new delhi the suspense over wrestler narsingh yadavs olympic participation was on saturday prolonged further after the national antidoping agency deferred its final verdict on the doping scandal to mondaythe national anti doping agency nada hearing today went on for marathon eight hoursnada dg navin agarwal said the panel studied a lot of documents today and will give its verdict on mondaythe panel again sat today and reviewed the whole case the panel will give its verdict at 4 pm on monday agarwal told reportersthe reason for marathon meeting and the delay in declaring the verdict as a lot of documents needed to be studied and the arguments have been lengthy we are hopeful that justice will be done he addedwfi president brij bhushan sharan singh refused to comment anything as the case is still subjudicenarsingh had returned positive for methandienone a banned anabolic steroid following which narsingh cried foul claiming that the entire episode was a conspiracy against himnarsingh has already been replaced by parveen rana in the olympic bound squadduring the earlier two days of hearing on narsinghs dope positive case he and his lawyers presented their case on the failed dope test which according to them was a conspiracy against the grappler but nadas legal team gave its arguments against the sabotage theory before the disciplinary committeenarsinghs hopes of competing in the olympics had faded further on wednesday after the wrestler failed a second dope test which was conducted on him on july 5 he was already under provisional suspension for failing a june 25 dope testmoreover the wrestlers final effort to establish a conspiracy theory also fell flat as one of the two cooks who had claimed to have seen a junior wrestler mixing something in narsinghs food at the sai sonepat centres mess changed his testimony in front of the threemember nada panelthe panel had summoned two cooks on the request of narsinghs lawyer vidushpat singhania on fridayearlier the argument put forth by nada was that narsingh was not eligible for remission which he had been asking for because he failed to establish that he did not commit any fault or negligencesince he has not been able to establish how the banned substance had entered his body we argued that he should be given punishment nadas lawyer gaurang kanth had said at the end of the hearing on thursdaynarsingh did not produce the relevant circumstantial evidence that there could have been sabotage as had been claimed by them they filed an affidavit that his drinks or water was spiked but they did not produce the evidence to prove it to satisfy nada or wada code he had arguednadas lawyer said that narsinghs claims of conspiracy or sabotage were not backed by sufficient proofthe argument advanced by them is that they are eligible for remission under 104 of wada code but the argument put forth by nada is that he is not eligible for remission because they have to show that he has no fault