Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Intelligent design advocate William Dembski has introduced a measure of information called “complex specified information”, or CSI. He claims that CSI is a reliable marker of design by intelligent agents. He puts forth a “Law of Conservation of Information” which states that chance and natural laws are incapable of generating CSI. In particular, CSI cannot be generated by evolutionary computation. Dembski asserts that CSI is present in intelligent causes and in the flagellum of Escherichia coli, and concludes that neither have natural explanations. ,  examine Dembski’s claims, point out significant errors in his reasoning, and conclude that there is no reason to accept his assertions.
['Wesley R. Elsberry', 'Jeffrey Shallit']
I am writing a research paper on a idea Information theory, evolutionary computation, and Dembski’s “complex specified information”
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea Information theory, evolutionary computation, and Dembski\u2019s \u201ccomplex specified information\u201d"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Intelligent design advocate William Dembski has introduced a measure of information called \u201ccomplex specified information\u201d, or CSI. He claims that CSI is a reliable marker of design by intelligent agents. He puts forth a \u201cLaw of Conservation of Information\u201d which states that chance and natural laws are incapable of generating CSI. In particular, CSI cannot be generated by evolutionary computation. Dembski asserts that CSI is present in intelligent causes and in the flagellum of Escherichia coli, and concludes that neither have natural explanations. ,  examine Dembski\u2019s claims, point out significant errors in his reasoning, and conclude that there is no reason to accept his assertions."}]