Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Two currently active strands of research on logics for multi-agent systems are dynamic epistemic logic, focusing on the epistemic consequences of actions, and logics of coalitional ability, focusing on what coalitions of agents can achieve by cooperating strategically.   bridge these topics by considering the question: “what can a coalition achieve by making public announcements?”.  propose an extension of public announcement logic with constructs of the form hGi’, where G is a group of agents, with the intuitive meaning that G can jointly execute a publicly observable action such that ’ will be true afterwards. Actions here are taken to be truthful public announcements, but turn out also to include sequences of such joint actions as ll as protocols with alternating actions by dierent agents, in response to the actions of others.  also study in detail the dierence beten ‘knowing how’ (knowing de re) and ‘knowing that’ (knowing de dicto) in our framework: both can elegantly be expressed in the single-agent case.  present several meta-logical properties of this Group Announcement Logic, including a sound and complete axiomatisation, expressivity and the complexity of model checking. The results are based on but greatly extend a part of [2].
['Thomas Ågotnes', 'Philippe Balbiani', 'Hans van Ditmarsch', 'Pablo Seban']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Group Announcement Logic
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Group Announcement Logic"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Two currently active strands of research on logics for multi-agent systems are dynamic epistemic logic, focusing on the epistemic consequences of actions, and logics of coalitional ability, focusing on what coalitions of agents can achieve by cooperating strategically.   bridge these topics by considering the question: \u201cwhat can a coalition achieve by making public announcements?\u201d.  propose an extension of public announcement logic with constructs of the form hGi\u2019, where G is a group of agents, with the intuitive meaning that G can jointly execute a publicly observable action such that \u2019 will be true afterwards. Actions here are taken to be truthful public announcements, but turn out also to include sequences of such joint actions as ll as protocols with alternating actions by dierent agents, in response to the actions of others.  also study in detail the dierence beten \u2018knowing how\u2019 (knowing de re) and \u2018knowing that\u2019 (knowing de dicto) in our framework: both can elegantly be expressed in the single-agent case.  present several meta-logical properties of this Group Announcement Logic, including a sound and complete axiomatisation, expressivity and the complexity of model checking. The results are based on but greatly extend a part of [2]."}]