13120
In English, "personification" is a literary device. But, I am talking about
when you take a common noun, and then add 「人」、「者」、 or「家」:  
「労働」--->「労働者」  
「案内」--->「案内者」  
「日本」---> 「日本人」  
「社会」 --->「社会人」  
「農業」---> 「農業家」  
「投資」---> 「投資家」

(1) Is there a generalized rule / guidance for knowing which nouns can be
personified, and which suffix to choose?

(2) When studying Japanese grammar in English, is "personification" the
correct technical term? The term "personification" when applied to English
writing is completely different.

note: Sometimes, I arbitrarily say 「＿じん」 or 「＿しゃ」 instead of 「＿の人」 without
knowing if it is really a word. If the overall context is clear, most Japanese
have no problem understanding what I mean. Does anyone else do this, or
something similar with other suffixes?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-10-13T12:10:42.683
13118
2013-10-13T18:12:24.687
2013-10-13T12:58:39.840
3962
3962
question
grammar
rules for "personification" with 「じん」、「しゃ」、「か」？
I'm not a native speaker or close to reaching that level but this is my
guess...

It seems like when root word is like a verb, use 者, when it is like a noun,
use 人. For more business-related activities 家 might be appropriate.

In classical chinese, 者 was a 'subject nominalizer' which means it takes verbs
and turns it into a subject. For example, 切玉=to cut jade, 切玉者=the one who cuts
jade.

It can be hard to tell what is a noun and a verb in Japanese but basically if
it's a する verb then it is likely to use 者 instead of 人.

I've never really thought about 家 but it seems like it usually appears when
describing someone's occupation (as if you were supporting your family with
it?). Note that 投資者 is also listed in the dictionary.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-10-13T18:12:24.687
13120
2013-10-13T18:12:24.687
3221
13118
answer