Consider this:

> watashi wa remon wo tabeta

This is translated as **I ate a lemon**.

How about this?

> remon wo watashi wa tabeta

This can be translated 2 ways:

1) A lemon I ate

**However** , it _also_ can be translated as:

2) I ate a lemon

which is **the same translation** as in the 1st case (watashi wa remon wo
tabeta), just the order of the words is different.

How would you deal with it on practice?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-10-11T03:19:54.693
53733
2017-10-11T12:07:32.320
2017-10-11T04:22:38.420
11104
26104
question
grammar particle-は particle-を word-order
"I ate a lemon" and "a lemon I ate"
> > remon wo watashi wa tabeta
>
> This can be translated 2 ways:
>
> 1) A lemon I ate

No it cannot be translated as “a lemon I ate”.

Particle _wo_ indicates a direct object of the verb _tabeta_ , and word order
does not change that.

The phrase “A lemon I ate” in Japanese is “watashi ga tabeta remon”.

> However, it also can be translated as:
>
> 2) I ate a lemon

And this is the only way it can be translated although the word order is not
natural.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-10-11T03:29:55.773
53734
2017-10-11T03:40:36.603
2017-10-11T03:40:36.603
11104
11104
53733
answer
Both phrases you gave mean "I ate lemon". I will show you, roughly, how to
parse the sentences so you can convince yourself of this.

## The verb is in the end of the clause

Clauses in Japanese always **end with the verb**. This is very important, and
(usually) won't change in casual speech, even if there are particles being
omitted and all that. The verb is always in the end of the clause.

This means that, when you see:

> watashi wa remon wo tabeta

You can conclude:

  * This is **one** complete **clause**. The verb is "tabeta".
  * What is marked with "wa"? Answer: "watashi". Therefore "watashi" is the topic of this clause.
  * What is marked with "wo"? Answer: "remon". Therefore "remon" is the object.

Therefore the translation can only be "I ate lemon". Now, if the sentence was,
instead:

> remon wo watashi wa tabeta

The analysis would be **identical** to the one I did above, and the only
possible translation is still "I ate lemon".

## What if particles are omitted?

In casual speech, it is not uncommon for particles to be omitted. But, you can
be sure that **the verb will still be in the end of the clause**. Consider:

> watashi, remon tabeta.

Particles were omitted, this is fine. But as you can see, the verb is still in
the end. This won't change in acsual speech. You simply have to guess which
particle was attached to "watashi" and which particle was attached to "remon",
and you can quickly guess "wa" and "wo" respectively, and understand the
sentence. This still means "I ate lemon".

## How to say "Lemon I ate" then?

First of all, note that "Lemon I ate" **is not a clause**! "I ate" is a
clause. But "Lemon I ate" is well, a lemon with a special property (you ate
it), so it is a **noun modified by a clause**.

Clauses can modify nouns. I don't know if you're familiar with this, so I will
explain a bit. Clearly, we can modify a noun with adjectives, such as "big
lemon", "small lemon", and so on. In english, we do this by putting the
adjective on the left of the noun. We can also modify a noun with a clause.
For example, "A lemon _that I ate_ ", or "A lemon _I ate_ " for short. In
Japanese, we can also do this, and to do this, we put the clause in the left
of the noun. Therefore.

  * We want to say "Lemon I ate".
  * Step 1: figure out how to say "I ate" (the clause). Well, it is "watashi wa tabeta" or "watashi ga tabeta" (in small sentences it is hard to see a difference between "wa" and "ga", so let's leave it like this for now...)
  * Step 2: figure out how to say "Lemon": that is "remon".
  * Put the clause to the left of the noun. Result: "watashi wa tabeta remon" **or** "watashi ga tabeta remon".
  * Note: It's unfortunate that we stumbled into this "wa" versus "ga" thing here, but since it's not the focus of your question, I will simply say that "wa" is wrong in this case. If you don't understand why, you'll have to look around or ask another question.

Conclusion: "Lemon that I ate" is "watashi ga tabeta remon". Since clauses in
Japanese end with a verb, it is clear that "remon" is not a part of the clause
here. Instead, it is being modified by a clause. And no particle omitting will
change this.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-10-11T12:07:32.320
53741
2017-10-11T12:07:32.320
7494
53733
answer