Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: the Internet was conceived as a decentralized net- work, the most widely used b applications today tend toward centralization. Control increasingly rests with cen- tralized service providers who, as a consequence, have also amassed unprecedented amounts of data about the behav- iors and personalities of individuals. Developers, regulators, and consumer advocates have looked to alternative decentralized architectures as the natural re- sponse to threats posed by these centralized services. The result has been a great variety of solutions that include per- sonal data stores (PDS), infomediaries, Vendor Relationship Management (VRM) systems, and federated and distributed social networks. And yet, for all these efforts, decentralized personal data architectures have seen little adoption. This position paper attempts to account for these failures, challenging the accepted wisdom in the b community on the feasibility and desirability of these approaches.  start with a historical discussion of the development of various categories of decentralized personal data architectures. Then  survey the main ideas to illustrate the common themes among these efforts.  tease apart the design character- istics of these systems from the social values that they (are intended to) promote.  use this understanding to point out numerous drawbacks of the decentralization paradigm, some inherent and others incidental.  end with recom- mendations for designers of these systems for working to- wards goals that are achievable, but perhaps more limited in scope and ambition.
['Arvind Narayanan', 'Vincent Toubiana', 'Solon Barocas', 'Helen Nissenbaum', 'Dan Boneh']
I am writing a research paper on a idea A Critical Look at Decentralized Personal Data Architectures
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea A Critical Look at Decentralized Personal Data Architectures"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: the Internet was conceived as a decentralized net- work, the most widely used b applications today tend toward centralization. Control increasingly rests with cen- tralized service providers who, as a consequence, have also amassed unprecedented amounts of data about the behav- iors and personalities of individuals. Developers, regulators, and consumer advocates have looked to alternative decentralized architectures as the natural re- sponse to threats posed by these centralized services. The result has been a great variety of solutions that include per- sonal data stores (PDS), infomediaries, Vendor Relationship Management (VRM) systems, and federated and distributed social networks. And yet, for all these efforts, decentralized personal data architectures have seen little adoption. This position paper attempts to account for these failures, challenging the accepted wisdom in the b community on the feasibility and desirability of these approaches.  start with a historical discussion of the development of various categories of decentralized personal data architectures. Then  survey the main ideas to illustrate the common themes among these efforts.  tease apart the design character- istics of these systems from the social values that they (are intended to) promote.  use this understanding to point out numerous drawbacks of the decentralization paradigm, some inherent and others incidental.  end with recom- mendations for designers of these systems for working to- wards goals that are achievable, but perhaps more limited in scope and ambition."}]