J. aware of the fact that, in order to compensate for earlier injustices or discrimination, there may be a need for temporary recourse to positive measures based on a ‘proactive’ concept of justice and possibly taking very different forms; whereas the establishment of quotas must be regarded as an extreme measure which may be applied only in accordance with the case-law established by the European Court of Justice and with due regard to the proportionality criterion,
J. apzinoties, ka, cenšoties izgaisināt senu netaisnību vai diskrimināciju, var izrādīties, ka kādu laiku ir jāizmanto labvēlīgi pasākumi, kas saistīti ar taisnīguma jēdziena tālredzīgu koncepciju un kas var būt ļoti dažāda veida; atgādinot, ka kvotu noteikšana jāuzskata par galēju pasākumu, kuru var piemērot tikai saskaņā ar Eiropas Kopienu Tiesas praksi, ievērojot proporcionalitātes principu;