Motivation: Aligning protein sequences with the best possible accuracy requires sophisticated algorithms. Since the optimal alignment is not guaranteed to be the correct one, it is expected that even the best alignment will contain sites that do not respect the assumption of positional homology. Because formulating rules to identify these sites is difficult, it is common practice to manually remove them. Although considered necessary in some cases, manual editing is time consuming and not reproducible. We present here an automated editing method based on the classification of ‘valid’ and ‘invalid’ sites.#R##N##R##N#Results: A support vector machine (SVM) classifier is trained to reproduce the decisions made during manual editing with an accuracy of 95.0%. This implies that manual editing can be made reproducible and applied to large-scale analyses. We further demonstrate that it is possible to retrain/extend the training of the classifier by providing examples of multiple sequence alignment (MSA) annotation. Near optimal training can be achieved with only 1000 annotated sites, or roughly three samples of protein sequence alignments.#R##N##R##N#Availability: This method is implemented in the software MANUEL, licensed under the GPL. A web-based application for single and batch job is available at http://fester.cs.dal.ca/manuel.#R##N##R##N#Contact: cblouin@cs.dal.ca#R##N##R##N#Supplementary information:Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
['Christian Blouin', 'Scott Perry', 'Allan Lavell', 'Edward Susko', 'Andrew J. Roger']
Reproducing the manual annotation of multiple sequence alignments using a SVM classifier