Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Using constraints in robust parsing seems to have what  call "robust parsing paradox". Preference Semantics and Connectionism both offered a promising approach to this problem. Hover, Preference Semantics has not addressed the problem of how to make full use of syntactic constraints, and Connectionism has some inherent difficulties of its own which prevent it producing a practical system.   are proposing a method to add syntactic preferences to the Preference Semantics paradigm while maintaining its fundamental philosophy. It will be shown that syntactic preferences can be coded as a set of ights associated with the set of symbolically manipulatable rules of a new grammar formalism. The syntactic preferences such coded can be easily used to compute with semantic preferences. With the help of some techniques borrod from Connectionism, these ights can be adjusted through training.
['Jin Wang']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Syntactic preferences for robust parsing with semantic preferences
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Syntactic preferences for robust parsing with semantic preferences"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Using constraints in robust parsing seems to have what  call \"robust parsing paradox\". Preference Semantics and Connectionism both offered a promising approach to this problem. Hover, Preference Semantics has not addressed the problem of how to make full use of syntactic constraints, and Connectionism has some inherent difficulties of its own which prevent it producing a practical system.   are proposing a method to add syntactic preferences to the Preference Semantics paradigm while maintaining its fundamental philosophy. It will be shown that syntactic preferences can be coded as a set of ights associated with the set of symbolically manipulatable rules of a new grammar formalism. The syntactic preferences such coded can be easily used to compute with semantic preferences. With the help of some techniques borrod from Connectionism, these ights can be adjusted through training."}]