Taxinol , Gemcitabine ( GEM ) , Navelbine ( NVB ) , Edatrexate ( ETX ) , CPT-11 and high dose Epirubicin ( EPI HD ) are recommended as new effective drugs .
Non-surgical therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) denotes those of TNM stage III and IV. NSCLC has its specific characteristics in respect of oncological behaviour, molecular biology, sensitivity to chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT), and requires different therapeutic strategies in comparison with small cell lung cancer. The therapies include: (1) surgery in combination with new effective drugs is resulted in improved RR from 15% a decade ago to 40-60% today. Cisplatin (C-DDP) is the most attractive drug in the treatment of NSCLC, in lengthening the life-span of Stage IV NSCLC patients and as an indispensable sensitizer in RT. Taxinol , Gemcitabine ( GEM ) , Navelbine ( NVB ) , Edatrexate ( ETX ) , CPT-11 and high dose Epirubicin ( EPI HD ) are recommended as new effective drugs . Response rates recently reported for the combination CT with the drugs mentioned above for NSCLC are from 30-65%, and with 8-42 weeks of MST. Induction or neoadjuvant therapies for advanced NSCLC, with 40-69% of RR, 25-29% of complete resection rate, 8-34% of CR and 17-45% of one year SR are reviewed. Eight random studies comparing MST between CT with C-DDP and best supportive care for NSCLC are statistically significant. (2) RT for Stage III NSCLC with 2 year and 5 year survivals of 20 and 5% respectively. Although such outcome is hardly acceptable, RT sensitizer, modified RT techniques and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are imperative to improve the effect of RT in advanced NSCLC. Clinical literature suggest that CRT is better than RT, though without marked difference. Further studies and sufficient follow-up are necessary to judge the efficacy in terms of long-term survival and toxic reaction. (3) Biological therapy: gene therapy of NSCLC is still in the experimental and developmental stage. Of biological response modifier (BRM), alpha IFN in 11 cases of NSCLC with RR of 9% and MST of 14 months, IL-2 and LAK cell treatment in 11 cases with RR of 9% and MST of 18 months are reported. Instillation of BRM such as IL-2 or alpha-IFN into the pleura after drainage of cancerous effusion has been reported as the most effective for those whose RR is of 80-90% and the clinical response time is fairly long. Hematological cytokine as a protective adjuvant therapy against CT/RT toxicity makes high dose of CT possible and raises the response and patient tolerance. In multimodality therapy, it plays an important role to reduce post CT infection and septicemia.
### Instruction:
            Given the context about compound efficacy for the given treatment mentioned within the input, mentioned the compounds 
            that can co-occur for the mentioned treatment

            ### Input:
            Non-surgical therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) denotes those of TNM stage III and IV. NSCLC has its specific characteristics in respect of oncological behaviour, molecular biology, sensitivity to chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT), and requires different therapeutic strategies in comparison with small cell lung cancer. The therapies include: (1) surgery in combination with new effective drugs is resulted in improved RR from 15% a decade ago to 40-60% today. Cisplatin (C-DDP) is the most attractive drug in the treatment of NSCLC, in lengthening the life-span of Stage IV NSCLC patients and as an indispensable sensitizer in RT. Taxinol , Gemcitabine ( GEM ) , Navelbine ( NVB ) , Edatrexate ( ETX ) , CPT-11 and high dose Epirubicin ( EPI HD ) are recommended as new effective drugs . Response rates recently reported for the combination CT with the drugs mentioned above for NSCLC are from 30-65%, and with 8-42 weeks of MST. Induction or neoadjuvant therapies for advanced NSCLC, with 40-69% of RR, 25-29% of complete resection rate, 8-34% of CR and 17-45% of one year SR are reviewed. Eight random studies comparing MST between CT with C-DDP and best supportive care for NSCLC are statistically significant. (2) RT for Stage III NSCLC with 2 year and 5 year survivals of 20 and 5% respectively. Although such outcome is hardly acceptable, RT sensitizer, modified RT techniques and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are imperative to improve the effect of RT in advanced NSCLC. Clinical literature suggest that CRT is better than RT, though without marked difference. Further studies and sufficient follow-up are necessary to judge the efficacy in terms of long-term survival and toxic reaction. (3) Biological therapy: gene therapy of NSCLC is still in the experimental and developmental stage. Of biological response modifier (BRM), alpha IFN in 11 cases of NSCLC with RR of 9% and MST of 14 months, IL-2 and LAK cell treatment in 11 cases with RR of 9% and MST of 18 months are reported. Instillation of BRM such as IL-2 or alpha-IFN into the pleura after drainage of cancerous effusion has been reported as the most effective for those whose RR is of 80-90% and the clinical response time is fairly long. Hematological cytokine as a protective adjuvant therapy against CT/RT toxicity makes high dose of CT possible and raises the response and patient tolerance. In multimodality therapy, it plays an important role to reduce post CT infection and septicemia.

            ### Response:
            Gemcitabine, Epirubicin
            