One aspect that contributes to the very high legibility of the Latin alphabet
is that the letters have ascenders and descenders which creates a
characteristic silhouette for different words. This way, a word can even be
read when the top or bottom 50% is cut away. Additionally, it speeds up the
reading.

![Demonstration of the variable height](https://i.stack.imgur.com/kTXoc.png)

In Japanese, all characters have the same height and no ascenders or
descenders. Sometimes, Kanji are set bigger than Kana which improves
legibility. But writing kana with ascenders and descenders is uncommon.

I saw it written that way on a beer ad in the Tokio metro, ハ was as big as x,
some characters were descending like p and some ascending like h. I
unfortunately do not have a photo of it and forgot which characters were
higher and which ones lower.

Is there a preferred way of setting the kana like this? Which kana should be x
high, which ones cap high and which ones descending and which ones ascending?

"That concept doesn't exist in Japanese". But it is being used and does
improve legibility. We don't have to do something the way we always did.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-19T23:30:08.057
15495
2014-04-22T03:12:40.453
3484
question
handwriting typesetting
On the legibility of Japanese writing (compared to the Latin alphabet with its variable letter height) – What's the correct kana height?
Part of the reason why kanji are often written larger than kana is because it
improves their legibility due to their more complex nature.

As a matter of what is considered standard, all characters in Japanese are
intended to occupy a box of a set, uniform size. That said, kana have a bit
more room for variation when you get into handwriting, especially if you get
into 書道【しょどう】 and/or 縦書き【たてがき】. Due to the free-flowing nature of Japanese
calligraphy, kana have a tendency to become elongated—し can extend to look
like a long, slightly curving line without any hook whatsoever, while the end
of の can trail off for a while, doubling its height. This also carries over
into signage to an extent, especially where a calligraphic feel is desired.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-20T03:15:10.763
15497
2014-04-20T03:15:10.763
4914
15495
answer
As I was randomly browsing through _Remembering the Kanji Volume 3_ , I found
what I was looking for.

The kana in this book are set in a font in which the height difference between
smaller kana like ロ or ハ and larger kana like イ or さ is more accentuated.
Additionally, in katakana, there seems to be a baseline and median line
running through the characters such that smaller katakana are x high and
larger kana having ascenders and descenders. The start and end of the strokes
also seem to be following those two lines. It's less pronounced in hiragana
though where the first stroke of い is starting slightly above the median line
and its hane going slightly below the baseline.

![50% of kanji for small kana](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Kcqt0.png)

Compared to a font in which the the differences are not as pronounced, it
looks like this. Both the baseline and median line are followed only loosely.
While in the above font, the first stroke of イ ends on the baseline, it's not
the case here. In the above font, the hook of さ starts exactly at the
baseline, here, the baseline is ignored.

![60% of kanji for small kana](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Bro1Q.png)

Thus, the proportions are as follows:

  * In both fonts, kana are vertically centered.
  * In the font on the top (where the height differences are more pronounced), large kana are roughly at 95% the size of kanji and small kana at 50%.
  * In the font on the bottom (where the baseline or median line is not closely followed), large kana are at 90% the size of kanji and small kana at 60%.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-22T03:12:40.453
15526
2014-04-22T03:12:40.453
3484
15495
answer