41357
I need help with translating the sentence "Sorry, It was only after I sent it,
I realized I made a mistake". The context is that you sent a letter or
something and somebody points out a mistake you made.

My approach:

> すみません,送ってはじめて間違ってしまったことに気がついた.

I am using the grammar pattern mentioned
[here](http://japanesetest4you.com/flashcard/learn-
jlpt-n3-grammar-%E3%81%A6%E3%81%AF%E3%81%98%E3%82%81%E3%81%A6-te-hajimete/)

Is this a common way to express only after/not until, or is it better to use
後. Which form of "only" would I have to use then?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-11-30T07:59:08.313
41336
2016-12-01T11:16:17.560
2016-11-30T09:59:10.710
18684
18684
question
grammar english-to-japanese
Translation of "It was only after/not until..."
Instead of just giving the answer, I will give you some pointers to help you.

You will have to use the word 後 or some other way to convey the "after" part.

Since we are talking about something that occurred "after" something else, it
usually mean that an action was concluded and therefore probably require the
past tense.

失敗 maybe usable depending on the context and what the problem is but you might
want to also consider the verb 間違う.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-11-30T09:31:03.153
41337
2016-11-30T10:37:51.510
2016-11-30T10:37:51.510
18142
18142
41336
answer
(First off, my comment above is no longer valid since you have altered your
sentence a great deal. Your original sentence made little sense.)

The grammar pattern:

> 「Action A + **て** + **はじめて** + Action B」

is a very common one and it would be quite useful if you learned how to use it
naturally.

One of the examples from your link, however, is completely irrelevant and it
should not be there, I am afraid to say. That example is:

> 「こんなに腹{はら}が立{た}ったのは生{う}まれて初{はじ}めてだった。」
>
> "It was the first time I felt so angry in my life."

That Japanese sentence itself is perfectly grammatical and natural-sounding, I
assure you. The problem, however, is that the sentence does _**not**_ mean " _
**It was only after I was born that I felt so angry**_." Hope you can see the
problem here.

_**The**_ 「てはじめて」 that we are discussing here must describe the order of two
events. " _ **Only after A happened, B happened**_."

Your sentence:

> 「すみません,送ってはじめて間違ってしまったことに気がついた.」

sounds OK. At least every Japanese-speaker would surely understand what you
meant to say. (You still need to use the Japanese period, though.)

Careful native speakers/writers, however, would tend to use the phrase 「てはじめて」
_**only when B is the logical and natural consquence of A**_. In real life,
people often say things like:

> 「病気をし **てはじめて** 健康のありがたさが分かる。」 "Only after one suffers a desease, does one
> appreciate the value of good health."

The logic in that example is clear-cut, is it not? It would universally be
understood, I reckon. This is why I stated above that your sentence only
"sounded OK". It is "alright" even though not everyone would think it is
great. At least, there will be no misunderstanding as far as the meaning is
concerned.

To improve it, you could say:

「すみません、送った後{あと}にはじめて間違いがあったことに気づきました。」 or

「すみません、間違いがあったことに気づいたのは送った後でした。」

Regarding the first sentence, the insertion of an 「後に」 would produce the same
kind of effect as using "only after" instead of just "after". You would be
better off if you did not try to translate "only" into a Japanese word and
squeeze it into your sentence.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-01T10:30:40.500
41357
2016-12-01T11:16:17.560
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
41336
answer