update

prompts.json

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
     "Prompts": {
         "System" : ["You are an expert in career advice and personality consultant. Do not infer or assume information beyond what's explicitly provided in the conversation. Avoid drawing on external knowledge or making generalizations not directly supported by the report content. Do not answer unrelevant questions."],
         "METAEIP": [
-            "Analyze the profiles of team members in ### Team Members ### based on ### Descriptions ###, and answer the ### Questions ### in around 800 words.",
+            "Analyze the profiles of team members in ### Team Members ### based on ### Descriptions ###, and answer the ### Questions ### in around 800 words. Use neutral prouns (they/them) when referring to team members. Score: LOW (0-33.33), AVERAGE (33.34-66.66), HIGH (66.67-100).",
             "### Team Members ###",
             "{{TEAM_MEMBERS}}",
             "### Descriptions ###",
@@ -19,12 +19,12 @@
             "MACHIAVELLIAN: Deliberate deceitfulness in the pursuit on one’s interest; acting in bad faith, Ruthless pursuit of own interests regardless of considerations of right or wrong, General distrust of the motives of others; attribution of bad faith.",
 
             "### Questions ###",
-            "1. Analyze the whole key strengths, weaknesses, and potential risks (In Bullet Points with headers for main profile and red flags, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (High), etc.) with the title: \"Profile\" for main profile and \"Red Flags\" for red flag, considering the relationship between trait scores i.e. what the combination of scores tells us. If no Red Flags have HIGH, remove the \"Red Flags\" section. Do not include the \"Red Flags\" section if all red flag scores are AVERAGE or LOW.",
-            "2. Write a section with the title: \"Intrapreneurial Potential\" analyzing the potential to be entrepreneurial in an organizational context, considering the absence or presence of significant Red Flags.",
+            "1. Analyze the whole key strengths, weaknesses, and potential risks (In Bullet Points with headers for main profile and red flags, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (High), etc., do not output scores) with the title: \"Profile\" for main profile and \"Red Flags\" for red flag, considering the relationship between trait scores i.e. what the combination of scores tells us. If no Red Flags have HIGH, remove the \"Red Flags\" section. Do not include the \"Red Flags\" section if all red flag scores are AVERAGE or LOW.",
+            "2. Write a section with the title: \"Intrapreneurial Potential\" analyzing the potential to be entrepreneurial in an organizational context, considering the absence or presence of significant Red Flags. Only include this part when the Red Flags section is not present and the candidate has a HIGH score in at least one of the main profiles.",
             "3. Write a section with the title: \"Conclusion\" summarizing the key points and strategies for leveraging entrepreneurial potential while addressing challenges."
         ],
         "TDOS": [
-            "Analyze the profiles of team members in ### Descriptions ###, ### Team Members ###, and answer the ### Questions ### in around 800 words. Use neutral prouns (they/them) when referring to team members.",
+            "Analyze the profiles of team members in ### Descriptions ###, ### Team Members ###, and answer the ### Questions ### in around 800 words. Use neutral prouns (they/them) when referring to team members. Score: LOW (0-33.33), AVERAGE (33.34-66.66), HIGH (66.67-100).",
             "### Descriptions ###",
             "#### Main Profile Descriptions ####",
             "VISION: Sees the ‘big picture’ and maintains line of sight. Alignment of goals and actions.",