Avoid duplicated APLOGNO.
In this case, the difference is tiny, but it could ease diagniostic (and numbers are cheap anyway)
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static APR_INLINE apr_status_t ldap_cache_lock(util_ldap_state_t *st, request_re
ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_CRIT, rv, r, APLOGNO(10134) "LDAP cache lock failed");
}
else {
- ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_CRIT, rv, NULL, APLOGNO(10134) "LDAP cache lock failed");
+ ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_CRIT, rv, NULL, APLOGNO(10165) "LDAP cache lock failed");
}
ap_assert(0);
}
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static APR_INLINE apr_status_t ldap_cache_unlock(util_ldap_state_t *st, request_
ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_CRIT, rv, r, APLOGNO(10135) "LDAP cache unlock failed");
}
else {
- ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_CRIT, rv, NULL, APLOGNO(10135) "LDAP cache unlock failed");
+ ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_CRIT, rv, NULL, APLOGNO(10166) "LDAP cache unlock failed");
}
ap_assert(0);
}
