Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Users presented with a system equipped with many advanced features and vast collections of searchable documents often have problems getting to the information they seek. Our studies with intelligence analysts using the Rosetta b-based information access system revealed inefficiencies in the way they used the tool. Motivated by that observation,  implemented a prototype of an intelligent software agent that monitors the behavior of users with a goal of generating real-time suggestions to improve their performance. To evaluate the agent's ability to predict the changes in the analysts' performance,  compared it to the judgment of human domain experts. The results revealed evidence of substantial disagreement among human judges.  found the level of agreement among the judges and the agent to be much higher. The agent's predictions re similar to those of an average judge.
['Tomasz D. Loboda', 'Peter Brusilovsky', 'Jonathan Grady']
I am writing a research paper on a idea An agent for versatile intelligence analysis system
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea An agent for versatile intelligence analysis system"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Users presented with a system equipped with many advanced features and vast collections of searchable documents often have problems getting to the information they seek. Our studies with intelligence analysts using the Rosetta b-based information access system revealed inefficiencies in the way they used the tool. Motivated by that observation,  implemented a prototype of an intelligent software agent that monitors the behavior of users with a goal of generating real-time suggestions to improve their performance. To evaluate the agent's ability to predict the changes in the analysts' performance,  compared it to the judgment of human domain experts. The results revealed evidence of substantial disagreement among human judges.  found the level of agreement among the judges and the agent to be much higher. The agent's predictions re similar to those of an average judge."}]