Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Two methods are proposed for collective knowledge extraction from questionnaires with ordinal scales and dichotomous questions.#R##N##R##N#Both methods are based on a three-way decision procedure and a statistical method aimed at attaining statistical significance of the above decision. One method is aimed at giving an (absolute) assessment of “objects” according to a given “criterion” and the other one at producing a relative ranking of the “objects”. A criterion can be related to one or more questionnaire items (usually questions or statements). In this latter case a method to compose ordinal items in aggregate scores is also given. The paper also presents two various case studies that illustrate the methods and give motivations for their application in different domains where the knowledge of a community or any distributed group of experts can be externalized (in terms of users' perceptions, attitudes, opinions, choices) with a structured closed-ended questionnaire.
['Federico Cabitza', 'Davide Ciucci', 'Angela Locoro']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Exploiting collective knowledge with three-way decision theory: Cases from the questionnaire-based research ☆
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Exploiting collective knowledge with three-way decision theory: Cases from the questionnaire-based research \u2606"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Two methods are proposed for collective knowledge extraction from questionnaires with ordinal scales and dichotomous questions.#R##N##R##N#Both methods are based on a three-way decision procedure and a statistical method aimed at attaining statistical significance of the above decision. One method is aimed at giving an (absolute) assessment of \u201cobjects\u201d according to a given \u201ccriterion\u201d and the other one at producing a relative ranking of the \u201cobjects\u201d. A criterion can be related to one or more questionnaire items (usually questions or statements). In this latter case a method to compose ordinal items in aggregate scores is also given. The paper also presents two various case studies that illustrate the methods and give motivations for their application in different domains where the knowledge of a community or any distributed group of experts can be externalized (in terms of users' perceptions, attitudes, opinions, choices) with a structured closed-ended questionnaire."}]