Remove a useless and erroneous precision about the upper limit of LimitRequestFields.
While at it, improve an unrelated syntax highlight somewhere else.
[skip ci]
@@ -2165,7 +2165,7 @@ ForceType image/gif
<p>Finally, if you have <a
href="mod_authz_host.html#reqhost">hostname-based Require
directives</a>, a hostname lookup will be performed regardless of
- the setting of <code>HostnameLookups</code>.</p>
+ the setting of <directive>HostnameLookups</directive>.</p>
</usage>
</directivesynopsis>
@@ -2863,8 +2863,8 @@ will be accepted from the client</description>
<contextlist><context>server config</context><context>virtual host</context></contextlist>
<usage>
- <p><var>Number</var> is an integer from 0 (meaning unlimited) to
- 32767. The default value is defined by the compile-time
+ <p>Setting <var>number</var> at 0 means unlimited.
+ The default value is defined by the compile-time
constant <code>DEFAULT_LIMIT_REQUEST_FIELDS</code> (100 as
distributed).</p>
