And if there is no longer any lawyer involved to act as a filter, it will be even harder to prevent criminal acts from being perpetrated - which is the precise opposite of what the legislation under consideration is intended to achieve.
En outre, si on en vient à éliminer le filtre de l’avocat, on rend encore plus difficile la prévention d’un éventuel acte criminel, obtenant l’effet inverse de celui recherché par la réglementation examinée.