Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: This article proposes an effective way of implementing a multiply accumulate circuit (MAC) for high-speed floating point arithmetic operations. The real-world applications related to digital signal processing and the like demand high-performance computation with greater accuracy. In general, digital signals are represented as a sequence of signed/unsigned fixed/floating point numbers. The final result of a MAC operation can be computed by feeding the mantissa of the previous MAC result as one of the partial products to a Wallace tree multiplier or Braun multiplier. Thus, the separate accumulation circuit can be avoided by keeping the circuit depth still within the bounds of the Wallace tree multiplier, namely  O ( log  2   n ), or Braun multiplier, namely  O ( n ). In this article, three kinds of floating point MACs are proposed. The experimental results show 48.54p of improvement in worst path delay achieved by the proposed floating point MAC using a radix-2 Wallace structure compared with a conventional floating point MAC without a pipeline using a 45nm technology library. The same proposed design gives 39.92p of improvement in worst path delay without a pipeline using a radix-4 Braun structure as compared with a conventional design. In this article, a radix-32  Q  32.32 -format-based floating point MAC is proposed using a Wallace tree/Braun multiplier. Also this article discusses the  msb  prediction problem and its solution in floating point arithmetic that is not available in modern fused multiply-add designs. The performance results show comparisons beten the proposed floating point MAC with various floating point MAC designs for radix-2,-4,-8, and -16. The proposed design has lesser depth than a conventional floating point MAC as ll as a lor area requirement than other ways of floating point MAC implementation, both with/without a pipeline.
['Mohamed Asan Basiri M', 'Noor Mahammad Sk']
I am writing a research paper on a idea An Efficient Hardware-Based Higher Radix Floating Point MAC Design
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea An Efficient Hardware-Based Higher Radix Floating Point MAC Design"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: This article proposes an effective way of implementing a multiply accumulate circuit (MAC) for high-speed floating point arithmetic operations. The real-world applications related to digital signal processing and the like demand high-performance computation with greater accuracy. In general, digital signals are represented as a sequence of signed/unsigned fixed/floating point numbers. The final result of a MAC operation can be computed by feeding the mantissa of the previous MAC result as one of the partial products to a Wallace tree multiplier or Braun multiplier. Thus, the separate accumulation circuit can be avoided by keeping the circuit depth still within the bounds of the Wallace tree multiplier, namely  O ( log  2   n ), or Braun multiplier, namely  O ( n ). In this article, three kinds of floating point MACs are proposed. The experimental results show 48.54p of improvement in worst path delay achieved by the proposed floating point MAC using a radix-2 Wallace structure compared with a conventional floating point MAC without a pipeline using a 45nm technology library. The same proposed design gives 39.92p of improvement in worst path delay without a pipeline using a radix-4 Braun structure as compared with a conventional design. In this article, a radix-32  Q  32.32 -format-based floating point MAC is proposed using a Wallace tree/Braun multiplier. Also this article discusses the  msb  prediction problem and its solution in floating point arithmetic that is not available in modern fused multiply-add designs. The performance results show comparisons beten the proposed floating point MAC with various floating point MAC designs for radix-2,-4,-8, and -16. The proposed design has lesser depth than a conventional floating point MAC as ll as a lor area requirement than other ways of floating point MAC implementation, both with/without a pipeline."}]