38882
I have three questions about the following sentnece, all regarding particles:

友達のおかげで、映画をただで見られた。

Why the の particle works as "to" here?

Why the を particle instead of は？isnt ただ setting like and adjective to say the
movie is free?

And the last で, just to be sure I'm getting it right, it's meaning that the
action to watch takes place on the movie or not?

Regarding the first で I understand it is about the compound sentence.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-31T21:25:30.940
38879
2016-08-31T22:46:36.823
16104
question
particles
Using を particle with ただ
1. Xのおかげ is literally 'virtue _of_ X' or 'thanks _to_ X'. So の doesn't have to be working as "to". 
  2. ただで is a single word, used as an adverb, meaning 'with no reason or cost'. If you take it out of the sentence, it'd be more clear why you're seeing を particle. 

> 映画を見られた。

  3. I don't think the first で makes the sentence compound, as the entire first half is more like an adverbial here. You might want to see it works like the preposition "by" in English, as in the following: 

> これで, 終りだ。 (By this, it's all done.)
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-31T22:05:41.037
38881
2016-08-31T22:25:22.967
2016-08-31T22:25:22.967
9980
9980
38879
answer
# 1.

の **doesn't** work as "to" here. Instead, Xのおかげで **translates** as "thanks to
X". What's the difference? It's that English and Japanese express the idea of
attribution differently. In English, you talk as if you were expressing
thanks, and this gratitude is directed "to" the person responsible.

What about Japanese? _Kage_ originally means "shadow". At first, it was used
like this in a religious context, where it refereed to the influence or
protection of a god or spirit ([source](http://gogen-
allguide.com/o/okagesama.html)). That's why it always comes with an _o-_
honorific. With time, the word lost the religious overtones, and just became a
way of saying "help, patronage, effort". So 友達のおかげ means "friend's help",
"friend's patronage", "friend's efforts".

The first で isn't about connecting sentences. It's the で that indicate how, in
what way, by what means: it was _through/via_ (で) _his friend's
effort/patronage/help_ (友達のお陰) that he could see the movie.

おかげで is a set pattern, and you can think of the whole thing as an equivalent
to English "thanks to".

# 2.

を is the normal particle in this case. The が particle marks the subject of the
verb (who does the action), and を marks the object (what undergoes the
action). If I eat the apple, I am doing the eating, and the apple is the thing
being eaten: 私 **が** りんご **を** 食べる。

The verb here is 見られる: to be able to see. What was it that he was able to see?
The movie. The movie is the object, so it's marked by を.

But what about は, you say? Well, は is a tricky particle; it marks the _topic_
, that is, what you want to talk about.

  * おばさんは、 As for my aunt… (she's gone / I hate her / etc.)
  * りんごは、 As for apples… (they're cheap today / they give me allergies / etc.)

The topic can be the subject, and in this case は **overwrites** the particle
が:

  * 私 **が** 映画を見た。 I saw the movie.
  * 私 **は** 映画を見た。 As for me, (I) saw a movie. (I don't know about you guys, but _as for me_ , I watched a movie.)

The topic can be the object, and in this case は overwrites the を:

  * 映画 **は** 私が見た。 As for the movie, I saw (it). (I haven't read the book yet, but as for the movie, I saw it.)

The topic can be other things too, neither subject nor object:

  * 私はピザだ。 As for me, it's pizza. (Betty's having pasta, Veronica's having salad, and as for me, I'm going with pizza tonight.)

Why を instead of は in your example? Because 映画 is the object of 見られた, and it's
not the topic.

# 3.

で here also means in what way, in what manner; it ties to ただ "free of cost".
Basically ただで translates to English "for free".
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-31T22:12:55.303
38882
2016-08-31T22:46:36.823
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
622
38879
answer