Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Effects are fundamental to programming languages. Even the lambda calculus has effects, and consequently the two famous evaluation strategies produce different semantics. As such, much research has been done to improve our understanding of effects. Since Moggi introduced monads for his computational lambda calculus, further generalizations have been designed to formalize increasingly complex computational effects, such as indexed monads follod by layered monads follod by parameterized monads. This succession prompted us to determine the most general formalization possible. In searching for this formalization  came across many surprises, such as the insufficiencies of arrows, as ll as many unexpected insights, such as the importance of considering an effect as a small component of a whole system rather than just an isolated feature.   present our semantic formalization for producer effect systems, which  call a productor, and prove its maximal generality by focusing on only sequential composition of effectful computations, consequently guaranteeing that the existing monadic techniques are specializations of productors.
['Ross Tate']
I am writing a research paper on a idea The sequential semantics of producer effect systems
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea The sequential semantics of producer effect systems"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Effects are fundamental to programming languages. Even the lambda calculus has effects, and consequently the two famous evaluation strategies produce different semantics. As such, much research has been done to improve our understanding of effects. Since Moggi introduced monads for his computational lambda calculus, further generalizations have been designed to formalize increasingly complex computational effects, such as indexed monads follod by layered monads follod by parameterized monads. This succession prompted us to determine the most general formalization possible. In searching for this formalization  came across many surprises, such as the insufficiencies of arrows, as ll as many unexpected insights, such as the importance of considering an effect as a small component of a whole system rather than just an isolated feature.   present our semantic formalization for producer effect systems, which  call a productor, and prove its maximal generality by focusing on only sequential composition of effectful computations, consequently guaranteeing that the existing monadic techniques are specializations of productors."}]