4212
Are honorifics used for dead people? For example, would チンギス・カン have something
after the name (presumably not just a mere さん!) when you're not referring to
the [dish](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genghis_Khan_%28Hokkaido_dish%29)?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-01-06T12:22:04.787
4206
2012-01-21T00:35:37.660
2012-01-07T23:45:55.267
91
91
question
honorifics
Are honorifics used for dead people?
You could use the prefix `故【こ】` to say "the _late_ ~". That's about the only
one I know.

例： 故斉藤氏 → The _late_ Mr. Saito

BTW, thanks for making me hungry for ジンギスカン （ブツブツ）...
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-01-06T15:45:30.383
4209
2012-01-06T15:45:30.383
78
4206
answer
Since honorifics generally apply when you are interacting directly with that
person, they usually aren't used for people that have died (Maybe spiritual
mediums do something different because they are supposedly 'interacting
directly' with the deceased, but I don't know).

Think of great people from Japanese history: 織田信長（おだのぶなが） 徳川家康（とくがわいえやす）
聖徳太子（しょうとくたいし）, all of them are referred to just by their name. Deceased
former prime ministers are simply referred to by their name. Deceased Emperors
are called by their reign (i.e. what we call Emperor Hirohito is just
昭和天皇（しょうわてんのう） the Showa Emperor in Japanese), while the current living
Emperor Akihito is referred to in Japanese by 天皇陛下（てんのうへいか） or His Majesty the
Emperor.

Going closer to home, people refer to their deceased relatives the same way
they did while they were alive. Buddhist beliefs give the deceased a new name
for the afterlife, but I have never heard of this new name actually being used
to refer to the deceased.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-01-06T18:07:56.287
4212
2012-01-06T18:07:56.287
1026
4206
answer
I would say yes. For example, if you were talking about a deceased teacher, it
would be perfectly natural to say (for instance) 先生が亡くなられた後..., which uses an
honorific. The honorific 先生 would also be used.

If a person personally knew and had a relationship of some kind with 岸信介, I
suggest that even now such a person would talk of 岸さん and use appropriate
honorifics. History books, on the other hand, would refer to him as 岸.

Genghis Khan and other long-dead historical personages don't count, unless you
happen to belong to a group that sees itself as directly (religiously?)
connected to Genghis Khan. It's the relationship that's important, not whether
they are alive or not.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-01-08T09:01:02.470
4224
2012-01-21T00:35:37.660
2012-01-21T00:35:37.660
1038
1038
4206
answer