Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely:  propose a new design for a 10-  $\hbox{k}\Omega$   quantized Hall resistance (QHR) array device. This design realizes quantized resistance values that approach decade values with fer Hall bars. In this design, the 10-  $\hbox{k}\Omega$   QHR array device consists of only 16 Hall bars, and this number is about 16 times lor than that in the previous design, although the nominal value is identical to the previous one. The nominal value of this device shows a relative difference of only 0.034   $\mu\Omega/\Omega$  , based on   $R_{K - 90}\ (=25\,812.807\ \Omega)$  , from the exact value of 10   $\hbox{k}\Omega$  . This fact might allow us to evaluate each Hall bar in the array device. The parameters of this 10-  $\hbox{k}\Omega$    QHR array device re measured by a conventional QHR and cryogenic current comparator using the 100-   $\Omega$   standard resistor. According to the measurement, the value of the 10-  $\hbox{k}\Omega$   QHR array device agrees with its nominal value within around one part in   $10^{8}$  . In the same manner, new combinations of Hall bars re designed for the 100-  $\Omega$   –1-  $\hbox{M}\Omega$   range.
['Takehiko Oe', 'Kenjiro Matsuhiro', 'Taro Itatani', 'Sucheta Gorwadkar', 'Shogo Kiryu', 'Nobu-hisa Kaneko']
I am writing a research paper on a idea New Design of Quantized Hall Resistance Array Device
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea New Design of Quantized Hall Resistance Array Device"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely:  propose a new design for a 10-  $\\hbox{k}\\Omega$   quantized Hall resistance (QHR) array device. This design realizes quantized resistance values that approach decade values with fer Hall bars. In this design, the 10-  $\\hbox{k}\\Omega$   QHR array device consists of only 16 Hall bars, and this number is about 16 times lor than that in the previous design, although the nominal value is identical to the previous one. The nominal value of this device shows a relative difference of only 0.034   $\\mu\\Omega/\\Omega$  , based on   $R_{K - 90}\\ (=25\\,812.807\\ \\Omega)$  , from the exact value of 10   $\\hbox{k}\\Omega$  . This fact might allow us to evaluate each Hall bar in the array device. The parameters of this 10-  $\\hbox{k}\\Omega$    QHR array device re measured by a conventional QHR and cryogenic current comparator using the 100-   $\\Omega$   standard resistor. According to the measurement, the value of the 10-  $\\hbox{k}\\Omega$   QHR array device agrees with its nominal value within around one part in   $10^{8}$  . In the same manner, new combinations of Hall bars re designed for the 100-  $\\Omega$   \u20131-  $\\hbox{M}\\Omega$   range."}]