Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: When forming their preferences about the distribution of income, rational people may be caught beten two opposite forms of “tyranny.” Giving absolute priority to the worst-off imposes a sort of tyranny on the rest of the population, but giving less than absolute priority imposes a reverse form of tyranny where the worst-off may be sacrificed for the sake of small benefits to many ll-off individuals.  formally show that this intriguing dilemma is more severe than previously recognised, and  examine how people negotiate such conflicts with a questionnaire-experimental study. Our study shows that both tyrannies are rejected by a majority of the participants, which makes it problematic for them to define consistent distributive preferences on the distribution.
['Frank Cowell', 'Marc Fleurbaey', 'Bertil Tungodden']
I am writing a research paper on a idea The tyranny puzzle in social preferences: an empirical investigation
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea The tyranny puzzle in social preferences: an empirical investigation"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: When forming their preferences about the distribution of income, rational people may be caught beten two opposite forms of \u201ctyranny.\u201d Giving absolute priority to the worst-off imposes a sort of tyranny on the rest of the population, but giving less than absolute priority imposes a reverse form of tyranny where the worst-off may be sacrificed for the sake of small benefits to many ll-off individuals.  formally show that this intriguing dilemma is more severe than previously recognised, and  examine how people negotiate such conflicts with a questionnaire-experimental study. Our study shows that both tyrannies are rejected by a majority of the participants, which makes it problematic for them to define consistent distributive preferences on the distribution."}]