Let and $\mathcal A$ and $\mathcal B$ denote cryptographic primitives. $\mathcal A$(k,m)-robust $\mathcal A$-to-$\mathcal B$combiner is a construction, which takes m implementations of primitive ${\ensuremath{{\cal A}}}$ as input, and yields an implementation of primitive ${\ensuremath{{\cal B}}}$, which is guaranteed to be secure as long as at least k input implementations are secure. The main motivation for such constructions is the tolerance against wrong assumptions on which the security of implementations is based. For example, a (1,2)-robust $\mathcal A$-to-$\mathcal B$ combiner yields a secure implementation of ${\ensuremath{{\cal B}}}$ even if an assumption underlying one of the input implementations of ${\ensuremath{{\cal A}}}$ turns out to be wrong.#R##N##R##N#In this work we study robust combiners for private information retrieval (PIR), oblivious transfer (OT), and bit commitment (BC). We propose a (1,2)-robust PIR-to-PIR combiner, and describe various optimizations based on properties of existing PIR protocols. The existence of simple PIR-to-PIR combiners is somewhat surprising, since OT, a very closely related primitive, seems difficult to combine (Harnik et al., Eurocrypt'05). Furthermore, we present (1,2)-robust PIR-to-OT and PIR-to-BC combiners. To the best of our knowledge these are the first constructions of $\mathcal A$-to-$\mathcal B$ combiners with ${\ensuremath{{\cal A}}}\neq {\ensuremath{{\cal B}}}$. Such combiners, in addition to being interesting in their own right, offer insights into relationships between cryptographic primitives. In particular, our PIR-to-OT combiner together with the impossibility result for OT-combiners of Harnik et al. rule out certain types of reductions of PIR to OT. Finally, we suggest a more fine-grained approach to construction of robust combiners, which may lead to more efficient and practical combiners in many scenarios.
['Remo Meier', 'Bartosz Przydatek']
On robust combiners for private information retrieval and other primitives