Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Large-scale software development is an evolutionary process. In an evolving specification, multiple development participants often hold multiple inconsistent views on the system being developed, and considerable effort is spent handling recurrent inconsistencies. Detecting and resolving inconsistencies is only part of the problem; a resolved inconsistency might not stay resolved as a specification evolves. Frameworks in which inconsistency is tolerated help by allowing resolution to be delayed. Hover, the evolution of a specification may affect both resolved and unresolved inconsistencies. A framework is presented and elaborated in which software development knowledge is partitioned into multiple views called ViewPoints. Inconsistencies beten ViewPoints are managed by explicitly representing relationships beten them, and recording both resolved and unresolved inconsistencies. It is assumed that ViewPoints will often be inconsistent, and so a complete work record is kept, detailing any inconsistencies that have been detected and what actions, if any, have been taken to resolve them. The work record is then used to reason about the effects of subsequent changes to ViewPoints, without constraining the development process. The paper demonstrates how inconsistency management is used as a tool for requirements elicitation and how ViewPoints provide a vehicle for achieving this. Inconsistency is used as a stimulus for eliciting missing information and capturing user-defined relationships that arise beten elements of an evolving specification.
['Steve M. Easterbrook', 'Bashar Nuseibeh']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Using ViewPoints for inconsistency management
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Using ViewPoints for inconsistency management"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Large-scale software development is an evolutionary process. In an evolving specification, multiple development participants often hold multiple inconsistent views on the system being developed, and considerable effort is spent handling recurrent inconsistencies. Detecting and resolving inconsistencies is only part of the problem; a resolved inconsistency might not stay resolved as a specification evolves. Frameworks in which inconsistency is tolerated help by allowing resolution to be delayed. Hover, the evolution of a specification may affect both resolved and unresolved inconsistencies. A framework is presented and elaborated in which software development knowledge is partitioned into multiple views called ViewPoints. Inconsistencies beten ViewPoints are managed by explicitly representing relationships beten them, and recording both resolved and unresolved inconsistencies. It is assumed that ViewPoints will often be inconsistent, and so a complete work record is kept, detailing any inconsistencies that have been detected and what actions, if any, have been taken to resolve them. The work record is then used to reason about the effects of subsequent changes to ViewPoints, without constraining the development process. The paper demonstrates how inconsistency management is used as a tool for requirements elicitation and how ViewPoints provide a vehicle for achieving this. Inconsistency is used as a stimulus for eliciting missing information and capturing user-defined relationships that arise beten elements of an evolving specification."}]