Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Virtual objects can be visualized inside real objects using augmented reality (AR). This visualization is called AR X-ray because it gives the impression of seeing through the real object. In standard AR, virtual information is overlaid on top of the real world. To position a virtual object inside an object, AR X-ray requires partially occluding the virtual object with visually important regions of the real object. In effect, the virtual object becomes less legible compared to when it is completely unoccluded. Legibility is an important consideration for various applications of AR X-ray. In this research,  explored legibility in two implementations of AR X-ray, namely, edge-based and saliency-based. In our first experiment,  explored on the tolerable amounts of occlusion to comfortably distinguish small virtual objects. In our second experiment,  compared edge-based and saliency-based AR X-ray methods when visualizing virtual objects inside various real objects. Moreover,  benchmarked the legibility of these two methods against alpha blending. From our experiments,  observed that users have varied preferences for proper amounts of occlusion cues for both methods. The partial occlusions generated by the edge-based and saliency-based methods need to be adjusted depending on the lighting condition and the texture complexity of the occluding object. In most cases, users identify objects faster with saliency-based AR X-ray than with edge-based AR X-ray. Insights from this research can be directly applied to the development of AR X-ray applications.
['Marc Ericson C. Santos', 'Igor de Souza Almeida', 'Goshiro Yamamoto', 'Takafumi Taketomi', 'Christian Sandor', 'Hirokazu Kato']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Exploring legibility of augmented reality X-ray
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Exploring legibility of augmented reality X-ray"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Virtual objects can be visualized inside real objects using augmented reality (AR). This visualization is called AR X-ray because it gives the impression of seeing through the real object. In standard AR, virtual information is overlaid on top of the real world. To position a virtual object inside an object, AR X-ray requires partially occluding the virtual object with visually important regions of the real object. In effect, the virtual object becomes less legible compared to when it is completely unoccluded. Legibility is an important consideration for various applications of AR X-ray. In this research,  explored legibility in two implementations of AR X-ray, namely, edge-based and saliency-based. In our first experiment,  explored on the tolerable amounts of occlusion to comfortably distinguish small virtual objects. In our second experiment,  compared edge-based and saliency-based AR X-ray methods when visualizing virtual objects inside various real objects. Moreover,  benchmarked the legibility of these two methods against alpha blending. From our experiments,  observed that users have varied preferences for proper amounts of occlusion cues for both methods. The partial occlusions generated by the edge-based and saliency-based methods need to be adjusted depending on the lighting condition and the texture complexity of the occluding object. In most cases, users identify objects faster with saliency-based AR X-ray than with edge-based AR X-ray. Insights from this research can be directly applied to the development of AR X-ray applications."}]