34314
I've been trying to read Japanese articles (easy ones) and was wondering if
someone could explain **how と話す and と言う differ in nuance or meaning**. They
seem to be used interchangeably.

For example, how would the following sentence's meaning (assuming my
translation is accurate of course) change if 言っていました were used instead of
話していました? (This is an article about a Gyouza festival that happened recently by
the way).

> 千葉県から来た男性は「いろいろなギョーザを食べることができて、とても楽しいです」と話していました A Man from Chiba-ken said
> ("reported" maybe), "You can eat many kinds of gyouza. It's a lot of fun."

As a side note, if possible, could someone please address **why 話していました was
used rather than just 話しました** and how the latter would change the meaning?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-05-23T18:00:34.453
34310
2016-05-23T23:43:13.000
3296
question
grammar nuances て-form
Difference between 言う and 話す
Roughly speaking, 話す is close to _talk_ or _speak_ , and 言う is close to _say_.
Sometimes they can be used interchangeably (like in your 千葉県の男性 example), but
sometimes they are not.

  * Saying just one word or two is not 話す. 話す is used with a relatively longer story, speech, opinion, lecture, etc.
  * 話す is rarely used without physical vocals. You can safely use 言う for something said in a written article/essay.
  * 言う doesn't necessarily require a listener (i.e., one can 言う something to oneself or to no one), while 話す almost always requires a listener.

As for your last question, I would say using 話していました is more vivid and
favorable than 話しました in a news article like this, but it's difficult for me to
explain why. A similar question is asked before: [What's the difference
between「～と言いました」and「～と言っていました」?](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/14764/5010)
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-05-23T23:37:06.873
34314
2016-05-23T23:43:13.000
2017-04-13T12:43:44.397
-1
5010
34310
answer