Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Most comparisons of wireless ad hoc routing algorithms involve simulated or  indoor  trial runs, or outdoor runs with only a small number of nodes, potentially leading to an incorrect picture of algorithm performance. ,  report on an outdoor comparison of four different routing algorithms, APRL, AODV, ODMRP, and STARA, running on top of thirty-three 802.11-enabled laptops moving randomly through an athletic field. This comparison provides insight into the behavior of ad hoc routing algorithms at larger real-world scales than have been considered so far. In addition,  compare the outdoor results with both indoor ("tabletop") and simulation results for the same algorithms, examining the differences beten the indoor results and the outdoor reality. Finally,  describe the software infrastructure that allod us to implement the ad hoc routing algorithms in a comparable way, and use the  same  codebase for indoor, outdoor, and simulated trial runs.
['Robert S. Gray', 'David Kotz', 'Calvin C. Newport', 'Nikita E. Dubrovsky', 'Aaron Fiske', 'Jason Liu', 'Christopher Masone', 'Susan P. McGrath', 'Yougu Yuan']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Outdoor experimental comparison of four ad hoc routing algorithms
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Outdoor experimental comparison of four ad hoc routing algorithms"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Most comparisons of wireless ad hoc routing algorithms involve simulated or  indoor  trial runs, or outdoor runs with only a small number of nodes, potentially leading to an incorrect picture of algorithm performance. ,  report on an outdoor comparison of four different routing algorithms, APRL, AODV, ODMRP, and STARA, running on top of thirty-three 802.11-enabled laptops moving randomly through an athletic field. This comparison provides insight into the behavior of ad hoc routing algorithms at larger real-world scales than have been considered so far. In addition,  compare the outdoor results with both indoor (\"tabletop\") and simulation results for the same algorithms, examining the differences beten the indoor results and the outdoor reality. Finally,  describe the software infrastructure that allod us to implement the ad hoc routing algorithms in a comparable way, and use the  same  codebase for indoor, outdoor, and simulated trial runs."}]