What happened was women, for example, who wanted the right to vote, took the Founding Fathers' concept of anatomical commonality being more important than anatomical difference and said, "The fact that we have a uterus and ovaries is not significant enough in terms of a difference to mean that we shouldn't have the right to vote, the right to full citizenship, the right to own property, etc."
갖고 싶어했던 여성들은, 헌법 제정자들의 해부학적 차이점보다 더 중요한 공통점 컨셉을 가져다가 말했습니다. “우리가 난소와 자궁을 가졌다는 사실은 우리가 투표를 해선 안된다는 것과, 완전한 시민권을 가지고, 재산을 소유하는 등의 관련 사실과는 별 관계가 없습니다.”