What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to determine whether there was an issue discussed in the opinion of the court about the constitutionality of a law or administrative action, and if so, whether the resolution of the issue by the court favored the appellant.

Miriam J. GOLDEN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America and Charlie Blalock Mayberry, Appellees.
No. 13490.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 13, 1951.
Albert A. Rosenthal, Birmingham, Ala., O. P. Lee, Opelika, Ala., for appellant.
J. A. Walker, Jacob Walker, Jr., Opelika, Ala., E. Burns Parker, U. S. Atty., Montgomery, Ala., for appellees.
Before HOLMES, STRUM, and RIVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed for the reasons well stated in the opinion of District Judge Kennamer, reported in 91 F. Supp. 950.

Question: Did the court's conclusion about the constitutionality of a law or administrative action favor the appellant?
A. Issue not discussed
B. The issue was discussed in the opinion and the resolution of the issue by the court favored the respondent
C. The issue was discussed in the opinion and the resolution of the issue by the court favored the appellant
D. The resolution of the issue had mixed results for the appellant and respondent
Answer: