Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely:  introduce and study incentive equilibria for multi-player meanpayoff games. Incentive equilibria generalise ll-studied solution concepts such as Nash equilibria and leader equilibria (also known as Stackelberg equilibria). Recall that a strategy profile is a Nash equilibrium if no player can improve his payoff by changing his strategy unilaterally. In the setting of incentive and leader equilibria, there is a distinguished player called the leader who can assign strategies to all other players, referred to as her follors. A strategy profile is a leader strategy profile if no player, except for the leader, can improve his payoff by changing his strategy unilaterally, and a leader equilibrium is a leader strategy profile with a maximal return for the leader. In the proposed case of incentive equilibria, the leader can additionally influence the behaviour of her follors by transferring parts of her payoff to her follors. The ability to incentivise her follors provides the leader with more freedom in selecting strategy profiles, and  show that this can indeed improve the payoff for the leader in such games. The key fundamental result of the paper is the existence of incentive equilibria in mean-payoff games.  further show that the decision problem related to constructing incentive equilibria is NP-complete. On a positive note,  show that, when the number of players is fixed, the complexity of the problem falls in the same class as two-player mean-payoff games.  also present an implementation of the proposed algorithms, and discuss experimental results that demonstrate the feasibility of the analysis of medium sized games.
['Anshul Gupta', 'M. S. Krishna Deepak', 'Bharath Kumar Padarthi', 'Sven Schewe', 'Ashutosh Trivedi']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Incentive Stackelberg Mean-Payoff Games
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Incentive Stackelberg Mean-Payoff Games"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely:  introduce and study incentive equilibria for multi-player meanpayoff games. Incentive equilibria generalise ll-studied solution concepts such as Nash equilibria and leader equilibria (also known as Stackelberg equilibria). Recall that a strategy profile is a Nash equilibrium if no player can improve his payoff by changing his strategy unilaterally. In the setting of incentive and leader equilibria, there is a distinguished player called the leader who can assign strategies to all other players, referred to as her follors. A strategy profile is a leader strategy profile if no player, except for the leader, can improve his payoff by changing his strategy unilaterally, and a leader equilibrium is a leader strategy profile with a maximal return for the leader. In the proposed case of incentive equilibria, the leader can additionally influence the behaviour of her follors by transferring parts of her payoff to her follors. The ability to incentivise her follors provides the leader with more freedom in selecting strategy profiles, and  show that this can indeed improve the payoff for the leader in such games. The key fundamental result of the paper is the existence of incentive equilibria in mean-payoff games.  further show that the decision problem related to constructing incentive equilibria is NP-complete. On a positive note,  show that, when the number of players is fixed, the complexity of the problem falls in the same class as two-player mean-payoff games.  also present an implementation of the proposed algorithms, and discuss experimental results that demonstrate the feasibility of the analysis of medium sized games."}]