Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: TinyTOCS has a unique opportunity to experiment with changes to the academic publishing model due to its high prole and high-quality student PC. Hover, TinyTOCS reiterates many of the shortcomings of the traditional publishing model [2], including a multi-month long review cycle, a closed and opaque peer-review process, and arbitrary content limitations. Instead,  argue that TinyTOCS should take a truly bold approach and serve as a testbed for experimentation. Specically,  encourage the committee to embrace several radical changes to traditional publishing. First, separate program committee certication from publication: let authors publish immediately and then certify work later. Adopt a model of real-time, unblinded reviews (i.e., let PC and community members retet papers to \accept" them, and let the community’s interest in the work speak for itself). This can cut review time from months to minutes, as ll as prevent anti-champions from burying interesting work. Lastly, remove arbitrary page and accept rate limitations. By adopting these positions, TinyTOCS can make the publishing process more open, transparent, and community-based.
['George Porter']
I am writing a research paper on a idea TinyTOCS as an Experimental Laboratory
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea TinyTOCS as an Experimental Laboratory"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: TinyTOCS has a unique opportunity to experiment with changes to the academic publishing model due to its high prole and high-quality student PC. Hover, TinyTOCS reiterates many of the shortcomings of the traditional publishing model [2], including a multi-month long review cycle, a closed and opaque peer-review process, and arbitrary content limitations. Instead,  argue that TinyTOCS should take a truly bold approach and serve as a testbed for experimentation. Specically,  encourage the committee to embrace several radical changes to traditional publishing. First, separate program committee certication from publication: let authors publish immediately and then certify work later. Adopt a model of real-time, unblinded reviews (i.e., let PC and community members retet papers to \\accept\" them, and let the community\u2019s interest in the work speak for itself). This can cut review time from months to minutes, as ll as prevent anti-champions from burying interesting work. Lastly, remove arbitrary page and accept rate limitations. By adopting these positions, TinyTOCS can make the publishing process more open, transparent, and community-based."}]