Shepherd, seconded by Harry Blackwell, simply characterized it as ‘a therapeutic myth’, which, in their opinion, was based on ‘serious methodological shortcomings’ and ‘spurious claims’.
Shepard, bakket op af Harry Blackwell, karakteriserede det blot som "etnterapeutisk myte', der efter deres mening, var baseret på 'alvorlige metodiske mangler" og "falske påstande".