Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Purpose#R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N#The purpose of this paper is to identify enablers and inhibitors to the adoption of mobile internet services by socioeconomically disadvantaged people: an understudied population adversely affected by digital inequality.#R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N#Design/methodology/approach#R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N#A qualitative study combining a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. In total, 32 socioeconomically disadvantaged people explored mobile lottery services and subsequently re asked a series of semi-structured questions about their perceptions of the technology.#R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N#Findings#R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N#Users’ attitudes toward mobile internet services re ambivalent. They experienced some advantages of smartphones (including escaping spatiotemporal constrains, fashionableness, privacy, and cost-effectiveness) and conceived of mobile internet services in terms of social advantages (including their ubiquitous nature, fitting in socially and fear of being “left behind”). Hover, they also experienced barriers and concerns, such as limited mobile data packages, external barriers from mobile services (including security concerns, complex online help tutorials, irrelevant pop-ups, and a lack of personalized services) and internal psychological barriers (including technophobia, self-concept, and habitus).#R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N#Research limitations/implications#R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N#The findings are of limited generalizability due to the small size of the sample. Hover, the study has implications for understanding the acceptance of technology among socioeconomically disadvantaged people.#R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N#Social implications#R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N#The study has social implications for bridging digital inequality in terms of socioeconomic status.#R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N#Originality/value#R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N#While previous studies have primarily focused on enablers of adopting mobile internet services by active users, this study reveals both the promise of and the barriers to the use of such services by inactive users who comprise an under-served population.
['Dandan Ma', 'Jia Tina Du', 'Yonghua Cen', 'Peng Wu']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Exploring the adoption of mobile internet services by socioeconomically disadvantaged people: A qualitative user study
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Exploring the adoption of mobile internet services by socioeconomically disadvantaged people: A qualitative user study"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Purpose#R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N#The purpose of this paper is to identify enablers and inhibitors to the adoption of mobile internet services by socioeconomically disadvantaged people: an understudied population adversely affected by digital inequality.#R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N#Design/methodology/approach#R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N#A qualitative study combining a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. In total, 32 socioeconomically disadvantaged people explored mobile lottery services and subsequently re asked a series of semi-structured questions about their perceptions of the technology.#R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N#Findings#R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N#Users\u2019 attitudes toward mobile internet services re ambivalent. They experienced some advantages of smartphones (including escaping spatiotemporal constrains, fashionableness, privacy, and cost-effectiveness) and conceived of mobile internet services in terms of social advantages (including their ubiquitous nature, fitting in socially and fear of being \u201cleft behind\u201d). Hover, they also experienced barriers and concerns, such as limited mobile data packages, external barriers from mobile services (including security concerns, complex online help tutorials, irrelevant pop-ups, and a lack of personalized services) and internal psychological barriers (including technophobia, self-concept, and habitus).#R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N#Research limitations/implications#R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N#The findings are of limited generalizability due to the small size of the sample. Hover, the study has implications for understanding the acceptance of technology among socioeconomically disadvantaged people.#R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N#Social implications#R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N#The study has social implications for bridging digital inequality in terms of socioeconomic status.#R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N#Originality/value#R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N##R##N#While previous studies have primarily focused on enablers of adopting mobile internet services by active users, this study reveals both the promise of and the barriers to the use of such services by inactive users who comprise an under-served population."}]