I find it difficult to translate Japanese indirect quotations into my own
language partly because of different grammatical patterns and verb conjugation
altogether; for example, what about this sentence:

> (お見舞いかたがた) 久しぶりに故郷の話でもしてこよう **と** 思い立った.  
>  ???? 'It sprang to my mind/I decided to speak about my hometown after such
> a long time'

I have tons of phrases with such construction. How do you guys go about
figuring out the meaning?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-06-12T16:48:47.210
5838
2014-02-28T03:27:18.927
2014-02-28T03:27:18.927
1433
question
particle-と quotes
Introducing an indirect quotation with と
I don't see a question in this quotation. Here is a translation attempt, but
without context there are sure to be misunderstandings on my part, especially
with what the words in parentheses refer to:

> (while incidentally calling on someone who is ill/visiting a sick person)
> After not having done so in a long time, it occurred to me to relate the
> story of my hometown. / I got the idea to go with that old story of my home
> town/ It occurred to me to go ahead and talk about my hometown or something
> that I hadn't talked about in a while.

Your question is very unclear, perhaps you can reformulate it.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-06-12T17:35:13.780
5839
2012-06-12T23:59:12.210
2012-06-12T23:59:12.210
706
706
5838
answer
The way I understand it is that the `と` here is similar to English quotation
marks, except it can also be used with thoughts etc:

> (お見舞いかたがた) 久しぶりに故郷の話でもしてこようと思い立った.
>
> _My somewhat literal translation attempt:_ (When I was calling on someone
> who was ill, while I was at it) it came into my mind to "resolve to go and
> have a talk about my hometown and whatnot for the first time in ages".
>
> _My attempt at a more natural translation:_ When I was visiting someone who
> was ill, it occurred to me that while I was at it, I could go and talk about
> my hometown and whatnot for the first time in a long time.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-08-16T12:15:40.877
6489
2012-08-16T12:15:40.877
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
796
5838
answer
The most literal translation that I can surmise is

> "After such a long time,'I will speak about my hometown' is what occurred to
> me."

So the と translates to "is what", "is the thing that" or just "that" in almost
all situations. It can be loosely considered a subordinating conjunction that
connects an independent clause to a dependent clause functioning as a noun.
This is the same function that the word "that" has in English. If you
absolutely must compare it to English grammar, it is best thought of as the
subordinating conjuction "that". But strictly speaking, there is a crucial
difference that makes it best described as a particle/postposition that
follows a quotation. As there are no postpositions in English, there is no
direct English equivalent.

The terms "direct" and "indirect" quotations don't really hold the same
syntactical distinction in Japanese that they do in English. In English, a
direct quotation has two criteria:

  1. It is (or is intended to be by the speaker) someone's exact words.
  2. It is delimited by quotation marks.
  3. It does not use a subordinating conjunction.

Look at the following sentences:

> 先生は「漢字を練習しなさい」と言った。  
> The teacher said "study kanji".
>
> 先生は漢字を練習しなさいと言った。  
> The teacher said to study kanji.("Study kanji" is what the teacher said.)

The first sentence is a direct quotation. In Japanese, it is delimited by
quotation marks, but still has a と functioning as a subordinating conjunction.
The conjunction is omitted in English because it is not considered a clause--
just a long predicate consisting of several words. In Japanese the と is always
there, whether the quotation is direct or indirect.

So summary: the と **resembles** "that" in English, but is actually a
postposition following a quotation, with no English equivalent.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-08-23T20:51:03.640
6579
2012-08-23T20:51:03.640
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
1575
5838
answer