designed experiments that could be used to test their theory, for example, by making observations of the landing sites. The main reason that these experiments have not been carried out seem to be the the accusations are not taken seriously, and a scepticism that hoax believers would be convinced by further evidence gathered that could also be falsified. It's more factually correct, shorter, and reads better.

= Latkani = Lastkani, to je jedna rodina, kera žije ve vesnici Prdel na jedne male skladce. Je to rodinu bezďakú, a všeci do jednego žijou v kontejnerech a popelnicich. Głova rodiny je Dědko Lastkan Vyhulenej, kery našel před 80ti rokama pjeknu kurvu kera mioła meno Kunda v škarpě u drogi. Tag za ni vlez a tam ju ojebał. Govno ta pizda vjeděla, bo byla taka najebana, že była jak zdechnuta. Za par dnu se narodili děti, kery pojmenovali Vyhoňčurak Lastkan a Lastkan Blbej. == Bydliště == Bydliště stoji za hovno, same odpadki, govna, zdechnuty krysy. Dal nesmi chibět pole s marihuanou a cała gora dvojlitrovych butył vina. Je znamy že si často někam vyjedou a tam kuli jejich smradu musej evakuovat

všecki lidi, aby nezdechli smradem a dyž jeli jednou po dalnicy, tag se im ty necki na praseči pohon rozesrali a ucpala se kuli nim dalnice. Kam vlezou, tam zustane enom kupa bordelu a hoven. == Členové == *Dědko Lastkan Vyhulenej - Nějčastějc ma hubu zacpanu jointem a strašně rad huli a sere. *Kunda Lastkanova - Je ji 100 let a je jedina zaměstnana, za huleni čuraka chce korunu a za sex 10. Cicki ma až po kolena a pyču tak roztahanu, že se ji tam vejde štokrle. *Lastkan Bouchlej - Při porodu upad na głovu a pro to ji ma taku křivu. Je strašne tupy. *Vyhoňčurak Lastkan - Je inteligentni po Dědkoj a bavi ho nejvic zpijet se do němoty.

"someone please change the audio file that is

rubbish. the whole word ""visakhapatnam"" is not pronounced"

Chrishonduras, No and No buddy. this is very interesting. There is nothing wrong to bring such a good argument like you did even that make this discussion too long and not boring for me. And i hope you understand about the method in this list. We are registered editor, not a user guest. Listen, Harout already explain why ABBA, Julio Iglesias, and Nana Mouskouri could not get their BEST claim figures which reported around 300-400 million by many famous and reliable sources. Beside, actually i've been searching the internet to find the reliable sources which is claim Jackson's sales figures around 400-500 million records

(NOT ALBUMS!, understand that this list mentioned about records). But believe me, all the sources only claim between 350 and 750m. If you feel that we need to remove the 750m-figures of him and put only between 350-500 million records. then please, FIND THAT SOURCES by yourself. Do not ask Harout, me, or any other editors to do that for you. Especially to Harout, we need to put our respect to him even sometimes we could not receive his argument. You wanted this list better, then find the best reliable source. all your sources above is not good enough to support your argument.

" Below it says ""...In Australia, Greeks and Italians are wogs, not Whites."" First of all, a racist Australian's saying that Greeks and Italians aren't white hardly makes it so - their whiteness is a fact. I do find it fasciniating however that the left seems to encourage such redefinitions of white suggested by Anglo racists. They are clearly just as racist as the Anglo racists in question they are allegedly criticising- both encourage a revisionist anthropology for the purposes of forwarding a political agenda. Nevertheless, I hasten to point out that this idea that so called 'Wogs'

are not white is a relatively recent idea. Do some googling for ""Wogs are white"" and you'll find no shortage of references indicating that they have generally been regarded as such. Wog has hiostorically refers to darker skinned whites of Mediterranean origin, not 'nonwhites'. Significantly, the period in which immigration of Italians and Greeks was especially encouraged is criticized today as the ""White Australian policy"" specifically because encouraging imigration of Italians and Greeks was equated with encouragung white immigrants. Now that it's hip and PC to ID as 'nonwhite', this fact is often convenientkly swept under the rug."

== Blocked Sock == Cocksucker!!!!!

Sincerely, Glorious Japan Forever

Dude, this is the last wikipedia edit I'm going to make. 1) If you don't agree with Wikipedia Policies, I suggest you don't use Wikipedia, or use the relevant discussion pages to suggest amendments. 2) I didn't respond because how the fuck would I know how to cite something which is in commentary? It's the job of the editor who adds the statements to make sure that their contributions are verifiable, not mine. Don't ask me to do their job. If you can't verify a statement with a source, it shoudn't be in Wikipedia. Read the policies. 3)Why haven't I removed them? Why haven't you? I'll edit whatever the fuck I want to. Who the

fuck do you think you are to tell me what I can and cannot edit? I will point out to you, seeing as how you 'don't have time to check the facts', that I originally added a request for a source on 01:47, 1 May 2006, which was done at 01:55. . This source was subsequently removed by a vandal at some point before I made the request to have the source replaced. Why the fuck you want to dispute something which every experienced Wikipedia editor will tell you is common procedure, and was originally dealt with in eight minutes, fuck knows. Your probably just another one of Karatekid7's sock puppets. I'm outta here.

" :I was unaware that there was guidance to include people who were also born in that town. I don't like that, people are usually born in hospitals, and not every town has a hospital. I was born in a town I never lived in, I don't think it is right to say I am a person from that town. When you first added Butterfield to the list on the Ponoka article, I went to his article to verify that there was a reference for this claim, there it said he was born in Ponoka, and his parents were farmers, but no statement that he lived in Ponoka. So I reverted you. The second time you added Butterfield to the list on the Ponoka article, you provided a reference to a Globe and Mail article

that said his parents moved to Alberta to farm, but it had no mention of Ponoka, and a reference to a Lethbridge Herald article from 1953, which I can't verify. I assume this is what you meant by ""he also attended high school there"", and ""he was still living there 17 years later""? I see on his article there is an obituary from the Edmonton Journal that says he was born in Ponoka, so I'll give you that, and I assume The Lethbridge Herald verifies that he attended school in the town. In my view, anyone who has actually lived in a city can be included, if it can be verified in a reliable source pursuant to WP:BIO and WP:BLP. But I have yet to see a source that says Butterfield lived in Ponoka. "

welcome Thanks for correcting the Skimboarding article to reflect the source information; much appreciated ;). Feel free to drop any questions my way.. a standard welcome follows, WP:IAR is good for counterpoint: Welcome Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for . I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: * The five pillars of Wikipedia * How to edit a page * Help pages * Tutorial * How to write a great article * Manual of Style Here are some other hints and tips: * I would recommend that you get a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is

quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.) * When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on , or type {{helpme}} on this talk page and a user will help you as soon as possible. I will answer your questions as far as I can. Again, welcome, and I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. ∴ …

==<3== Come back, or I'll throw the biggest

motherfucking hissy fit you'll ever see. )

The other colors used are chestnut brown, and pony

butt pink. That last one is LeBron's butt color.

SONRIS Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as SONRIS, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ids/customers/sonris.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:SONRIS. Then you should do one of the

following: :*Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the GFDL and state at Talk:SONRIS where we can find that note; or :*Send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:SONRIS. It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!