55509
I need some help with understanding the meaning of the のが part in the last
sentence (shown in **bold** ), which [this
answer](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/22/whats-the-difference-
between-wa-%E3%81%AF-and-ga-%E3%81%8C) has told me means that the sentence is
a cleft sentence and [this
one](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/19204/i-dont-understand-
what-%E3%81%AE%E3%82%82-means-in-this-sentence) told me how to mostly parse
the cleft sentence, but not what のが _means_.

Context:

> 鼻先を彼女のナイフが かすめ飛ぶ。
>
> The tip of my nose flies as it skims over her knife. OR  
>  The tip of my nose leaps as it grazes her knife.
>
> あと少し避{よ}ける **のが** 遅{おく}れていたら……

According to the second link, which has great examples that I am using here to
try and understand my own sentence:

"The non-focused element introduces a variable , and the focused element tells
us the value of ... The most basic type of cleft looks like ＡのはＢだ in Japanese,
where Ａ introduces a variable , and Ｂ tells us the value of that variable."

When applied to my own sentence, I understand this to mean the following:

> In [あと少し避{よ}ける **のが** 遅{おく}れていたら……]
>
> ﹅
>
> A) **あと少し避{よ}ける** のが遅{おく}れていたら……
>

>>

```

>>     non-focused element: (x)      あと少し避{よ}ける

>>         focused element:       遅{おく}れていたら = (x)

>>     (translated non-focused element is shown in bold at the bottom of this
post)

>>  
```

From what I can tell, the focused element is a verb that can be translated to
variants of either 'late' or 'delayed' in the provided context while
indicating continuing action or state (i.e. to be ..ing, to have been ..ing).

  1. Does the のが in my sentence mean that the sentence is a cleft sentence?

  2. Is my understanding of cleft-sentences sufficient to have correctly translated and parsed あと少し避{よ}けるのが遅{おく}れていたら…… into the following possible translations?

> > > ' **After a short distance** [ I ] was almost late in **avoiding** [her
> knife]......' OR ' **After a little while** [ I ] could barely **fend off**
> [her knife]......'
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-12-28T22:59:16.877
55500
2017-12-29T07:26:56.400
2017-12-29T05:58:13.667
9831
26406
question
grammar translation cleft-sentences
How to translate this cleft-sentence: あと少し避けるのが遅れていたら……?
I think "あと少し避(よ)けるのが遅(おく)れていたら……" is a hypothetical situation rather than the
result "I was barely able to dodge it". So, I think it's hard to make so-
called cleft sentence(It should be 強調構文 "It is ... that ~ "in Japanese 英文法).

You might use "were to ~" for emphasizing the hypothetical condition to
translate; "If I were to dodge it a little bit later...".

I think it's easier to make cleft sentence with "鼻先を彼女のナイフが かすめ飛ぶ。" like " It
was her knife that skimming over tip of my nose".
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-12-29T05:43:59.197
55506
2017-12-29T05:43:59.197
55500
answer
> (A) あと少｛すこ｝し避｛よ｝ける **のが** 遅｛おく｝れていたら...

In this context, the above phrase implies like:

> (B) あと少｛すこ｝し避｛よ｝けるのが遅｛おく｝れていたらそのナイフが私｛わたし｝の顔｛かお｝に刺｛さ｝さっていただろう。

"のが" could be replaced with "ことが" or "動作が" in the given pharase without
changing the meaning.

>   1. Does the のが in my sentence mean that the sentence is a cleft sentence?
>

No. The の in のが is a normalizer as is written in Naruto's comment, which makes
the verb with 避ける a noun, so it could be replaced with こと or 動作 _action (of
avoiding)_ here.

>   2. Is my understanding of cleft-sentences sufficient to have correctly
> translated and parsed ...
>

Since the sentence is not a cleft one, the answer is No.  
My attempt for (B) is:  
_A knife might have stuck in my face if I had been a little late for avoiding
it_.

On the theme that が could be sometimes replaced with こと as a normalizer, there
are usuful explanations
[here](https://www.alc.co.jp/jpn/article/faq/03/9.html) and
[here](http://nihongodaybyday.blogspot.jp/2010/03/blog-post_13.html), I'm
sorry to say, but they are written only in Japanese.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-12-29T06:39:39.737
55508
2017-12-29T06:39:39.737
20624
55500
answer
As pointed out by @naruto, the の is a nominalizer. It turns the verb 避ける into
a noun phrase, so that it can be the subject of the clause.

> あと少し避けるのが遅れていたら...

To break it down:

あと少し -- "a little more"  
避けるの -- subject "(the/my) dodging"  
が -- subject marker  
遅れ(ていたら) -- verb "be delayed; be late"  
～ていたら -- indicates a hypothetical condition, "If... had done/been..."

あと少し is an adverbial phrase modifying the verb phrase 遅れ(る), "be delayed a
little more". So the sentence literally means:

"If (my) dodging had been delayed a little more..." i.e. "If I had dodged a
little slower..."

As you can see, the line is a conditional subordinate clause, rather than a
full sentence. The latter half of the sentence (i.e. the main clause, or the
apodosis) is left unsaid as implied: "... I would have gotten hurt." or
something along those lines.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-12-29T06:55:21.133
55509
2017-12-29T07:26:56.400
2017-12-29T07:26:56.400
9831
9831
55500
answer