And in this pivotal, critical decision, instead of just telling the world that his old friend Hamilton was wrong and was adopting the wrong policies, he actually began to argue that Hamilton's ideas were unconstitutional -- that they violated the very nature of the Constitution that the two of them had drafted together.
In dieser ausschlaggebenden Entscheidung, statt einfach der Welt zu sagen, dass sein alter Freund Hamilton falsch lag und falsche Richtlinien verabschiedete, begann er zu argumentieren, dass Hamiltons Ideen verfassungswidrig seien, dass sie den Geist der Verfassung verletzen würden, die die beiden zusammen entworfen hatten.