A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 122 advanced NSCLC patients with pleural effusion , and among them , 61 received thoracic hyperthermic perfusion with recombinant human endostatin ( ES ) plus nedaplatin ( Endostatin group ) , while the other 61 underwent thoracic hyperthermic perfusion with cisplatin alone ( Cisplatin group ) .
Effect of thoracic hyperthermic perfusion with recombinant human endostatin plus nedaplatin in treating pleural effusion in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. To explore the efficacy and safety of thoracic hyperthermia perfusion with recombinant human endostatin plus nedaplatin in the treatment of pleural effusion in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ### methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 122 advanced NSCLC patients with pleural effusion , and among them , 61 received thoracic hyperthermic perfusion with recombinant human endostatin ( ES ) plus nedaplatin ( Endostatin group ) , while the other 61 underwent thoracic hyperthermic perfusion with cisplatin alone ( Cisplatin group ) . The short-term efficacy, changes in the pleural effusion and serum immunological indicators before and after treatment, quality of life, and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups of patients. Finally, the progression of pleural effusion in patients were followed up and recorded. ### results After treatment, the overall response rate of patients in endostatin group was considerably higher than that in Cisplatin group (p=0.030). At 2 weeks after treatment, the level of alanine transferase (ALT) rose notably, while that of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) declined dramatically in both groups of patients, and the patients in endostatin group had markedly lower levels of ALT and CEA than those in Cisplatin group (p=0.007, p=0.003). After treatment, the Karnofsky Performance status (KPS) score of patients was prominently raised in the two groups, and endostatin group exhibited considerably higher KPS scores than Cisplatin group (p=0.045). The incidence rates of nausea and vomiting as well as diarrhea in endostatin group were prominently lower than those in Cisplatin group (p=0.039, p=0.048). According to the follow-up results, the median time to the progression of pleural effusion in endostatin group was markedly longer than that in Cisplatin group (p=0.008). ### conclusions Compared with the thoracic hyperthermic perfusion with cisplatin alone, the thoracic hyperthermic perfusion with recombinant human endostatin plus nedaplatin showed dramatically potential efficacy, decrease of the incidence rate of adverse reactions in the digestive system, improvement of quality of life of patients, and prolongation of progression of pleural effusion.
### Instruction:
            Given the context about compound efficacy for the given treatment mentioned within the input, mentioned the compounds 
            that can co-occur for the mentioned treatment

            ### Input:
            Effect of thoracic hyperthermic perfusion with recombinant human endostatin plus nedaplatin in treating pleural effusion in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. To explore the efficacy and safety of thoracic hyperthermia perfusion with recombinant human endostatin plus nedaplatin in the treatment of pleural effusion in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ### methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 122 advanced NSCLC patients with pleural effusion , and among them , 61 received thoracic hyperthermic perfusion with recombinant human endostatin ( ES ) plus nedaplatin ( Endostatin group ) , while the other 61 underwent thoracic hyperthermic perfusion with cisplatin alone ( Cisplatin group ) . The short-term efficacy, changes in the pleural effusion and serum immunological indicators before and after treatment, quality of life, and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups of patients. Finally, the progression of pleural effusion in patients were followed up and recorded. ### results After treatment, the overall response rate of patients in endostatin group was considerably higher than that in Cisplatin group (p=0.030). At 2 weeks after treatment, the level of alanine transferase (ALT) rose notably, while that of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) declined dramatically in both groups of patients, and the patients in endostatin group had markedly lower levels of ALT and CEA than those in Cisplatin group (p=0.007, p=0.003). After treatment, the Karnofsky Performance status (KPS) score of patients was prominently raised in the two groups, and endostatin group exhibited considerably higher KPS scores than Cisplatin group (p=0.045). The incidence rates of nausea and vomiting as well as diarrhea in endostatin group were prominently lower than those in Cisplatin group (p=0.039, p=0.048). According to the follow-up results, the median time to the progression of pleural effusion in endostatin group was markedly longer than that in Cisplatin group (p=0.008). ### conclusions Compared with the thoracic hyperthermic perfusion with cisplatin alone, the thoracic hyperthermic perfusion with recombinant human endostatin plus nedaplatin showed dramatically potential efficacy, decrease of the incidence rate of adverse reactions in the digestive system, improvement of quality of life of patients, and prolongation of progression of pleural effusion.

            ### Response:
            endostatin, nedaplatin, Endostatin
            