This would be relatively inexpensive and need not contradict the provision that the increase for areas with a geographical or natural handicap must not result in the total support granted for a priority exceeding 60% of public expenditure on that priority.
This would be relatively inexpensive and need not contradict the provision that the increase for areas with a geographical or natural handicap must not result in the total support granted for a priority exceeding 60% of public expenditure on that priority.