29681
My questions are regarding portions of the following sentence in bold:

> 幸{さいわ}いナイフが小さい **のと** 、親指の骨が堅{かた}かった **ので** 、今だに親指は手に付いて居る。

More generally, I am wondering about the 「〜のと〜ので」 construct presented here. (I
am assuming that it can be treated as a single construct)

  1. What role does 「のと」 play here? Is it simply linking multiple reasons for 「ので」, or is there some relation between the reasons listed?

  2. Can 「のと」 also be used in this fashion for more than two reasons?

  3. What would be the difference between the above and the following?

> 幸{さいわ}いナイフが小さ **くて** 、親指の骨が堅{かた}かった **ので** 、今だに親指は手に付いて居る。
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-11-29T19:18:33.037
29551
2015-12-05T12:38:44.490
2015-11-29T23:32:09.330
9838
9838
question
grammar nuances particles
Meaning of 「〜のと〜ので」
>   1. What role does 「のと」 play here? Is it simply linking multiple reasons
> for 「ので」, or is there some relation between the reasons listed?
>

Yes. It is linking multiple reasons for "ので". "のと" can be broken up into "の"
and "と", where the former is appended to the adjective to make it a noun (e.g.
"小{ちい}さいの" = "小さいこと" = "the fact that the knife was small"), and the latter
simply plays the role of a conjunction (e.g. "AとB" = "A and B").

The word preceding "のと" can be a verb, い-adjective or な-adjective, with the な
appended. Examples:

  1. あるのと
  2. 気{き}づいたのと
  3. 入{はい}っているのと
  4. 知{し}られていたのと
  5. 高{たか}いのと
  6. 静{しず}かなのと

You can replace "ので" with something that would be equivalent, such as "ことから"
or "おかげで", or in spoken dialogue, where the last part of the sentence is
implied and easily inferred by the listener, omit it altogether.

>   2. Can 「のと」 also be used in this fashion for more than two reasons?
>

Yes, you can string together more than just two reasons with "のと" to make a
list of reasons why something is the way it is, or why something happened.
However, it might be stylistically better to vary what conjunctions you use;
this especially if it is a long list.

An example:

> >
> 幸{さいわ}いナイフが小さいのと、親{おや}指{ゆび}の骨{ほね}が堅{かた}かったのと、手{て}袋{ぶくろ}をしていたのと、すでに救{きゅう}急{きゅう}車{しゃ}を呼{よ}んでいたので、今{いま}だに親指は手に付{つ}いている。

But as you can see, it gets a little bit repetitive after more than one or two
uses.

>   3. What would be the difference between the above and the following?
>

They are two ways of saying the same thing. The て-form of an い-adjective is
used to create a conjunction between the first and second clauses, where the
clauses are independent of each other.

In the first clause, the knife is being described, and in the second clause,
the hardness of the finger is being described. The combination of these
attributes result in the speaker still having his or her thumb attached.

Using "のと" instead of the て-form would, however, imply at an earlier stage in
the sentence that the properties being listed all contributed to a common
effect (lowering the probability of cutting a finger off, in this case).
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-03T12:35:42.563
29639
2015-12-04T01:12:07.187
2015-12-04T01:12:07.187
11830
11830
29551
answer
The difference between X **くて** Yので and X **のと** Yので is that `くて` can
sometimes imply a causal relationship **between** X and Y.

In a context where the two reasons could possibly be related, a sentence with
`くて` can be interpreted as:

> 頭が痛 **くて** 、昨日あまり眠れなかったので、集中できない。  
>  _I can't concentrate because [ I couldn't sleep well yesterday because [my
> head hurt] ]._

Using `のと` will unambiguously separate the two reasons:

> 頭が痛い **のと** 、昨日あまり眠れなかったので、集中できない。  
>  _I can't concentrate because [my head hurts] and [I couldn't sleep well
> yesterday]._

This is not an issue in your example from 『坊っちゃん』, because knife size cannot
possibly be interpreted as the cause of the rigidity of his thumb bone. There
is no significant difference between `のと` and `くて` in this case.

**TL;DR** `のと` is a way of simply listing reasons, while `くて` can sometimes
denote a relationship between them. `のと` can be used in this way to list more
than two reasons.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-05T12:38:44.490
29681
2015-12-05T12:38:44.490
888
29551
answer