Clarify how to use the reviewers section of the template
@@ -28,13 +28,17 @@ Start by filling out this header template with metadata for this enhancement.
* Enhancements should have agreement from all stakeholders prior to merging.
-* `reviewers`: This can be anyone that has an interest in this work.
+* `reviewers`: This can be anyone that has an interest in this work or the expertise
+ to provide a useful input/assessment. At a minimum it should include the lead for
+ any team that will need to do work for this EP, or whose team will own/support the
+ resulting implementation. Please indicate what aspect of the EP you expect them
+ to be concerned with so they do not always need to review the entire EP in depth.
* `approvers`: All enhancements must be approved, but the appropriate people to
approve a given enhancement depends on its scope. If an enhancement is
limited in scope to a given team or component, then a peer or lead on that
team or pillar is an appropriate approver. If an enhancement captures
- something more broad in scope, then a member of the OpenShift architects team
+ something more broad in scope, then a member of the OpenShift staff engineers team
or someone they delegate would be appropriate. Examples would be something
that changes the definition of OpenShift in some way, adds a new required
dependency, or changes the way customers are supported. Use your best
