Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: With regard to e-voting system certification, political bodies around the world show very different approaches, ranging from high-level recommendations on the electoral system, not providing the associated details, to procedures that describe specific controls over critical components, not framing them in a "big picture". In this work,  compare and integrate two approaches that effectively represent the two extremes of the spectrum. In fact, the EU recommendation can be usefully adopted as a high- level guideline to keep in focus what the ultimate goal of a certification path should be. The U.S.A. field-tested procedures instead provide the necessary concreteness to the operative side of the certification path. The final result of this attempt at taking the best of both worlds is a step towards an applied methodology that turns a conceptually ll-conceived, but not directly applicable document into a real testing and certification manual, by exploiting the experience and guidance provided by more pragmatic, but less organized, sources.
['Marco Prandini', 'Marco Ramilli']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Taking the Best of Both Worlds: A Comparison and Integration of the U.S. I am writing a research paper on a idea and EU Approaches to E-Voting Systems Evaluation
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Taking the Best of Both Worlds: A Comparison and Integration of the U.S. I am writing a research paper on a idea and EU Approaches to E-Voting Systems Evaluation"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: With regard to e-voting system certification, political bodies around the world show very different approaches, ranging from high-level recommendations on the electoral system, not providing the associated details, to procedures that describe specific controls over critical components, not framing them in a \"big picture\". In this work,  compare and integrate two approaches that effectively represent the two extremes of the spectrum. In fact, the EU recommendation can be usefully adopted as a high- level guideline to keep in focus what the ultimate goal of a certification path should be. The U.S.A. field-tested procedures instead provide the necessary concreteness to the operative side of the certification path. The final result of this attempt at taking the best of both worlds is a step towards an applied methodology that turns a conceptually ll-conceived, but not directly applicable document into a real testing and certification manual, by exploiting the experience and guidance provided by more pragmatic, but less organized, sources."}]