I mean that we have mathematically consistent theories that were actually introduced to explain a completely different phenomenon, OK, things that I haven't even talked about, that each predict the existence of a very weakly interacting, new particle.
Ma pean silmas et meil on matemaatiliselt terviklikud teooriad mille me võtsime kasutusele et seletad hoopis teist nähtust, OK, asju millest ma pole isegi rääkinud, mis kõik ennustavad väha nõrgalt koosmõjuva uue osakese olemasolu.