If you could get a deal at Copenhagen, where people agreed, A, that there was a long-term target for carbon emission cuts, B, that there was short-range targets that had to be met so this wasn't just abstract; it was people actually making decisions now that would make a difference now, and if you could then find a financing mechanism that meant that the poorest countries that had been hurt by our inability to deal with climate change over many, many years and decades are given special help so that they can move to energy-efficient technologies, and they are in a position financially to be able to afford the long-term investment that is associated with cutting carbon emissions, then you are treating the world equally, by giving consideration to every part of the planet and the needs they have.
sa reducem emisiile de dioxid de carbon intr-un mod benefic pentru intreaga planeta. Niciodata nu am avut asa ceva inainte pentru ca [protocolul de la] Kyoto nu a functionat. Si daca am putea ajunge la o intelegere la Copenhaga, in care oamenii sa spuna ca, A, a fost o tinta pe termen lung in ce priveste reducerea emisiilor de carbon, B, a fost o tinta de valori care trebuie atinse pe termen scurt astfel incat sa nu fie doar ceva abstract, chiar sa fie oameni care iau decizii care sa faca o diferenta acum, si daca ai putea gasi apoi un mecanism de finantare care ar insemna ca cele mai sarace state care au fost afectate de inabilitatea noastra de a opri schimbarea climatica de-a lungul a ani si ani, decenii si decenii sunt ajutate spre a putea trece la tehnologii eficiente din punct de vedere energetic, si sunt in pozitia financiara de a-si putea permite investitia pe termen lung care e necesara pentru aceasta reducere a emisiilor de carbon, atunci tratezi lumea in mod egal,