Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Personal health records (PHRs) are a rapidly expanding area in medical informatics due to the belief that they may improve healthcare delivery and control costs of care. To truly understand the full potential value of a technology, a cost analysis is critical. Hover, little evidence exists on the value potential of PHRs, and a cost model for PHRs does not currently exist in the literature.#R##N##R##N# presents a sample cost model for PHR systems, which include PHR infrastructure and applications.  used this model to examine the costs of provider-tethered, payer-tethered, third-party, and interoperable PHRs. Our model projects that on a perperson basis, third-party PHRs will be the most expensive follod by interoperable PHRs, and then provider-tethered PHRs and payer-tethered PHRs are the least expensive. Data interfaces are a major cost driver, thus these findings underscore the need for standards development and use in the implementation of PHR systems.
['Sapna Shah', 'David C. Kaelber', 'Adam Vincent', 'Eric C. Pan', 'Douglas Johnston', 'Blackford Middleton']
I am writing a research paper on a idea A Cost Model for Personal Health Records (PHRs)
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea A Cost Model for Personal Health Records (PHRs)"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Personal health records (PHRs) are a rapidly expanding area in medical informatics due to the belief that they may improve healthcare delivery and control costs of care. To truly understand the full potential value of a technology, a cost analysis is critical. Hover, little evidence exists on the value potential of PHRs, and a cost model for PHRs does not currently exist in the literature.#R##N##R##N# presents a sample cost model for PHR systems, which include PHR infrastructure and applications.  used this model to examine the costs of provider-tethered, payer-tethered, third-party, and interoperable PHRs. Our model projects that on a perperson basis, third-party PHRs will be the most expensive follod by interoperable PHRs, and then provider-tethered PHRs and payer-tethered PHRs are the least expensive. Data interfaces are a major cost driver, thus these findings underscore the need for standards development and use in the implementation of PHR systems."}]