nagpur the maharashtra animal and fishery sciences university mafsu on tuesday lodged a complaint with nagpur municipal corporation nmc that former congress corporator kamlesh chaudhary and his mother meena have restarted unauthorized construction and urged it to take appropriate action advocate anil kumar mulchandani former counsel of nagpur improvement trust nit said restarting unauthorized construction is a major violation when the civic body has already served notice under section 53 1 of maharashtra regional and town planning mrtp acttoi had on tuesday reported the statement of activist jwala jambuvantrao dhote that chaudharys had restarted works in the catchment area of futala lake she visited the area on tuesday and informed about the latest development to mafsu officials then mafsu sent a letter to nmc as directed by vicechancellor dr ashish paturkar and gave information in detailon january 11 nagpur bench of bombay high court had taken cognizance of restaurant constructed by chaudharys in water bodys catchment area without permission of nmc or approval from land owner mafsu citing tois report nmc counsel had made a statement before the hc that he would obtain instructions with regard to the said issue and place the same before the court on the next date accordingly the hc had ordered hearing in the case with two existing suo motu pils on wednesdayit is learnt that nmc has filed its submission before hc on tuesdayafter receiving notice from nmc on january 10 chaudharys had started to dismantle the restaurant they also removed tin roof of cement concrete booking office of lawn constructed in an unauthorized manner many years ago part of the office was also used for the restaurantconsidering adinterim injunction ordered by the district court teams of nmc and mafsu returned without demolishing the unauthorized constructions or taking possession of the land on monday it was noticed on monday that the tin roof was constructed again over the booking office a hoarding for advertisement of function lawn has also been erected in front of the officemulchandani told toi this was a violation if they restarted works as already nmc has served notice under section 53 1 of mrtp act they cannot reconstruct whatever was demolished after the noticeon district court passing order when the matter was subjudice before hc mulchandani said it is a clear case of suppression of facts by the petitioner they were supposed to inform the court that hc had already taken cognizance of the issue and will hear it on january 18 also petitioner did not inform the court that the jurisdiction of civil court is barred as per section 149 of mrtp act he said