input: Text: Dirty Laundry Now and then, a documentary film comes along that makes us re-examine the rules that unofficially govern the genre: Can there be a middle ground between fiction and fact? Can a documentary use scripted scenes and yet remain ontologically authentic? How much can you stylize material before you alter the reality that you're striving, at least in theory, to capture? Unmade Beds, Nicholas Barker's "'real life' feature film," has proudly worn its mongrel status as a "directed" documentary of single life in the big city, employing, in the face of criticism, what amounts to a cackling-punk defiance. The movie tracks four aging New Yorkers--two men, two women--through their lonely dating rituals, in the process depicting a universe of lusty, coupled-up haves and downcast, excluded have-nots, all viewed Rear Window -style through rectangular openings in the massive apartment houses in which they reside. This is not cinema vérité, and nothing has been left to chance. The director selected his four subjects from many hundreds of potential candidates, followed them around for months, and then scripted their monologues and dialogues to reflect what he says he saw. Calling his own film "an exercise in mendacity," Barker goes on, "I'm quite happy to tell lies about my characters and even collude with their self-delusions if it enables me to communicate larger dramatic truths." Spurned by U.S. distributors, Unmade Beds opened two weeks ago in a small screening room in downtown Manhattan, where it proceeded to set box office records and generate lots of (
  Question: The film review author gives all of the following reasons for his negative critique toward "Unmade Beds" EXCEPT that:
  
   (A) he believes the director has taken too many liberties to bend the characters to his own perceptions of them
   (B) he believes its scripted nature does not qualify it as a true documentary film
   (C) he believes the characters to be so vulgar that the audience cannot empathize with them
   (D) he believes the director does not ultimately communicate the more profound truths about society
  Answer:<extra_id_0>.
output: <extra_id_0> he believes the characters to be so vulgar that the audience cannot empathize with them<extra_id_1>