Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely:  presents a novel proof-theoretic account of dialogue coherence. It focuses on an abstract class of cooperative information-oriented dialogues and describes how their structure can be accounted for in terms of a multi-agent hybrid inference system that combines natural deduction with information transfer and observation.  show how certain dialogue structures arise out of the interplay beten the inferential roles of logical connectives (i.e., sentence semantics), a rule for transferring information beten agents, and a rule for information flow beten agents and their environment. The order of explanation is opposite in direction to that adopted in game-theoretic semantics, where sentence semantics (or a notion of valid inference) is derived from winning dialogue strategies. That approach and the current one may, hover, be reconcilable, since  focus on cooperative dialogue, whereas the game-theoretic tradition concentrates on adversarial dialogue.
['Paul Piwek']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Meaning and Dialogue Coherence: A Proof-theoretic Investigation
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Meaning and Dialogue Coherence: A Proof-theoretic Investigation"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely:  presents a novel proof-theoretic account of dialogue coherence. It focuses on an abstract class of cooperative information-oriented dialogues and describes how their structure can be accounted for in terms of a multi-agent hybrid inference system that combines natural deduction with information transfer and observation.  show how certain dialogue structures arise out of the interplay beten the inferential roles of logical connectives (i.e., sentence semantics), a rule for transferring information beten agents, and a rule for information flow beten agents and their environment. The order of explanation is opposite in direction to that adopted in game-theoretic semantics, where sentence semantics (or a notion of valid inference) is derived from winning dialogue strategies. That approach and the current one may, hover, be reconcilable, since  focus on cooperative dialogue, whereas the game-theoretic tradition concentrates on adversarial dialogue."}]