Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Realistic and complex planning situations require a mix ed-initiative planning framework in which human and automated planners interact to mutually construct a desired plan. Ideally, this joint cooperation has the potential of achie ving better plans than either the human or the machine can create alone. Human planners often tak e a case-based approach to planning, relying on their past e xperience and planning by retrie ving and adapting past planning cases. Planning by analogical reasoning in which generati ve and case-based planning are combined, as in Prodigy/Analogy, provides a suitable framework to study this mixed-initiative integration. Hover, having a human user engaged in this planning loop creates a variety of new research questions. The challenges  found creat- ing a mixed-initiative planning system fall into three cate gories: planning paradigms differ in human and machine planning; visualization of the plan and planning process is a com- plex, b ut necessary task; and human users range across a spectrum of e xperience, both with respect to the planning domain and the underlying planning technology.  presents our approach to these three problems when designing an interf ace to incorporate a human into the process of planning by analogical reasoning with Prodigy/Analogy. The interface allows the user to follo w both generative and case-based planning, it supports visualization of both plan and the planning rationale, and it addresses the v ariance in the experience of the user by allowing the user to control the presentation of information.
['Michael T. Cox', 'Manuela M. Veloso']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Supporting Combined Human and Machine Planning: An Interface for Planning by Analogical Reasoning
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Supporting Combined Human and Machine Planning: An Interface for Planning by Analogical Reasoning"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Realistic and complex planning situations require a mix ed-initiative planning framework in which human and automated planners interact to mutually construct a desired plan. Ideally, this joint cooperation has the potential of achie ving better plans than either the human or the machine can create alone. Human planners often tak e a case-based approach to planning, relying on their past e xperience and planning by retrie ving and adapting past planning cases. Planning by analogical reasoning in which generati ve and case-based planning are combined, as in Prodigy/Analogy, provides a suitable framework to study this mixed-initiative integration. Hover, having a human user engaged in this planning loop creates a variety of new research questions. The challenges  found creat- ing a mixed-initiative planning system fall into three cate gories: planning paradigms differ in human and machine planning; visualization of the plan and planning process is a com- plex, b ut necessary task; and human users range across a spectrum of e xperience, both with respect to the planning domain and the underlying planning technology.  presents our approach to these three problems when designing an interf ace to incorporate a human into the process of planning by analogical reasoning with Prodigy/Analogy. The interface allows the user to follo w both generative and case-based planning, it supports visualization of both plan and the planning rationale, and it addresses the v ariance in the experience of the user by allowing the user to control the presentation of information."}]