opinion: COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Petitioner
  v.
  Micheal BACA, et al.
  No. 19-518
  Supreme Court of the United States.
  July 6, 2020
  L. Lawrence Lessig, Counsel of Record, Jason Harrow, Equal Citizens, Cambridge, MA, Jason B. Wesoky, Denver, Co, Counsel for Electors, David H. Fry, J. Max Rosen, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, San Francisco, CA, for respondents.
  Philip J. Weiser, Attorney General, Eric R. Olson, Solicitor General, Office of the Colorado, Attorney General, Denver, Colorado, Grant T. Sullivan, Assistant Solicitor General, Leeann Morrill, First Assistant Attorney, General, Michael D. Mcmaster, Assistant Solicitor General, Michael Kotlarczyk, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel J. De Cecco, Alexa D. Jones, Danny Rheiner, Assistant Attorney General Fellows, for petitioner.
  PER CURIAM.
  The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is reversed for the reasons stated in Chiafalo v. Washington , --- U.S. ----, 140 S.Ct. 2316, --- L.Ed.2d ----, 2020 WL 3633779 (2020).
  It is so ordered.
  Justice SOTOMAYOR took no part in the decision of this case.
  Justice THOMAS concurs in the judgment for the reasons stated in his separate opinion in Chiafalo v. Washington, ante, p. ----.
choices: Alabama Alaska American Samoa Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Federated States of Micronesia Florida Georgia Guam Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Marshall Islands Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Northern Mariana Islands Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Palau Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virgin Islands Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming United States Interstate Compact Philippines Indian Dakota