Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Reading and writing book reviews for learned journals plays an important part in academic life but little is known about how academics carry out these tasks. The aim of this research was to explore these activities with academics from the arts and humanities, the social sciences, and the natural sciences. An electronic questionnaire was used to ascertain (a) how often the respondents read and wrote book reviews, (b) how useful they found them, and (c) what features they thought important in book reviews. Fifty-two academics in the arts, 53 in the social sciences, and 51 in the sciences replied. There re few disciplinary differences. Most respondents reported reading beten one and five book reviews a month and writing beten one and two a year. There was high overall agreement beten what the respondents thought re important features of book reviews, but there re also wide individual differences beten them. This agreement across the disciplines supports the notion that book reviews can be seen as an academic genre with measurable features. This has implications for how they are written, and how authors might be taught to write them better. A potential checklist for authors is suggested.
['James Hartley']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Reading and writing book reviews across the disciplines
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Reading and writing book reviews across the disciplines"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Reading and writing book reviews for learned journals plays an important part in academic life but little is known about how academics carry out these tasks. The aim of this research was to explore these activities with academics from the arts and humanities, the social sciences, and the natural sciences. An electronic questionnaire was used to ascertain (a) how often the respondents read and wrote book reviews, (b) how useful they found them, and (c) what features they thought important in book reviews. Fifty-two academics in the arts, 53 in the social sciences, and 51 in the sciences replied. There re few disciplinary differences. Most respondents reported reading beten one and five book reviews a month and writing beten one and two a year. There was high overall agreement beten what the respondents thought re important features of book reviews, but there re also wide individual differences beten them. This agreement across the disciplines supports the notion that book reviews can be seen as an academic genre with measurable features. This has implications for how they are written, and how authors might be taught to write them better. A potential checklist for authors is suggested."}]