83728
Would the で in というわけで be analyzed as the te-form of da or the de particle?
Both of them seem like they would fit, as the de particle can indicate
cause/reason (as alluded to in this [similar
question](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/65554/is-
the-%E3%81%A7-in-%E3%81%A8%E3%81%84%E3%81%86%E7%90%86%E7%94%B1%E3%81%A0%E3%81%91%E3%81%A7-a-form-
of-%E3%81%A0-or-the-instrumental-particle)) but [another
question](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/27863/explanatory-
particle-%E3%81%AE-comes-from-%E3%81%AE%E3%81%A7?rq=1) states that ので can be
interpreted as "て form of the explanatory particle の with だ..." and indeed
というわけだ is by itself a valid phrase.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-01-18T03:03:17.763
83727
2021-01-18T03:30:01.723
35688
question
grammar expressions て-form particle-で
Is the で in というわけで the de-particle or the te-form of だ?
というわけで in the middle of a sentence is NOT interchangeable with というわけであって,
というわけであり or というわけでして, so I think this type of で is a _particle_ that marks a
condition/scope.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-01-18T03:30:01.723
83728
2021-01-18T03:30:01.723
5010
83727
answer