Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: No one denies that people adapt what they say and how they interpret what is said to them, depending on their interactive partners. What is controversial is when and how they do so. Several psycholinguistics research programs have found what appear to be failures to adapt to partners in the early moments of processing and have used this evidence to argue for modularity in the language processing architecture, claiming that the system cannot take into account a partner’s distinct needs or knowledge early in processing.  review the evidence for both early and delayed partner-specific adaptations, and  identify some challenges and difficulties with interpreting this evidence.  then discuss new analyses from a previously published referential communication experiment (Metzing & Brennan, 2003) demonstrating that partner-specific effects need not occur late in processing. In contrast to Pickering and Garrod (2004) and Keysar, Barr, and Horton (1998b),  conclude that there is no good evidence that early processing has to be be ‘‘egocentric,’’ ‘‘dumb,’’ or encapsulated from social knowledge or common ground, but that under some circumstances, such as when one partner has made an attribution about another’s knowledge or needs, processing can be nimble enough to adapt quite early to a perspective different from one’s own.
['Susan E. Brennan', 'Joy E. Hanna']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Partner-specific adaptation in dialog.
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Partner-specific adaptation in dialog."}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: No one denies that people adapt what they say and how they interpret what is said to them, depending on their interactive partners. What is controversial is when and how they do so. Several psycholinguistics research programs have found what appear to be failures to adapt to partners in the early moments of processing and have used this evidence to argue for modularity in the language processing architecture, claiming that the system cannot take into account a partner\u2019s distinct needs or knowledge early in processing.  review the evidence for both early and delayed partner-specific adaptations, and  identify some challenges and difficulties with interpreting this evidence.  then discuss new analyses from a previously published referential communication experiment (Metzing & Brennan, 2003) demonstrating that partner-specific effects need not occur late in processing. In contrast to Pickering and Garrod (2004) and Keysar, Barr, and Horton (1998b),  conclude that there is no good evidence that early processing has to be be \u2018\u2018egocentric,\u2019\u2019 \u2018\u2018dumb,\u2019\u2019 or encapsulated from social knowledge or common ground, but that under some circumstances, such as when one partner has made an attribution about another\u2019s knowledge or needs, processing can be nimble enough to adapt quite early to a perspective different from one\u2019s own."}]