50361
> 先に問いに対する答えを **明確にした方がよりわかりやすい** 回答になると思います。 このお話は、『饅頭こわい』ですか？
> ([context](https://www.italki.com/notebooks/817607))

I feel a bit unsure about the sentence as a whole, but I struggle the most
with the part in bold. I have quite some trouble with 明確にした方. Especially 方
gives me a headache since I'm a bit clueless on how to meaningfully interpret
it in context of the phrase it is embedded into. I think I might have seen a
similar construction elsewhere. The fact that it's followed by が and then
directly by より makes the riddle even harder for me. Unless for the case that
より means "from", I only know it in context of comparisons.

In these contexts it usually doesn't directly succeed the subject marker. It
should look more like this: この饅頭はそのチョコレートよりおいしい。=> "These manju are more
delicious than that chocolate." (I hope I did this correctly, I'm terrible at
comparisons.) It could as well be 方が, as in そうしたほうがいいです. But then the
following より still irritates me.

My translation so far looks like this:

> The answer regarding the question before the **made precise manner がより**
> becomes an easy to understand reply I think. Is this the "I fear manju"
> story?

As you can see I cant get through that middle section of the sentence. It
doesn't even begin to make sense. I might know the 明確にした方 from similar
structures like
[here](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/46543/feeling-unsure-
about-the-connection-of-the-two-sides-of-the-
comma/46547?noredirect=1#comment83264_46547) 「地図は普通、北を上にして掛かれる」
CC BY-SA 4.0
2017-07-13T23:47:59.357
50359
2021-10-15T18:12:55.040
2021-10-15T18:12:55.040
30454
20172
question
grammar parsing
明確にした方がよりわかりやすい
There are two parts in the expression:

> 明確にした方が よりわかりやすい

* * *

Let's start with what you specified you already knew:

The first one is what you think it is:

> It could as well be 方が, as in そうしたほうがいいです.

そうしたほうが is roughly "doing it would (be)" or "doing it this way would (be)".

The second one is also what you think it is:

> It should look more like this: この饅頭はそのチョコレートよりおいしい。=> "These manju are more
> delicious than that chocolate."

If you leave only よりおいしい, you have "more delicious (than)", "tastier (than)".

The trick here is that より serves two functions: "than ..." and "more ... /
...-er". Without the preceding part it still retains the latter (makes the
adjective comparative).

Now if you combine the two things, you come up with "doing it this way would
be tastier", which has a strange meaning, but serves the purpose of showing
the structure.

* * *

Back to the original example:

～を明確にした方が by analogy to そうしたほうが translates to "making ... clear would be"

よりわかりやすい by analogy to よりおいしい translates to "easier to understand"

If you combine the two parts from the phrase in question, you'll end up with:

> making ... clear would be (or "make it") easier to understand

Which still requires some polishing to fit the context, but is already pretty
understandable, isn't it?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-07-14T05:21:29.103
50361
2017-07-14T05:42:33.097
2017-07-14T05:42:33.097
11104
11104
50359
answer