Is there an easy way to express the concept of “reductio ad absurdum” in
Japanese?

I find that the following dictionary terms tend to be unfamiliar even to
college-educated Japanese speakers:

帰謬法

背理法

I ask this because I was conversing with a friend in Japanese and using
reductio ad absurdum to show how an idea was nonsense. But she said that this
sort of argument was extreme and idiotic, to which I responded I that this
type of argumentation is quite common in European languages and is explicitly
taught by name in schools.

Or, is it maybe the case that there is _NO_ easy way to express this concept
in Japanese because the Japanese culture does not have an extensive tradition
of discussing logic? It seems so. Wikipedia, for example, has the article on
"reductio ad absurdum" in more than 30 languages, but not Japanese.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-07-01T02:53:15.690
36329
2016-07-01T09:41:44.887
5343
question
translation words
"Reductio ad absurdum": Any easy way to express this concept in Japanese?
The tradition of logical debate is far more valued in western cultures, so
it's not surprising that even though a specific term exists in Japanese, most
people wouldn't be familiar with it in that context.

Similarly, there's no easy way to express わびさび in English. Of course, you
could use the specific term "wabisabi", but who would understand you? People
familiar with Japanese culture and tradition.

However, you can _explain_ wabisabi in English, as "an aesthetic sensibility
emphasising quiet simplicity and subdued refinement".

Likewise, you can explain reductio ad absurdum（背理法）in Japanese
as「間接証明によって矛盾を指摘する論じ方」.

That being said, as naruto mentions the teaching of 背理法 in math class is part
of the official direction from the 文部科学省 as can be seen here:

<http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/old-cs/1322525.htm>
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-07-01T03:21:50.170
36330
2016-07-01T09:41:44.887
2016-07-01T09:41:44.887
7055
7055
36329
answer
All adults who graduated from high school _should_ be aware of 背理法, because
they all learned it in math classes in order to prove [why the square root of
2 is irrational](http://mathtrain.jp/sqrt2irrational), [why there are
infinitely many prime numbers](http://mathtrain.jp/prime), etc. Well, don't
ask me how many of them actually remember it.

Anyways, even among people who remember 背理法, most of them consider 背理法 as a
purely mathematical technique, but not as a rhetorical device nor a debate
technique. And unfortunately, I don't think there is an easy Japanese word for
_reductio ad absurdum_ which you can safely use in conversations.

That does not mean Japanese people cannot use 背理法 in daily conversations. Even
elementary school kids can make an argument like
「人類は永遠にタイムマシンを発明できないよ。だってもし発明できたら、未来の人が現代にいっぱい来てるはずでしょ？」. We just haven't
gotten used to categorizing and naming the types of arguments we use everyday.

To explain _reductio ad absurdum_ in plain words, I would say
「敢えて逆のことを言って矛盾を突くやり方」 or something like that.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-07-01T05:25:03.467
36333
2016-07-01T05:44:04.063
2016-07-01T05:44:04.063
9831
5010
36329
answer