Well said Armin,must agree, what happens like you say if there is a slump in Whisky consumption in decades to come.
The Population on the Island is less than 4000 so it’s mostly uninhabited. This is a good thing. Huge demand globally for these spirits so I say great and its a good for the jobs and local economy. The metrics would probably show the island economy is mostly spirits. If they are looking for workers I’d love to work at a distillery and learn all about it.
That’s exactly my point: The demand is huge now. But after every boom comes a bust. And then? Where are the worker going to go in a monoculture?
Armin Grewe I think this is an example of a recession “Proof” industry. If there’s a black Tuesday the first thing people will do is reach for the bottle of the liquid Gold ($$$). Anyhow the stuff will sit in casks for at least 12 years anyway.
Armin Grewe the monoculture of the island is probably sheep. It’s mostly grassland so goat cheese lamb and wool seem like logical produce (salmon?). Goods like produce will fair better in tough economic times that tourism will. Tourism is discretionary expenditures whereas food is a necessity.
I read about some small islands off the north shore where there are ancient settlements. I also read about one of the oldest Celtic crosses in Europe. The Island should be in the process of developing and cataloging all of those archeological sites to promote ethnic (gaelic and celtic) tourism so people can go and see the ruins and see displays etc. Then go for some of the local fish and brew at a nice restaurant or camp on a beach.
Tim Helmer they already do this. Although camping on beaches is not the wonderful idea it sounds and can lead to all sorts of pollution unfortunately.
The produce you mention is and can only ever be relatively small scale.
Hundreds, perhaps thousands, of ignorant punters traipsing all over Islay only because of its whisky is a bad idea for the island.
I agree. There’s far more to Islay than whisky. At least the weather stops it becoming a Magaluf!
Irena Krasinska-Lobban I have my grandmothers History of Islay book, family photos from the 1850’s and Laggan Farm and that’s about it. I plan to visit the island in the next 5-10 years. Never been there. Diversification is great but obviously with only 3500 residents the public coffers are limited as to what they can do. It’s a sleepy place I gather.
Michael Small whisey tourism huh. Well what else can do you think can be done?
I think it’s the Ileachs who should decide what can be done. Outside interference in a small(ish) community can be very detrimental. The highlands and island have suffered greatly at the hands of people and organisations who have changed things ‘for their own good’.
Tim Helmer Is there any reason to drastically alter the existing culture of the island? Not likely.
In recent years the island has lost nearly all of its dairy herd and its cheese making. Sure there remains sheep and beef. Farmers are turning to growing barley for the ethos of Islay whisky completely from Islay.
Yes, Islay whisky has a global market for single malt and for blending and the current distilleries can sell all they make.
Two things worry me, all eggs in one basket – if something happens to global whisky consumption, Islay is in serious trouble, the other point is that the island infrastructure, specifically road, ferry, waste disposal and water supply are under considerable strain at present. With existing distilleries looking to massively increase production and 4 new distilleries in the pipeline, in addition to rum and gin production, can the island cope??
Some good points made in your post, not least regards infrastructure. I’ve said elsewhere that I think the drinks industry needs to feather its own (island) nest a little bit more and provide some financial support. /continued….
That seems odd when you take into account the island population was double what it is now during the late 1800’s. Just goes to show how wasteful of resources like water the modern lifestyle is. The water these distilleries use is metered no? Hopefully if they’re not using native peat filter water they pay their fair share for the upkeep and development of the local water supplies. I just spent the last hour going through the Wikipedia page on Islay. Seems to me the Island has always been in the ownership of one individual or another; Dominus Insularum—”Lord of the Isles”. Perhaps some day in the future the Island can buy back its own land so that the locally elected government and island inhabitants can take a more self directed approach rather than letting external market economics dictate the course of business. That would be a first in the Islands long and complex history.
Michael Small Drastically altering the culture is not likely unless people start moving back onto the island and it reaches its former population of over 7000. Back in the day most folks were farming but to see economic growth on the island perhaps some other industry could be started. There is the potential for mining perhaps. The Island has a complex geology. I’m just brainstorming here because some of the people on this post have expressed worry for the Islands economic future. Not like Pitcairn Island though, now there is an island in trouble. They actively encouraging people to move to the island.
Jim Loudon Yes I see that and then by 1891 it was down to just over 7500. My great grandfather John Dunlop rented Lagan Farm but eventually he became annoyed at the increasing rent so they sold everything and moved to Canada in about 1900.
Jim Loudon oh, well that is just great, it’s like socialism but on a small scale. They set a good example. A person could just take out a 99 year lease from the community. All profit stays with the island and is not bleed off to external landlords living elsewhere where they no doubt spend the profits to suit themselves and not the community that generated it.
Islay is an interesting economic example. If I wanted to buy land from a wealthy landowner I need to waive a big bag of cash in his face. If the Island has 15000 people on it the cost goes up because the occupants are busy making money and can afford rent. If the Island is barren guess how much it’s worth? Not much. So the loss of population on Islay in the last century and a half is the direct result of the landlords putting an economic pinch on the Islanders and mismanaging the Islands financial well being. Kind of like slum lords who buy a hotel, bleed it for money yet not spending a penny on upkeep then turning it over for a profit. They destroy the hotel and make a big bag of cash. It’s sick. I think the concern of some of the posts on this thread for the future of the island are well founded. Perhaps the time has come for Islay to take back the Island and set up a trust fund like Eigg did.
You are being very unkind to the landowners on Islay,Tim Helmer, The land on Islay is, in the main, well managed and the owners do not put an ‘economic pinch’ on the inhabitants. In fact they are quite generous benefactors to the community in one way or another.
Whilst the owners of the larger estates may have business interests on the mainland they maintain homes on Islay and they and their families spend time there. They reinvest in their estates. Why would they not? The downtrodden tenants of the cruel landlords are, thankfully, confined to history as far as Islay is concerned – this is 2018 not 1818. They certainly are NOT like slum landlords.
If you wanted to buy land you would have to pay the market value and only if that land was put up for sale.
I would suggest that Wikipedia is not the best source of information if it is presenting such a feudal view.
The various land owners – and the rest of the population – all pay taxes of one sort or another. Some of these – e.g whisky duties, going straight into the UK Treasury others – i.e. Council Tax go to Argyll and Bute Council, under whose jurisdiction Islay lies.
There is not and never will be a ‘locally elected government’ on Islay and not possible for all monies generated to remain on the island.
Regarding buy outs – Eigg and Gigha are completely different – both these islands were private land in the ownership of one person with, inthe case of Eigg, no publicly owned infrastructure such as roads. Islay is in the ownership of many with a road networking owned and maintained (albeit not very well) by Argyll & Bute Counciland I would doubt whether Ileachs would ever want a ‘buy out’.
If even a small part of the whisky revenue, i.e. taxes & duty, from these many distilleries was allowed to stay on, and be invested in, Islay the infrastructure could be upgraded to cope. As things stand this will never happen.
As for the water, distilleries on Islay and the mainland draw their water from natural sources – mostly springs – and I do not know of any who draw from public water supplies.
Additionally – do not mistake uninhabited for unuseable. The land may not have dwellings but every acre of Islay is used for something, whether it is arable -used for crops; grassland – grazing for cattle and sheep; moorland – grazed by sheep or shot over for grouse, deer etc or for forestry; or water – let for fishing.
Yes, the population has decreased, as have populations all over the highlands and islands. Small crofts are not economically viable and the larger farms, on the mainland as well as Islay and other islands, became mechanised and no longer require a large workforce. People’s expectations have changed and sons and daughters are no longer expected, nor do they necessarily wish, to stay at home following the family occupation whatever that may be.
Tim Helmer there’s plenty of space in England as well. Plenty. The problem are the NIMBYs and the planning laws.
NIMBY’s, refuseniks, contrarians I get it. There are a lot of provincial attitudes.
Jim Loudon I read that it was also accomplished on another Hebridean Island Eriskay.