new delhi the altercation between a woman and a traffic policeman which was caught on camera has taken a new twist with police control room pcr logs revealing that it was head constable satish chandra who first called up to complain about a woman trying to flee while being challaned the call was made around 1038am saying that the woman was misbehaving and abusing after being stopped for a challan there are two more pcr calls after this which were made by the woman ramanjeet kaur and her daughter kaur who works as a household help at a businessmans house was returning home with her daughters after a parentteacher meeting at their school when the incident took place also the cop had recorded the conversation and the arguments which took place between them he has submitted this audio clip to police along with his complaint nowhere is the cop heard demanding a bribe in the recording the cop recorded the arguments as per the protocol traffic policemen are instructed to record any misbehaviour in case people try to flaunt their clout or get aggressive during challans these recordings are retained for a certain period and then destroyed in the 44second audio clip the cop is heard saying that he will issue a challan which she can pay in court he demands her licence and rc to fill in the details in the challan form but the woman still refuses the woman is heard calling the cop tuchche worthless among other things and denying receiving a challan the womans children can be heard crying and asking her to show the licence and the rc veena singh who stays right across the crime spot said she had been seeing satish chandra issuing challans for months without ever losing his cool i went down hearing chaos but the altercation was over by then my guards and others standing there told me that the woman had hit and abused the traffic policeman after which they had exchanged stones i think the cop reacted after being provoked the police should probe this she said the police brass is now in a fix with these developments as chandra has already been dismissed and arrested under prevention of corruption act the cop was immediately dismissed without an inquiry contrary to the usual practice even though the dismissal is not unlawful police have used article 311 2b which deems such dismissal by a competent authority lawful trusting in their judgment but the fact that the cop in question had 27 years of unblemished service record should have been kept in mind before an extreme decision was taken evidently based on media reports chandra has the right to go to court against the dismissal and i believe from experience that the court will revoke the dismissal based on the circumstances and evidence said a former top cop who did not wish to be named the top brass is now considering its next step and chandras