2335
**_Update:** There seems to be some controversy here as to whether or not
there really is a difference between vouching and guaranteeing, which impacts
how it is translated. Please see the discussion I started on [English
L&U](https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/36205/what-is-the-difference-
between-vouch-and-guarantee) about this, where I believe the answers are
supporting the idea that there is a difference, and explain what that
difference is._

Japanese does not seem to have a readily available equivalent for the concept
of "vouching" for someone when you are introducing someone for work, or as a
possible date, or whenever there is some kind of favour involved and it's not
just social.

To be more accurate, in Japanese culture, when one introduces someone else,
the _default assumption_ is that you are vouching for that person.

Which means that just about _any_ and _every_ introduction comes with a fair
amount of responsibility. Which might be fine, except Japanese tend to err on
the side of caution by being hesitant to make introductions, for whatever
purpose, for fear that something might go wrong.

The words the dictionary provides for "vouch" is `保証【ほしょうする】`, or
`請け合う【うけあう】`, both of which mean "guarantee", which is much too strong. I
think because the default assumption is that any introduction comes with a
sense of vouching for that person, to then add words only stresses the
assurance, not qualify it.

The problem with anything like "guaranteeing", is that it implies that if
something goes wrong, you can come back to me, either for compensation, or
maybe just to punch me in the stomach, or something.

In English language and culture, when I'm vouching for someone, I am telling
you about the content of their character. What transpires from their actions
is between you and them. Guaranteeing is about putting assurance on future
actions and transactions.

So is there a way in Japanese I can say I'm vouching for the person without
guaranteeing their future actions?

Also, can I qualify a meeting by saying I'm _not_ vouching for someone? In
other words, despite the fact that this introduction is to help you with
something, I'm only making the introduction because I'm trying to help, but I
don't know the person I'm introducing well enough to give you any assurance.

This is somewhat a cultural issue as well as a language issue, which means I
wouldn't expect there's some perfect term that I simply haven't discovered
yet. If this is a concept that has to be described in some way so as to
introduce it to the language, then let's concoct something new.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-07-29T06:24:22.697
2279
2011-07-31T14:06:57.490
2017-04-13T12:38:10.367
-1
119
question
word-choice culture
How would one convey the concept of "vouching" in Japanese?
Let me start by thinking about the difference between vouching and
guaranteeing. If I understand what you're saying right, you mean something
like: if I lend a guy a guitar because you vouch for him as a reliable guy,
and he breaks it and won't replace it, I'm SOL, because I have no right to
expect you to replace it instead. But if you _guarantee_ that he won't break
it, I _am_ within my rights to ask you to replace it.

I think in the first case I would still be pissed at you, though. I would feel
that you had misled me (unintentionally or not) about this guy's character,
and that you had a _moral_ obligation to step up and make the situation right.

Maybe your understanding of "vouching" is different; if so, that shows that
the concept of "vouching" is hard to translate partly because it means
different things in different contexts/to different people. And a word this
flexible is unlikely to have an exact counterpart in Japanese, as you note.

So if there's something you want to say to differentiate an introduction from
"default vouching", it's probably best to state it directly. 信頼できる人だと思いますよ, or
whatever. If my guitar got broken in that case, I might feel that you had
terrible judgment, but I probably wouldn't feel _misled_ \-- you did say
と思います, after all. (Of course, I might still decide to hold you responsible.)

I would offer a similar answer for your opposite question, how to introduce
someone _without_ vouching for them. If you want your hedge to be clear, and
don't have the skill to put it across by implication alone (I don't think I
do), the safe thing to do is to state it clearly. 直接一緒に仕事したことはないけど,
二回しか会ったことないけど, etc.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-07-30T21:14:57.643
2335
2011-07-30T21:14:57.643
531
2279
answer
I have no illusion that this answer might not be up to your expectations (it
is rather a list of minor points and suggestions), but it is probably more
appropriate than the lengthy comment back-and-forth we've been having, so here
goes:

**1.** I disagree with the level along which you differentiate "vouching" and
"guaranteeing" (in the context of introductions). As a few have pointed out
already, I think the general idea is that "vouching" is merely a _moral_ (and
_somewhat_ informal) obligation whereas "guaranteeing" implies something
stronger (often legal or financial) and more formal. In both cases, the
implication on the person you are vouching/guaranteeing for is the same: you
wager a share of your own "standing credit" to their benefit. In both cases,
you are bearing witness to the content of their character (to what extent: you
decide), which _does_ indirectly affect how they might behave in their future
interactions with the person you are introducing them to (I don't think
anybody is asking you to predict the future either).

I think you could perfectly envision a situation where you **vouch** strongly
for someone you'd trust with your life (say, setting up your brother with a
friend), yet put **guarantee** for someone you do not know so intimately
(typically: when facilitating a business deal).

However, this is all obviously way out of scope for JLU (not even particularly
Japan-related), so better agree to disagree, if that's not how you see things
(although I fear it has a strong impact on any possible answer to your
question).

**2.** Your first sub-question asks how to "vouch for somebody without
guaranteeing their future actions" and the point above should make it clear
how that is contradictory in nature.

More exactly: I don't think any reasonable person would ever ask you to
vouch/guarantee for **all possible future actions** of the person you are
introducing: only what can be reasonably foreseen from their character and
past actions:

  * If thermonuclear war strikes tomorrow and the person you vouched for turns out to be a sleeper agent for the rising masses of robotic overlords, I don't think anybody will call you on that.

  * On the other hand, if that person turns out to be a deeply unpleasant individual to work with, who consistently produces shoddy work and casually steals expensive office supply, your business partner might understandably expect you to **not** have vouched for such a person (and blame you accordingly if you did).

**3.** Which takes us to the (slightly anticlimactic and rather obvious)
answer, which also should address your second subquestion:

> To "vouch" for someone you do not want to guarantee anything about (i.e.
> vouch for), you simply do not vouch for them.

While vouching is indeed an implied part of **formal** Japanese business
introductions, it is also perfectly possible to introduce someone without
vouching for them.

It sounds you may be looking for a specific word (although it is unclear
whether you want a verb describing such an action, such as 保証する, or a
sentence/expression that can be used while performing it). I honestly don't
think there is a particular set expression in Japanese that says "I am not
vouching for this person" and is recommended in business situations (at least
I have never heard it), but there is a plethora of ways to distance yourself
from a person you are introducing:

  * Pointedly using the word "知り合い" (or similar) at the exclusion of any word indicating a formal association through work or such (同僚 etc).

  * Insisting on how undeveloped your own relationship is: e.g. how many times you've met, such as recommended in Matt's answer (but this could easily sound quite rude if the person you are introducing is present). If the "vouchee" is not part of the conversation, then I find that "会えば会釈する程度" ("nodding acquaintance") is quite a nice non-commital (yet respectful) turn of phrase.

  * Common sense, really, but: keeping your introduction short and terse within the limit of politeness is a good way to convey your neutrality: "吉田会社の田村さんです".

**3.** With all that said, I think it is worth pointing out that, particularly
in Japanese business settings, you will often be called to vouch for people
that you may **not want** to vouch for. Unfair as it may be, there is just no
way to introduce a member of your inner circle (relative, colleague etc.) to
an outsider without automatically taking a part of responsibility in their
future actions (if you have the intimate conviction that your boss is an axe
murderer, you can try slipping some oblique reference in, but good luck with
that).

(This aspect may or may not have to do with your current situation, but at any
rate, it is squarely in the "Culture" side of things, so let's not dwell on it
here.)
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-07-31T08:07:31.807
2348
2011-07-31T08:12:44.360
2011-07-31T08:12:44.360
290
290
2279
answer