Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely:  study cheap talk communication in a simple two actions-two states model featuring ambiguous priors. First,  find that in equilibrium, S often mixes beten messages triggering different beliefs and behavior by R while R also occasionally randomizes.  interpret randomization by respectively S and R as embodying two different modes of ambiguous communication. Second,  find that for sufficiently high ambiguity, more than two messages are often necessary to implement the optimal decision rule of S. If only two messages are available and S faces his preference twin, S may be unable to implement his optimal decision rule and influential communication may be altogether impossible.  stress the non replicability of these results within an expected utility environment. Third,  show that the addition of a little ambiguity may generate influential communication that is unambiguously advantageous to S.
['Christian Kellner', 'Mark Thordal-Le Quement']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Modes of ambiguous communication
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Modes of ambiguous communication"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely:  study cheap talk communication in a simple two actions-two states model featuring ambiguous priors. First,  find that in equilibrium, S often mixes beten messages triggering different beliefs and behavior by R while R also occasionally randomizes.  interpret randomization by respectively S and R as embodying two different modes of ambiguous communication. Second,  find that for sufficiently high ambiguity, more than two messages are often necessary to implement the optimal decision rule of S. If only two messages are available and S faces his preference twin, S may be unable to implement his optimal decision rule and influential communication may be altogether impossible.  stress the non replicability of these results within an expected utility environment. Third,  show that the addition of a little ambiguity may generate influential communication that is unambiguously advantageous to S."}]