Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: The advent of proof-carrying code has generated significant interest in reasoning about low-level languages. It is widely believed that low-level languages with jumps must be difficult to reason about because of being inherently non-modular.  argue that this is untrue.  take it seriously that, unlike statements of a high-level language, pieces of low-level code are multiple-entry and multiple-exit. And  define a piece of code as consisting of either a single labelled instruction or a finite union of pieces of code. Thus  obtain a compositional natural semantics and a matching Hoare logic for a basic low-level language with jumps. By their simplicity and intuitiveness, these are comparable to the standard natural semantics and Hoare logic of While. The Hoare logic is sound and complete wrt the semantics and allows for compilation of proofs of the Hoare logic of While.
['Ando Saabas', 'Tarmo Uustalu']
I am writing a research paper on a idea A compositional natural semantics and Hoare logic for low-level languages
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea A compositional natural semantics and Hoare logic for low-level languages"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: The advent of proof-carrying code has generated significant interest in reasoning about low-level languages. It is widely believed that low-level languages with jumps must be difficult to reason about because of being inherently non-modular.  argue that this is untrue.  take it seriously that, unlike statements of a high-level language, pieces of low-level code are multiple-entry and multiple-exit. And  define a piece of code as consisting of either a single labelled instruction or a finite union of pieces of code. Thus  obtain a compositional natural semantics and a matching Hoare logic for a basic low-level language with jumps. By their simplicity and intuitiveness, these are comparable to the standard natural semantics and Hoare logic of While. The Hoare logic is sound and complete wrt the semantics and allows for compilation of proofs of the Hoare logic of While."}]