Use the pitch to complete the assignment. The details are below:

Length: 1500 words

You will act as a member of the panel of investors to evaluate one of the venture pitches presented, called Helpmates. In your report, you will rate and provide a rationale for your rating of the new venture pitch. You will assess whether the new venture is a good investment opportunity (e.g., how favorable the business context, the attractiveness of the opportunity, the strength of the new venture team) and provide recommendations for the new venture (e.g. key strengths, key weaknesses and additional information or revisions). Your evaluation should be informed by the principles, concepts and frameworks provided below:
• Gartner. (1988). “Who Is an Entrepreneur?” Is the Wrong Question. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 12(4), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225878801200401
• Volery, & Mueller, S. (2018). Managing paradoxes and tensions: A key element of entrepreneurs’ leadership behaviour. In Volery & S. Mueller, Research Handbook on Entrepreneurship and Leadership (pp. 133–155).
• Dyer, Gregersen, H. B., & Christensen, C. M. (2009). The innovator’s DNA. Harvard Business Review, 87(12), 60–128.
• Kuratko, Morris, M. H., & Schindehutte, M. (2015). Understanding the dynamics of entrepreneurship through framework approaches. Small Business Economics, 45(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9627-3
• Eisenman. (1001). Entrepreneurship: A Working Definition. Harvard Business Revie. https://hbr.org/2013/01/what-is-entrepreneurship
• Zhao, & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Entrepreneurial Status: A Meta-Analytical Review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.259
• Markman, & Baron, R. A. (2003). Person–entrepreneurship fit: why some people are more successful as entrepreneurs than others. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(03)00018-4
• Claire, Lefebvre, V., & Ronteau, S. (2020). Entrepreneurship as practice: systematic literature review of a nascent field. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 32(3-4), 281–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2019.1641975
• Review, Brown, T., Christensen, C. M., Nooyi, I., & Govindarajan, V. (2020). HBR’s 10 Must Reads on Design Thinking (with featured article “Design Thinking” By Tim Brown). Harvard Business Review Press.
• Brown, & Wyatt, J. (2010). DESIGN THINKING FOR SOCIAL INNOVATION. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8(1), 31–.
• Review, Blank, S., Andreessen, M., Hoffman, R., & Sahlman, W. A. (2018). HBR’s 10 Must Reads on Entrepreneurship and Startups (featuring Bonus Article “Why the Lean Startup Changes Everything” by Steve Blank). Harvard Business Review Press.
• Review, Christensen, C. M., Johnson, M. W., McGrath, R. G., & Blank, S. (2019). Article: “Reinventing Your Business Model” by Mark W. Johnson, Clayton M. Christensen, and Henning Kagermann (Article featured in HBR’s 10 Must Reads on Business Model Innovation). Harvard Business Review Press.
• McMullen, & Shepherd, D. A. (2006). Entrepreneurial Action and the Role of Uncertainty in the Theory of the Entrepreneur. The Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 132–152. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.19379628
• Byrnes. (2520). How to create a winning post-pandemic business model. Harvard Business Review.
• Ulwick. (2002). Turn customer input into innovation. Harvard Business Review, 80(1), 91–97.
• Taneja. (8201). Building a startup that will last. Harvard Business Review, 2–6. https://hbr.org/2019/07/building-a-startup-that-will-last
• Gans, Scott, E. L., & Stern, S. (2018). Strategy for start-ups. Harvard Business Review, 96(3), 44–.
• Garvin, & Levesque, L. C. (2006). Meeting the challenge of corporate entrepreneurship. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 102–150.
• Binns, Harreld, J. B., O’reilly III, C., & Tushman, M. L. (2014). The art of strategic renewal. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(2), 21–23.
• Sawhney, Wolcott, R. C., & Arroniz, I. (2006). The 12 different ways for companies to innovate. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(3), 75–81.
• Aldrich, & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools Rush in? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation. The Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670. https://doi.org/10.2307/258740
• Moroz, & Hindle, K. (2012). Entrepreneurship as a Process: Toward Harmonizing Multiple Perspectives. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 781–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00452.x
• Liabilities of newness and size

How should you write the report?
For your assignment, you must use the template below:
A. RATE EACH CRITERIA (not included in word count) - 1 (Weak), 2 (Neutral), 3 (Strong), DK (Don’t Know), NA (Not applicable):
1. Context Evaluation:
• Favorable regulatory/societal context and trends 
• Favorable window of opportunity 
2. Market Evaluation:
• Attractive market 
• Clear customer needs 
• Value of offering to customers who are willing to pay 
3. Industry Evaluation:
• Favorable competitive dynamics 
• Available suppliers and partners 
4. Economics Evaluation:
• Financial strength of the opportunity 
• Potential for growth in the future 
5. Presentation Evaluation:
• Personal passion 
• Clear and compelling 
• Realistic 
• Ability to implement 
B. STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF THE PITCH:
Use the criteria you rated above to explain the strengths and weaknesses of the pitch by providing a rationale for your rating.
1. What are the key strengths of the Pitch?
2. What are the key weaknesses of the Pitch?
C. OUTCOME AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
Choose one of the three outcomes reported below for the Pitch: 
(A) Invite to submit the business plan 
(B) Invite to revise and then submit the business plan
(C) Do not invite to submit the business plan
Provide your conclusions and recommendations ONLY for the section below associated with the chosen outcome.
If you chose A “Invite to submit business plan”:
1. What are the key reasons you accepted the Pitch?
2. What recommendations would you give to the founders?
If you chose B “Invite to revise before submitting business plan”:
1. What additional information or revisions would you like the founders to add before submitting the Business Plan?
2. What recommendations would you give to the founders?
If you chose C “Do not invite to submit business plan”:
1. What are the key reasons you rejected the Pitch?
2. What recommendations would you give to the founders?

The word count for this assignment is 1500 words (excluding section A), which includes the template wording and in-text references but excludes the Reference List.
You must use at least eight of the list of resources provided to support your evaluation.

What are the grading criteria?
• 50%: Quality of analysis of the key strengths and weaknesses of the Pitch. Uses course content (e.g., theory, concepts, practices, processes, tools, guest lectures) to evaluate the new venture and its strategy discussing the limits and potential of the opportunity.
• 25%: Outcome and recommendations. The conclusions on accepting (or not accepting) the Pitch and the relevant recommendations are evidence-based and conceptually robust.
• 25%: Clarity of expression and conformity with instructions. Provide a deliverable of professional quality; each section of the document contributes to the composition of a cohesive report; conforms with instructions (word limit, referencing).
피치를 사용하여 과제를 완료하세요. 자세한 내용은 아래와 같습니다:길이: 1500단어여러분은 투자자 패널의 일원으로 헬프메이트라는 벤처 피치 중 하나를 평가하는 역할을 맡게 됩니다. 보고서에서 새로운 벤처 피치에 대한 평가와 평가의 근거를 제공해야 합니다. 신규 벤처가 좋은 투자 기회인지 평가하고(예: 비즈니스 환경, 기회의 매력도, 신규 벤처 팀의 강점), 신규 벤처에 대한 권장 사항(예: 주요 강점, 주요 약점, 추가 정보 또는 수정 사항)을 제공합니다. 평가는 아래 제공된 원칙, 개념 및 프레임워크에 따라 이루어져야 합니다:- Gartner. (1988). "기업가란 누구인가?" 잘못된 질문입니다. 기업가정신 이론과 실제, 12(4), 11-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225878801200401.- Volery, & Mueller, S. (2018). 역설과 긴장 관리: 기업가 리더십 행동의 핵심 요소. Volery & S. Mueller, 기업가 정신과 리더십에 관한 연구 핸드북 (133-155쪽).- Dyer, Gregersen, H. B., & Christensen, C. M. (2009). 혁신가의 DNA. 하버드 비즈니스 리뷰, 87(12), 60-128.- Kuratko, Morris, M. H., & Schindehutte, M. (2015). 프레임워크 접근법을 통한 기업가 정신의 역학 이해. 중소기업 경제학, 45(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9627-3- Eisenman. (1001). 기업가 정신: 실무적 정의. 하버드 비즈니스 리뷰. https://hbr.org/2013/01/what-is-entrepreneurship- Zhao, & Seibert, S. E. (2006). 빅 5 성격 차원과 기업가적 지위: 메타 분석적 검토. 응용 심리학 저널, 91(2), 259-271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.259- Markman, & Baron, R. A. (2003). 개인-기업가 정신 적합성: 왜 어떤 사람들은 다른 사람들보다 기업가로서 더 성공적인가. 인적 자원 관리 검토, 13(2), 281-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(03)00018-4- Claire, Lefebvre, V., & Ronteau, S. (2020). 실천으로서의 기업가 정신: 초기 분야에 대한 체계적인 문헌 검토. 기업가 정신과 지역 개발, 32(3-4), 281-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2019.1641975- 검토, 브라운, T., 크리스텐슨, C. M., 누이, I., & 고빈다라잔, V. (2020). HBR의 디자인 사고에 대한 10 가지 필독서 (추천 기사 "디자인 사고"Tim Brown의 기사 포함). 하버드 비즈니스 리뷰 프레스.- Brown, & Wyatt, J. (2010). 사회 혁신을 위한 디자인 사고. 스탠포드 사회 혁신 검토, 8(1), 31-.- 검토, 블랭크, S., 안드레센, M., 호프만, R., & 살만, W. A. (2018). 기업가 정신과 스타트업에 관한 HBR의 10가지 필독서(Steve Blank의 "린 스타트업이 모든 것을 바꾸는 이유" 보너스 기사 포함). 하버드 비즈니스 리뷰 프레스.- 검토, Christensen, C. M., Johnson, M. W., McGrath, R. G., & Blank, S. (2019). Article: "비즈니스 모델 재창조"(마크 W. 존슨, 클레이튼 M. 크리스텐슨, 헤닝 카거만 저)(HBR의 비즈니스 모델 혁신에 관한 10가지 필독서에 수록된 기사). 하버드 비즈니스 리뷰 프레스.- McMullen, & Shepherd, D. A. (2006). 기업가 이론에서 기업가적 행동과 불확실성의 역할. 아카데미 오브 매니지먼트 리뷰, 31(1), 132-152. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.19379628- Byrnes. (2520). 팬데믹 이후 성공적인 비즈니스 모델을 만드는 방법. 하버드 비즈니스 리뷰.- Ulwick. (2002). 고객 의견을 혁신으로 전환하십시오. 하버드 비즈니스 리뷰, 80(1), 91-97.- Taneja. (8201). 지속 가능한 스타트 업 구축. 하버드 비즈니스 리뷰, 2-6. https://hbr.org/2019/07/building-a-startup-that-will-last- Gans, Scott, E. L., & Stern, S. (2018). 스타트업을 위한 전략. 하버드 비즈니스 리뷰, 96(3), 44-.- Garvin, & Levesque, L. C. (2006). 기업 기업가 정신의 도전에 맞서기. 하버드 비즈니스 리뷰, 84(10), 102-150.- Binns, Harreld, J. B., O'reilly III, C., & Tushman, M. L. (2014). 전략적 리뉴얼의 기술. MIT 슬론 매니지먼트 리뷰, 55(2), 21-23.- Sawhney, Wolcott, R. C., & Arroniz, I. (2006). 기업이 혁신하는 12가지 방법. MIT 슬론 경영 리뷰, 47(3), 75-81.- Aldrich, & Fiol, C. M. (1994). 바보들이 달려들까? 산업 창출의 제도적 맥락. 아카데미 오브 매니지먼트 리뷰, 19(4), 645-670. https://doi.org/10.2307/258740- Moroz, & Hindle, K. (2012). 과정으로서의 기업가 정신: 여러 관점의 조화를 향하여. 기업가정신 이론과 실제, 36(4), 781-818. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00452.x- 새로움과 규모의 책임보고서는 어떻게 작성해야 하나요?과제를 위해서는 아래 템플릿을 사용해야 합니다:A. 각 기준 평가(단어 수에 포함되지 않음) - 1(약함), 2(중립), 3(강함), DK(모름), NA(해당 없음):1. 컨텍스트 평가:- 우호적인 규제/사회적 맥락 및 동향 - 유리한 기회의 창 2. 시장 평가:- 매력적인 시장 - 명확한 고객 니즈 - 기꺼이 지불할 의향이 있는 고객에게 제공하는 가치