Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: The algebraic graph transformation approach was initiated in 1973 and supports the rule-based modification of graphs based on pushout constructions. The vertex and edge types used within the rules (or productions) as ll as possible inheritance relationships defined beten them are specified in the type graph. Hover, the termination proof can only be accomplished for graph transformation systems without inheritance relationships. Thus, all graph transformation systems with inheritance relationships in the type graph must be flattened. To this end, the algebraic graph transformation approach provides a formal description for how to flatten the type graph as ll as a definition of abstract and concrete productions.   ,  will extend the definitions to also consider vertices in negative application conditions with finer node types and positive application conditions. Furthermore,  will prove the semantic equivalence of the original and the flattened graph transformation system. The whole flattening algorithm is then implemented in a prototype which supports an abstract or concrete flattening of a given graph transformation system. The prototype is finally evaluated within a case study.
['Christine Natschläger', 'Klaus-Dieter Schewe']
I am writing a research paper on a idea A Flattening Approach for Attributed Type Graphs with Inheritance in Algebraic Graph Transformation
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea A Flattening Approach for Attributed Type Graphs with Inheritance in Algebraic Graph Transformation"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: The algebraic graph transformation approach was initiated in 1973 and supports the rule-based modification of graphs based on pushout constructions. The vertex and edge types used within the rules (or productions) as ll as possible inheritance relationships defined beten them are specified in the type graph. Hover, the termination proof can only be accomplished for graph transformation systems without inheritance relationships. Thus, all graph transformation systems with inheritance relationships in the type graph must be flattened. To this end, the algebraic graph transformation approach provides a formal description for how to flatten the type graph as ll as a definition of abstract and concrete productions.   ,  will extend the definitions to also consider vertices in negative application conditions with finer node types and positive application conditions. Furthermore,  will prove the semantic equivalence of the original and the flattened graph transformation system. The whole flattening algorithm is then implemented in a prototype which supports an abstract or concrete flattening of a given graph transformation system. The prototype is finally evaluated within a case study."}]