It therefore seems quite legitimate to take the view that this fact can be regarded as a case of 'fumus persecutionis': a decision not to proceed was taken where Mr Albertini was the injured party, while the request for dismissal was rejected and the matter referred for trial when he was the subject of an investigation.
Tāpēc šķiet diezgan pamatoti šo faktu uzskatīt par fumus persecutionis lietu — kad G. Albertini bija cietušais, tika pieņemts lēmums izbeigt lietu, bet, kad izmeklēšana tika veikta pret viņu, pieprasījums izbeigt lietu tika noraidīts un lieta tika nodota tiesai.