Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Abstract Two-sided mergers and acquisitions (M&A) fits have been regarded as a critical step, which should always be taken by a bidder company when trying to identify suitable target companies prior to an M&A.  proposes an approach to two-sided M&A fits based on a cross-efficiency model with contrasting attitudes. In this approach, firstly, feasible M&A fits are screened using a preference function from an M&A fit matrix, according to the preferences of both the bidder companies and target companies in terms of efficiency and return to scale. Secondly, two-sided M&A fits are selected from a feasible M&A fit matrix, according to the value of cross-efficiency with contrasting attitudes. This allows for the existence of contrasting attitudes of peers toward an M&A fit, as opposed to the aggressive, benevolent or neutral cross-efficiency evaluation which consists of just one attitude (either aggressive, benevolent or indifferent). Finally, an illustrative example is given to explain the feasibility and validity of the two-sided M&A fit strategy.
['Hailiu Shi', 'Ying-Ming Wang', 'Sheng-Qun Chen', 'Yi-Xin Lan']
I am writing a research paper on a idea An approach to two-sided M&A fits based on a cross-efficiency evaluation with contrasting attitudes
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea An approach to two-sided M&A fits based on a cross-efficiency evaluation with contrasting attitudes"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Abstract Two-sided mergers and acquisitions (M&A) fits have been regarded as a critical step, which should always be taken by a bidder company when trying to identify suitable target companies prior to an M&A.  proposes an approach to two-sided M&A fits based on a cross-efficiency model with contrasting attitudes. In this approach, firstly, feasible M&A fits are screened using a preference function from an M&A fit matrix, according to the preferences of both the bidder companies and target companies in terms of efficiency and return to scale. Secondly, two-sided M&A fits are selected from a feasible M&A fit matrix, according to the value of cross-efficiency with contrasting attitudes. This allows for the existence of contrasting attitudes of peers toward an M&A fit, as opposed to the aggressive, benevolent or neutral cross-efficiency evaluation which consists of just one attitude (either aggressive, benevolent or indifferent). Finally, an illustrative example is given to explain the feasibility and validity of the two-sided M&A fit strategy."}]