Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Failure models characterise the expected component failures in fault-tolerant computing. In the context of dis- tributed systems, a failure model usually consists of two parts: a functional part specifying in what way individual processing entities may fail and a structural part specifying the potential scope of failures within the system. Such mod- els must be expressive enough to cover all relevant practical situations, but must also be simple enough to allow uncom- plicated reasoning about fault-tolerant algorithms. Usu- ally, an increase in expressiveness complicates formal rea- soning, but enables more accurate models that allow to im- prove the assumption coverage and resilience of solutions. ,  introduce the structural failure model class DiDep that allows to specify directed dependent fail- ures, which, for example, occur in the area of intrusion tolerance and security. DiDep is a generalisation of pre- vious classes for undirected dependent failures, namely the general adversary structures, the fail-prone systems, and the core and survivor sets, which  show to be equivalent.  show that the increase in expressiveness of DiDep does not significantly penalise the simplicity of corresponding mod- els by giving an algorithm that transforms any Consensus algorithm for undirected dependent failures into a Consen- sus algorithm for a DiDep model.  characterise the im- proved resilience obtained with DiDep and show that cer- tain models even allow to circumvent the famous FLP im- possibility result.
['Timo Warns', 'Felix C. Freiling', 'Wilhelm Hasselbring']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Solving Consensus Using Structural Failure Models
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Solving Consensus Using Structural Failure Models"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Failure models characterise the expected component failures in fault-tolerant computing. In the context of dis- tributed systems, a failure model usually consists of two parts: a functional part specifying in what way individual processing entities may fail and a structural part specifying the potential scope of failures within the system. Such mod- els must be expressive enough to cover all relevant practical situations, but must also be simple enough to allow uncom- plicated reasoning about fault-tolerant algorithms. Usu- ally, an increase in expressiveness complicates formal rea- soning, but enables more accurate models that allow to im- prove the assumption coverage and resilience of solutions. ,  introduce the structural failure model class DiDep that allows to specify directed dependent fail- ures, which, for example, occur in the area of intrusion tolerance and security. DiDep is a generalisation of pre- vious classes for undirected dependent failures, namely the general adversary structures, the fail-prone systems, and the core and survivor sets, which  show to be equivalent.  show that the increase in expressiveness of DiDep does not significantly penalise the simplicity of corresponding mod- els by giving an algorithm that transforms any Consensus algorithm for undirected dependent failures into a Consen- sus algorithm for a DiDep model.  characterise the im- proved resilience obtained with DiDep and show that cer- tain models even allow to circumvent the famous FLP im- possibility result."}]