Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Everyday experience tells us that some errors are transient, but also that some can be handled simply by “retrying” the failed operation. For instance, a glitch on the network might turn a resource unreachable for a short period of time; or a sudden peak of work on a server can cause a momentary denial of service. In many occasions, without other kind of specialized recovery code, it is possible to keep a program running only by retrying a failed operation. Unfortunately, retry is not explicitly available on many platforms or programming languages and, even if it re, it could not be blindly used for dealing with every abnormal situation. On languages like C# or Java, or even on languages that offer the retry construct such as Smalltalk and Eiffel, where errors are represented and communicated through exceptions, there is no simple way to clear the effects of a failed operation and, thus, re-attempt its execution. Programmers have to explicitly write sometimes complex and error-prone code to repair the state of a program and the execution context. ,  propose an AOP technique for implementing “retry” on systems lacking such a feature without using any language extensions for AOP or imposing modifications to the development language. Our approach eliminates the need for programmers to write “state-cleaning” code for normal objects by means of a transparent transactional mechanism and provides the means to identify non-idempotent operations on the code. In our evaluation  show that a relevant number of application failures can be masked using this approach.
['Bruno Cabral', 'Paulo Marques']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Implementing Retry - Featuring AOP
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Implementing Retry - Featuring AOP"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Everyday experience tells us that some errors are transient, but also that some can be handled simply by \u201cretrying\u201d the failed operation. For instance, a glitch on the network might turn a resource unreachable for a short period of time; or a sudden peak of work on a server can cause a momentary denial of service. In many occasions, without other kind of specialized recovery code, it is possible to keep a program running only by retrying a failed operation. Unfortunately, retry is not explicitly available on many platforms or programming languages and, even if it re, it could not be blindly used for dealing with every abnormal situation. On languages like C# or Java, or even on languages that offer the retry construct such as Smalltalk and Eiffel, where errors are represented and communicated through exceptions, there is no simple way to clear the effects of a failed operation and, thus, re-attempt its execution. Programmers have to explicitly write sometimes complex and error-prone code to repair the state of a program and the execution context. ,  propose an AOP technique for implementing \u201cretry\u201d on systems lacking such a feature without using any language extensions for AOP or imposing modifications to the development language. Our approach eliminates the need for programmers to write \u201cstate-cleaning\u201d code for normal objects by means of a transparent transactional mechanism and provides the means to identify non-idempotent operations on the code. In our evaluation  show that a relevant number of application failures can be masked using this approach."}]