Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Organizations that compete in institutional environments in which oppositional logics compete for dominance face a risk-return trade-off beten maintaining ideological purity versus pragmatism by borrowing template elements from the rival ideology. Deviating from ideological purity might improve a firm’s competitive strength, hover, at the same time, it might also undermine its very identity and legitimacy. Although such decisions are of strategic importance, research about why, how, and where these trade-offs are made is still limited.  develop the argument that organizations will be more likely to deviate from ideological purity when the potential return of borrowing from the oppositional template exceeds the perceived risk of doing so. The more organizations aspire to be ideologically pure, the more they are constrained by the moral codes that define the category, and, therefore, the higher the risk associated with deviating from purity. Hover, given the potential benefits of pragmatism, pure or...
['Christophe Boone', 'Serden Özcan']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Ideological Purity vs. I am writing a research paper on a idea Hybridization Trade-Off: When Do Islamic Banks Hire Managers from Conventional Banking?
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Ideological Purity vs. I am writing a research paper on a idea Hybridization Trade-Off: When Do Islamic Banks Hire Managers from Conventional Banking?"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Organizations that compete in institutional environments in which oppositional logics compete for dominance face a risk-return trade-off beten maintaining ideological purity versus pragmatism by borrowing template elements from the rival ideology. Deviating from ideological purity might improve a firm\u2019s competitive strength, hover, at the same time, it might also undermine its very identity and legitimacy. Although such decisions are of strategic importance, research about why, how, and where these trade-offs are made is still limited.  develop the argument that organizations will be more likely to deviate from ideological purity when the potential return of borrowing from the oppositional template exceeds the perceived risk of doing so. The more organizations aspire to be ideologically pure, the more they are constrained by the moral codes that define the category, and, therefore, the higher the risk associated with deviating from purity. Hover, given the potential benefits of pragmatism, pure or..."}]