new delhi while dismissing a petition seeking registration of an fir against dda officials for allegedly committing forgery a delhi court said the act of the petitioner approaching different courts seeking the registration of a second fir in the same case was nothing but a mischievous act of forum shoppingthe petitioner had approached a magistrate court seeking registration of an fir alleging that the accused committed cheating and forgery in mutating a property partly belonging to him in their favour in connivance with officials of ddathe magistrate court had dismissed the complaint saying no useful purpose would be served by ordering the registration of another fir pertaining to the same facts and circumstances as it would amount to multiplicity of proceedings aggrieved by the order the petitioner approached the sessions court against itadditional sessions judge anuj agrawal said nothing deterred the investigating agency to investigate the other offences if any which were discovered alleged to have been committed in the same transaction and a second fir on the same cause of action was not permissiblethe judge further said that he was refraining himself from imposing any cost upon the revisionist for their mischievous approach