External methods for evaluating MT systems define various measures based on MT results and their usage. While operational systems are mostly evaluated since long by task- based methods, evaluation campaigns of the last years use (parsimoniously) quite expensive subjective methods based on unreliable human judgments, and (for the most part) methods based on reference translations, that are impossible to use during the real usage of a system, less correlated with human judgments when quality increases, and totally unrealistic in that they force to measure progress on fixed corpora, endlessly retranslated, and not on new texts to be translated for real needs. There are also numerous biases introduced by the desire to diminish costs, in particular the usage of parallel corpora in the direction opposed to that of their production, and of monolingual rather than bilingual judges. We prove the above by an analysis of the history of MT evaluation, of the « mainstream » evaluation methods, and of certain recent evaluation campaigns. We propose to abandon the reference-based methods in external evaluations, and to replace them by strictly task-based methods, while reserving them for internal evaluations.
['Hervé Blanchon', 'Christian Boitet']
Pour l'évaluation externe des systèmes de TA par des méthodes fondées sur la tâche