mumbai a family court last week annulled the marriage of a couple who had met through a matrimonial website on the grounds that their acrimonious relationship was never consummated the couple both previously divorced separated a day after the wedding after the husband found out that the woman had been divorced twice before the woman did not respond to the petition filed by the man in may last year to find out the reasons behind the two previous failed marriages of the respondent he made several attempts to contact her and her family but all the attempts were turned down the marriage was never consummated as the respondent left his company immediately after the marriage the court observed while the 37yearold man is from ghaziabad the woman is from mumbai in the petition the man said that they had come across each others profiles on a matrimonial website and developed a mutual liking before marriage the woman and her family had informed him that she had been divorced as her marriage had failed the man said that as he too was divorced he did not disapprove of her divorced status with the consent of both families the couple got married on november 30 2012 the man alleged that soon after the wedding the womans family told him about her two divorces the man expressed his discontent and distrust towards the woman and her family and questioned her about concealing the fact he said that had it been revealed to him sooner he would have never consented to the marriage the man further stated that after she left him he made several attempts to contact her and her family to find out the reasons behind the two previous failed marriages however all his attempts were turned down the man had filed the petition seeking a decree of nullity under section 121 a of the hindu marriage act the section declares a marriage as voidable if it has not been consummated in my considered view the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent has not been consummated owing to impotency of the respondent qua petitioner therefore he is entitled to a decree of nullity under section 121 a the court said