The cost-minimisation analysis showed that treatment costs for a 12-week course of capecitabine ( Pounds 2132 ) and tegafur with uracil ( Pounds 3385 ) were lower than costs for the intravenous Mayo regimen ( Pounds 3593 ) and infusional regimens on the de Gramont ( Pounds 6255 ) and Modified de Gramont ( Pounds 3485 ) schedules over the same treatment period .
The clinical and economic benefits of capecitabine and tegafur with uracil in metastatic colorectal cancer. Two oral fluoropyrimidine therapies have been introduced for metastatic colorectal cancer. One is a 5-fluorouracil pro-drug, capecitabine; the other is a combination of tegafur and uracil administered together with leucovorin. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these oral therapies against standard intravenous 5-fluorouracil regimens. A systematic literature review was conducted to assess the clinical effectiveness of the therapies and costs were calculated from the UK National Health Service perspective for drug acquisition, drug administration, and the treatment of adverse events. A cost-minimisation analysis was used; this assumes that the treatments are of equal efficacy, although direct randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparisons of the oral therapies with infusional 5-fluorouracil schedules were not available. The cost-minimisation analysis showed that treatment costs for a 12-week course of capecitabine ( Pounds 2132 ) and tegafur with uracil ( Pounds 3385 ) were lower than costs for the intravenous Mayo regimen ( Pounds 3593 ) and infusional regimens on the de Gramont ( Pounds 6255 ) and Modified de Gramont ( Pounds 3485 ) schedules over the same treatment period . Oral therapies result in lower costs to the health service than intravenous therapies. Further research is needed to determine the relative clinical effectiveness of oral therapies vs infusional regimens.
### Instruction:
            Given the context about compound efficacy for the given treatment mentioned within the input, mentioned the compounds 
            that can co-occur for the mentioned treatment

            ### Input:
            The clinical and economic benefits of capecitabine and tegafur with uracil in metastatic colorectal cancer. Two oral fluoropyrimidine therapies have been introduced for metastatic colorectal cancer. One is a 5-fluorouracil pro-drug, capecitabine; the other is a combination of tegafur and uracil administered together with leucovorin. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these oral therapies against standard intravenous 5-fluorouracil regimens. A systematic literature review was conducted to assess the clinical effectiveness of the therapies and costs were calculated from the UK National Health Service perspective for drug acquisition, drug administration, and the treatment of adverse events. A cost-minimisation analysis was used; this assumes that the treatments are of equal efficacy, although direct randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparisons of the oral therapies with infusional 5-fluorouracil schedules were not available. The cost-minimisation analysis showed that treatment costs for a 12-week course of capecitabine ( Pounds 2132 ) and tegafur with uracil ( Pounds 3385 ) were lower than costs for the intravenous Mayo regimen ( Pounds 3593 ) and infusional regimens on the de Gramont ( Pounds 6255 ) and Modified de Gramont ( Pounds 3485 ) schedules over the same treatment period . Oral therapies result in lower costs to the health service than intravenous therapies. Further research is needed to determine the relative clinical effectiveness of oral therapies vs infusional regimens.

            ### Response:
            capecitabine, tegafur, uracil
            