\begin{table}[htb!]
\centering
{\small
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|cl||cc|c|}
\hline
& &gamma deviance &RMSE &average\\
\hline
  (0)&  null model &2.085& 35,311&24,641\\\hline
  (1a)&  gamma GLM &1.717& 32,562&25,105\\  
   (1b)&  gamma GLM recalibrated with $K=24$&1.641& 31,578&24,641\\\hline  
(2a)&  gamma FFNN &1.496& 29,673&24,526\\
  (2b)&  gamma FFNN recalibrated with $K=22$ &1.452& 28,806&24,641\\
  (2c)&  gamma FFNN tree adjustment with 4 bins (seed 1) &1.508& 29,371&24,641\\
  (2d)&  gamma FFNN tree adjustment with 8 bins (seed 2) &1.466& 27,942&24,641\\\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}}
\caption{Losses in the Swedish motorcycle example based on all available covariates. }
\label{results gamma 1}
\end{table}
gamma deviance RMSE average
(0) null model 2.085 35,311 24,641
(1a) gamma GLM
(1b) gamma GLM recalibrated with K = 24 1.717 32,562
1.641 31,578 25,105
24,641
(2a) gamma FFNN
(2b) gamma FFNN recalibrated with K = 22
(2c) gamma FFNN tree adjustment with 4 bins (seed 1)
(2d) gamma FFNN tree adjustment with 8 bins (seed 2) 1.496 29,673
1.452 28,806
1.508 29,371
1.466 27,942 24,526
24,641
24,641
24,641