Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Extensive standardization and R&D efforts are dedicated to establishing secure interdomain routing. These efforts focus on two complementary mechanisms: origin authentication with RPKI, and path validation with BGPsec. Hover, while RPKI is finally gaining traction, the adoption of BGPsec seems not even on the horizon. This is due to inherent, possibly insurmountable, obstacles, including the need to replace today's routing infrastructure, meagre benefits in partial deployment and online cryptography.    propose path-end validation, a much easier to deploy alternative to BGPsec. Path-end validation is a modest extension to RPKI that does not require modifications to BGP message format nor online cryptography. Yet  show, through extensive simulations on empirically-derived datasets, that path-end validation yields significant security benefits, even with very limited partial deployment.  present an open-source prototype implementation of path-end validation, which does not require changing today's routers, illustrating the deployability advantage over BGPsec.
['Avichai Cohen', 'Yossi Gilad', 'Amir Herzberg', 'Michael Schapira']
I am writing a research paper on a idea One Hop for RPKI, One Giant Leap for BGP Security
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea One Hop for RPKI, One Giant Leap for BGP Security"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Extensive standardization and R&D efforts are dedicated to establishing secure interdomain routing. These efforts focus on two complementary mechanisms: origin authentication with RPKI, and path validation with BGPsec. Hover, while RPKI is finally gaining traction, the adoption of BGPsec seems not even on the horizon. This is due to inherent, possibly insurmountable, obstacles, including the need to replace today's routing infrastructure, meagre benefits in partial deployment and online cryptography.    propose path-end validation, a much easier to deploy alternative to BGPsec. Path-end validation is a modest extension to RPKI that does not require modifications to BGP message format nor online cryptography. Yet  show, through extensive simulations on empirically-derived datasets, that path-end validation yields significant security benefits, even with very limited partial deployment.  present an open-source prototype implementation of path-end validation, which does not require changing today's routers, illustrating the deployability advantage over BGPsec."}]