Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: A random sample of 800 Japanese-language books with publication dates prior to 1943 was extracted from the OCLC World Cat database and 409 re examined. The book titles re queried in both Google Books and HathiTrust. The texts re then examined for their level of typical user access, their accuracy in metadata, and their scan quality. Despite their likely public domain status within Japan and in the United States, 0.2% (N=1) of the sampled texts re visible in Google Books as full texts. While 12.5% (N=50) of the sample re visible in HathiTrust. Within the full view texts, errors in scanning and metadata re identified, including problems with legibility (blurred characters) in 68% of visible texts, distorted content (slanted and upside-down pages) in 90%, motion or blur of turning pages captured by digital cameras in 48%, extra-textual objects (3-D items not part of text, i.e. Fingers, hands, book holders, etc.) in 94%, and use of heavily-defaced, dirty or fragile source material in 28%. The most common metadata errors re missing bibliographic information, especially missing page numbers (in 18% of texts) and incomplete tables of contents (in 22%), and problems associated with poor OCR, especially unusable keywords and common phrases (in 50% of texts) that appear to be random words, articles, and unpronounceable symbols.
['Andrew Philip Weiss', 'Ryan James']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Comparing the Access to and Legibility of Japanese Language Texts in Massive Digital Libraries
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Comparing the Access to and Legibility of Japanese Language Texts in Massive Digital Libraries"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: A random sample of 800 Japanese-language books with publication dates prior to 1943 was extracted from the OCLC World Cat database and 409 re examined. The book titles re queried in both Google Books and HathiTrust. The texts re then examined for their level of typical user access, their accuracy in metadata, and their scan quality. Despite their likely public domain status within Japan and in the United States, 0.2% (N=1) of the sampled texts re visible in Google Books as full texts. While 12.5% (N=50) of the sample re visible in HathiTrust. Within the full view texts, errors in scanning and metadata re identified, including problems with legibility (blurred characters) in 68% of visible texts, distorted content (slanted and upside-down pages) in 90%, motion or blur of turning pages captured by digital cameras in 48%, extra-textual objects (3-D items not part of text, i.e. Fingers, hands, book holders, etc.) in 94%, and use of heavily-defaced, dirty or fragile source material in 28%. The most common metadata errors re missing bibliographic information, especially missing page numbers (in 18% of texts) and incomplete tables of contents (in 22%), and problems associated with poor OCR, especially unusable keywords and common phrases (in 50% of texts) that appear to be random words, articles, and unpronounceable symbols."}]