52473
The following exchange occurs in Volume 3, Chapter 51 of the manga ReLife.

The sequence of events is: A girl told a guy that she saw him a year or two
ago and it was love at first sight. She describes seeing him being nice to a
customer during his work. Then she asks him if he has a girlfriend. He says no
and she continues below:

> あたしが新太{あらた}君の彼女になりたいです・・・って言ったら  
>  アリ・・・ナシ？
>
> 今すぐの話じゃなくてもいいの  
>  可能性の話でもいいの

I'm having difficulty with the second part. My current understanding is
something like:

> **Literally:**  
>  It's fine if you don't have a response right now.  
> It's fine if the response is that there is a possibility.
>
> **Figuratively:**  
>  You don't have to answer right now. Just letting me know there's a
> possibility is good enough.

I'm interested in the use of 話 above. I've seen 話 used like this quite often
and have never fully understood it. **Is 話 a synonym for 答え in this case or
does it mean something else** (perhaps it implies that two people are talking
rather than just one person answering...)? Also, I'm surprised to see 話
modified directly by 可能性の. I would have expected something like 可能性のことの話 (I'm
not sure why). **Is that incorrect or unnatural?**

**I'm also confused about 今すぐの.** As far as I understand, 今すぐ is a 副動詞
(adverb) and describes when a 動詞 (verb) occurred. Here, it seems to be being
treated as a 名詞 (noun) and is modifying 話. **Am I missing something here?**

Also, as if to simply further my confusion, the fan translation is essentially
opposite what I expected:

> **Fan Translation**  
>  I'd like to hear your answer as soon as possible.  
>  I'd like you to decide now.

Is that a valid translation? Thank you for reading through all these
questions.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-08-18T20:27:14.837
52469
2017-08-19T11:32:39.410
2017-08-19T00:25:49.577
9831
3296
question
grammar particle-の adverbs
Questions about 話 and ＜副動詞＞の
The first two lines seem rather blunt to me. I might be misconstruing that
part. It would make more sense to me if this were her own private inner
thoughts. But, I'm inclined to agree more with your take on the matter than
the fan translation (your approach seems more faithful to the Japanese).

Nevertheless, I would construe 話 as "something to talk about". So, the final
two lines I would translate as

> [This] isn't something [that needs] to be talked about right now.  
>  Even if it were just a conversation about the possibility, would be fine.

Notice that I've put [square brackets] around the parts where I've embellished
the translation a bit. Though probably a more faithful translation of the
first line would be:

> It's fine if we don't talk about it right now.

What I'd like to point out that, even in English, it's still clear that she
wants an answer. We don't have to force the translation of 話 into "response"
or "answer" to understand what's at the core of what she's saying.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-08-18T21:08:40.657
52470
2017-08-18T21:14:02.793
2017-08-18T21:14:02.793
4875
4875
52469
answer
According to the website [国語文法 (under the heading
連体修飾語になる)](https://www.kokugobunpou.com/%E6%B4%BB%E7%94%A8%E3%81%AE%E3%81%AA%E3%81%84%E8%87%AA%E7%AB%8B%E8%AA%9E/%E5%89%AF%E8%A9%9E-1-%E6%80%A7%E8%B3%AA%E3%81%A8%E5%83%8D%E3%81%8D/),
【副詞】 (adverbs) can modify 【体言】 (non-inflected words, i.e nouns) in some cases.
This is called 【連体修飾語】(modifier of an uninflected word), and can happen when
the adverbs are in isolation or before 【の】.

Adverbs don't only modify verbs in English either. However, they modify noun
phrases (i.e "I saw **only** _the mailman_ ") and similar grammatical
structures in these cases, and not nouns by themselves ("I saw **only**
_mailman_ ", which is not correct).

To follow this, I think it's important to remember that there isn't always a
one-to-one conversion between languages and therefore we assume our adverb is
the same as 【副詞】, which isn't really the case. This is **one** example of
that, but another one is the [concept of
の-adjectives](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/a/2771/25454) (縦じまのシャツ ➡
"vertical-striped shirt"), where some nouns are erratically listed as
"の-adjectives" under some dictionaries and not others, when there really is no
such thing. It's just one of the _functions_ of の and works with any nouns as
long as it, _in essence_ , makes sense for the noun to describe the other noun
in some way.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-08-18T22:18:49.160
52472
2017-08-19T11:32:39.410
2017-08-19T11:32:39.410
25454
25454
52469
answer
First, that fan translation is (mostly) wrong.

話 is not a synonym for _response/reply_ , but it refers to the whole
discussion that is taking place. ～の話じゃない means "We are not talking about ～;
This is not a matter of ～", and ～の話じゃなくていい means "We don't have to talk about
～; This conversation doesn't necessarily have to be about ～."

今すぐ is a standalone adverb, but it also works as a plain no-adjective (in
other words, [a plain noun](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/2770/5010)).
Many words work similarly. For example, 突然言う = to say suddenly, 突然の発言 = sudden
statement, 絶対違う = absolutely wrong, 絶対に違う = absolutely wrong, 絶対の自信 = absolute
confidence.

So 今すぐの話じゃなくていい means "We don't have to talk about doing something
immediately," "I'm not asking you to do something immediately," "You don't
have to decide right now," "It's not urgent," or something similar.
"彼女になりたいですって言ったらアリ?" sounds like an obvious 告白 (See: [_Kokuhaku_ : Japan's
"Love Confessing" Culture](https://www.tofugu.com/japan/kokuhaku-love-
confessing-japan/)), and this normally means she is asking for him to be in an
exclusive relationship immediately. This is clearly too much in this situation
where the guy even does not know who she is. By 今すぐの話じゃなくていい, she's saying she
doesn't want such an important decision right now. She does want to talk with
him right now, does want some answer, but his answer could be whether there is
any chance in the future. Your figurative translation seems perfect to me,
after all.

可能性の話, literally "matter of possibilities", makes perfect sense, and 可能性のことの話
sounds fairly awkward to me.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-08-19T00:16:42.517
52473
2017-08-19T00:16:42.517
5010
52469
answer