Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely:  presents an approach for estimating the Semantic Textual Similarity of full English sentences as specified in Shared Task 2 of SemEval-2015. The semantic similarity of sentence pairs is quantified from three perspectives - structural, syntactical, and semantic. The numerical representations of the derived similarity measures are then applied to train a regression ensemble. Although none of these three sets of measures is able to represent the semantic similarity of two sentences individually, our experimental results show that the combination of these features can precisely assess the semantic similarity of the sentences. In the English subtask our system’s best result ranked 35 among 73 system runs with 0.7189 average Pearson correlation over five test sets. This was 0.08 correlation points less than the best submitted run.
['Hamed Hassanzadeh', 'Tudor Groza', 'Anthony Nguyen', 'Jane Hunter']
I am writing a research paper on a idea UQeResearch: Semantic Textual Similarity Quantification
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea UQeResearch: Semantic Textual Similarity Quantification"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely:  presents an approach for estimating the Semantic Textual Similarity of full English sentences as specified in Shared Task 2 of SemEval-2015. The semantic similarity of sentence pairs is quantified from three perspectives - structural, syntactical, and semantic. The numerical representations of the derived similarity measures are then applied to train a regression ensemble. Although none of these three sets of measures is able to represent the semantic similarity of two sentences individually, our experimental results show that the combination of these features can precisely assess the semantic similarity of the sentences. In the English subtask our system\u2019s best result ranked 35 among 73 system runs with 0.7189 average Pearson correlation over five test sets. This was 0.08 correlation points less than the best submitted run."}]