39497
In polite sentences when the 2nd sentence is omitted, should the です be before
or after the particles?

> A: 彼女はいつも勉強しません。

which one should B say?

> B: 学生なのにです。

or

> B: 学生ですのに。

* * *

> A: お金はありませんのか。

which one should B answer?

> B: 学生なのでです。

or

> B: 学生ですので。

(Feel free to correct any wrong grammar in either B or A. If no one points it
out, I'll assume I am right.)

The real question is the position of です. ので indicates reason for the 2nd
sentence and のに means despite. And in plain sentences the です is omitted. Am I
right guys (for the facts I have shown)?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-09-26T08:52:44.780
39483
2016-10-26T17:07:49.150
2016-09-26T15:28:04.137
11104
15891
question
grammar particles
Should it be のにです or ですのに when stating an omitted 2nd sentence in polite sentence?
学生なのにです is natural in the first example. I rarely hear 学生ですのに but couth ladies
may say that.

お金はありませんのか is unnatural. お金を(orは)持っていませんか、お金を(orは)持っていますか, お金はありますか are
appropriate. 学生ですので is natural. 学生なのでです is unnatural but 学生なので(持って)ないです is
natural.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-09-26T15:59:53.453
39497
2016-09-26T16:08:16.680
2016-09-26T16:08:16.680
9831
7320
39483
answer