Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: A description logics representation of the Foundational Model of Anatomy (FMA) in the b Ontology Language (OWL-DL) would allow developers to combine it with other OWL ontologies, and would provide the benefit of being able to access generic reasoning tools. Hover, the FMA is currently represented in a frame language. The differences beten description logics and frames are not only syntactic, but also semantic.  analyze some theoretical and computational limitations of converting the FMA into OWL-DL. Namely, some of the constructs used in the FMA do not have a direct equivalent in description logics, and a complete conversion of the FMA in description logics is too large to support reasoning. Therefore, an OWL-DL representation of the FMA would have to be optimized for each application.  propose a solution based on OWLFull, a superlanguage of OWL-DL, that meets the expressiveness requirements and remains application-independent. Specific simplified OWL-DL representations can then be generated from the OWLFull model by applications.  argue that this solution is easier to implement and closer to the application needs than an integral translation, and that the latter approach would only make the FMA maintenance more difficult.
['Olivier Dameron', 'Daniel L. Rubin', 'Mark A. Musen']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Challenges in converting frame-based ontology into OWL: the Foundational Model of Anatomy case-study.
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Challenges in converting frame-based ontology into OWL: the Foundational Model of Anatomy case-study."}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: A description logics representation of the Foundational Model of Anatomy (FMA) in the b Ontology Language (OWL-DL) would allow developers to combine it with other OWL ontologies, and would provide the benefit of being able to access generic reasoning tools. Hover, the FMA is currently represented in a frame language. The differences beten description logics and frames are not only syntactic, but also semantic.  analyze some theoretical and computational limitations of converting the FMA into OWL-DL. Namely, some of the constructs used in the FMA do not have a direct equivalent in description logics, and a complete conversion of the FMA in description logics is too large to support reasoning. Therefore, an OWL-DL representation of the FMA would have to be optimized for each application.  propose a solution based on OWLFull, a superlanguage of OWL-DL, that meets the expressiveness requirements and remains application-independent. Specific simplified OWL-DL representations can then be generated from the OWLFull model by applications.  argue that this solution is easier to implement and closer to the application needs than an integral translation, and that the latter approach would only make the FMA maintenance more difficult."}]