Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Usability testing has long been considered a gold standard in evaluating the ease of use of software and bsites-producing metrics to benchmark the experience and identifying areas for improvement. Hover, logistical complexities and costs can make frequent usability testing infeasible. Alternatives to usability testing include various forms of expert reviews that identify usability problems but fail to provide task performance metrics. This case study describes a method by which multiple teams of trained evaluators generated task usability ratings and compared them to metrics collected from an independently run usability test on three software products. Although inter-rater reliability ranged from modest to strong and the correlation beten actual and predicted metrics did establish fair concurrent validity, opportunities for improved reliability and validity re identified. By establishing clear guidelines, this method can provide a useful usability rating for a range of products across multiple platforms, without costing significant time or money.
['Christian Rohrer', 'James Wendt', 'Jeff Sauro', 'Frederick Boyle', 'Sara Cole']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Practical Usability Rating by Experts (PURE): A Pragmatic Approach for Scoring Product Usability
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Practical Usability Rating by Experts (PURE): A Pragmatic Approach for Scoring Product Usability"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Usability testing has long been considered a gold standard in evaluating the ease of use of software and bsites-producing metrics to benchmark the experience and identifying areas for improvement. Hover, logistical complexities and costs can make frequent usability testing infeasible. Alternatives to usability testing include various forms of expert reviews that identify usability problems but fail to provide task performance metrics. This case study describes a method by which multiple teams of trained evaluators generated task usability ratings and compared them to metrics collected from an independently run usability test on three software products. Although inter-rater reliability ranged from modest to strong and the correlation beten actual and predicted metrics did establish fair concurrent validity, opportunities for improved reliability and validity re identified. By establishing clear guidelines, this method can provide a useful usability rating for a range of products across multiple platforms, without costing significant time or money."}]