6694
[This question](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/6036/1628) has made me
think about the class of adjectives, which can function both as イ- and as
ナ-adjective, e.g.

```

    大きい   大きな
    小さい   小さな
    真っ白い 真っ白な (etc.)
    細かい   細かな
    暖かい   暖かな
    四角い   四角な (etc.)
    柔らかい 柔らかな
    
```

In my (non-)answer to the question, I mentioned that the difference of `やわらかい`
and `やわらかな` is very subtle at best.

I am wondering, can this maybe explained in more generality? What are the
differences in the word pairs above?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-09-02T02:06:09.067
6675
2022-09-22T08:55:16.070
2019-08-24T07:01:20.083
1628
1628
question
grammar meaning word-choice adjectives terminology
Adjectives functioning both as イ- and ナ-adjective
To answer part of the question:

For 大きい／大きな and 小さい／小さな I understand the difference is small, but the _na_
-form is often preferred with abstract words

> 大きな功績 great achievement  
>  大きな進歩 great progress  
>  小さな間違い small mistakes  
>  小さい時 when I was small (i.e. when I was a child).

I use the word "often" because there are exceptions: both 大きい問題 and 大きな問題 are
acceptable*.

* _Reference: "nihongo notes 10", p. 56_
CC BY-SA 4.0
2012-09-02T03:57:29.743
6680
2021-05-01T05:35:10.893
2021-05-01T05:35:10.893
1628
1556
6675
answer
After some research, there seems to be little difference in meaning. In some
situations, maybe ease of pronunciation is more of a guide than nuance of
meaning. For example, in the Balanced Corpus of Contemporary Written Japanese
(BCCWJ, 少納言), we have

```

    大きな木  154 results
    大きい木   12 results
    
```

(But 木 is clearly no abstract concept.)

However, my question stated that 大きい etc. can be used as both イ- and
ナ-adjective, which seems to be only half of the truth as 大き shouldn't be
considered a ナ-adjective, even though it can modify nouns as 大きな.

For example, 大き cannot be inflected, to form an adverb (cf. 静か → 静かに.)

Rather 大きな belongs to the class of [連体詞]{れんたいし} (Rikaichan calls this _pre-
noun adjectival_ or _adnominal adjective_ , a better name would be _adnoun_ ).

連体詞 are words which cannot inflect and must modify a noun (or pronoun), e.g.

> この、その、あの、……
>
> おかしな、大きな、小さな、……

as in

> このやり方は一番よい。
>
> こうするのが一番よい。

or

> 空におかしな形の雲が浮かんでいる。
>
> 空に変な形の雲が浮かんでいる。

These 連体詞 seem to come in 4-5 varieties (depending on the book you read):

> 「～の」の形・・・この、その、あの、どの、ほんの
>
> 「～な」の形・・・大きな、小さな、おかしな、いろんな
>
> 「～た、～だ」の形・・・たいした、たった、とんだ、ばかげた
>
> 「～る」の形・・・ある、あらゆる、いわゆる、さる、きたる、いかなる、堂々たる
>
> 「～が」の形・・・わが

All this information is a summary of [this
site](http://blog.livedoor.jp/aritouch/archives/2865534.html). I hope someone
will find it useful.

This should also shed some grammatical light on
[this](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/6569/1628) and [this
question](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/6502/1628).

In an after-thought as to why `小さい時` cannot be `小さな時` is that `小さな` is a 連体詞
and must modify a (pro)noun and thus forces the meaning `small time`, rather
than allowing for the interpretation as a sentence in which the (omitted)
subject was small, which is usually translated with a relative clause, i.e.
`the time, when I was small` or just `when I was small`.

So, the general rule seems to be that one can choose either one of the word
pair, but when choosing the one ending in な, one chooses to modify directly
the noun which must follow it and disallows constructions with relative
clauses.

E.g. compare

> 山の大きい街 vs. 山の大きな街.

The former can mean a `city with a big mountain`, whereas the latter is
necessarily a `big city situated on a mountain`. (One can probably come up
with better examples.)
CC BY-SA 4.0
2012-09-04T04:50:02.800
6694
2019-08-24T07:04:55.460
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
1628
6675
answer
A morphological analysis may help to shed light on the difference between 形容詞
and 形容動詞 (referred to as i- and na-adjective respectively in Japanese grammar
books written in English).
[形容詞](https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/%E5%BD%A2%E5%AE%B9/#jn-67145)
expresses the appearance, nature, or state of things.
[形容動詞](https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/%E5%BD%A2%E5%AE%B9%E5%8B%95%E8%A9%9E/#jn-67154)
does the same but the structure of it is **a noun followed by the conjugated
form of the copula だ** 「だろ・だっ（で・に）・だ・な・なら・〇」. So, a noun followed by the
_attributive_ form of だ (which is な) transfers the _attributes_ of that noun
to the described word (noun, pronoun or a noun clause).

In this light, let's compare 小さい and 小さな. 小さい simply means _small_ , but 小さな
means _having attributes of 小さ_. 小さ is an archaic term for _a baby_. So, 小さい木
is simply _a small tree_ , while 小さな木 is _a tree with the attributes of a
baby_ , in other words _a baby tree_. The meaning of both expressions are
almost identical, but the latter uses the technique called
[personification](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personification). This
technique gives that _**artistic and emotional taste**_ mentioned at the end
of the dictionary entry for
[小さい](https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/%E5%B0%8F%E3%81%95%E3%81%84_%28%E3%81%A1%E3%81%84%E3%81%95%E3%81%84%29/#jn-140896).
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-09-22T08:55:16.070
96309
2022-09-22T08:55:16.070
3371
6675
answer