So to say "all seeing eye" in Japanese, すべて見る目 is all good as far as I know,
but I've occasionally run into it with wo「を」 and no「の」. What are the nuances
of saying it with these particles, compared to without? I think I would choose
wo before no if I want to describe an eye that sees everything, would that
make sense or is it all extremely similar? I'm still new to phrasing the same
thing in different ways.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-01-07T09:50:27.800
83514
2021-02-06T22:04:05.557
2021-01-07T10:07:51.273
30454
41487
question
nuances particles
すべて見る目 vs すべてを見る目 vs すべての見る目
These can be parsed as:

[すべて見る]目, relative clause + noun

[すべて **を** 見る]目, same thing, but this time すべて is treated as a noun

[すべて **の** ][見る目], is a bit more interesting because now 見る目 is treated as a
noun phrase modified by another noun

Translating the third one into English gives a very awkward phrase, but it
might be more natural-sounding in Japanese.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-01-07T21:42:36.513
83526
2021-01-07T21:42:36.513
41270
83514
answer