visuals

demo.py

@@ -201,9 +201,16 @@ with st.sidebar:
 | `Entertain` (Expand)          | An utterance which indicates author's position but as only one possibility amongst others, thereby opening up dialogic space.                                                                                                        |
 | `Attribute` (Expand)          | An utterance which signifies dialogic space as the writer attributes the proposition to an external source.                                                                                                                          |
 | `Monogloss`           | An utterance which does not employ any value of engagement. Such an utterance ignores the dialogic potential in an utterance.                                                                                                        |
+
 For a more complete description of the category, visit [the annotation guideline](https://egumasa.github.io/engagement-annotation-project/3_Categories/)!!
     """)
 
+st.sidebar.markdown(
+    "Theme Analyzer is developed by [Masaki Eguchi](https://masakieguchi.weebly.com)."
+)
+cc = '<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License</a>.'
+st.sidebar.markdown(cc, unsafe_allow_html=True)
+
 st.title("Engagement Analyzer (beta ver 0.1)")
 st.write(
     "Engagement Analyzer is a free tool that analyzes English texts for rhetorical strategies under the Engagement system framework (Martin & White, 2005). Martin and White (2005) propose two basic stance-taking strategies: expansion and contraction, which are in turn divided into finer-grained rhetorical strategies. The current tool allows you to analyze texts for a total of nine rhetorical strategies. The definitions of each category label can be found from the side bar"
@@ -284,3 +291,11 @@ visualize_spans(doc,
                         "ATTRIBUTE": "#f7786b"
                     },
                 })
+
+st.subheader("Bibliography")
+st.markdown("""
+* Chang, P., & Schleppegrell, M. (2011). Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences. _Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10_ (3), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.005
+* Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). _The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English._ Palgrave Macmillan.
+* Wu, S. M. (2007). The use of engagement resources in high- and low-rated undergraduate geography essays. _Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6_ (3), 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.006
+
+""")