Concretely, the abovementioned Article 26 of French Constitution cannot endanger Mr Onesta's prerogatives as a parliamentarian : firstly, he will not be subjected to any custodial measure, as his conviction has been suspended under the conditions laid down by Articles 132-29 to 132-38 of the French criminal code; secondly, although he has also been sentenced to pay a sum to the civil parties, this case is not covered by Article 26 of French Constitution.
Precīzāk, minētais Francijas konstitūcijas 26. pants nevar ietekmēt Gérard Onesta deputāta tiesības : pirmkārt, viņš netiks pakļauts nevienam uzraudzības pasākumam, jo viņa notiesāšana ir atlikta saskaņā ar Francijas kriminālkodeksa 132-29 pantu un 132-38 pantu; otrkārt, lai gan tiesa viņam jau ir piespriedusi samaksāt civilpersonām, šis jautājums neattiecas uz Francijas konstitūcijas 26. pantu.