Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Spoken contributions in dialogue often continue or complete earlier contributions by either the same or a different speaker. These compound contributions(CCs) thus provide a natural context for investigations of incremental processing in dialogue.  present a corpus study which confirms that CCs are a key dial ogue phenomenon: almost 20% of contributions fit our general definition of CCs, with ne arly 3% being the cross-person case most often studied. The results suggest that processing is word-by-word incremental, as splits can occur within syntactic ‘constituents’; hover, some s ystematic differences beten sameand cross-person cases indicate important dialogue-specific pragmatic effects. An experimental study then investigates these effects by artificially intro ducing CCs into multi-party text dialogue. Results suggest that CCs affect people’s expectations abou t who will speak next and whether other participants have formed a coalition or ‘party’. Together, these studies suggest that CCs require an incremental processing mechanism that can provide a resource for constructing linguistic constit uents that span multiple contributions and multiple participants. They also suggest the need to model higher-level dialogue units that have consequences for the organisation of turn-taking and for the development of a shared context.
['Christine Howes', 'Matthew Purver', 'Patrick G. T. Healey', 'Gregory J. Mills', 'Eleni Gregoromichelaki']
I am writing a research paper on a idea On Incrementality in Dialogue: Evidence from Compound Contributions
[{"from": "human", "value": "I am writing a research paper on a idea On Incrementality in Dialogue: Evidence from Compound Contributions"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Thats a unique idea.You should consider the following idea to enhance your idea so that it would impact uniquely: Spoken contributions in dialogue often continue or complete earlier contributions by either the same or a different speaker. These compound contributions(CCs) thus provide a natural context for investigations of incremental processing in dialogue.  present a corpus study which confirms that CCs are a key dial ogue phenomenon: almost 20% of contributions fit our general definition of CCs, with ne arly 3% being the cross-person case most often studied. The results suggest that processing is word-by-word incremental, as splits can occur within syntactic \u2018constituents\u2019; hover, some s ystematic differences beten sameand cross-person cases indicate important dialogue-specific pragmatic effects. An experimental study then investigates these effects by artificially intro ducing CCs into multi-party text dialogue. Results suggest that CCs affect people\u2019s expectations abou t who will speak next and whether other participants have formed a coalition or \u2018party\u2019. Together, these studies suggest that CCs require an incremental processing mechanism that can provide a resource for constructing linguistic constit uents that span multiple contributions and multiple participants. They also suggest the need to model higher-level dialogue units that have consequences for the organisation of turn-taking and for the development of a shared context."}]