95870
The sentence (from the first episode of _Death Note_ )

> **書く人物** の顔が 頭に入っていないと効果はない

means something like

> If the written person’s face is not in your head, there will be no effect.

For this post I'm struggling to understand "書く人物":

  1. The translation provided is something like "person who is written" or "written person's". But how would we know this doesn't just translate to "person who writes" or "person who will write", since 書く is in the non-past (and non-passive) tense? Is it just through context alone?

  2. If instead of 書く人物 we used instead 書かれた人物 (to more closely mirror the way things are idiomatically spoken in English), would this just be total nonsense in Japanese, or would it have some other different meaning than "written person"?

**NOTE:** [This
question](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/64621/parsing-the-
sentence-%e6%9b%b8%e3%81%8f%e4%ba%ba%e7%89%a9%e3%81%ae%e9%a1%94%e3%81%8c%e9%a0%ad%e3%81%ab%e5%85%a5%e3%81%a3%e3%81%a6%e3%81%84%e3%81%aa%e3%81%84%e3%81%a8%e5%8a%b9%e6%9e%9c%e3%81%af%e3%81%aa%e3%81%84)
also discusses this sentence, as well as the inherent ambiguity of Japanese
relative clauses. For this question I'm more focused on how the
tense/conjugation of 書く impacts the way we interpret this sentence.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-08-18T02:33:22.010
95865
2022-08-18T12:34:36.827
51280
question
adjectives
Understanding 書く人物
It’s highly dependent on context.

In this particular context, I suppose 頭 belongs to the person who does the
writing. My reading of the sentence is that it describes a state where Person
A writes (about/to) Person B but Person B’s face is not committed in Person
A’s head. Then, it would be natural to say 書く人物 from the perspective of Person
A as the subject, and 人物 would be naturally understood as the object of
writing, which is Person B. In other words, it is because of 書く人物 that I
understood the sentence the way I did.

書かれた人物 is not nonsense. It just sounds like Person B is already written
(about/to), and by someone other than Person A (i.e. the owner of 頭).

書かれる人物 would solve one of the problems but it would still sound like the
writing is, or will be, done by someone else.

If you want to eliminate the ambiguity, you can make the subject explicit.

> 自分が／の書く人物の顔が頭に入っていないと効果はない。
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-08-18T04:19:01.130
95870
2022-08-18T04:19:01.130
43676
95865
answer
It seems the artist omits "（自分が）デスノートに名前を" from the line:

  * Japanese: _デスノートに名前を_ 書く人物の顔が 頭に入っていないと効果はない
  * English: I cannot kill a person who I don't remember one's face even if I write one's name on the Death Note.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-08-18T12:22:14.420
95873
2022-08-18T12:34:36.827
2022-08-18T12:34:36.827
38986
38986
95865
answer