27277
I am studying Japanese using the Michel Thomas Method. It says you can use
_nagara_ to show that one action happens while another occurs.

It then gives the following example:

> _nominagara shigoto o shimashita_  
>  I drank while I worked / I drank while working
>
> _konban sushi o resutoran de tabenagara Nihon no tomodachi to hanashimasu_  
>  Tonight I will eat sushi in a Japanese restaurant while I talk with my
> Japanese friend.
>
> _tabenagara terebi o mimasu_  
>  I eat while I watch TV / I eat while watching TV
>
> _koko no resutoran ga suki desu kara shigoto o shinagara koko de
> tabemashita_  
>  Because I like the restaurants round here, I ate here while I worked.

The last one really confuses me. In all the others, the order of the actions
in the English translation mirrors the Japanese.

However, in the last one, the English translations mentions eating first and
then work, whereas in the Japanese it's the other way around.

Is there are a reason for this, or, like most things in Japanese, does the
order not matter?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-08-09T11:38:33.637
27273
2016-02-25T15:43:27.627
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
9537
question
grammar
Word order of actions when using nagara (while)?
V-nagara is basically a kind of transgressive:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgressive_(linguistics)>

my native language (Russian) has those. I'm not a linguist so take my
explanation with a grain of salt, but the way I understand transgressives, the
action _that provides background_ is mentioned first and the _main action_
comes last.

English doesn't have this kind of transgressive structure, so these sentences
are translated using coordinate clauses instead. Consider the following
ungrammatical sentence:

"Eating a cake, I read the newspaper."

No one ever talks like this. However, you should be able to understand the
general concept and why eating is mentioned first - it serves as a background
for the main action (reading the newspaper).

In your last example, working also serves as a background, not the main
action. Kinda like "working there, I used to eat there".

P.S. in Russian, you can often switch the word order depending on which action
you want to bring into the spotlight. Therefore "reading the newspaper, I ate
a cake" also works if you wish to focus more on the cake eating process rather
than the newspaper reading one. However, this is only possible for actions of
similar scale. The "working there, I used to eat there" example can't be
reformatted into "eating there, I used to work there" because eating can't
serve as a background for something bigger, like work. I have no idea whether
this rule applies to Japanese, but most likely it does.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-08-09T12:01:58.160
27274
2015-08-09T12:20:28.463
2015-08-09T12:20:28.463
10753
10753
27273
answer
The verb in the **ながら** clause is always secondary to the main verb in the
sentence. To take the example from the excellent book 'A Dictionary of Basic
Japanese Grammar' by Seiichi Makino and Michio Tsutsui, If you were told

> ちょっと話がしたいんですが。  
>  I'd like to have a little talk with you

You could answer in two ways

> A) じゃ、コーヒーを飲み **ながら** 話しましょう。  
>  Then, lets talk while we drink coffee
>
> B) じゃ、話し **ながら** コーヒーを飲みましょう。  
>  Let's drink coffee while we talk

Both responses would be fine in English, but in Japanese the main verb is
about **talking** because that's what the original sentence was about.
Therefore only response A) is appropriate. Drinking coffee is secondary to the
main action of talking.

In your last example, the man is talking about liking the restaurants around
here, so the main action would be about eating or drinking in them. Working
there is secondary to the main theme, i.e. things to do with restaurants.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-08-09T12:25:38.553
27277
2016-02-25T15:43:27.627
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
7944
27273
answer