the bush approach i wouldve admired him had he interrogated you straight by giving the antiporn feminist rap about commoditization or objectification of female body how its a systemized degradation and how it leads to proliferation of sexual violence etc since he isnt smart enough to drop names beyond aamir khan you couldve quoted scholars like andrea dworkin catherine mckinnon whose crusade has been to regulate if not eradicate pornography there upon throwing wendy mcelroys name who asserts that pornography benefits women both personally and politically you couldve asked if we as feminists believe in my body my choice why cannot pornography within the regulatory limits be my choice sunny this is a classic duel between individual freedom and social control the present day hashtags about intolerance erupt from this very conflict where do you draw the line between allowed and offensive who draws that line who gives them that right to override your personal liberty but moral censorship is our forte in 1950 charges of obscenity were filed against akbar padmsees painting of a naked couple public exhibition of nudity is considered a crime of an obscene act in a public place the judge ruled that since the work was within the premises of an art gallery it could not be deemed obscene my point is that your craft has a context and it got to be seen in that context besides pornography is not criminalised in india your situation is actually very unique sunny typically a chosen few hoist the moral flag after which the mob takes over and the majority remain bystanders all these 3 categories are your fans and not just viewers how much they love you and your art got substantiated by the statistics cited by the interviewer if their joint sessions with you were not enriching and libratory why would they have visited you time and again so you can say let him who is without sin cast the first stone actually they did not cast any stone at you and in fact expressed their gratitude towards you when they unequivocally lifted the ban on the triplex internet sites it is ironical that while lingam and yoni had occupied a respected space in our traditional epics and art pornophobia has fractured our contemporary social ethos the only concern you will be sharing with them is when the participation in such activities is coerced and nonconsensual when participants are under duress or are incapable of giving their consent as in case of mentally or physically challenged or intoxicated persons forcing them is wrong in every sense our dispute arises against their omnipotent audacity to claim that the consenting women are so damaged and exploited by the patriarchy that their consent is neither voluntary nor free if my consent for my adult acts is alleged to be notional why wont you call a wifes freedom offered by the institution of marriage an illusion is a married woman devoid of the patriarchal cultural dictate isnt she expected