the court hasnt said anything on itrai yes that is because the court has given us and the learned amicus the responsibility of taking into consideration the suggestions of all state associations factoring it into a model draft constitution and presenting it before the court which we did last decemberit is not every day that you see an individual or a group of people or an organisation defying an order of the countrys highest court why do you think members of bcci have held this confidence that they could defy this orderrai see it is very difficult for me to try and find out from what source or what argument or what corner they derive that confidence but im convinced about one thing it is because of their own personal prevarications nothing other than that theyre pushing the envelope trying to see how far they can go continuing to defy but im sure once the court makes up its mind and steps in its all over in just one hearing were hoping thatll take place in the month of julysports administrators around the world have longer tenures so that theres a continuity in administration rules are not so stringent anywhere as the lodha recommendations are the point is if an administrator were to be there for only three years where would there be any continuity to the functioning from a big picture perspectiverai certainly not people are posted to critical positions chiefs of armed forces ministers have a fiveyear tenure cabinet secretaries have a twoyear tenure or is given a fouryear tenure no continuity or consistency is lost because its not personalities that matter it is the institution and the structure of that institution that matters the sc view on this was create a structure so that whoever comes and operates that structure the structure doesnt get disturbed in any way you see theres a structure and then theres a system to operate that structure so whether i stay there for three years or six years it doesnt matterlot of these arguments were presented in the sc it took vikram limaye only five days to understand what the financial model of the icc was and it took him just five days to suggest an alternative model also and within that one month preceding the icc meeting we could stop around eight countries and get them on board with that model the unfortunate thing is that when the issue went to the icc the bcci representatives to the icc did not deliberate on the governance model but were concentrating on the finance modelbcci doesnt have to bother about two million dollars here and there because in three games we can create that money what we should have concentrated on was the governance structure and i raised this issue with the officebearers i said why did we not raise a concern with the governance structure that is when they realised it that they shouldve concentrated on the governance model and not