Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: An experimental study was conducted on children aged 2;6–3;0 and 3;6–4;0 investigating the priming effect of two WANT-constructions to establish whether constructional competition contributes to English-speaking children’s inﬁnitival to omission errors (e.g., *I want ___ jump now). In two beten-participant groups, children either just heard or heard and repeated WANT-to, WANT-X, and control prime sentences after which to-inﬁnitival constructions re elicited.  found that both age groups re primed, but in different ways. In the 2;6–3;0 year olds, WANT-to primes facilitated the provision of to in target utterances relative to the control contexts, but no signiﬁcant effect was found for WA NT-X primes. In the 3;6–4;0 year olds, both WANT-to and WANT-X primes shod a priming effect, namely WANT-to primes facilitated and WANT-X primes inhibited provision of to. argue that these effects reﬂect developmental differences in the level of proﬁciency in and preference for the two constructions, and they are broadly consistent with “priming as implicit learning” accounts. The current study shows that (a) children as young as 2;6–3;0 years of age can be primed when they have only heard (not repeated) particular constructions, (b) children are acquiring at least two constructions for the matrix verb WANT, and (c) that these two WANT-constructions compete for production.
['Minna Kirjavainen', 'Elena Lieven', 'Anna L. Theakston']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Can Infinitival to Omissions and Provisions Be Primed? An Experimental Investigation Into the Role of Constructional Competition in Infinitival to Omission Errors.
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Can Infinitival to Omissions and Provisions Be Primed? An Experimental Investigation Into the Role of Constructional Competition in Infinitival to Omission Errors."}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: An experimental study was conducted on children aged 2;6\u20133;0 and 3;6\u20134;0 investigating the priming effect of two WANT-constructions to establish whether constructional competition contributes to English-speaking children\u2019s in\ufb01nitival to omission errors (e.g., *I want ___ jump now). In two beten-participant groups, children either just heard or heard and repeated WANT-to, WANT-X, and control prime sentences after which to-in\ufb01nitival constructions re elicited.  found that both age groups re primed, but in different ways. In the 2;6\u20133;0 year olds, WANT-to primes facilitated the provision of to in target utterances relative to the control contexts, but no signi\ufb01cant effect was found for WA NT-X primes. In the 3;6\u20134;0 year olds, both WANT-to and WANT-X primes shod a priming effect, namely WANT-to primes facilitated and WANT-X primes inhibited provision of to. argue that these effects re\ufb02ect developmental differences in the level of pro\ufb01ciency in and preference for the two constructions, and they are broadly consistent with \u201cpriming as implicit learning\u201d accounts. The current study shows that (a) children as young as 2;6\u20133;0 years of age can be primed when they have only heard (not repeated) particular constructions, (b) children are acquiring at least two constructions for the matrix verb WANT, and (c) that these two WANT-constructions compete for production."}]