Cytotoxic monotherapy was the most frequently prescribed regimen ( N = 60 , 46 % ) in 2L , followed by combination therapies ( N = 45 , 35 % ) , pembrolizumab monotherapy ( N = 19 , 15 % ) , and bevacizumab monotherapy ( N = 6 , 5 % ) .
Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes among patients with previously treated recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: A community oncology-based analysis. There is no standard systemic treatment for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (r/mCC) after failure of first-line (1L) therapy. This study characterizes the patient experience, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes of patients who initiated second-line (2L) therapy for r/mCC in a US community oncology setting. ### methods This is an observational study of cervical cancer patients who failed 1L systemic treatment for r/mCC and initiated 2L systemic therapy between 2014 and 2019 within the US Oncology Network (USON). USON's electronic health records were used to identify eligible patients and abstract data. Overall survival (OS), time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), and time to first subsequent treatment (TFST) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. ### results A total of 130 patients were identified (mean age 53 years). Over 60% of patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0-1. Cytotoxic monotherapy was the most frequently prescribed regimen ( N = 60 , 46 % ) in 2L , followed by combination therapies ( N = 45 , 35 % ) , pembrolizumab monotherapy ( N = 19 , 15 % ) , and bevacizumab monotherapy ( N = 6 , 5 % ) . Median OS was 9.1 months (95% CI: 7.2-12.2) after initiation of 2L therapy. Median TTD was 2.8 months (95% CI: 2.5-3.3), and median TFST was 4.9 months (95% CI: 4.2-5.7). No significant difference in outcomes was found when stratified by 2L treatments. ### conclusions The observed heterogeneity in 2L r/mCC therapy suggests no clear standard-of-care in this setting. Additionally, short duration of OS observed was consistent across 2L regimens. New, effective treatment options in this setting are needed.
### Instruction:
            Given the context about compound efficacy for the given treatment mentioned within the input, mentioned the compounds 
            that can co-occur for the mentioned treatment

            ### Input:
            Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes among patients with previously treated recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: A community oncology-based analysis. There is no standard systemic treatment for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (r/mCC) after failure of first-line (1L) therapy. This study characterizes the patient experience, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes of patients who initiated second-line (2L) therapy for r/mCC in a US community oncology setting. ### methods This is an observational study of cervical cancer patients who failed 1L systemic treatment for r/mCC and initiated 2L systemic therapy between 2014 and 2019 within the US Oncology Network (USON). USON's electronic health records were used to identify eligible patients and abstract data. Overall survival (OS), time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), and time to first subsequent treatment (TFST) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. ### results A total of 130 patients were identified (mean age 53 years). Over 60% of patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0-1. Cytotoxic monotherapy was the most frequently prescribed regimen ( N = 60 , 46 % ) in 2L , followed by combination therapies ( N = 45 , 35 % ) , pembrolizumab monotherapy ( N = 19 , 15 % ) , and bevacizumab monotherapy ( N = 6 , 5 % ) . Median OS was 9.1 months (95% CI: 7.2-12.2) after initiation of 2L therapy. Median TTD was 2.8 months (95% CI: 2.5-3.3), and median TFST was 4.9 months (95% CI: 4.2-5.7). No significant difference in outcomes was found when stratified by 2L treatments. ### conclusions The observed heterogeneity in 2L r/mCC therapy suggests no clear standard-of-care in this setting. Additionally, short duration of OS observed was consistent across 2L regimens. New, effective treatment options in this setting are needed.

            ### Response:
            pembrolizumab, bevacizumab
            