What could be the difference between 要求事項｛ようきゅうじこう｝ and 要件｛ようけん｝?

And what would make more sense, 法的要求事項 or 法的要件. Are they the same thing?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-03-13T12:27:42.233
44380
2017-03-14T22:30:16.817
2017-03-13T18:09:10.263
1628
9364
question
word-choice
What is the difference between 要求事項 and 要件?
> 要求事項: items/things that someone or something demands or claims
>
> 要件: necessary condition, requirement

要求{ようきゅう} has the implied meaning of 'order', so you shouldn't use this phrase
without a good reason. For example, 卒業{そつぎょう}要件 (graduation requirements)
can't be alternatively written as 卒業要求事項.

When it comes to 法的{ほうてき}要求事項 and 法的要件, 法{ほう} (law) is not a person and its
requirements can be treated as orders. Therefore, both of these phrases are
possible. While 法的要件 means just 'legal requirement', 法的要求事項 sounds like very
firm requirements imposed by the law. Practically, they indicate the same
thing, though.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-03-14T08:48:18.307
44415
2017-03-14T22:30:16.817
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
20238
44380
answer