We discuss a number of issues in the definition, computation and comparison of PageRank values that have been addressed sparsely in the literature, often with contradictory approaches. We study the difference between  weakly and  strongly preferential PageRank, which patch the dangling nodes with different distributions, extending analytical formulae known for the strongly preferential case, and corroborating our results with experiments on a snapshot of 100 millions of pages of the  .uk domain. The experiments show that the two PageRank versions are poorly correlated, and results about each one cannot be blindly applied to the other; moreover, our computations highlight some new concerns about the usage of exchange-based correlation indices (such as Kendall's  ? ) on approximated rankings.
['Paolo Boldi', 'Roberto Posenato', 'Massimo Santini', 'Sebastiano Vigna']
Traps and Pitfalls of Topic-Biased PageRank