questioning and has fully cooperated in the probeyou ed want to arrest me but for what reason the answer is to humiliate me to humiliate me and to humiliate me minute by minute and hour by hour he saidhe argued that the ed had lodged the case in 2017 whereas the offences alleged are of the period 20072008singhvi said penal provisions under which the case has been lodged became scheduled offences under the pmla only after the 2009 amendment and the ed cannot do this retrospectivelyyou are trying to paint a person as a kingpin when these alleged offences did not exist at that time he said adding that fundamental right of citizens under article 21 right to life and personal liberty cannot be suspendedthe delhi high court while rejecting the anticipatory bail of chidambaram had held that the facts of the case prime facie reveal that the petitioner is the kingpin the key conspirator in this caseon the allegations of chidambaram being evasive singhvi said 12 questions were put to him and though six of them were repetitive he answered all of them and never said to hell with you and i would not answer your questionsthe question put to me chidambaram was do i have a foreign bank account i said i do not have any foreign bank account then another question was asked does your son have any foreign bank account i said yes and he has taken requisite permission from the rbi for that he saidhow does question of evasion arise unless they ed want you to give an answer which they want he said adding the ed has presented a completely distorted version of what evasion ishe said chidambaram was not a flight risk that he may abscond non cooperation does not mean that a person has to give answer which the probe agency want and there was no question of tampering of any evidencewhat can i chidambaram tamper in an 11yearold case which document can i tamper the man was also in power till 2014 he saidsibal said they have also filed another application to place on record additional facts and challenge the order passed by the trial court on monday extending the cbis remand of chidambaram till august 30 in the inx media corruption casechidambaram has also challenged the august 22 trial courts order remanding him to cbi custody till august 26during the arguments sibal said ed cannot place documents in the court randomly and behind the back for seeking chidambarams custodythey are just producing documents at random and saying this is part of the case diary sibal said adding they cannot place the documents behind the back and seek custody of accused this is not permissible under the lawin a statement chidambarams family demanded that the centre produce evidence in support of its allegations like properties in multiple countries and numerous shell companiesthe family said they were distressed that the media has been reporting completely wild unverified and unsubstantiated allegations against