Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: The C/C++11 concurrency model balances two goals: it is relaxed enough to be efficiently implementable and (leaving aside the ``thin-air'' problem) it is strong enough to give useful guarantees to programmers. It is mathematically precise and has been used in verification research and compiler testing. Hover, the model is expressed in an axiomatic style, as predicates on complete candidate executions. This suffices for computing the set of allod executions of a small litmus test, but it does not directly support the incremental construction of executions of larger programs. It is also at odds with conventional operational semantics, as used implicitly in the rest of the C/C++ standards.     Our main contribution is the development of an operational model for C/C++11 concurrency. This covers all the features of the previous formalised axiomatic model, and  have a mechanised proof that the two are equivalent, in Isabelle/HOL.  also integrate this semantics with an operational semantics for sequential C (described elsewhere); the combined semantics can incrementally execute programs in a small fragment of C.     Doing this uncovered several new aspects of the C/C++11 model:  show that one cannot build an equivalent operational model that simply follows program order, sequential consistent order, or the synchronises-with order. The first negative result is forced by hardware-observable behaviour, but the latter two are not, and so might be ameliorated by changing C/C++11. More generally,  hope that this work, with its focus on incremental construction of executions, will inform the future design of new concurrency models.
['Kyndylan Nienhuis', 'Kayvan Memarian', 'Peter Sewell']
I am writing a research paper on a idea An operational semantics for C/C++11 concurrency
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea An operational semantics for C/C++11 concurrency"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: The C/C++11 concurrency model balances two goals: it is relaxed enough to be efficiently implementable and (leaving aside the ``thin-air'' problem) it is strong enough to give useful guarantees to programmers. It is mathematically precise and has been used in verification research and compiler testing. Hover, the model is expressed in an axiomatic style, as predicates on complete candidate executions. This suffices for computing the set of allod executions of a small litmus test, but it does not directly support the incremental construction of executions of larger programs. It is also at odds with conventional operational semantics, as used implicitly in the rest of the C/C++ standards.     Our main contribution is the development of an operational model for C/C++11 concurrency. This covers all the features of the previous formalised axiomatic model, and  have a mechanised proof that the two are equivalent, in Isabelle/HOL.  also integrate this semantics with an operational semantics for sequential C (described elsewhere); the combined semantics can incrementally execute programs in a small fragment of C.     Doing this uncovered several new aspects of the C/C++11 model:  show that one cannot build an equivalent operational model that simply follows program order, sequential consistent order, or the synchronises-with order. The first negative result is forced by hardware-observable behaviour, but the latter two are not, and so might be ameliorated by changing C/C++11. More generally,  hope that this work, with its focus on incremental construction of executions, will inform the future design of new concurrency models."}]