6139
The wikipedia article on [jinmeiyō
kanji](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jinmeiyo_kanji) states:

> Before September 27, 2004, there were 2232 government-designated jinmeiyō
> kanji used in personal and geographical names, with plans to increase this
> list by 578 kanji in the near future. This was the largest increase since
> World War II. The plan had not been without controversy, however. For
> example, the Chinese characters for "cancer", "hemorrhoids", "corpse" and
> "excrement", as well as parts of compound words (words created from two or
> more Chinese characters) meaning "curse", "prostitute", and "rape", are
> among the proposed additions to the list. This is because no measures were
> taken to determine the appropriateness of the kanji proposed, with the
> committee deciding that parents could make such decisions themselves.
> However, the government will seek input from the public before approving the
> list.

My first assumption was that maybe a kanji had more than one meaning, one
which was bad, and one that wasn't, but that doesn't seem to be the case:
looking up 癌 in jisho.org only gave cancer, and cancer related terminology.

The article goes on to say:

> Some of these kanji have led to speculation that the "odd" kanji being added
> to the names list are being done so in an attempt to make a de-facto
> expansion of the Jōyō Kanji List, rather than with the serious idea that
> anyone will use them in names.

And also

> Many others were included not for their potential uses in names (as is
> noted), but rather because of their frequent use and are easy to read and
> write.

But why would the Japanese government do a de-facto expansion of the Jōyō
Kanji List, rather than just modify the actual Jōyō Kanji List?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-07-14T10:42:15.527
6134
2013-04-05T23:48:43.527
2013-04-05T23:48:43.527
91
91
question
kanji names offensive-words language-reform
Why is the Japanese government considering adding kanji such as "cancer" to the jinmeiyō kanji?
> Why is the Japanese government considering adding kanji such as “cancer” to
> the jinmeiyō kanji?

I do not think that the government is trying to add these kanji to the set of
jinmeiyō kanji.

I think that some people are confused by the unclear description in Wikipedia.
At least I was confused at first. So probably it is useful to clarify it.

[Article 50 of the Family Register Act
(戸籍法)](http://law.e-gov.go.jp/htmldata/S22/S22HO224.html#1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000005000000000000000000000000000000)
regulates that a name of a child in a family register must consist of common
and easy letters, and the [Ordinance for Enforcement of the Family Register
Act
(戸籍法施行規則)](http://law.e-gov.go.jp/htmldata/S22/S22F00501000094.html#1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000006000000000000000000000000000000)
regulates that “common and easy letters” here means hiragana, katakana, jōyō
kanji, and other kanji letters listed in the [appendix of the
Ordinance](http://law.e-gov.go.jp/htmldata/S22/S22F00501000094.html#3000000002000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000).
“Jinmeiyō kanji” (人名用漢字) usually refers to kanji letters in this appendix.
(The English Wikipedia refers to both jōyō kanji and the kanji letters in the
appendix of the Ordinance as “jinmeiyō kanji,” but I think that this
definition is less common.)

The quoted paragraph of the English Wikipedia is about the situation in 2004.
The [Japanese
Wikipedia](http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%BA%BA%E5%90%8D%E7%94%A8%E6%BC%A2%E5%AD%97)
is much clearer on what happened in 2004. Partly motivated by the public
demand of expansion of jinmeiyō kanji, the Legislative Council (法制審議会) of the
Ministry of Justice published an initial proposal to add 578 kanji letters to
the set of jinmeiyō kanji on June 11, 2004, and called for comments. This
proposal was controversial because the proposed kanji letters included some
letters which did not seem appropriate for names at all, such as 糞
(excrement), 屍 (corpse), 呪 (curse), 癌 (cancer), 姦 (rape), 淫 (obscene), 怨
(grudge), 痔 (hemorrhoid), 妾 (mistress). The reason for this is explained in
the quoted portion:

> This is because no measures were taken to determine the appropriateness of
> the kanji proposed, with the committee deciding that parents could make such
> decisions themselves.

In other words, the Council chose the kanji letters which were “common and
easy” as the law regulated, irrespective of whether they were suitable for
names. There was nothing wrong about this as long as the law is concerned, but
it was different from how jinmeiyō kanji letters were chosen before.

According to the English Wikipedia, this made some people wonder “What is the
point?” and made them speculate that there was a hidden reason for the
proposal: the Council wanted to expand the jōyō kanji list, and the expansion
of the set of jinmeiyō kanji was meant to lead to a _de facto_ expansion of
the jōyō kanji list. Note that the jōyō kanji list is maintained by the
National Language Council (国語審議会) of the Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Technology, which is a different organization from the one
responsible for jinmeiyō kanji. I do not know if this story has any truth in
it.

On the basis of the feedback from the public, the Legislative Council removed
the nine letters which I listed above from the proposal (and added one letter)
on July 23. They removed other 79 letters on August 13, and made this list as
a final proposal on September 8. This final proposal came into effect on
September 27, 2004.

Since then, the set of jinmeiyō kanji was updated a little in 2009 (and also
in 2010 because of an update of the jōyō kanji list; remember that jinmeiyō
kanji means kanji letters which can be used for names _other than jōyō kanji_
). But I do not think that there is a current movement to add the letters such
as “cancer” to the set of jinmeiyō kanji.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-07-15T08:31:57.887
6139
2012-07-19T22:58:00.703
2012-07-19T22:58:00.703
15
15
6134
answer