Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Abstract   Speaker variability in the coarticulation of the vols /a,i,u/ was investigated in / C  1 ,VC 2 ∈/ pseudo-words, containing the consonants /p,t,k,d,s,m,n,r/. These words re read out in isolation by fifteen male speakers of Dutch. The formants  F  1–3  (in Bark) re extracted from the steady-state of each vol /a,i,u/. Coarticulation in each of 1200 realisations per vol was measured in  F  1–3  as a function of consonantal context, using a score-model based measure called COART. The largest amount of coarticulation was found in /u/ where nasals and alveolars in  C  1 -position had the largest effect on the formant positions, especially on  F  2 . Coarticulation in /a,u/ proved to be speaker-specific. For these vols the speaker variability of COART in a context was larger, generally, if COART itself was larger. Studied in a speaker identification task, finally, COART improved identification results only when three conditions re combined: (a) if COART was used as an additional parameter to  F  1–3 ; (b) if the COART-values for the vol re high; (c) if all vol contexts re pooled in the analysis. The two main conclusions from this study are that coarticulation cannot be investigated speaker-independently and that COART  can  be contributive to speaker identification, but only in very restricted conditions.
['H. van den Heuvel', 'Bert Cranen', 'T. Rietveld']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Speaker variability in the coarticulation of /a,i,u/
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Speaker variability in the coarticulation of /a,i,u/"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Abstract   Speaker variability in the coarticulation of the vols /a,i,u/ was investigated in / C  1 ,VC 2 \u2208/ pseudo-words, containing the consonants /p,t,k,d,s,m,n,r/. These words re read out in isolation by fifteen male speakers of Dutch. The formants  F  1\u20133  (in Bark) re extracted from the steady-state of each vol /a,i,u/. Coarticulation in each of 1200 realisations per vol was measured in  F  1\u20133  as a function of consonantal context, using a score-model based measure called COART. The largest amount of coarticulation was found in /u/ where nasals and alveolars in  C  1 -position had the largest effect on the formant positions, especially on  F  2 . Coarticulation in /a,u/ proved to be speaker-specific. For these vols the speaker variability of COART in a context was larger, generally, if COART itself was larger. Studied in a speaker identification task, finally, COART improved identification results only when three conditions re combined: (a) if COART was used as an additional parameter to  F  1\u20133 ; (b) if the COART-values for the vol re high; (c) if all vol contexts re pooled in the analysis. The two main conclusions from this study are that coarticulation cannot be investigated speaker-independently and that COART  can  be contributive to speaker identification, but only in very restricted conditions."}]