Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: The basic measurements for software quality control and management are the various project and software metrics collected at various states of a software development life cycle. The software metrics may not all be relevant for predicting the fault proneness of software components, modules, or releases. Thus creating the need for the use of feature (software metric) selection. The goal of feature selection is to find a minimum subset of attributes that can characterize the underlying data with results as ll as, or even better than the original data when all available features are considered. As an example of inter-disciplinary research (beten data science and software engineering), this study is unique in presenting a large comparative study of wrapper-based feature (or attribute) selection techniques for building defect predictors. ,  investigated thirty wrapper-based feature selection methods to remove irrelevant and redundant software metrics used for building defect predictors. In this study, these thirty wrappers vary based on the choice of search method (Best First or Greedy Stepwise), leaner (Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine, and Logistic Regression), and performance metric (Overall Accuracy, Area Under ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) Curve, Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve, Best Geometric Mean, and Best Arithmetic Mean) used in the defect prediction model evaluation process. The models are trained using the three learners and evaluated using the five performance metrics. The case study is based on software metrics and defect data collected from a real world software project. The results demonstrate that Best Arithmetic Mean is the best performance metric used within the wrapper. Naive Bayes performed significantly better than Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine as a wrapper learner on slightly and less imbalanced datasets.  also recommend Greedy Stepwise as a search method for wrappers. Moreover, comparing to models built with full datasets, the performances of defect prediction models can be improved when metric subsets are selected through a wrapper subset selector.
['Huanjing Wang', 'Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar', 'Amri Napolitano']
I am writing a research paper on a idea An Empirical Investigation on Wrapper-Based Feature Selection for Predicting Software Quality
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea An Empirical Investigation on Wrapper-Based Feature Selection for Predicting Software Quality"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: The basic measurements for software quality control and management are the various project and software metrics collected at various states of a software development life cycle. The software metrics may not all be relevant for predicting the fault proneness of software components, modules, or releases. Thus creating the need for the use of feature (software metric) selection. The goal of feature selection is to find a minimum subset of attributes that can characterize the underlying data with results as ll as, or even better than the original data when all available features are considered. As an example of inter-disciplinary research (beten data science and software engineering), this study is unique in presenting a large comparative study of wrapper-based feature (or attribute) selection techniques for building defect predictors. ,  investigated thirty wrapper-based feature selection methods to remove irrelevant and redundant software metrics used for building defect predictors. In this study, these thirty wrappers vary based on the choice of search method (Best First or Greedy Stepwise), leaner (Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine, and Logistic Regression), and performance metric (Overall Accuracy, Area Under ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) Curve, Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve, Best Geometric Mean, and Best Arithmetic Mean) used in the defect prediction model evaluation process. The models are trained using the three learners and evaluated using the five performance metrics. The case study is based on software metrics and defect data collected from a real world software project. The results demonstrate that Best Arithmetic Mean is the best performance metric used within the wrapper. Naive Bayes performed significantly better than Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine as a wrapper learner on slightly and less imbalanced datasets.  also recommend Greedy Stepwise as a search method for wrappers. Moreover, comparing to models built with full datasets, the performances of defect prediction models can be improved when metric subsets are selected through a wrapper subset selector."}]