I have the following passage

> 携帯電話なんて持つんじゃなかった
>
> 勝手に無断外泊を続けてるのは こっちなのにメール一本くれないハチがますます勝手な女に思えてイラ立った
>
> ただの通信手段の機械に人の絆の強さを試されたくなんかないのに

One professional translation of this passage translates the first sentence as
"I should have never bought something like a mobile phone". I don't really see
how this can be understood, for me it seems like it should be something like
"I didn't have a mobile phone with me" (which clashes with the next sentence
however).

If anyone could explain this translation for me, I would really appreciate it.
Thanks for any help.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-05-26T22:24:40.400
58991
2018-05-27T00:53:09.080
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
27824
question
translation
Does the following sentence mean "should not have"?
> 「携帯電話{けいたいでんわ}なんて持{も}つんじゃなかった。」

The translation you found:

> "I should have never bought something like a mobile phone"

is indeed good.

The most common and natural ways to say:

> "should not have (Verb)ed"

are:

> 「(verb in dictionary form) + べき + では/じゃ + なかった」
>
> 「(verb in dictionary form) + の/ん + では/じゃ + なかった」

Needless to say, 「ん」 is more informal than 「の」 and 「じゃ」 than 「では」,
respectively.

Your own attempt " _ **I didn't have a mobile phone with me**_." is off. That
would be the equivalent of:

> 「（その時）携帯電話を **持っていなかった** 。」
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-05-27T00:30:08.747
58992
2018-05-27T00:53:09.080
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
58991
answer