35930
> わたしは くにで ５しゅうかん 日本語 を べんきょうしました。
>
> わたしは くにで 日本語 を ５しゅうかん べんきょうしました。

I have seen sentence in this two orders. Which is more appropriate?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-14T12:17:48.810
35916
2016-06-15T04:18:02.797
2016-06-14T15:36:11.820
78
12049
question
word-order
「５しゅうかん　日本語　を　べんきょうしました」or 「日本語　を　５しゅうかん　べんきょうしました」
Both are same, you can choose as you like.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-14T13:50:18.507
35922
2016-06-14T13:50:18.507
7320
35916
answer
From my personal experience,

I would say that it depends on the circumstance...  
It's probably pretty rare in daily life that that much specific information
would ever occur in one sentence.

Usually there would be more than enough context to be able to avoid saying

  1. **what you did** （study Japanese）, 
  2. **where you did it** (in your home country) and
  3. **for how long** (5 weeks) and then 
  4. **emphasizing that it was you** （わたしは）

all in one utterance.

Here's an example of where it might happen though...

The teacher says:

```

    [皆]{みな}さんバケーションをどのように[過]{す}ごしましたか？ボブは？
     - How did you all spend your vacations? How about you Bob?
    
```

Bob says:

```

    あっ、えぇと．．．[九州]{きゅうしゅう}へ[行]{い}ってボランティアしました。
     - Ummm, I went to Kyushu and did some volunteer work. 
    
```

Then Sue says:

```

    あたしは[香港]{ほんこん}で[買]{か}い[物]{もの}してた！[広東語]{かんとんご}もちょっと[勉強]{べんきょう}しました。
    - I went shopping in Hong Kong! And I studied a little bit of Cantonese.
    
```

You might say:

> [僕]{ぼく}は[故郷]{ふるさと}に[帰]{かえ}って日本語を **３[週間]{しゅうかん}** [勉強]{べんきょう}していました。
>
>   * I went back home and studied Japanese **for 3 weeks**.
>

OR

> 僕は[故郷]{ふるさと}に帰って **３週間** 日本語を勉強していました。
>
>   * I went back home and **for 3 weeks** I studied Japanese .
>

This one sounds a little repetitive in English, just because we have to repeat
"I"... Doesn't sound that way in Japanese.

OR

> 僕は **３週間** [故郷]{ふるさと}に帰って日本語を勉強していました。
>
>   * I went back home **for 3 weeks** and studied Japanese.
>

OR

> **３週間** 僕は[故郷]{ふるさと}に帰って日本語を勉強していました。
>
>   * **For 3 weeks** I went back home and studied Japanese.
>

This last one sounds like your over-emphasizing the fact that you were there
for 3 whole weeks, so it would be a little out of place in this context.

Long story short, 3週間 **日本語** を勉強しました and 日本語を **3週間** 勉強しました, are
grammatically equivalent.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-15T02:47:20.403
35930
2016-06-15T04:18:02.797
2016-06-15T04:18:02.797
9831
7055
35916
answer
They're pretty similar; no one would bat an eye if you swapped them most of
the time. However there is a slight difference in that there's an implied
emphasis or contrast on the beginning of a sentence. So you'd be more likely
to use the first in talking about what you did at different times: For five
weeks, I studied Japanese [and then...] vs. maybe using the second to contrast
with a different language: I studied Japanese for five weeks [but my Spanish
is better.]

Also, yeah, the sentences as you abbreviated then for your question title are
much more conversational than the full text, but that's also not something you
really need to worry about as a beginner.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-15T04:06:23.640
35933
2016-06-15T04:06:23.640
15760
35916
answer