12631
For example in Genesis 1:

> 元始{はじめ}に神{かみ} 天地{てんち}を創造{つくり}たまへり

Why are the kanji 元始 and 創造 given the interesting readings? Moreover, they
seem to be given the readings of the less specific words 始め and 作り. Why not do
this:

> 始めに神 天地を作りたまへり

I understand the motivation of giving a technical kanji compound to denote a
special concept, but usually when that happens an ad-hoc 和製漢語 or existing 音読み
compound reading is given. So why not

> 元始{げんし}に神 天地を 創造{そうぞう}したまへり

Is this practice of using kanji compounds imported from China but instead
giving the reading of the closest Japanese word more common in Classical
Japanese?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-08-15T22:04:37.473
12552
2013-08-26T11:07:41.130
2960
question
grammar kanji readings classical-japanese
Why does the 文語 version of the Bible have so many nonstandard readings?
The 文語 translation of The Bible was made before WWII when written Japanese was
undergoing a huge revolution.

文語 is the written Japanese. Before Meiji, all written Japanese used a type of
written Japanese called 文語体. 文語体 developed during 中古日本語, which was developed
in Heian.

And during Meiji there was a reform which suggested that written Japanese
should be the same as the oral one. This perfectly explains why the 文語 version
of the Bible is so different compared with the modern ones.

At that time, Japan also had a 'diglossia'.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-08-16T01:00:38.210
12553
2013-08-16T01:00:38.210
3110
12552
answer
Meiji-yaku is influenced from chinese bible(聖經).

<http://xybk.fuyin.tv/bible/NCV/b5/>

> 創造天地萬物 1 起初， 神創造天地。 2 地是空虛混沌；深淵上一片黑暗； 神的靈運行在水面上。 3 神說：“要有光！”就有了光。 4
> 神看光是好的，他就把光暗分開了。

Many kanji notations are same as that of chinese version, but the reading are
that of japanese. here becomes the deviations between the representations
(kanji) and the readings.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-08-17T00:15:14.457
12562
2013-08-17T00:15:14.457
3847
12552
answer
This is one of the neat things about Japanese, and actually can shed some
light on [音]{おん}[読]{よ}み・[訓]{くん}[読]{よ}み.

One can think about the whole Japanese writing system as just using the 漢字
that have similar meaning for the Japanese word, and "reading" it as Chinese
or Japanese.

It started out by being just literal Chinese ([漢文]{かんぶん}). Then, instead of
reading it as Chinese, it was read as Japanese (i.e., 漢文[訓読]{くんどく} with
[片]{かた}[仮名]{かな} markup). However, after a while, the verbs started being moved
to the end (matching Japanese grammar), and then, there was a shift to using
the 漢字 for their "sound" instead of actual meaning (i.e., [和文]{わぶん}). Having
to write so many strokes just for sound was cumbersome (i.e.,
[萬葉]{まんよう}[仮名]{がな}); so, [平]{ひら}[仮名]{がな} was invented. It was difficult to
understand text written only in 仮名 without the 漢字 to convey meaning; so, after
a while, both 漢字 and 仮名 were mixed together (i.e.,
[和]{わ}[漢]{かん}[混淆]{こんこう}[文]{ぶん} and [仮名]{かな}[交]{ま}じり[文]{ぶん}).

That is a grossly over-simplified history of the Japanese writing system.

So, 漢字 and Japanese sounds have always been loosely coupled, which has allowed
for authors to pick-and-match 漢字 and reading.

An example of this is the word つくる—there are different 漢字 used to convey
different meanings/nuances.

  * 作る
  * 做る
  * 創る
  * 造る

The author(s) of your Bible decided to use 元始 for the meaning of "はじめ", and 創造
as the meaning of "つくる".
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-08-24T11:39:18.493
12631
2013-08-26T11:07:41.130
2013-08-26T11:07:41.130
3835
3835
12552
answer