46895
So, there's this sentence:

> 弟のもっといいお手本になりなさい！

And the translation given is:

> Set a better example for your brother!

But I simply cannot understand why it is composed like that.

Specifically:

  * Why is there の in there? Isn't it expresses possession or relation? 
  * Why is there に at the end? I'd think that に should be precisely where there is の currently. Although, the only way I can see it could work is "you should become better example" so the に there. Doesn't explain の, though.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-27T06:16:43.113
46893
2017-04-27T06:50:04.960
9990
question
particle-に particle-の
Usage of の and に in 弟のもっといいお手本になりなさい！
手本 is a copybook, so the sentence is literally composed of

>   * 弟 Little brother
>   * の possessive particle (↑Little brother **'s** )
>   * もっといい more good (better)
>   * お (honorific prefix)
>   * 手本 copybook
>   * に into
>   * なりなさい！ please become! (なる + なさる in imperative form)
>

お手本 is usually used figuratively to mean an example or a role model.

> Why is there に at the end? I'd think that に should be precisely where there
> is の currently.

に means that the one this command is directed at should "become a copybook",
as in to set an example. I can't think of a word that would fit in the place
of お手本 so that に could be used in place of の.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-27T06:40:39.817
46894
2017-04-27T06:40:39.817
19206
46893
answer
I think you might be misled by the non perfectly literal translation.

Ok, so let's try to break down the sentence.

Since the ~なさい indicates an imperative (some sort of order or exhortation to o
something), we can safely assume that the subject here is the listener so
there would be an implied "あなたは" before 弟の...

This might help to clarify the の a little bit. In fact, it's just the usual
possessive particle: (you) become your brother**'s** better example = a better
example for your brother.

に here is just the particle that is used when a change, expressed through the
verb なる, (in this case conjugated as なりなさい) happens. In particular, "change
into something" (in this particular case there is に because 手本 is a noun)

You can look up about に + なる
[here](http://maggiesensei.com/2010/12/10/%E3%81%A8%E3%81%AA%E3%82%8B-vs-%E3%81%AB%E3%81%AA%E3%82%8B%E3%80%80-to-
naru-vs-ni-naru/) for example.

So, to sum it up, there is really nothing fancy about either of the particles
in this sentence. This should be clear if you try to translate the sentence
literally and you consider as I mentioned before that there is an implied
subject in the beginning:

> (あなたは)弟のもっといいお手本になりなさい

To break it down further ask yourself the following:

  1. Who's the subject? あなたは
  2. What is the action? An order to become a something (...になりなさい)
  3. What's that something? もっといいお手本.
  4. To whom is that related? To the subject's younger brother 
  5. How? As possession: 弟の

All together: (you) become your brother's better example.

That in English renders much better as: become a better example for your
brother.

I think the confusion here is in that this sentence is asking you to become
actually "a better example" as that's a thing. What I'm saying as that
probably you are focusing on that "for" rather than a possessive "'s".

PS: also more on なる [here](http://www.guidetojapanese.org/surunaru.html).
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-27T06:45:01.103
46895
2017-04-27T06:50:04.960
2017-04-27T06:50:04.960
14205
14205
46893
answer