Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Compiler correctness proofs for higher-order concurrent languages are difficult: they involve establishing a termination-preserving refinement beten a concurrent high-level source language and an implementation that uses low-level shared memory primitives. Hover, existing logics for proving concurrent refinement either neglect properties such as termination, or only handle first-order state. ,  address these limitations by extending Iris, a recent higher-order concurrent separation logic, with support for reasoning about termination-preserving refinements. To demonstrate the por of these extensions,  prove the correctness of an efficient implementation of a higher-order, session-typed language. To our knowledge, this is the first program logic capable of giving a compiler correctness proof for such a language. The soundness of our extensions and our compiler correctness proof have been mechanized in Coq.
['Joseph Tassarotti', 'Ralf Jung', 'Robert Harper']
I am writing a research paper on a idea A Higher-Order Logic for Concurrent Termination-Preserving Refinement
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea A Higher-Order Logic for Concurrent Termination-Preserving Refinement"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Compiler correctness proofs for higher-order concurrent languages are difficult: they involve establishing a termination-preserving refinement beten a concurrent high-level source language and an implementation that uses low-level shared memory primitives. Hover, existing logics for proving concurrent refinement either neglect properties such as termination, or only handle first-order state. ,  address these limitations by extending Iris, a recent higher-order concurrent separation logic, with support for reasoning about termination-preserving refinements. To demonstrate the por of these extensions,  prove the correctness of an efficient implementation of a higher-order, session-typed language. To our knowledge, this is the first program logic capable of giving a compiler correctness proof for such a language. The soundness of our extensions and our compiler correctness proof have been mechanized in Coq."}]