Unsupervised ranking faces one critical challenge in evaluation applications, that is, no ground truth is available. While PageRank and its variants show a good solution in related objects, they are applicable only for ranking from link-structure data. In this work, we focus on unsupervised ranking from multi-attribute data which is also common in evaluation tasks. To overcome the challenge, we propose five essential meta-rules for the design and assessment of unsupervised ranking approaches: scale and translation invariance, strict monotonicity, compatibility of linearity and nonlinearity, smoothness, and explicitness of parameter size. These meta-rules are regarded as high level knowledge for unsupervised ranking tasks. Inspired by the works in [2] and [6], we propose a ranking principal curve (RPC) model, which learns a one-dimensional manifold function to perform unsupervised ranking tasks on multi-attribute observations. Furthermore, the RPC is modeled to be a cubic Bezier curve with control points restricted in the interior of a hypercube, complying with all the five meta-rules to infer a reasonable ranking list. With control points as model parameters, one is able to understand the learned manifold and to interpret and visualize the ranking results. Numerical experiments of the presented RPC model are conducted on two open datasets of different ranking applications. In comparison with the state-of-the-art approaches, the new model is able to show more reasonable ranking lists.
['Chun-Guo Li', 'Xing Mei', 'Bao-Gang Hu']
Unsupervised ranking of multi-attribute objects based on principal curves