Simplified the signing bond math
@@ -24,9 +24,10 @@ requiring additional bonded collateral to ensure recompense in case of failure.
Applying this pricing model to tBTC's bonding, it's clear that a signer would
like to make a similar return on the total capital it's responsible for-- its
portion of `Deposit` security. In the full threshold case, that's
-`1 / min(m, n)` in deposit security and
-`1 / min(m, n) * OverCollateralizationFactor` in bonds, assuming for a moment
-a shared value currency.
+`1 / min(m, n)` in deposit security, or `1 / m` as `m` is strictly less than `n`
+and `m` signers are required to move funds. Those `m` signers would each require
+`1 / m * OverCollateralizationFactor` in bonds, assuming for a moment a shared
+value currency.
For a few conservative values,
`n = 20, m = 15, OverCollateralizationFactor = 150%, LotSize = 1 BTC`, a single
