convinced and dismissed the pleathe lawyers then started arguing in the ed case and contended that there was no need for custodial interrogation as most of the evidence in the case was documentary and the agency could start prosecution without interrogating chidambaram sibal claimed that no serious questioning took place in the last five days in cbi custody and even earlier when the former minister had appeared before the ed three timesthe lawyer said he had instruction from his client to say that only one relevant question about a bank account in uk was asked which he denied he pleaded that the sc should ask the ed to place the transcript of chidambarams questioningcomparing the delhi hc verdict and a note which was handed over to the hc in a sealed envelop by the agency sibal told the bench that the hc judge simply did a copypaste job and did not apply his mind in deciding the case he said that even the commas and full stops were copied from the note and the hc erred in blindly relying upon the unverified note without giving them the opportunity to counter the allegationssolicitor general tushar mehta told the bench that the hc had passed the order after going through the probe report as the proceedings remained inconclusive the bench extended interim protection to chidambaram till tuesday when the solicitor general will continue his argumentswatch inx media case cbi gets chidambarams custody till august 30