A recent re-appraisal of Henry's strategy of the Agincourt campaign incorporates these three accounts and argues that war was seen as a legal due process for solving the disagreement over claims to the French throne.
En nylig revurdering af Henriks strategi ved Agincourt-felttoget medtager disse tre beretninger og taler for, at det var set som en lovlig måde at løse uoverensstemmelser om kravet om Frankrigs trone.