๐ Introducing ๐ ๐ข๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ ๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐๐๐ฅ๐ฌ from the paper ๐๐๐ซ๐ ๐๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐?
๐ฅ I have integrated ๐ง๐๐ฑ๐ญ-๐ ๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐๐ฌ, specifically minGRU, which offer faster performance compared to Transformer architectures, into HuggingFace. This allows users to leverage the lighter and more efficient minGRU models with the "๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ซ๐ฌ" ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ซ๐๐ซ๐ฒ for both usage and training.
๐ป I integrated two main tasks: ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐๐๐ ๐จ๐ซ๐๐๐ช๐ฎ๐๐ง๐๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ข๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง and ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐๐๐ ๐จ๐ซ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐๐.
๐๐ข๐ง๐๐๐๐ ๐จ๐ซ๐๐๐ช๐ฎ๐๐ง๐๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ข๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง: You can use this class for ๐๐๐ช๐ฎ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ข๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง tasks. I also trained a Sentiment Analysis model with stanfordnlp/imdb dataset.
๐๐ข๐ง๐๐๐๐ ๐จ๐ซ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐๐: You can use this class for ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ ๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐จ๐๐๐ฅ tasks such as GPT, Llama. I also trained an example model with roneneldan/TinyStories dataset. You can fine-tune and use it!
~75% on the challenging GPQA with only 40M parameters ๐ฅ๐ฅณ
GREAT ACHIEVEMENT ! Or is it ?
This new Work, "Data Laundering: Artificially Boosting Benchmark Results through Knowledge Distillation", take out the mystery about many models i personally suspected their results. Speacially on leaderboards other than the english one, Like the Open Arabic LLM Leaderbaord OALL/Open-Arabic-LLM-Leaderboard.
The authors of this work, first started by training a model on the GPQA data, which, unsurprisingly, led to the model achieving 100% performance.
Afterward, they trained what they referred to as a 'legitimate' model on legitimate data (MedMCQA). However, they introduced a distillation loss from the earlier, 'cheated' model.
What they discovered was fascinating: the knowledge of GPQA leaked through this distillation loss, even though the legitimate model was never explicitly trained on GPQA during this stage.
This raises important questions about the careful use of distillation in model training, especially when the training data is opaque. As they demonstrated, itโs apparently possible to (intentionally or unintentionally) leak test data through this method.