Currently there is a problem when assessing monographs: lack of method and clear indicators to measure the prestige and quality of the publishers and their works. There are precedents that attempt to solve these deficiencies, but they have biases. Research groups (E-LECTRA or EPUC) and other entities (REBIUN, UNE, FECYT or ANECA) and doctoral programs ("Training in the Knowledge Society" - USAL), have revealed the nature of this problem that affects negatively on the perception people have of researchers and institutions.   On the other hand, to generate any evaluation system in the current landscape of scientific publishing, the technical needs of both publishers and resources must be taken into account by specific criteria and indicators and, as far as possible, trying to generate a multifunctional tool for all kinds of scientific publication. This paper tackles the steps to Creating quality standards for scientific content in digital environments through the development of a utility model.
['Almudena Mangas Vega', 'Raquel Gómez Díaz', 'José Antonio Cordón García']
Creating quality standards for scientific content in digital environments through the development of a utility model