opinion: McKINLEY MEMORIAL BAPTIST CHURCH v. THE AMERICAN WORKMEN et al.
  No. 5488.
  Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.
  Argued May 5, 1982.
  Decided May 23, 1932.
  Oscar H. Brinkman, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
  Charles W. Harr, Sefton Darr, George Monk, James O’D. Moran, C. Albert White, J. Baseom Harrell, Jr., Chapin B. Bauman, Charles M. Nash, and Arthur J. Hilland, all of Washington, D. C., for appellees.
  Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB, VAN ORSDEL, HITZ, -and GROWER, Associate Justices.
  PER CURIAM.
  This case was begun by appellant as plaintiff in the lower court, by a bill of complaint entitled “a Bill to Restrain Execution of ’Trustees’ Deed.” It was alleged in the bill that the plaintiff was the owner of certain real estate situate in the District of Columbia, which was subject to a deed of trust for $5,500, being a first lien, upon the property, held by defendant The American Workmen, a corporation, and that the property had been sold at trustees’ sale to defendant Humphries, under the deed of trust securing such loan, under circumstances which amounted to a fraud upon the plaintiff. The plaintiff prayed that the sale be set aside and the trustees bo restrained from conveying the property to Humphries, and for an injunction pendente lite to that effect.
  The cause was heard by the lower court upon the motion of plaintiff for an injunction pendente lite and defendants’ motion to dismiss the bill of complaint. The plaintiff’s motion was overruled, and the defendants’ motion was sustained. The bill of complaint accordingly was dismissed, and this appeal was taken by plaintiff.
  At the hearing of the case in this court the respective parties by their counsel stated in open court that the sale in question had been rescinded by the purchaser, Hum-phries, without objection of the defendants, because of the delay occasioned by this suit in procuring a deed for the property. .
  It therefore appears that this appeal has become moot, and it is hereby dismissed; the costs to be assessed in equal parts against plaintiff and defendant The American Workmen.
  Dismissed.
instruction: What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
  Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
  When coding the detailed nature of participants, use your personal knowledge about the participants, if you are completely confident of the accuracy of your knowledge, even if the specific information is not in the opinion. For example, if "IBM" is listed as the appellant it could be classified as "clearly national or international in scope" even if the opinion did not indicate the scope of the business. 
  
  Your task concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "private organization or association", specifically "other". Your task is to determine what subcategory of private association best describes this litigant.
choices: Civic, social, fraternal organization Political organizations - Other than political parties Examples: Civil rights focus; Public Interest - broad, civil liberties focus (ACLU) or broad, multi-issue focus (Common Cause, Heritage Foundation, ADA) or single issue - Environmental ENV, Abortion, etc. (prolife, pro-abortion), elderly, consumer interests: Consumer Federation of America, Consumer's Union, National Railroad Passenger Association; PAC Political party Educational organization - Private, non-profit school Educational organization - Association, not individual school - PTA or PTO Religious or non-profit hospital or medical care facility (e.g., nursing home) Other religious organization (includes religious foundations) Charitable or philanthropic organization (including foundations, funds, private museums, private libraries) Other Unclear