Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Much evidence has been found for pervasive links beten the manual and speech motor systems, including evidence from infant development, deictic pointing, and repetitive tapping and speaking tasks.  expand on the last of these paradigms to look at intra- and cross-modal effects of emphatic stress, as ll as the effects of coordination in the absence of explicit rhythm. In this study, subjects repeatedly tapped their finger and synchronously repeated a single spoken syllable. On each trial, subjects placed an emphatic stress on one finger tap or one spoken syllable. Results show that both movement duration and magnitude are affected by emphatic stress regardless of whether that stress is in the same domain (e.g., effects on the oral articulators when a spoken repetition is stressed) or across domains (e.g., effects on the oral articulators when a tap is stressed). Though the size of the effects differs beten intra-and cross-domain emphases, the implementation of stress affects both motor domains, indicating a tight connection. This close coupling is seen even in the absence of stress, though it is highlighted under stress. The results of this study support the idea that implementation of prosody is not domain-specific but relies on general aspects of the motor system.
['Benjamin Parrell', 'Louis Goldstein', 'Sungbok Lee', 'Dani Byrd']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Spatiotemporal coupling between speech and manual motor actions
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Spatiotemporal coupling between speech and manual motor actions"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Much evidence has been found for pervasive links beten the manual and speech motor systems, including evidence from infant development, deictic pointing, and repetitive tapping and speaking tasks.  expand on the last of these paradigms to look at intra- and cross-modal effects of emphatic stress, as ll as the effects of coordination in the absence of explicit rhythm. In this study, subjects repeatedly tapped their finger and synchronously repeated a single spoken syllable. On each trial, subjects placed an emphatic stress on one finger tap or one spoken syllable. Results show that both movement duration and magnitude are affected by emphatic stress regardless of whether that stress is in the same domain (e.g., effects on the oral articulators when a spoken repetition is stressed) or across domains (e.g., effects on the oral articulators when a tap is stressed). Though the size of the effects differs beten intra-and cross-domain emphases, the implementation of stress affects both motor domains, indicating a tight connection. This close coupling is seen even in the absence of stress, though it is highlighted under stress. The results of this study support the idea that implementation of prosody is not domain-specific but relies on general aspects of the motor system."}]