From: Daniel Bünzli <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rich@annexia.org>
Cc: Ocaml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>, oliver@first.in-berlin.de, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, Yawar Amin <yawar.amin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Build-/Installation-Tools - not enogh of them?
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 10:01:18 +0100
Message-ID: <etPan.5c0a36de.5de7cc77.a9b0@erratique.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181207082651.6f2w5tpuiljb327p@annexia.org>
On 7 December 2018 at 09:26:51, Richard W.M. Jones (rich@annexia.org) wrote:
> Most people who want per-user packaging are now using containers,
> using the existing Linux distro package managers.
I hope you realize this still doesn't solve the initial problem I mentioned (and is rather painful to work with as a developer). I'm afraid if system packagers would like their systems to be used for development they will need to focus quite a bit more on the developer user experience and interoperability. I'd be glad to see this happening but I'm afraid it's not.
Best,
Daniel
--
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-listhttps://inbox.ocaml.org/caml-list
Forum: https://discuss.ocaml.org/
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs