This view is backed up by opinions of law firms which have been circulated in parliament, claiming that Article 95 is not the proper legal basis for access to repair information and that the relevant provisions are disproportionate.
Šo viedokli pamato Parlamentā izplatītie juridisko firmu atzinumi, kuros teikts, ka 95. pants nav piemērots tiesiskais pamats piekļuvei remonta informācijai un ka attiecīgie noteikumi ir nesamērīgi.