6143
I've always been curious about the pronunciation of the す in です and at the end
of 〜ます verbs. Most commonly the "u" sound is inaudible, but sometimes by some
people it's more pronounced, and some people really **go** for it.

Does it vary by age group, audience, gender, region etc in a way that I
haven't picked up on? Can anyone offer any particular guidance for people
speaking Japanese as a foreign language?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-04-06T22:09:10.610
5175
2015-01-19T05:32:36.233
2012-09-22T05:09:13.397
501
1272
question
dialects phonology phonetics pitch-accent vowels
Pronunciation of す in です and the end of ます verbs
I usually hear people draw out the long "su" at the end of a sentence when
giving some sort of presentation or speech (where it gives emphasis to
speaker's sentence... or, perhaps, gives the speaker more time to think about
what to say next.) It happens in English, too, like when a voice-over
announcer makes something sound more dramatic.

In most general conversation, keeping the short "s" sound should be fine.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-04-06T22:25:31.380
5176
2012-04-06T22:25:31.380
1188
5175
answer
The best way I can describe the normal sound of the 'u' part of す is that it
is said as far under your breath as possible. However there is always a sound
even if it is not noticeable. It takes a fair bit of exposure to pick it up.

One of the problems you are probably having with this is that your text book
says that you just drop the 'u' part at the end. This really isn't true at
all, the correct sound is just hard for English speakers to say at first.

ます does not sound like 'mas' as in the English 'Christmas', there is always
something after the 's' part.

That being said if your untrained ears hear a 'u' that sound like as in the
English 'sue', there are two possible reasons for that.

1) The person is making fun of your accent (as English speakers tend to really
mess this up).

2) They are asking a question. Asking a question in this way is normally
considered less polite than adding か.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-04-17T05:16:42.500
5225
2012-04-17T05:16:42.500
1129
5175
answer
I've long been puzzled by this. I've been told it was more common in Kansai,
but I've definitely heard it in Tokyo, although I have no idea where the
people were originally from. People have told me it was a dialectal
difference, only to get caught saying it themselves later. Go figure.

It's particularly common in short expressive phrases like そう（なん）です～. I can
only suppose the extra vowel allows for more expression. I sometimes feel it
almost replaces ね.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-04-17T13:47:03.393
5226
2012-04-17T13:47:03.393
801
5175
answer
This is the result of a well known [devoicing rule in
Japanese](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_phonology#Devoicing).
Devoicing means that there is no vibration of the vocal folds. For example,
the difference between [s] and [z] is only that [z] is voiced. The IPA
diacritic for devoiced phones is a circle at the bottom of the glyph e.g.
[z̥]=[s]. Although there is still much dialectal,
[idiolectal](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiolect) (the way a particular
individual uses words), and lexical (the way a particular word is used by
individuals) variation in devoicing vowels, and in fact, what is called
Japanese vowel devoicing does not in all cases result in merely a devoiced
vowel. Taken from [The Sounds of Japanese (Vance,
2008)](http://www.cambridge.org/gb/knowledge/isbn/item1157656/?site_locale=en_GB):

> The so-called devoiced vowel is actually missing entirely in many cases,
> although traces of it remain as coarticulations in the immediately preceding
> consonant. Some researchers refer to the affected vowel as reduced, and this
> term is more accurate as it covers a wider range of possibilities.

A [coarticulation](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coarticulation) in a preceding
consonant means that, for a consonant vowel sequence the consonant has been
pronounced (articulated) slightly differently in anticipation of the upcoming
vowel, so different vowels might result in slightly different articulations of
that consonant. Coarticulation is one acoustic feature that complicates speech
recognition/synthesis.

The traditional and most simple description of vowel devoicing, taken from [An
Introduction to Japanese Linguistics (Tsujimura,
2006)](http://ca.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-1405110651.html),
gives two conditions for devoicing which Vance calls a good first
approximation:

  1. The high vowels /i/ and /u/ are voiceless when they are at the end of the word and are preceded by a voiceless consonant
  2. The high vowels /i/ and /u/ are voiceless between voiceless consonants.

The う in です# and ます# (# represents end of utterance) satisfy the first
condition and so undergo devoicing:

  * desɯ# → desɯ̥# since /s/ is a voiceless consonant
  * masɯ# → masɯ̥# since /s/ is a voiceless consonant

If, for example, we have ですか, the う is still devoiced because /ɯ/ is found
between /s/ and /k/ (/desɯka/) which are both voiceless consonants and so the
2nd condition is applicable. Devoicing a vowel can be tricky if you
deliberately try it in isolation, but to do so just don't let your vocal folds
vibrate.

However Vance offers the following relevant observation:

> Devoicing between a voiceless consonant and a pause is much less consistent
> than devoicing between two voiceless consonants.

There is one immediate complication (among several) to devoicing high vowels;
what happens when a vowel is both devoiced and [pitch-
accented](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_pitch_accent), as in the /i/
of 四季 /ɕika/? The contradiction is that you cannot have a high pitch on a
phone that isn't voiced (vocal fold vibration, or
[phonation](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonation), is what generates that
part of the signal that is perceived as pitch). Usually textbooks (or at least
the two that I know of) in a first course of Japanese linguistics will not
address this contradiction. This paper [Against Marking Accent Locations in
Japanese Textbooks (Hasegawa,
1995)](http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~hasegawa/Accent/accent.html) argues
against this pedagogical simplification:

> The fact that native listeners do hear an accent on a devoiced syllable
> indicates that associating an accent invariably with a high pitch cannot be
> an accurate description of the language. This paper discusses how Japanese
> accent is actually realized and argues that marking accent locations in
> textbooks without a detailed explanation about accent is merely an extra
> complication that introductory textbooks should avoid.

Devoicing becomes rather complicated when intonation and other exceptional
cases are considered, but just looking at the sheer number of papers on the
topic it seems to be a well studied and documented feature of Japanese
phonology.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-07-15T14:03:26.823
6143
2015-01-19T05:32:36.233
2015-01-19T05:32:36.233
1454
5175
answer