Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: In our paper at PROOFS 2013,  formally studied a few known countermeasures to protect CRT-RSA against the BellCoRe fault injection attack. Hover,  left Vigilant's countermeasure and its alleged repaired version by Coron et al. as future work, because the arithmetical framework of our tool was not sufficiently porful.   bridge this gap and then use the same methodology to formally study both versions of the countermeasure.  obtain surprising results, which  believe demonstrate the importance of formal analysis in the field of implementation security. Indeed, the original version of Vigilant's countermeasure is actually broken, but not as much as Coron et al. thought it was. As a consequence, the repaired version they proposed can be simplified. It can actually be simplified even further as two of the nine modular verifications happen to be unnecessary. Fortunately,  could formally prove the simplified repaired version to be resistant to the BellCoRe attack, which was considered a ``challenging issue" by the authors of the countermeasure themselves.
['Pablo Rauzy', 'Sylvain Guilley']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Formal Analysis of CRT-RSA Vigilant's Countermeasure Against the BellCoRe Attack: A Pledge for Formal Methods in the Field of Implementation Security
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Formal Analysis of CRT-RSA Vigilant's Countermeasure Against the BellCoRe Attack: A Pledge for Formal Methods in the Field of Implementation Security"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: In our paper at PROOFS 2013,  formally studied a few known countermeasures to protect CRT-RSA against the BellCoRe fault injection attack. Hover,  left Vigilant's countermeasure and its alleged repaired version by Coron et al. as future work, because the arithmetical framework of our tool was not sufficiently porful.   bridge this gap and then use the same methodology to formally study both versions of the countermeasure.  obtain surprising results, which  believe demonstrate the importance of formal analysis in the field of implementation security. Indeed, the original version of Vigilant's countermeasure is actually broken, but not as much as Coron et al. thought it was. As a consequence, the repaired version they proposed can be simplified. It can actually be simplified even further as two of the nine modular verifications happen to be unnecessary. Fortunately,  could formally prove the simplified repaired version to be resistant to the BellCoRe attack, which was considered a ``challenging issue\" by the authors of the countermeasure themselves."}]