Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: In multiple instance learning, objects are sets (bags) of feature vectors (instances) rather than individual feature vectors. ,  address the problem of how these bags can best be represented. Two standard approaches are to use (dis)similarities beten bags and prototype bags, or beten bags and prototype instances. The first approach results in a relatively low-dimensional representation, determined by the number of training bags, whereas the second approach results in a relatively high-dimensional representation, determined by the total number of instances in the training set. Hover, an advantage of the latter representation is that the informativeness of the prototype instances can be inferred. , a third, intermediate approach is proposed, which links the two approaches and combines their strengths. Our classifier is inspired by a random subspace ensemble, and considers subspaces of the dissimilarity space, defined by subsets of instances, as prototypes.  provide insight into the structure of some popular multiple instance problems and show state-of-the-art performances on these data sets.
['Veronika Cheplygina', 'David M. J. Tax', 'Marco Loog']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Dissimilarity-Based Ensembles for Multiple Instance Learning
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Dissimilarity-Based Ensembles for Multiple Instance Learning"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: In multiple instance learning, objects are sets (bags) of feature vectors (instances) rather than individual feature vectors. ,  address the problem of how these bags can best be represented. Two standard approaches are to use (dis)similarities beten bags and prototype bags, or beten bags and prototype instances. The first approach results in a relatively low-dimensional representation, determined by the number of training bags, whereas the second approach results in a relatively high-dimensional representation, determined by the total number of instances in the training set. Hover, an advantage of the latter representation is that the informativeness of the prototype instances can be inferred. , a third, intermediate approach is proposed, which links the two approaches and combines their strengths. Our classifier is inspired by a random subspace ensemble, and considers subspaces of the dissimilarity space, defined by subsets of instances, as prototypes.  provide insight into the structure of some popular multiple instance problems and show state-of-the-art performances on these data sets."}]