gurgaon the allottees grievances redress forum agrf set up in september 2015 for gurgaon will hold its third meeting in midjune under the chairmanship of the deputy commissionerthe decision reflects the pervading sense of frustration in gurgaons real estate market with 209 complaints received by the department of town and country planning dtcp against 37 developers over the past four months so far agrf has held two meetings in september 2015 and january 2016 in which it took up 23 complaintsweve received a large number of complaints which is why we have scheduled the third meeting of agrf in midjune said assistant town planner atp r s batth he said action has been taken on most of the complaints received at the last two meetingsdtcp planning officer jaibir sharma said this time most complaints are against orchid petal 58 and unitech 25 were scrutinising all complaints of a similar nature against the same builder will be clubbed together said sharma adding most complaints are for delay in delivery delay in beginning construction and for facilities not provided as promisedexpressing the governments resolve to tackle homebuyers problems the official said most projects are running behind schedule in some cases work has stopped on site leaving buyers who have already made most of the payment high and dry anxious and frustrated they are approaching us with complaints against the developershe said the forum mostly deals with three types of complaints where a builder is accused of cheating investors it asks police to file a case and then monitors the probe in case of contractrelated violations builders accused of not providing amenities as promised and of violation of licence conditions the forum recommends action against the developer to be taken by dtcoin the two previous rounds firs were registered against four developers after agrf received complaints against them challenging the ruling two developers approached court questioning the forums authority said sharma he further said agrf should be given more power to take effective action against defaulting developers