99207
When talking about chimneys with a native Japanese speaker, I said:

> でも、アメリカンの家には普通です
>
> But, for American houses it's normal (for chimneys to exist/be a part of the
> house).

Which was corrected to:

> でも、アメリカの家では普通のことです

I can somewhat understand the corrections to アメリカ and こと. And while I don't
fully understand the need for them, especially the こと one, I'm not entirely
confused by them either. To me, it just changes the meaning from "for American
houses it's normal" to "for America's houses it's a normal thing".

When asking why it was で instead of に, I wasn't really given any explanation.
I was just told:

> アメリカの家には普通、煙突あるよ
>
> これはOKだよ

Trying to follow up and get some sort of explanation, I asked:

> 「アメリカの家には普通のことです」がいいですか？

But I was just told:

> うーん、説明するのは難しいけど、この場合は"家には"だとおかしいな
>
> My translation:
>
> Nope, the explanation is difficult, but in this case "家には" is weird/wrong.

I assumed に because I'm just trying to state this (a chimney being a part of
the house) is normal for American houses. And I don't really see a hard action
or reason taking place here, which would make me think で should be used.

Can someone explain the reason why に is wrong and why で is correct?
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-04-04T21:45:12.730
99199
2023-04-05T16:21:43.100
30339
question
particle-に particle-で
Corrections causing confusion about using に over で
To me, でも、アメリカンの家には普通です is okay if not totally natural.

In terms of omission, it drops a part of phrase which should be the source of
oddness.

In full, it should be

> (アメリカンの家に煙突があるの)は普通です

and 煙突がある(の) is dropped.

Compare

> (アメリカでは(家に煙突があるの))は普通です

Dropping the whole phrase inside () (and associated は) results in

> アメリカでは普通です

which is more natural. So just leaving a topical phrase works whereas the
first version feels like chopping a sentence.

* * *

Cf. _It is (felt) normal for [person]_. would translate to _[person]には普通です_.
E.g.,

  * アメリカ人に(とって)は(家に煙突があるのは)普通です

Here again, the は-phrase アメリカ人には is left and the main clause in () is dropped.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-04-04T22:48:56.490
99201
2023-04-04T22:48:56.490
45489
99199
answer
The correction from アメリカン to アメリカ is just a question of vocabulary. アメリカン is
not a common word by itself.

I agree the addition of こと is unnecessary.

The で in アメリカの家では can be understood as delimiting the scope within which the
main statement (about something being normal) is true.

に sounds odd here because the sentence lacks a verb that goes with it to
explicitly state something (a chimney) exists in a particular place (an
American house).

In the following sentence, which uses both, で delimits the scope within which
the statement 家に煙突があるのは普通です is true, whereas に modifies the verb ある to denote
where a chimney exists.

> アメリカでは家に煙突があるのは普通です。

* * *

I re-read your question and realized that you chose に not as a location marker
but for marking something whose standards something (the normal-ness of having
a chimney) is judged by. に alone is simply not suitable for that. You can use
にとって instead.

> アメリカの家にとっては普通です。

* * *

I had to add this because many people seem to be misled.

You can also say:

> アメリカでは普通に家に煙突があります。

This で cannot be explained as a location marker working on an adjective as it
does on a verb because the sentence has no adjective in it. And there seems to
be no good reason to see this で as a different usage from the で in
アメリカでは家に煙突があるのは普通です.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-04-05T03:32:31.243
99206
2023-04-05T16:21:43.100
2023-04-05T16:21:43.100
43676
43676
99199
answer
This is simply because you must use で as a location marker when the predicate
is an adjective (including no-/na-adjectives like 普通).

  * アメリカ **で** はそれは普通です。  
It's normal in America.

  * ニューヨーク **で** は物価が高いです。  
Prices are high in New York.

  * 東京 **で** は今、桜が綺麗です。  
In Tokyo, the cherry blossoms are beautiful right now.

  * 動物の体は寒い場所 **で** 大きく、暖かい場所 **で** 小さい。  
Animal bodies are larger in cold places and smaller in warm places.

You can use に as a location particle when it's used with a verb of existence
such as ある and いる. So アメリカの家 **に** は煙突が **ある** is perfectly fine.

アメリカには普通です might be acceptable when some verb that takes に is clearly implied
in the previous context (e.g., "I rarely have the opportunity to go to China,
but to America, it's common"), but this doesn't happen often.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-04-05T03:39:29.377
99207
2023-04-05T03:39:29.377
5010
99199
answer