Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely:   test the effectiveness of a compensation mechanism when a negative externality is produced. It allows agents suffering from the negative externality to compensate those who reduce its production. Transfers are implemented via a two-stage design which is 10 an adaptation of Varian’s mechanism. It has been previously tested in the lab with different types of games, and its effectiveness turns out to depend on the experiment, for unclear reasons which  try to decipher in this paper. Three possible explanations, choice overload, mere coordination and inequality, are proposed and studied.  show that, other things equal, the larger the size of the strategy space, the lor the mechanism’s efficiency (choice overload ef15 fect). Perhaps surprisingly, the data show that the appearance of additional equilibria does not jeopardize effectiveness (no mere coordination effect). Finally, inequality of outcomes plays a key role (fairness effect).
['Estelle Midler', 'Charles Figuieres', 'Marc Willinger']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Choice overload, coordination and inequality: three hurdles to the effectiveness of the compensation mechanism?
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Choice overload, coordination and inequality: three hurdles to the effectiveness of the compensation mechanism?"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely:   test the effectiveness of a compensation mechanism when a negative externality is produced. It allows agents suffering from the negative externality to compensate those who reduce its production. Transfers are implemented via a two-stage design which is 10 an adaptation of Varian\u2019s mechanism. It has been previously tested in the lab with different types of games, and its effectiveness turns out to depend on the experiment, for unclear reasons which  try to decipher in this paper. Three possible explanations, choice overload, mere coordination and inequality, are proposed and studied.  show that, other things equal, the larger the size of the strategy space, the lor the mechanism\u2019s efficiency (choice overload ef15 fect). Perhaps surprisingly, the data show that the appearance of additional equilibria does not jeopardize effectiveness (no mere coordination effect). Finally, inequality of outcomes plays a key role (fairness effect)."}]