1647
_Feel free to participate to the[meta-discussion on whether this type of
question (relying on buddhist terms) should be allowed on
JLU](https://japanese.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/348/should-discussions-
of-buddhist-terms-be-off-topic)._

A while back, looking at a reproduction of some famous zen buddhist scrolls in
a nearby Kyoto temple, I was somewhat surprised to see that the quintessential
notion of "void, emptiness" is represented by '空', rather than '無', to which
my eminently non-scholar mind always gave a more spiritual overtone (beyond
its everyday prosaic use).

A typical example would be the common sentence:

> 色即是空【しきそくぜくう】→ "form is emptiness, matter is void"

Can anybody better versed in Japanese and/or buddhist terms explain to me the
nuances in meaning between these two kanji/words _in a religious context_?

Are there other cases where "void, emptiness" would be translated with '無' in
a buddhist context?

**Edit:** to give a famous example of why '無' would seem a good candidate for
the same concept, Yasujiro Ozu's grave in Kamakura [famously bears nothing but
the kanji
'無'](http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%B0%8F%E6%B4%A5%E5%AE%89%E4%BA%8C%E9%83%8E#.E6.98.A0.E7.94.BB.E4.BA.BA.E7.94.9F),
ostensibly standing for the buddhist concept of 'nothingness'.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-06-30T05:02:48.940
1646
2018-05-27T06:34:35.393
2017-03-16T15:48:25.793
-1
290
question
kanji nuances
Why is 空【くう】, and not 無【む】, used to define "void", "emptiness" in a buddhist context? What are their nuances?
I have a feeling someone smarter than me will provide an answer with better
references, but I still hope this answer helps.

Not long ago I was out on a walking tour of Aoyama Cemetery and the exact same
question came up. The tour guide, who has studied religion and history offered
this explanation:

無 （usually な・い, but the on-yomi ム is used in this Buddhist context) means a
complete absence of anything, which I think in English we would equate with
void, so it would seem like the right choice.

空 （usually から, but the on-yomi クウ is used in this Buddhist context） means an
emptiness as well, however, and was used to refer to the air from back before
the more modern and scientific concept that the air is not in fact empty but
contains molecules.

The difference between them is that the emptiness referred to by 空 is, as our
guide explained, like the emptiness inside a cup. It is empty, but is
conceptually bounded by the cup so that it is a space that could hold
something, such as a drink.

無い on the other hand means a complete absence, without even any implication of
potential. In other words, no cup.

In the Buddhist use, then, when you see it on the top layer of the five
elements,
([地,水、火、風、空](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/76/Pagoda.svg),
earth, water, fire, air, void), implies an emptiness that has a potential to
contain something.

Of course, it gets a little tricky because there is no "cup" for the concept
of all of existence. The void being referred to by 空 doesn't imply that
anything particular should occupy that space. There is no automatic equivalent
for the universe to hold like a drink would seem to be the natural thing to
fill a cup. Just that the void is a vessel into which existence can happen.
And from here the philosophical discussion takes over from the linguistic one.

Side note: 風 （usually かぜ, but the on-omi フウ is used in this Buddhist context）,
or wind, in this context actually means "air", as back in the day, the "air"
was only experienced when you could feel the wind. Before I had this
discussion on the tour, I always thought they were simply differentiating wind
from air.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-06-30T05:50:01.033
1647
2011-07-16T03:59:10.697
2011-07-16T03:59:10.697
119
119
1646
answer
無 is taken directly from the Chinese, and is often translated as "nothing." It
is fundamentally a Daoist concept. You can find it prominently in the _Dao De
Jing_ and the _Zhuangzi_. It has many implications, from metaphysics (the
opposition of being 有) to linguistics (the inability of language to capture
all meaning) to the pragmatics of living life (a room is useful because it's
empty) to the paradox of acting without intention ( _wu wei_ 無為). Zen (Chan)
Buddhists in China borrowed this concept to help understand related ideas in
Buddhism (specifically the limitations of language to capture meaning and the
lack of substantial being in the cosmos). So Mu in Japanese has fundamentally
this meaning--there is no substantiality to things, and language does not
capture all possible descriptions of reality.

空 is also taken directly from the Chinese and (in a Buddhist context) is a
technical term, a translation of the Sanskrit (Sunyata). It is often
translated into English as "empty," and refers specifically to the belief in
Buddhism that there is no substantial, persisting, permanent part of anything:
一切皆空. It is closely related to the concept of _anatman_ which is rendered in
Chinese as 無我. So you can see that 空 and 無 are conceptually related.

To answer the question: why is 空 used to represent the Buddhist concept of
emptiness instead of 無, the answer is that 空 was selected very early in the
tradition as a translation for _sunyata_ , perhaps to distinguish from Daoist
無. The early translator could just have easily chosen 無 or even 虛. The choice
has nothing to do with the basic meanings of the terms 空 and 無 and everything
to do with a translator's difficult (and probably ultimately arbitrary) choice
early in the tradition. 空 at the time the translator chose it, probably around
the first century CE, was not a technical philosophical term in Chinese
(meaning simply empty) and so would have been a good choice to translate a
foreign term for its lack of conceptual baggage. 虛 and especially 無 would have
been more conceptually laden, and so potentially confusing to the beginning
student of Buddhism.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-10-19T16:16:39.293
40141
2016-10-19T16:16:39.293
18325
1646
answer
Essentially both Kanji means emptiness. But in this context Because it
represents, symbolises that the emptiness is just like the vastness of the
infinite sky, ether, universe that's unchanging reality, totally beyond the
reach of ordinary perception. 空 means both sky, emptiness depending on
context. That's the beauty of Kanji it conveys two significant meanings both
relevant to each other. Also incidentally 空 is also last character in name of
Sun Wukong 孫悟空 since he was bestowed his name, the great sage equaling the
heavens, later achieved enlightenment after accompanying Xuanzang in Journey
to the west.

As for imprinted on grave, it signifies souls are not material as dead upon
death, in grave, but eternal.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-02-16T16:18:54.160
56686
2018-05-27T06:34:35.393
2018-05-27T06:34:35.393
26901
26901
1646
answer