electronic evidence available against noor either in the form of any cctv footage or his call data record location which could prima facie show his presence at the scene of crime on the date of incident it directed him not to tamper with evidence and to install aarogya setu app on his mobile phone the court however clarified that anything stated in the order should not be construed as expressing any opinion on the final merits of the cases as they were at pre cognizancepre committal stage it had earlier granted him bail in three other cases related to rioting in khajuri khas area during the hearing advocate akhtar shamim appearing for noor said that he has been falsely implicated in the cases and there was no electronic evidence against him special public prosecutor manoj choudhary appearing for the police opposed the bail applications saying 153 cases were registered and were being investigated in the area and noors role was under investigation from the point of view of an individual as well as collectively being part of the conspiracy the cases were registered on the complaints of giyanender kumar kochar hanif and sanjay kumar goyal kochar had alleged in his complaint that on february 24 his shop was vandalised by the riotous mob due to which he suffered a loss of about rs 12 lakh hanif alleged that his tailor shop was vandalised by the rioters due to which he suffered a loss of about rs 5 lakhs and goyal alleged in his complaint that the mob had set fire to his medical shop communal clashes had broken out in north east delhi on february 24 after violence between citizenship law supporters and protesters spiralled out of control leaving at least 53 people dead and around 200 injured