During the trial, experts showed that intelligent design was an old argument for religion and not science. They looked at the authors' notes for the book, "Of Pandas and People", that the school was using. These notes included things that had been changed when the book was being prepared for printing. It had been changed from being about creationism to being about intelligent design. The authors did this by changing the words "created" to "designed" and "creationists" to "intelligent design proponents". In one version, the word "creationists" was even changed to "cdesign proponentsists" by mistake. The judge found this interesting. These changes were made just after Edwards v. Aguillard said you could not teach creationism in schools. The judge said this showed that intelligent design was creationism.
d ʊ ɹ ɹ ɪ ŋ WORD_BOUNDARY ð ə WORD_BOUNDARY t ɹ aɪ ə l WORD_BOUNDARY ɛ k s p ɜː t s WORD_BOUNDARY ʃ oʊ d WORD_BOUNDARY ð æ t WORD_BOUNDARY ɪ n t ɛ l ɪ d̠ʒ ə n t WORD_BOUNDARY d ɪ z aɪ n WORD_BOUNDARY w ʌ z WORD_BOUNDARY ʌ n WORD_BOUNDARY oʊ l d WORD_BOUNDARY ɑ ɹ ɡ j uː m ə n t WORD_BOUNDARY f ɔ ɹ WORD_BOUNDARY ɹ ɪ l ɪ d̠ʒ ə n WORD_BOUNDARY æ n d WORD_BOUNDARY n ɑ t WORD_BOUNDARY s aɪ ə n s WORD_BOUNDARY ð eɪ WORD_BOUNDARY l ʊ k t WORD_BOUNDARY æ t WORD_BOUNDARY ð ɪ WORD_BOUNDARY ɔ θ ə ɹ z WORD_BOUNDARY n oʊ t s WORD_BOUNDARY f ə ɹ ð ə WORD_BOUNDARY b ʊ k WORD_BOUNDARY ʌ v WORD_BOUNDARY p æ n d ə z WORD_BOUNDARY æ n d WORD_BOUNDARY p iː p ə l WORD_BOUNDARY ð æ t ð ə WORD_BOUNDARY s k uː l WORD_BOUNDARY w ʌ z WORD_BOUNDARY j uː z ɪ ŋ WORD_BOUNDARY ð iː z WORD_BOUNDARY n oʊ t s WORD_BOUNDARY ɪ ŋ k l uː d ɪ d WORD_BOUNDARY θ ɪ ŋ z WORD_BOUNDARY ð æ t WORD_BOUNDARY h ʌ d b ɪ n WORD_BOUNDARY t̠ʃ eɪ n d̠ʒ d WORD_BOUNDARY w ɛ n WORD_BOUNDARY ð ə WORD_BOUNDARY b ʊ k WORD_BOUNDARY w ʌ z WORD_BOUNDARY b iː ɪ ŋ WORD_BOUNDARY p ɹ ɪ p ɛ ɹ d WORD_BOUNDARY f ɔ ɹ WORD_BOUNDARY p ɹ ɪ n t ɪ ŋ WORD_BOUNDARY ɪ t WORD_BOUNDARY h ʌ d b ɪ n WORD_BOUNDARY t̠ʃ eɪ n d̠ʒ d WORD_BOUNDARY f ɹ ʌ m WORD_BOUNDARY b iː ɪ ŋ WORD_BOUNDARY ʌ b aʊ t WORD_BOUNDARY k ɹ iː eɪ ʃ ə n ɪ z ə m WORD_BOUNDARY t ə WORD_BOUNDARY b iː ɪ ŋ WORD_BOUNDARY ʌ b aʊ t WORD_BOUNDARY ɪ n t ɛ l ɪ d̠ʒ ə n t WORD_BOUNDARY d ɪ z aɪ n WORD_BOUNDARY ð ɪ WORD_BOUNDARY ɔ θ ə ɹ z WORD_BOUNDARY d ɪ d WORD_BOUNDARY ð ɪ s WORD_BOUNDARY b aɪ WORD_BOUNDARY t̠ʃ eɪ n d̠ʒ ɪ ŋ WORD_BOUNDARY ð ə WORD_BOUNDARY w ɜː d z WORD_BOUNDARY k ɹ iː eɪ t ɪ d WORD_BOUNDARY t ə WORD_BOUNDARY d ɪ z aɪ n d WORD_BOUNDARY æ n d WORD_BOUNDARY k ɹ iː eɪ ʃ ə n ɪ s t s WORD_BOUNDARY t ʊ WORD_BOUNDARY ɪ n t ɛ l ɪ d̠ʒ ə n t WORD_BOUNDARY d ɪ z aɪ n WORD_BOUNDARY p ɹ ə p oʊ n ə n t s WORD_BOUNDARY ɪ n WORD_BOUNDARY w ʌ n WORD_BOUNDARY v ɜː ʒ ə n WORD_BOUNDARY ð ə WORD_BOUNDARY w ɜː d WORD_BOUNDARY k ɹ iː eɪ ʃ ə n ɪ s t s WORD_BOUNDARY w ʌ z WORD_BOUNDARY iː v ə n WORD_BOUNDARY t̠ʃ eɪ n d̠ʒ d WORD_BOUNDARY t ə WORD_BOUNDARY s iː d ɪ z aɪ n WORD_BOUNDARY p ɹ ə p oʊ n ə n t s ɪ s t s WORD_BOUNDARY b aɪ WORD_BOUNDARY m ɪ s t eɪ k WORD_BOUNDARY ð ə WORD_BOUNDARY d̠ʒ ʌ d̠ʒ WORD_BOUNDARY f aʊ n d WORD_BOUNDARY ð ɪ s WORD_BOUNDARY ɪ n t ɹ ɛ s t ɪ ŋ WORD_BOUNDARY ð iː z WORD_BOUNDARY t̠ʃ eɪ n d̠ʒ ɪ z WORD_BOUNDARY w ɜː WORD_BOUNDARY m eɪ d WORD_BOUNDARY d̠ʒ ʌ s t WORD_BOUNDARY æ f t ə ɹ ɹ WORD_BOUNDARY ɛ d w ə ɹ d z WORD_BOUNDARY v iː WORD_BOUNDARY æ ɡ ɪ l ɑ ɹ d WORD_BOUNDARY s ɛ d WORD_BOUNDARY j uː WORD_BOUNDARY k ʊ d WORD_BOUNDARY n ɑ t WORD_BOUNDARY t iː t̠ʃ WORD_BOUNDARY k ɹ iː eɪ ʃ ə n ɪ z ə m WORD_BOUNDARY ɪ n WORD_BOUNDARY s k uː l z WORD_BOUNDARY ð ə WORD_BOUNDARY d̠ʒ ʌ d̠ʒ WORD_BOUNDARY s ɛ d WORD_BOUNDARY ð ɪ s WORD_BOUNDARY ʃ oʊ d WORD_BOUNDARY ð æ t WORD_BOUNDARY ɪ n t ɛ l ɪ d̠ʒ ə n t WORD_BOUNDARY d ɪ z aɪ n WORD_BOUNDARY w ʌ z WORD_BOUNDARY k ɹ iː eɪ ʃ ə n ɪ z ə m WORD_BOUNDARY