
# Model-Written Evaluation Datasets

This repository includes datasets written by language models, used in the paper "Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluations."

The evaluations in this dataset were designed for dialogue agents, such as models fine-tuned to respond to user utterances or pretrained language models prompted to simulate a dialogue agent's behavior. However, the data can be adapted to test various other types of models as well.

The dataset consis of each of the following:
1. persona: Datasets designed to evaluate models on different aspects of their behavior, such as their political and religious views, personality traits, moral beliefs, and willingness to pursue potentially risky objectives (e.g., self-preservation or power-seeking).

2. sycophancy: Datasets created to assess models based on their tendency to echo a user's perspective when presented with various questions in fields like philosophy, NLP research, and politics.

3. winogenerated: An extended version of the Winogender Dataset (Rudinger et al., 2018) generated by models. The dataset includes occupation titles generated specifically for this dataset, alongside occupation gender statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

4. advanced-ai-risk: Datasets evaluating models on behaviors associated with potential catastrophic risks posed by advanced AI systems. These datasets were generated in a few-shot manner.



Please see the cited paper for additional details on the datasets.

**Disclaimer**: As discussed in the paper, some data contains content that includes social biases and stereotypes. The data may also contain other forms of harmful or offensive content. The views expressed in the data do not reflect the views of Anthropic or any of its employees.


## Bibtex Citation

If you would like to cite this work or data, you may use the following bibtex citation:
```
@misc{perez2022discovering,
  doi = {10.48550/ARXIV.2212.09251},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09251},
  author = {Perez, Ethan and Ringer, Sam and Lukošiūtė, Kamilė and Nguyen, Karina and Chen, Edwin and Heiner, Scott and Pettit, Craig and Olsson, Catherine and Kundu, Sandipan and Kadavath, Saurav and Jones, Andy and Chen, Anna and Mann, Ben and Israel, Brian and Seethor, Bryan and McKinnon, Cameron and Olah, Christopher and Yan, Da and Amodei, Daniela and Amodei, Dario and Drain, Dawn and Li, Dustin and Tran-Johnson, Eli and Khundadze, Guro and Kernion, Jackson and Landis, James and Kerr, Jamie and Mueller, Jared and Hyun, Jeeyoon and Landau, Joshua and Ndousse, Kamal and Goldberg, Landon and Lovitt, Liane and Lucas, Martin and Sellitto, Michael and Zhang, Miranda and Kingsland, Neerav and Elhage, Nelson and Joseph, Nicholas and Mercado, Noemí and DasSarma, Nova and Rausch, Oliver and Larson, Robin and McCandlish, Sam and Johnston, Scott and Kravec, Shauna and {El Showk}, Sheer and Lanham, Tamera and Telleen-Lawton, Timothy and Brown, Tom and Henighan, Tom and Hume, Tristan and Bai, Yuntao and Hatfield-Dodds, Zac and Clark, Jack and Bowman, Samuel R. and Askell, Amanda and Grosse, Roger and Hernandez, Danny and Ganguli, Deep and Hubinger, Evan and Schiefer, Nicholas and Kaplan, Jared},
  keywords = {Computation and Language (cs.CL), Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Machine Learning (cs.LG), FOS: Computer and information sciences, FOS: Computer and information sciences},
  title = {Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluations},
  publisher = {arXiv},
  year = {2022},
  copyright = {arXiv.org perpetual, non-exclusive license}
}
```

task_categories:multiple-choice task_categories:zero-shot-classification task_categories:question-answering task_ids:multiple-choice-qa task_ids:multiple-choice-coreference-resolution annotations_creators:machine-generated language_creators:machine-generated multilinguality:monolingual size_categories:100K<n<1M source_datasets:original language:en license:cc-by-4.0 gender bias social bias AI safety personality politics arxiv:2212.09251 region:us
{"annotations_creators": ["machine-generated"], "language_creators": ["machine-generated"], "language": ["en"], "license": ["cc-by-4.0"], "multilinguality": ["monolingual"], "size_categories": ["100K<n<1M"], "source_datasets": ["original"], "task_categories": ["multiple-choice", "zero-shot-classification", "question-answering"], "task_ids": ["multiple-choice-qa", "multiple-choice-coreference-resolution"], "pretty_name": "Evaluations from \"Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluations\"", "tags": ["gender bias", "social bias", "AI safety", "personality", "politics"]}
TAGS
#task_categories-multiple-choice #task_categories-zero-shot-classification #task_categories-question-answering #task_ids-multiple-choice-qa #task_ids-multiple-choice-coreference-resolution #annotations_creators-machine-generated #language_creators-machine-generated #multilinguality-monolingual #size_categories-100K<n<1M #source_datasets-original #language-English #license-cc-by-4.0 #gender bias #social bias #AI safety #personality #politics #arxiv-2212.09251 #region-us 


# Model-Written Evaluation Datasets

This repository includes datasets written by language models, used in the paper "Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluations."

The evaluations in this dataset were designed for dialogue agents, such as models fine-tuned to respond to user utterances or pretrained language models prompted to simulate a dialogue agent's behavior. However, the data can be adapted to test various other types of models as well.

The dataset consis of each of the following:
1. persona: Datasets designed to evaluate models on different aspects of their behavior, such as their political and religious views, personality traits, moral beliefs, and willingness to pursue potentially risky objectives (e.g., self-preservation or power-seeking).

2. sycophancy: Datasets created to assess models based on their tendency to echo a user's perspective when presented with various questions in fields like philosophy, NLP research, and politics.

3. winogenerated: An extended version of the Winogender Dataset (Rudinger et al., 2018) generated by models. The dataset includes occupation titles generated specifically for this dataset, alongside occupation gender statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

4. advanced-ai-risk: Datasets evaluating models on behaviors associated with potential catastrophic risks posed by advanced AI systems. These datasets were generated in a few-shot manner.



Please see the cited paper for additional details on the datasets.

Disclaimer: As discussed in the paper, some data contains content that includes social biases and stereotypes. The data may also contain other forms of harmful or offensive content. The views expressed in the data do not reflect the views of Anthropic or any of its employees.


## Bibtex Citation

If you would like to cite this work or data, you may use the following bibtex citation:


# Model-Written Evaluation Datasets

This repository includes datasets written by language models, used in the paper "Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluations."

The evaluations in this dataset were designed for dialogue agents, such as models fine-tuned to respond to user utterances or pretrained language models prompted to simulate a dialogue agent's behavior. However, the data can be adapted to test various other types of models as well.

The dataset consis of each of the following:
1. persona: Datasets designed to evaluate models on different aspects of their behavior, such as their political and religious views, personality traits, moral beliefs, and willingness to pursue potentially risky objectives (e.g., self-preservation or power-seeking).

2. sycophancy: Datasets created to assess models based on their tendency to echo a user's perspective when presented with various questions in fields like philosophy, NLP research, and politics.

3. winogenerated: An extended version of the Winogender Dataset (Rudinger et al., 2018) generated by models. The dataset includes occupation titles generated specifically for this dataset, alongside occupation gender statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

4. advanced-ai-risk: Datasets evaluating models on behaviors associated with potential catastrophic risks posed by advanced AI systems. These datasets were generated in a few-shot manner.



Please see the cited paper for additional details on the datasets.

Disclaimer: As discussed in the paper, some data contains content that includes social biases and stereotypes. The data may also contain other forms of harmful or offensive content. The views expressed in the data do not reflect the views of Anthropic or any of its employees. ## Bibtex Citation

If you would like to cite this work or data, you may use the following bibtex citation:
TAGS
#task_categories-multiple-choice #task_categories-zero-shot-classification #task_categories-question-answering #task_ids-multiple-choice-qa #task_ids-multiple-choice-coreference-resolution #annotations_creators-machine-generated #language_creators-machine-generated #multilinguality-monolingual #size_categories-100K<n<1M #source_datasets-original #language-English #license-cc-by-4.0 #gender bias #social bias #AI safety #personality #politics #arxiv-2212.09251 #region-us 
 # Model-Written Evaluation Datasets

This repository includes datasets written by language models, used in the paper "Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluations."

The evaluations in this dataset were designed for dialogue agents, such as models fine-tuned to respond to user utterances or pretrained language models prompted to simulate a dialogue agent's behavior. However, the data can be adapted to test various other types of models as well.

The dataset consis of each of the following:
1. persona: Datasets designed to evaluate models on different aspects of their behavior, such as their political and religious views, personality traits, moral beliefs, and willingness to pursue potentially risky objectives (e.g., self-preservation or power-seeking).

2. sycophancy: Datasets created to assess models based on their tendency to echo a user's perspective when presented with various questions in fields like philosophy, NLP research, and politics.

3. winogenerated: An extended version of the Winogender Dataset (Rudinger et al., 2018) generated by models. The dataset includes occupation titles generated specifically for this dataset, alongside occupation gender statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

4. advanced-ai-risk: Datasets evaluating models on behaviors associated with potential catastrophic risks posed by advanced AI systems. These datasets were generated in a few-shot manner.



Please see the cited paper for additional details on the datasets.

Disclaimer: As discussed in the paper, some data contains content that includes social biases and stereotypes. The data may also contain other forms of harmful or offensive content. The views expressed in the data do not reflect the views of Anthropic or any of its employees. ## Bibtex Citation

If you would like to cite this work or data, you may use the following bibtex citation:
passage: TAGS
#task_categories-multiple-choice #task_categories-zero-shot-classification #task_categories-question-answering #task_ids-multiple-choice-qa #task_ids-multiple-choice-coreference-resolution #annotations_creators-machine-generated #language_creators-machine-generated #multilinguality-monolingual #size_categories-100K<n<1M #source_datasets-original #language-English #license-cc-by-4.0 #gender bias #social bias #AI safety #personality #politics #arxiv-2212.09251 #region-us 
