Nine patients received a combination of cisplatin and etoposide ( EP ) , 5 had cyclophosphamide , doxorubicin and vincristine , 1 had cyclophosphamide , etoposide and vincristine and 1 had monotherapy with oral etoposide .
Resolution of superior vena cava obstruction in small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. Small cell lung cancer is a highly chemo-sensitive malignancy. As it often presents with a central lesion, superior vena cava obstruction (SVCO) is not an uncommon manifestation. From January 1990 to December 1993, 161 patients with small cell lung carcinoma were seen at our institution. Twenty (12.4%) of these patients presented with symptoms and signs of SVCO. Initial therapy consisted of radiotherapy in 4 patients and chemotherapy in 16 patients. Of those treated with chemotherapy, patient characteristics included 13 males, median age of 62.5 years (range 51 to 78 years), Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 3 to 4 in 7 patients; 1 to 2 in 9 patients, and limited stage disease in 8 patients. The median period of follow-up was 5 months. Nine patients received a combination of cisplatin and etoposide ( EP ) , 5 had cyclophosphamide , doxorubicin and vincristine , 1 had cyclophosphamide , etoposide and vincristine and 1 had monotherapy with oral etoposide . Overall response to chemotherapy was 81% (with 31% complete responses). All responders had resolution of SVCO. Only 3 patients did not respond (1 patient defaulted, 1 patient died of neutropenic sepsis at week one and 1 patient had stable disease). Resolution of SVCO was noted within the first 2 weeks after the first cycle; the earliest being 3 days. The only patient given single-agent oral etoposide responded within 10 days after initiation of treatment. Of the 7 patients with poor performance status (ECOG 3 to 4), 3 died from treatment-related complications. Chemotherapy is highly effective as a primary treatment of small cell lung carcinoma despite presentation with SVCO. However, caution is advised in the use of combination chemotherapy for those presenting with poor performance status. Initial therapy with oral etoposide or radiotherapy should be considered as possible alternatives for these patients.
### Instruction:
            Given the context about compound efficacy for the given treatment mentioned within the input, mentioned the compounds 
            that can co-occur for the mentioned treatment

            ### Input:
            Resolution of superior vena cava obstruction in small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. Small cell lung cancer is a highly chemo-sensitive malignancy. As it often presents with a central lesion, superior vena cava obstruction (SVCO) is not an uncommon manifestation. From January 1990 to December 1993, 161 patients with small cell lung carcinoma were seen at our institution. Twenty (12.4%) of these patients presented with symptoms and signs of SVCO. Initial therapy consisted of radiotherapy in 4 patients and chemotherapy in 16 patients. Of those treated with chemotherapy, patient characteristics included 13 males, median age of 62.5 years (range 51 to 78 years), Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 3 to 4 in 7 patients; 1 to 2 in 9 patients, and limited stage disease in 8 patients. The median period of follow-up was 5 months. Nine patients received a combination of cisplatin and etoposide ( EP ) , 5 had cyclophosphamide , doxorubicin and vincristine , 1 had cyclophosphamide , etoposide and vincristine and 1 had monotherapy with oral etoposide . Overall response to chemotherapy was 81% (with 31% complete responses). All responders had resolution of SVCO. Only 3 patients did not respond (1 patient defaulted, 1 patient died of neutropenic sepsis at week one and 1 patient had stable disease). Resolution of SVCO was noted within the first 2 weeks after the first cycle; the earliest being 3 days. The only patient given single-agent oral etoposide responded within 10 days after initiation of treatment. Of the 7 patients with poor performance status (ECOG 3 to 4), 3 died from treatment-related complications. Chemotherapy is highly effective as a primary treatment of small cell lung carcinoma despite presentation with SVCO. However, caution is advised in the use of combination chemotherapy for those presenting with poor performance status. Initial therapy with oral etoposide or radiotherapy should be considered as possible alternatives for these patients.

            ### Response:
            cisplatin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, vincristine, etoposide
            