What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Your task is to determine the general category of issues discussed in the opinion of the court. Choose among the following categories. Criminal and prisioner petitions- includes appeals of conviction, petitions for post conviction relief, habeas corpus petitions, and other prisoner petitions which challenge the validity of the conviction or the sentence or the validity of continued confinement. Civil - Government - these will include appeals from administrative agencies (e.g., OSHA,FDA), the decisions of administrative law judges, or the decisions of independent regulatory agencies (e.g., NLRB, FCC,SEC). The focus in administrative law is usually on procedural principles that apply to administrative agencies as they affect private interests, primarily through rulemaking and adjudication. Tort actions against the government, including petitions by prisoners which challenge the conditions of their confinement or which seek damages for torts committed by prion officials or by police fit in this category. In addition, this category will include suits over taxes and claims for benefits from government. Diversity of Citizenship - civil cases involving disputes between citizens of different states (remember that businesses have state citizenship). These cases will always involve the application of state or local law. If the case is centrally concerned with the application or interpretation of federal law then it is not a diversity case. Civil Disputes - Private - includes all civil cases that do not fit in any of the above categories. The opposing litigants will be individuals, businesses or groups.

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Harold W. GREENWELL, Appellant.
No. 14361.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Oct. 6, 1970.
Harold Bradley Evans, Jr., Alexandria, Va. (court-appointed counsel), on the brief, for appellant.
Brian P. Gettings, U. S. Atty., and Justin W. Williams, Asst. U. S. Atty., on the brief, for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and SOBELOFF and BOREMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Greenwell was convicted of escaping from the District of Columbia Department of Corrections Maximum Security Facility at Lorton, Virginia. The escape occurred during the pendency of an appeal" from a conviction for an earlier escape, which we affirmed. United States v. Greenwell, 4 Cir., 418 F.2d 846. Appointed counsel on this appeal has indicated that he is unable to discover any meritorious issue. In accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, he has filed a brief raising several “arguable” issues and has given Greenwell an opportunity to raise others. On review of the brief and the record we find further briefing or oral argument unnecessary and affirm the judgment of conviction.
Affirmed.

Question: What is the general category of issues discussed in the opinion of the court?
A. criminal and prisoner petitions
B. civil - government
C. diversity of citizenship
D. civil - private
E. other, not applicable
F. not ascertained
Answer: