Documents attached to bibliography entries

Good-hearted Marlene Caterall puts forward the official line of provincial Liberals, ignoring the fact there is and always has been a publicly insured method of diagnosing sensitivities, and that the controversy is about the silly ideas of clinical ecology, not about the health complaint of persons with sensitivities. Her irresponsible assumption that there is a lack of science and a lack of clinical experience exemplifies, as well as anything, how prejudice and mythology in the hands of well meaning people who make irresponsible assumptions contributes to the unnecessary exclusion, injury and killing of person with sensitivities across Canada.