Update LOC comparison.
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ ex100: func v
| execution [2] | **1.0** (3.1s) | 5.9 (18.3s) | **0.94** (2.9s) | 2.05 (6.34s) |
| code size [3] | **1.0** (175KB) | 0.65 (114KB) | **144** (25.2MB) | 144 (25.2MB) |
| startup [4] | **1.0** (1.3us) | 1.0 (1.3us) | **9310** (12.1ms)| 9850 (12.8ms) |
- | LOC [5] | **1.0** (4.2K) | 0.26 (1.1K) | **329** (1480K) | 329 (1480K) |
+ | LOC [5] | **1.0** (9.5K) | 0.58 (5.5K) | **155** (1480K) | 155 (1480K) |
[1] is based on wall time of compilation of sieve code (w/o any include file and memory File System for GCC) 100 times
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ ex100: func v
[4] is based on wall time of generation of object code for empty C file or generation of empty MIR module through API
- [5] is based only on files required for x86-64 C compiler and MIR generator and interpreter files
+ [5] is based only on files required for x86-64 C compiler and files for minimal program to create and run MIR code
## MIR project competitors
* I only see two real universal light-weight JIT competitors
