47197
While stumbling across [Lucky Star episode
15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifMy4LvZINk&t=601s) (26-second clip, from
**8:51 - 9:17** ), I found that there was a scene where the characters were
watching a quiz show, where one of the questions asked was on keigo:

> Ｑ：「 **行く** 」の謙{けん}譲{じょう}語{ご}はなんでしょうか。
>
> Ａ：正{せい}解{かい}は「 **参{まい}る** 」でした！
>
> (The characters were all certain it was **伺{うかが}う** , but they all agree
> with **参る** later.)

Now, if I am not mistaken, 伺う is used when the act of going to a place
involves the listener (eg. saying はい、うかがいます！ to one's boss, when asked to go
to him) and 参る is used when the movement is **not** related to the listener
(eg. not the boss' company, country, home, etc.). I think both verbs are
humble forms of 行く.

* * *

**Why, then, is 参る preferred as an answer to 伺う?** Is there a nuance I am
missing here?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-05-08T17:12:23.300
47194
2017-05-08T19:46:49.187
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
11849
question
word-choice nuances keigo anime
Quiz question on keigo
While there were many blog entries on keigo usage that said both 参る and 伺う are
謙譲語 for 行く, all of the dictionaries I checked (広辞苑, 新明解, 大辞林, etc.) agreed
that 伺う is a 謙譲語 for **訪問する／訪れる** , not 行く.

So the quiz segment is technically correct, even though it seems like a lot of
people think 伺う is also a 謙譲語 for 行く. This is probably because 参る and 伺う are
often interchangeable.

In terms of nuance in usage, I think the more important distinction is:

  * 参る humbles yourself in relation to the **listener**
  * 伺う humbles yourself in relation to the **place** you're visiting (or **someone** who is there)

So you can say 「妹のいる東京に参ります」 but not 「妹のいる東京に伺います」.

* * *

You can read more on the [two types of
謙譲語](https://www.google.co.jp/search?q=%E8%AC%99%E8%AD%B2%E8%AA%9E%E2%85%A0%20%E8%AC%99%E8%AD%B2%E8%AA%9E%E2%85%A1
"謙譲語Ⅰ 謙譲語Ⅱ - Google Search"), categorized by who the humbleness is directed
toward.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-05-08T18:37:18.677
47197
2017-05-08T19:07:20.523
2017-05-08T19:07:20.523
888
888
47194
answer
I believe that 伺う means more "to visit" than "to go". Thus, 伺う is more like
the humble form of 訪{たず}ねる.

Of course, "visiting" someone/somewhere does necessarily involve changing
locations, but because (訪ねる / 伺う) can both be _transitive_ , the emphasis
seems to be on who/what you are visiting (the direct object).

With regard to 行く and 参る, both are only _intransitive_. The subject is the
"actor" and he/she is simply going somewhere. The emphasis seems primarily to
be the act of "going". Perhaps because 参る and 行く are strictly intransitive, is
feels like a better fit. And grammatically, it is definitely a better fit.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-05-08T19:46:49.187
47198
2017-05-08T19:46:49.187
22062
47194
answer