Logic-based approaches for analyzing and evaluating arguments have been largely studied in recent years, yielding a variety of formal methods for argumentation-based reasoning. The goal of this paper is to provide an abstract, proof theoretical investigation of logical argumentation, where arguments are represented by sequents, conflicts between arguments are represented by sequent elimination rules, and deductions are made by dynamic proof systems extending standard sequent calculi.
['Ofer Arieli', 'Christian Straßer']
Deductive Argumentation by Enhanced Sequent Calculi and Dynamic Derivations