What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to determine whether there was an issue discussed in the opinion of the court about the interpretation of federal rule of procedures, judicial doctrine, or case law, and if so, whether the resolution of the issue by the court favored the appellant.

EUREKA CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Willie B. CORNETT, Charles Scrivner, James Lyons, Estil Moore, Smith Coal Company, and O. H. Black, W. D. Black, and Raymond E. Black, Partners, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Black Brothers Lines, Appellees.
Nos. 11049, 11050.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Oct. 6, 1950.
Craft & Stanfill, Hazard, Ky., W. A. Stanfill, Hazard, Ky., for appellant.
Cornett & Dixon, Hyden, Ky., Smith & Leary, Frankfort, Ky. and Dennis B. Wooten and W. W. Reeves, Hazard, Ky., A. E. Cornett, Hyden, Ky., for appellees.
Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and SI-MONS and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The above, causes coming on, to be heard on transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel, and the court being duly advised,
Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgments are hereby affirmed, in accordance with the reasons set forth in the opinion of the District Court.

Question: Did the interpretation of federal rule of procedures, judicial doctrine, or case law by the court favor the appellant?
A. No
B. Yes
C. Mixed answer
D. Issue not discussed
Answer: