Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: In this second part of our contribution to the workshop,  look in more detail at the Sorkin model, its relationship to constructions in Chu space theory, and then compare it with the Nerve constructions given in the flrst part. 1 In the flrst part of this article,  saw how the nerve construction from algebraic topology could be applied to 'observational' situations.  also noted how, in theoretical physics, Sorkin had proposed a poset or T0-space model for an ob- servational context in which a space or spacetime, X, was observed by means of an open cover F. This Sorkin model is thus a second means of encoding obser- vational data on X. In fact there is no real need for F to be a cover of X. Those parts of X which are not covered are just not observed! Therefore  will use the more general term of a flnite family of open sets, abbreviated to FFOS 2 to
['Jonathan Gratus', 'Timothy Porter']
I am writing a research paper on a idea A geometry of information, II: Sorkin models, and biextensional collapses
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea A geometry of information, II: Sorkin models, and biextensional collapses"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: In this second part of our contribution to the workshop,  look in more detail at the Sorkin model, its relationship to constructions in Chu space theory, and then compare it with the Nerve constructions given in the flrst part. 1 In the flrst part of this article,  saw how the nerve construction from algebraic topology could be applied to 'observational' situations.  also noted how, in theoretical physics, Sorkin had proposed a poset or T0-space model for an ob- servational context in which a space or spacetime, X, was observed by means of an open cover F. This Sorkin model is thus a second means of encoding obser- vational data on X. In fact there is no real need for F to be a cover of X. Those parts of X which are not covered are just not observed! Therefore  will use the more general term of a flnite family of open sets, abbreviated to FFOS 2 to"}]