Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: The typical proof of linearizability establishes an abstraction map from the concurrent program to a sequential specification, and identifies the commit points of operations. If the concurrent program uses fine-grained concurrency and complex synchronization, constructing such a proof is difficult.  propose a sound proof system that significantly simplifies the reasoning about linearizability. Linearizability is proved by transforming an implementation into its specification within this proof system. The proof system combines reduction and abstraction, which increase the granularity of atomic actions, with variable introduction and hiding, which syntactically relate the representation of the implementation to that of the specification.  construct the abstraction map incrementally, and eliminate the need to reason about the location of commit points in the implementation.  have implemented our method in the QED verifier and demonstrated its effectiveness and practicality on several highly-concurrent examples from the literature.
['Tayfun Elmas', 'Shaz Qadeer', 'Ali Sezgin', 'Ömer Subaşı', 'Serdar Tasiran']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Simplifying linearizability proofs with reduction and abstraction
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Simplifying linearizability proofs with reduction and abstraction"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: The typical proof of linearizability establishes an abstraction map from the concurrent program to a sequential specification, and identifies the commit points of operations. If the concurrent program uses fine-grained concurrency and complex synchronization, constructing such a proof is difficult.  propose a sound proof system that significantly simplifies the reasoning about linearizability. Linearizability is proved by transforming an implementation into its specification within this proof system. The proof system combines reduction and abstraction, which increase the granularity of atomic actions, with variable introduction and hiding, which syntactically relate the representation of the implementation to that of the specification.  construct the abstraction map incrementally, and eliminate the need to reason about the location of commit points in the implementation.  have implemented our method in the QED verifier and demonstrated its effectiveness and practicality on several highly-concurrent examples from the literature."}]