53415
As I know, when the potential form of a verb is being used, direct object
particle "を" should not be used. Instead, が or は should be used. So when
should we use which? For example,

> 富士山が 登れた climb Fuji Mountain.
>
> 重い荷物は持てます hold heavy baggage.

I don't see why in the second example, the particle は is used, because
logically, "baggage" is the object of the verb "hold". I think it should be
the same as in the first sentence, where が is used.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2017-09-21T21:28:34.890
53413
2022-01-16T08:13:29.193
2022-01-16T08:13:29.193
30454
25900
question
potential-form は-and-が
A question about the particle used with potential form
> when the potential form of a verb is being used, direct object particle "を"
> should not be used. Instead, が or は should be used.

That's not really correct; you can still use を naturally in many cases. See:
[The difference between が and を with the potential form of a
verb.](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/609/5010)

> が or は should be used. So when should we use which?

So do you know [the standard difference between が and
は](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/22/5010)? Can you explain the
difference between [先生は来る and
先生が来る](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/43213/5010), for example? If yes,
there is nothing special here. Please keep in mind that [Japanese potential
forms are similar to English
"-able"](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/a/36482/5010). は is used to
topicalize a word or making a contrast, whereas が is used for "neutral
description" or "exhaustive listing".

>   * 重い荷物が持てます。 (neutral)  
>  I can carry heavy baggage.
>   * 重い荷物は持てます。 (contrastive _wa_ )  
>  I can (at least) carry heavy baggage (although I cannot do something else).
>

Another example:

> **A** : この3人の中で、誰 **が** 英語を話せますか？ Who can speak English among the three?  
>  **B** : 太郎 **が** 話せます。 Taro can speak English.  
>  (exhaustive-listing _ga_ ; implies he is the only person who can speak
> English among the three)  
>  **C** : 花子は中国語 **は** 話せますよ。 (But) Hanako can speak Chinese!  
>  (contrastive _wa_ ; implies she cannot speak English)
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-22T01:13:44.903
53415
2017-09-22T01:13:44.903
5010
53413
answer
The Japanese no one teaches you.

The Potential Form (-areru) does not mean literally "can". That is a wrong way
of teaching this form and leads to confusion. What it really means is "to make
-verb- possible".

> Hon ga yomeru/yomareru.  
>  Lit: The book makes reading possible.

> Fujisan ga noboreta.  
>  Fujisan made climbing possible.

The object makes the action possible/performable. Once you assimilate this
idea you can procede to translate these in natural English, that is, using
"can".

If you chance the perspective you can say:

> Watashi wa (watashi ga) kono hon wo yomeru/yomareru.  
>  In relation to me, I make reading this book possible.

> Watashi wa (watashi ga) Fujisan wo noboreta.  
>  In relation to me, I made climbing Fujisan possible.

Now the one who makes the actions possible is you (watashi).

Unfortunately, most Japanese courses teach Japanese the wrong way when they
should teach you Japanese the way Japanese people think.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-01-15T18:55:08.163
92977
2022-01-15T19:34:51.130
2022-01-15T19:34:51.130
30454
50251
53413
answer