I am trying to wrap my head around how the Japanese speak and how that differs
from kanji. On and Kun makes a difference when reading kanji, depending
usually how the sentence is made up of kanas and kanji. But when speaking, do
they speak in On and Kun as well? Do they pay attention how they say it
compared to how they would write it out and then read that outloud?

From my understanding, you can technically write all in kana if you really
wanted to, regardless how practical that would actually be, but it can be
done. So when speaking do they take into account, "well I am saying this,
which if I wrote it with kanji (assuming you knew the kanji to begin with),
and since this word would be next to this kanji or not next to any kanji, I
would have to say it this way to make sense."?

I've read that Japanese school children in general for their age/level, learn
to speak Japanese first, then learn the kanas and then the kanji. Which I
guess makes sense, especially if what I wrote above is true of you can
basically write anything with the kanas. I've taken a similar approach due to
my confusion, but fact checking with dictionaries to make sure it is accurate
for the sound.

What I am seeing so far is that in hira Love (I guess general love) is AI. I
search for the kanji and find it, but it has both On and Kun with the Kun
being the AI sound. Same with To Meet in hira. The sound AU is used and again
that is Kun when looking at the kanji. The dictionaries I have show the
different meanings of a kanji, but I am not sure how they represent themselves
in the On or Kun, just that they exist and these are the sounds with some
having a few different ones.

I probably just confused you as much as I confuse my self, but can anyone help
me understand please? Thank you for your time and patience.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-09-12T07:20:19.993
71752
2019-09-20T04:34:14.370
35361
question
kanji katakana hiragana sound-symbolism
Do the Japanese speak with On and Kun in daily conversation?
Take a step back for a second.

Kanji do have meaning on their own, but they aren't always words on their own.
Some kanji only make one sound corresponding to one word. In these cases, it's
a simple matter of learning the Kanji, the word and the pronunciation.

However most Kanji make multiple sounds depending on the context and can be
used to form various very different words. It might be useful to start off
thinking of kanji as cool letters that have some meaning or meanings
associated with them and have different sounds depending on context. Think
about the letter 'G'. sometimes it makes a sound like at the start of "Go,"
and sometimes it makes a sound like at the start of "Giraffe." G on it's own
isn't a word unless there's some context to read it in. Kanji also require
context to become words.

Let's look at 4 words

> 生{い}きる : いきる : Ikiru : To live (Kun'yomi)
>
> 生{なま} : なま : Nama : Raw (Kun'yomi)
>
> 生{せい}徒{と} : せいと : Seito : Student (On'yomi)
>
> 一{いっ}生{しょう} : いっしょう : Isshou: A lifetime (On'yomi)

As you can see, the kanji 「生」 makes all kinds of different sounds depending on
which word you've formed, and depending on your context.

To answer your original question, the labels On'yomi and Kun'yomi only refer
to the origin of a particular pronunciation of a Kanji with On referring to a
pronunciation of Chinese origin and Kun referring to a pronunciation of
Japanese origin. Japanese people use both On'yomi and Kun'yomi when they speak
depending on which words they use.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-09-16T08:52:53.657
71839
2019-09-20T04:22:12.770
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
35374
71752
answer
I would say there is very little conscious thought of whether something is a
_kun_ reading or an _on_ reading of a character when speaking normally. That
said, if you were to ask someone if a given reading is _on_ or _kun_ , they’d
likely be able to answer quickly (if educated). It’s more
secondary/subconscious knowledge, but can sometimes come in explicit use if
you’re trying to read a new compound word and guessing how each character
should be read (e.g, it’s more likely to use _on_ readings).

In the end, people think in terms of spoken words and their meanings, with
writing systems adding an extra layer of nuance or connections between words.
This means that something like characters and readings would not be in the
primary mental thought process for most conversations.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-09-20T04:34:14.370
71934
2019-09-20T04:34:14.370
3097
71752
answer