In the sentence (from Harry Potter) below Dudley tries to grab the letter and
then read it.

>
> ダドリーが[手紙]{てがみ}を[奪]{うば}って[読]{よ}もうとしたが、おじさんは[手]{て}が[届]{とど}かないように[高々]{たかだか}と[掲]{かか}げていた。

When I read it until `...としたが` I thought the action of grabbing succeeded, but
when Dudley tried to read the letter something happened that prevented it.

However from the latter part I seems that Dudley didn't even managed to grab
the letter because the uncle was holding the letter high above.

  1. Is my understanding the Dudley didn't even grab the letter correct?
  2. How can we change the first part of this sentence in order to convey that Dudley actually grabbed the letter? Would using `と言って` work? 

>
> ダドリーが[手紙]{てがみ}を[奪]{うば}ってと言って、[読]{よ}もうとしたが、おじさんは[手]{て}が[届]{とど}かないように[高々]{たかだか}と[掲]{かか}げていた。
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-13T15:34:46.673
60099
2018-07-15T19:08:48.200
2018-07-13T22:10:25.673
22352
26539
question
grammar て-form sentence
Meaning of the the structure 〜V1てV2ようとしたが、〜 in the sentence
1. According to the English version of the book (and the movies too if I remember correctly), Dudley couldn't grab it. So yes you were right about that point.

> Dudley tried to grab the letter to read it, but Uncle Vernon held it high
> out of his reach.

(Harry Potter 1 P27, by J.K. Rowling)

I think the key grammar here is not just としたが but ようとしたが

しようとする means trying to do something. For example

食べようとしている means trying to eat (something)

But in the sentence you provided it connected with が which indicates a
contradiction with the latter part of the sentence.

So 読もうとしたが means, he did try to read it but (failed to do so because
Vernon...)  

  2. I'm not sure what you are trying to say here but I believe that と言って is not use for that purpose. I think we use と言って when referring to a speech or quotation.

P.S. To answer the question in your title, I think the Ｖ１て。。。 structure here
is used to connect two actions together chronologically. So I think it turns
奪って読む into 奪って読もうとする [He grab it then read it] -> [He tried to grab it and
read it]
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-13T15:49:58.157
60101
2018-07-14T02:24:07.493
2018-07-14T02:24:07.493
30549
30549
60099
answer
I dont know the original sentences but...

Dudley couldn't touch the letter even one time.

so in this scene, his uncle(おじさん)has the letter, and Dudley tried to rob the
letter and read the letter but he couldn't both of them.

if he could rob the letter but he couldn't read,
彼は手紙を奪って読もうとしたが、おじさんは手紙を取り上げ手の届かないように高々と掲げていた。

he could get the letter but his uncle get it back.

and if he could rob and read the letter halfway but he couldn't read all of
the letter. 彼は手紙を奪って途中まで読んだが、おじさんは手紙を取り返し手が届かないように高々と掲げていた。

and your question, 奪って読もうとしたが there are two verbs, and ~が.

"奪って読もう" including (奪おうとした：tried to rob）and (読もうとした:tried to read). and you
can estimate to failed some action from 〜が.

there are two possibility, Dudley couldn't rob, and couldn't read. or, Dudley
could rob but couldn't read. (in the case could read but couldn't rob, if u
could read, Dudley have to rob the letter.)

and next sentence Uncle hold the letter higher place. that means he holding
letter, if Dudley could rob, there are the expression Uncle could get the
letter back.

but the original sentences there is no such expression. so that means Dudley
failed to rob the letter.

so, first question, yes you are correct.

and next question,

if Dudley could get the letter, but couldn't read. and keep the next sentence
like that.

ダドリーは手紙を奪った後にすぐ奪い返され、おじさんは手紙を手の届かないように高々と掲げていた。

in this case Dudley couldn't read even one word of letter.

ダドリーは手紙を奪って読んでいるときに奪い返され、おじさんは手紙を手の届かないように高々と掲げていた。

in this case Dudley could read halfway but couldn't read all.

if you want to change, you should explain the fact that uncle get the letter
buck.

im Japanese. so, im sorry for some mistakes of English.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-15T19:08:48.200
60142
2018-07-15T19:08:48.200
30628
60099
answer