AG: The answer to the question is hard for me because, on the one hand, I think that we should feel really great about the fact that the Republican nominee -- certain nominee -- John McCain, and both of the finalists for the Democratic nomination -- all three have a very different and forward-leaning position on the climate crisis. All three have offered leadership, and all three are very different from the approach taken by the current administration. And I think that all three have also been responsible in putting forward plans and proposals. But the campaign dialogue that -- as illustrated by the questions -- that was put together by the League of Conservation Voters, by the way, the analysis of all the questions -- and, by the way, the debates have all been sponsored by something that goes by the Orwellian label, "Clean Coal." Has anybody noticed that?
Raspunsul la aceasta intrebare e dificil pentru mine pentru ca, pe de-o parte, cred ca ar trebui sa ne simtim bine despre faptul ca nominalizatul Republican - nominalizatul sigur - John McCain, si ambii finalisti pentru nominalizarea Democrata - toti trei au diferite pozitii despre criza climatica. Toti trei au dovedit un spirit de conducator, si toti trei au abordat problema intr-un mod diferit fata de administratia curenta. Si cred ca toti trei sunt respnosabili pentru crearea de planuri si propuneri. Dar dialogul din campanie care - asa cum s-a vazut si din intrebari - a fost organizat de Liga Votantilor pentru Conservare, apropo, analizarea tuturor intrebarilor -- si , apropo, dezbaterile au fost sponsorizate de ceea ce poarta o eticheta Orwelliana "Carbune Curat." A observat cineva asta?