Say I have a phrase 'High Quality Music'. The phrase which seems to correspond
with 'High Quality' is 良質, which is both a no-adjective and a na-adjective. In
this case, when trying to link it with the noun for music, 音楽, should I use no
or na? Would it be 良質な音楽 or 良質の音楽?

All help is appreciated :)
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-12-15T21:30:59.233
55212
2017-12-16T00:24:37.170
2017-12-15T22:02:52.467
5010
26974
question
grammar
If a word is both a na-adjective and a no-adjective, should I use a 'no' or a 'na'
In this case, 良質な音楽 and 良質の音楽 are interchangeable and both are equally fine.
Maybe the former is relatively colloquial and the latter sounds a little
stiffer.

However, just because a dictionary says a word is both a na- and no-adjective
does not always mean they are totally interchangeable. There are often times
when one is far more common than the other (see [Is there a difference between
最高の and 最高な?](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/48585/5010)), and there are
even times when using の instead of な changes the meaning. For example 無垢な
means "pure and innocent (person)" whereas 無垢の usually means "unfigured
(dress)" or "solid (wood, as opposed to veneer)."
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-12-15T22:15:08.137
55213
2017-12-16T00:24:37.170
2017-12-16T00:24:37.170
5010
5010
55212
answer