Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely:  compares the characteristics of the series–series and double-sided Inductor-Capacitor-Capacitor (LCC) compensation topologies for electric vehicle (EV) wireless chargers. Both the ll-tuned and mistuned topologies for the two compensation methods are analyzed in detail. The mistuning considered here is mainly caused by the variations of the relative position beten the primary and secondary sides. The output por displacements caused by mistuning are compared for both compensation topologies, as ll as the impacts of the load variations on the performances of the mistuned topologies. The voltage and current stresses on components are also studied. The comparative result shows that the double-sided LCC compensation topology is less sensitive to mistuning. A double-sided LCC-compensated EV wireless charger system with up to 7.7-kW output por is built to verify the analysis results. A peak efficiency of 96% from dc por source to battery load is achieved.
['Weihan Li', 'Han Zhao', 'Junjun Deng', 'Siqi Li', 'Chunting Chris Mi']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Comparison Study on SS and Double-Sided LCC Compensation Topologies for EV/PHEV Wireless Chargers
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Comparison Study on SS and Double-Sided LCC Compensation Topologies for EV/PHEV Wireless Chargers"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely:  compares the characteristics of the series\u2013series and double-sided Inductor-Capacitor-Capacitor (LCC) compensation topologies for electric vehicle (EV) wireless chargers. Both the ll-tuned and mistuned topologies for the two compensation methods are analyzed in detail. The mistuning considered here is mainly caused by the variations of the relative position beten the primary and secondary sides. The output por displacements caused by mistuning are compared for both compensation topologies, as ll as the impacts of the load variations on the performances of the mistuned topologies. The voltage and current stresses on components are also studied. The comparative result shows that the double-sided LCC compensation topology is less sensitive to mistuning. A double-sided LCC-compensated EV wireless charger system with up to 7.7-kW output por is built to verify the analysis results. A peak efficiency of 96% from dc por source to battery load is achieved."}]