61715
Something I learned early on when I learnt the causative-passive was that the
sentences also make sense when you drop the causative-passive, e.g.

> 私はパンを食べさせられた。
>
> 私はパンを食べた。

Basically, "it's just a nuance". Someone (possibly unnamed) made you do the
action. But I recently came across this example where I'm pretty sure I can't
use that line of thought:

> 考えさせられる小説。  
>  "A novel that forces you to think".

Is this correct Japanese? 考える小説 would be "a thinking novel", so 考えさせらる小説 reads
to me as "a novel that is forced to think", which of course is nonsense.

EDIT:

Hm, thinking about it some more, I realised, that 考える小説 may make some sense,
as "books to think", or "books for thinking"? Is that the reason why 考えさせられる小説
works?
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-09-24T10:46:04.070
61710
2022-03-14T22:10:43.520
2022-03-14T22:09:11.863
30454
14391
question
relative-clauses causation ambiguous-relative-clauses
Does 考えさせられる小説 make sense?
考えさせられる小説 is a correct Japanese expression, and it indeed means "a novel that
makes you think (deeply)." (Note that させる/させられる is not necessarily forcible.
The use of "force" is too strong.)

Technically speaking, 考えさせられる小説 can also mean "the novel that is made to
think", but that's nonsense. Grammatically, this is an [**adverbial-head**
relative clause](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/a/54677/5010) made from:

> (人々は)この小説に考えさせられる。  
>  People are made to think by this novel.

Which can be relativized to:

> (人々が)考えさせられる小説  
>  the novel by which people are made to think

The last sentence is too literal, and it's way more natural to say "the book
that makes you think" in English.

考える本 is an uncommon expression, but it can also mean "a book that thinks" and
"a book for thinking" depending on the context.

**EDIT:** Of course you can also say (人々に)考えさせる小説, which may seem more
straightforward to the eyes of English speakers. But such a sentence tends to
look tricky in Japanese. [See this
discussion](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/a/32449/5010).
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-09-24T14:47:14.140
61715
2018-09-24T15:09:49.943
2018-09-24T15:09:49.943
5010
5010
61710
answer
> 私は小説に考えさせられる。  
>  I am forced to think by the novel.

> 小説に考えさせられる私  
>  I who is forced to think by the novel.

> 私が考えさせられる小説  
>  The novel which forces me to think.

It is possible to say either

> 考えさせられる私
>
> 考えさせられる小説.

The meaning will depend on the context.

Just by saying:  

> 考えさせられるA  
>

there is no way to know if A is the subject or object.

Since 小説 is an inanimate object unable to think, the only possible
interpretation here is that 小説 is the agent of the passive.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-09-24T14:55:51.170
61716
2022-03-14T22:10:43.520
2022-03-14T22:10:43.520
30454
18157
61710
answer