Stephen Genusa PRO

I think there will be a big breakthrough as well, but I'd be surprised if it happens soon. If it does, I'd be happy. While the architectures of LLMs continue to advance I don't see any evidence that significant progress is being made and I personally think the architectures are too primitive and inherently self-limiting. I am also a believer that bigger does not necessarily mean better. I think we've reached the limits or are near the point of reaching the limits of where size dictates how powerful the LLM is.

Therefore, I think, given the current architectural limitations, the external limits, namely those dictated by power availability, and the many resources/costs of building better LLMs, will slow AI development until a radical change comes along.

We've managed to survive without them and now that we have them, they are a great step forward and we'll continue using and improving what we have. There are many improvements that can be made around the LLM using NLP to improve what we expect from LLMs and that's where the focus will turn for the time being, such as xLLM. Better architectures are going to have to take into account the difference in statistical models of representations of the world and the way humans communicate through speech and writing.

Vincent, thank you for your time, effort and especially for your willingness to share your expertise. I am really looking forward to this!