56953
> しかし、許可をもらわないでコピーした漫画をインターネットで読む人が増えているため、 **漫画全部の売り上げ** は少なくなっています。  
>  However, because the number of people who read manga on the internet - that
> has been copied without permission - is increasing, total manga sales are
> decreasing.

No problem with understanding (I hope), but 漫画全部の売り上げ looks weird to me. I
feel it ought to be 漫画の全部の売り上げ. Is this a typo? If not, why is it okay to
write it like this?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-02-28T21:05:06.573
56950
2018-02-28T23:55:09.050
7944
question
grammar particle-の
Why is 漫画全部の売り上げ grammatical
名詞+全部 is almost as common as 名詞+の+全部

Think of it as akin to the difference between ‘All manga’ vs. ‘All of the
manga’. There is really no functional difference. If the case for a difference
had to be made, it would likely be a slight reduction in formality when not
using the particle.

This applies to 全員, 全て, 半分, etc.

```

    漫画全部
    
    漫画家全員
    
    料理全て
    
    参加者全員
    
    気持ち半分
    
```

Two similar expressions, one using の and one without:

> 財産全部、地獄に持って行ける訳じゃない。
>
> その財産の全部を出資するものとする。

Also see: [Can the particle "no" sometimes be
omitted?](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/38748)
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-02-28T22:24:59.320
56953
2018-02-28T23:55:09.050
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
27280
56950
answer