Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Information extraction is a critical step in the practice of conducting biomedical systematic literature reviews. Extracted structured data can be aggregated via methods such as statistical meta-analysis. Typically highly trained domain experts extract data for systematic reviews. The high expense of conducting biomedical systematic reviews has motivated researchers to explore lor cost methods that achieve similar rigor without compromising quality. Crowdsourcing represents one such promising approach. In this work-in-progress study,  designed a crowdsourcing task for biomedical information extraction.  briefly report the iterative design process and the results of two pilot testings.  found that giving more concrete examples in the task instruction can help workers better understand the task, especially for concepts that are abstract and confusing.  found a few workers completed most of the work, and our payment level appeared more attractive to workers from low-income countries. In the future,  will further evaluate our results with reference to gold standard extractions, thus assessing the feasibility of tasking crowd workers with extracting biomedical intervention information for systematic reviews.
['Yalin Sun', 'Pengxiang Cheng', 'Shengwei Wang', 'Hao Lyu', 'Matthew Lease', 'Iain James Marshall', 'Byron C. Wallace']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Crowdsourcing Information Extraction for Biomedical Systematic Reviews
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Crowdsourcing Information Extraction for Biomedical Systematic Reviews"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Information extraction is a critical step in the practice of conducting biomedical systematic literature reviews. Extracted structured data can be aggregated via methods such as statistical meta-analysis. Typically highly trained domain experts extract data for systematic reviews. The high expense of conducting biomedical systematic reviews has motivated researchers to explore lor cost methods that achieve similar rigor without compromising quality. Crowdsourcing represents one such promising approach. In this work-in-progress study,  designed a crowdsourcing task for biomedical information extraction.  briefly report the iterative design process and the results of two pilot testings.  found that giving more concrete examples in the task instruction can help workers better understand the task, especially for concepts that are abstract and confusing.  found a few workers completed most of the work, and our payment level appeared more attractive to workers from low-income countries. In the future,  will further evaluate our results with reference to gold standard extractions, thus assessing the feasibility of tasking crowd workers with extracting biomedical intervention information for systematic reviews."}]