87341
I have these two sentences:

  * 私は映画を仕事のあと見た。
  * 仕事のあと映画を見た。

To me, they seem equivalent in meaning. However, for the Google Translator the
first one means 'I watched **the** movie after work.' while the second one
means 'I watched **a** movie after work.'

Is this translation accurate? If so, changing the position of the direct
object (the movie) has changed the meaning of the sentence, hasn't it? What
are the grammatical rules to know where to put the direct object?
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-07-04T21:10:51.277
87335
2021-12-30T02:45:48.650
2021-07-05T01:30:08.230
9831
45408
question
meaning word-order object
Can the place that the direct object occupies change the meaning of the sentence?
Those two Japanese sentences mean the same thing, although the latter is more
natural. Japanese word order is more flexible than that of English.

The Japanese language does not have the equivalents of "a", "the" and "-s". If
there is absolutely no context, even a bilingual human cannot often tell if
the correct English translation of 猫 in a sentence is " **the** cat", " **a**
cat", "cat **s** ", or " **the** cat **s** ". In your case, a human would
probably think " **a** movie" (singular) is most likely, but no one can be
100% sure. And if there are two translations that are equally possible, you
cannot predict which is chosen by Google Translate.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-07-05T01:16:07.600
87340
2021-07-05T01:30:14.123
2021-07-05T01:30:14.123
9831
5010
87335
answer
Whether to translate 映画 as “a movie”, “movies”, “the movie”, or “the movies”
depends on the context and cannot be determined by its position in a sentence
alone. However, word order does affect the focus of a sentence.

When there is no additional context, 私は映画を仕事のあと見た looks like a (bit redundant)
response to a question about when the speaker watched 映画. In other words, the
sentence somewhat puts 仕事のあと into focus. If it is indeed a response to such a
question, 映画 must be old information to the listener. Google Translate might
take that into consideration when it translates it as “the movie”.

仕事のあと映画を見た, on the other hand, looks more like a response to a question about
what the speaker did after work. 映画を見た is put into focus. Then, 映画 is new
information to the listener and “a movie” may be more appropriate.

But that’s when these are written as independent sentences. How they are
interpreted in real life highly depends on the context and also on which part
is given prominence when pronounced.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-07-05T01:57:26.427
87341
2021-12-30T02:45:48.650
2021-12-30T02:45:48.650
43676
43676
87335
answer