mumbai picking holes in the motives attributed by the central bureau of investigation cbi against peter mukerjea for the murder of sheena bora the former media honchos lawyer on friday claimed that it was indrani mukerjeas personal secretary kajal sharma who said hi jiju to peter when indrani handed him the phone claiming sheena who was in the us was on the line though she was already dead sheena was murdered on april 24 2012 and her body was dumped in a forest in raigad district indrani her former husband sanjeev khanna and her driver shyamvar rai have been arrested for the crime peters defence counsel aabad ponda said while the cbi claimed peter had lied and assured his son rahul that sheena was alive and well in the us as he had spoken to her the call data records cdr reveal that the person peter spoke to was kajal indrani the prime accused in the case had handed him the phone asking him to speak to sheena and immediately took it back after a voice greeted him as brotherinlaw the cdr and the time mentioned by cbi match with the call made by indrani to kajal argued ponda he also said that the cbi had said that indranis motive in plotting and executing the murder of her own daughter sheena from an earlier relationshipindrani introduced her as her sisteras she objected to her engagement to rahul peters biological son fearing that her other daughter vidhie would lose out on inheritance vidhie is indranis daughter from her second husband khanna indrani and peter adopted vidhie after their marriage this motive doesnt go against peter because he could disinherit his son if he wasnt happy said ponda the allegation that he was against the relationship is false there are witness statements that show he was never against it and had blessed the couple too on the other circumstances of peters multiple phone calls with indrani before during and after the crime to show conspiracy ponda said the first set of calls were when peter and vidhi were in rome and there was nothing incriminating in calls to family indrani would call to wish them briefly he added ponda questioned why the cbi found these calls objectionable but not the 12 calls made by indrani to kajal on april 23 2012 and more calls later as well as the two calls and three text messages to senior police officer deven bharti my argument is not that calls to kajal or anyone else makes them coaccused but why find only calls made to her husband objectionable ponda said the arguments will continue on monday before special cbi judge h s mahajan