Judge Jes Schioler believed that even though Ole Lundin, due to his age and other personal circumstances, would normally only be in a conditional punishment or community service, the circumstances of the theft were so serious that it had to be reflected in the punishment.
Dommer Jes Schiøler mente, at selv om Ole Lundin på grund af sin alder og sine øvrige personlige forhold normalt kun ville stå til en betinget straf eller samfundstjeneste, så var omstændighederne ved tyveriet så alvorlige, at det måtte afspejle sig i straffen.