In the intention-to-treat analysis , 57 % of patients that received tenecteplase and 53 % of patients that received alteplase reached good functional outcome ( modified Rankin Scale score of 0 - 1 ) at 3 months ( odds ratio , 1.19 ; 95 % CI , 0.68 - 2.10 ) .
Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase Between 3 and 4.5 Hours in Low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Background and Purpose- Thrombolysis with alteplase has beneficial effect on outcome and is safe within 4.5 hours. The present study compares the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase and alteplase in patients treated 3 to 4.5 hours after ischemic stroke. Methods- The data are from a prespecified substudy of patients included in The NOR-TEST (Norwegian tenecteplase Stroke Trial), a randomized control trial comparing tenecteplase with alteplase. Results- The median admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for this study population was 3 (interquartile range, 2-6). In the intention-to-treat analysis , 57 % of patients that received tenecteplase and 53 % of patients that received alteplase reached good functional outcome ( modified Rankin Scale score of 0 - 1 ) at 3 months ( odds ratio , 1.19 ; 95 % CI , 0.68 - 2.10 ) . The rates of intracranial hemorrhage in the first 48 hours were 5.7% in the tenecteplase group and 6.7% in the alteplase group (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.26-2.70). At 3 months, mortality was 5.7% and 4.5%, respectively. After excluding stroke mimics and patients with modified Rankin Scale score of >1 before stroke, the proportion of patients with good functional outcome was 61% in the tenecteplase group and 57% in the alteplase group (odds ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.65-2.37). Conclusions- tenecteplase is at least as effective as alteplase to achieve a good clinical outcome in patients with mild stroke treated between 3 and 4.5 hours after ischemic stroke. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01949948.
### Instruction:
            Given the context about compound efficacy for the given treatment mentioned within the input, mentioned the compounds 
            that can co-occur for the mentioned treatment

            ### Input:
            Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase Between 3 and 4.5 Hours in Low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Background and Purpose- Thrombolysis with alteplase has beneficial effect on outcome and is safe within 4.5 hours. The present study compares the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase and alteplase in patients treated 3 to 4.5 hours after ischemic stroke. Methods- The data are from a prespecified substudy of patients included in The NOR-TEST (Norwegian tenecteplase Stroke Trial), a randomized control trial comparing tenecteplase with alteplase. Results- The median admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for this study population was 3 (interquartile range, 2-6). In the intention-to-treat analysis , 57 % of patients that received tenecteplase and 53 % of patients that received alteplase reached good functional outcome ( modified Rankin Scale score of 0 - 1 ) at 3 months ( odds ratio , 1.19 ; 95 % CI , 0.68 - 2.10 ) . The rates of intracranial hemorrhage in the first 48 hours were 5.7% in the tenecteplase group and 6.7% in the alteplase group (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.26-2.70). At 3 months, mortality was 5.7% and 4.5%, respectively. After excluding stroke mimics and patients with modified Rankin Scale score of >1 before stroke, the proportion of patients with good functional outcome was 61% in the tenecteplase group and 57% in the alteplase group (odds ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.65-2.37). Conclusions- tenecteplase is at least as effective as alteplase to achieve a good clinical outcome in patients with mild stroke treated between 3 and 4.5 hours after ischemic stroke. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01949948.

            ### Response:
            tenecteplase, alteplase
            