we coa were willing to go to the sc and request for clarification but somehow those clarifications were not sought and people went about interpreting it the way they wanted to there is no clause in the reforms package that couldve been interpreted any differently from what it was meant to be its only a question of which way i wanted to interpret itgiven your experience as a senior bureaucrat what do you think was the reason that the implementation of reforms wasnt happening obviously some things werent workablerai ive spent all my time in my career building consensus in this particular instance regarding bcci i made two attempts to meet all members of bcci first meeting in delhi and the second one in mumbai and understand what the issues were as long as those issues werent about personalities but principles policies i told them that i would be the first in placing these issues in front of the sc and say look these are the issues that have come forward and the court may take an opinion on that but we found that the issues werent about policies but about personalities so we were left with no option but to take the view that the sc order in its undiluted form is the only way forward thats what we recommended to the honble scthe sc couldve given the matter involving bcci some more time considering a lot of things were waiting to be addressedrai in all fairness to the sc i must say that the honble court has given us at least nine to 10 hearings in the last one and half years and i think the court has given enough opportunities and bandwidth to listen to our genuine issues when i say our i mean bcci coa and state associations but when we keep talking about fundamental rights and equalitiesthen remember were talking about the apex court of the land they understand fundamental rights they understand equalities and liberties much better than anybody else in the country they have adjudicated on a particular issue factoring all these things so where is the question of questioning those aspects the issue is just this that if it does not suit my convenience or my interests ill keep wanting to delay itin all fairness the supreme court has not had time this is the honble chief justices bench the chief justice is among the busiest persons in the country today and he has far more important issues to attend to which are far more urgent thats why the court has not been able to devote time to the bcci matter but as i said earlier nine to 10 opportunities were given and im very clear in my mind if anyone of us have any genuine policy issues the court would have definitely listened to us and factored it in the judgement the honble chief justice has said the bench is open to suggestionsyoull have filed eight status reports and