outset the judge asked the varsity about the status of the issue and what the vc has done after the courts april 25 orderwhat jnu intends to do from now onwards did the vc manage to see the statements of women students recorded before a magistrate under section 164 crpc the court saidthe varsitys counsel said the vc has seen the statements of the students and a fact finding committee has been set up which is expected to conclude the enquiry in three monthsshe said the professor has resigned from all official postions and has been adviced not to go to the laboratory or the departmentthe counsel said supervisors of some women students pursuing phd have been changed and alternative arrangements were being made for those for whom suitable supervisors have not yet been foundwhen the court enquired whether johri will still be evaluating the work of these phd students the universitys counsel replied in negativeeven the professors counsel said he does not wish to continue or touch their work now saying if the evaluation turned out to be against them they could again level some allegations against himon being asked by the court whether the professor was willing to move out of the campus and reside somewhere else his counsel refused and said he cannot move out as his prestige was at stake and he has three daughterswhen the judge asked you will not volunteer johris counsel said no i will nothis counsel said he was served with the notice yesterday and has sought time to file his response on the petition seeking his suspensionadvocate satyakam appearing for the delhi police told the court that the investigation was going on and they have filed a status report a fresh one would be submitted before the next date of hearing on may 23the court had on april 25 directed the jnu to treat the representations of women students as complaints and initiate a probe against the professor on charges of sexual harassment while questioning the varsity for not taking any steps in the matterstudents professors and women rights organisations have been demanding his arrest after several students had accused him of sexual harassmentjohri had claimed before the trial court in his bail plea that in compliance with certain ugc guidelines regarding compulsory attendance and leave pattern he had sent an email on february 27 to certain students including a complainant student warning them against their irregular attendance patternhe had said the allegations levelled by the woman pertained to 201314 but the fir was registered in 2018