Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Cognitive radio networks (CRNs) have emerged as a promising solution to the ever-growing demand for additional spectrum resources and more efficient spectrum utilization. A large number of routing protocols for CRNs have been proposed recently, each based on different design goals, and evaluated in different scenarios, under different assumptions. Hover, little is known about the relative performance of all these protocols, let alone the tradeoffs among their different design goals. ,  conduct the first detailed, empirical performance comparison of three representative routing protocols for CRNs, under the same realistic set of assumptions. Our extensive simulation study shows that the performance of routing protocols in CRNs is affected by a number of factors, in addition to PU activity, some of which have been largely ignored by the majority of previous works.  find that different protocols perform ll under different scenarios, and investigate the causes of the observed performance. Furthermore,  present a generic software architecture for the experimental evaluation of CRN routing protocols on a test bed based on the USRP2 platform, and compare the performance of two protocols on a 6 node test bed. The test bed results confirm the findings of our simulation study.
['Li Sun', 'Wei Zheng', 'Naveen Rawat', 'Vikramsinh Sawant', 'Dimitrios Koutsonikolas']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Performance Comparison of Routing Protocols for Cognitive Radio Networks
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Performance Comparison of Routing Protocols for Cognitive Radio Networks"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Cognitive radio networks (CRNs) have emerged as a promising solution to the ever-growing demand for additional spectrum resources and more efficient spectrum utilization. A large number of routing protocols for CRNs have been proposed recently, each based on different design goals, and evaluated in different scenarios, under different assumptions. Hover, little is known about the relative performance of all these protocols, let alone the tradeoffs among their different design goals. ,  conduct the first detailed, empirical performance comparison of three representative routing protocols for CRNs, under the same realistic set of assumptions. Our extensive simulation study shows that the performance of routing protocols in CRNs is affected by a number of factors, in addition to PU activity, some of which have been largely ignored by the majority of previous works.  find that different protocols perform ll under different scenarios, and investigate the causes of the observed performance. Furthermore,  present a generic software architecture for the experimental evaluation of CRN routing protocols on a test bed based on the USRP2 platform, and compare the performance of two protocols on a 6 node test bed. The test bed results confirm the findings of our simulation study."}]