13 is shown to the press and this plaintiff knocks on the door at the last minute senior advocate vikas pahwa had argued on behalf of krishnamoorthy that ansal was previously aware of the books publishing because it was mentioned in a 2012 plea presented to the supreme courtresponding to this nayar had argued i have to interject i didnt know about this a gentleman who tampers with evidence who was convicted for section 304a should now be convicted for perjury complete misrepresentation of fact ansal has contended that the publication of the contested series will further harm him and will constitute a major violation of his fundamental rights particularly his right to privacyhe also claimed in the lawsuit that he had apologised to the victims families in front of the supreme court and expressed regret for the terrible incidentadditionally he claims that after learning that the contested series is based on the contested book he purchased a copy of it and was shocked to find that it contained a onesided narration of the unfortunate incident