325
Given that there has been discussion by the Japanese government to use the
[Japanese Language Proficiency Test
(JLPT)](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_Language_Proficiency_Test) as
one of the measures by which permanent residences or citizenship might be
granted, how good of a measure of it of actual real world Japanese skill? Does
passing the level N1 test mean that you are on par with a native speaker or
does it just show that you have advanced knowledge of the language?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-06-01T12:36:53.250
303
2015-06-30T15:23:41.027
2015-06-30T15:23:41.027
1628
question
jlpt learning resources
Is the Japanese Language Proficiency Test (JLPT) a good measure of my Japanese language ability?
First and foremost the JLPT does not have a speaking component. This means you
may be able to recognise and understand grammar when reading or listening, but
you may be unable to actually _speak_ the language with any proficiency. This
is my case exactly, I can understand far more than what I can express.

Secondly, the entire test is multiple choice. Multiple choice makes things a
bit easier for the student and if you can eliminate the two "obviously false
answers" you're left with a 50/50 shot of getting it right - I've seen people
fake their way through exams with minimal knowledge of the content, but great
"test taking skills".

It's very hard to gauge proficiency in language. However, the JLPT is
definitely a good way of guiding your study. I've mainly been using the JLPT
tests not for the piece of paper I receive for doing it, but as a study guide
on where I should be focusing my study. It's a good guide to get you from
beginner to advanced in terms of which kanji/grammar points you should know.

However, I guess if you're able to pass the JLPT N1 test, you're more than on
your way to being "fluent".
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-06-01T12:52:50.507
311
2011-06-01T12:52:50.507
108
303
answer
I can tell you that N1 is not meaning on par with a native speaker. Actually
many japanese could not pass N1 with an high score without studying. That's
because of many questions about grammar and kanji usage. Still the test
doesn't measure your active skill (speak and write) but only your passive
ones. I know people who passed N1 but are not really fluent in everyday
japanese.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-06-01T12:53:54.500
312
2011-06-01T12:53:54.500
60
303
answer
True fluency is rare, and involves more than passing a standardized test. I
will refer you to [an answer I
gave](https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/10335/how-would-you-define-
fluent-level-in-english/10339#10339) in EL&U.SE which I quoted from my
treasured copy of Jack Seward's _Japanese in Action_. He is talking about
Japanese, but I removed all the specific-language references because it's a
good measure for fluency in any language. **EDIT** : I've just added them
back, since I found my copy of the book after cleaning out my office for the
New Year. **(^_^)** The passage is now given as written, with only slight
adjustments.

> To be accurately judged fluent in Japanese, I believe a foreigner should
> have the following qualifications:
>
>   1. He should be able to conduct all his daily affairs (business, visits to
> the doctor, TV-ing, bar-hopping, lovemaking, etc.) completely in Japanese
> without strain.
>
>   2. His accent may not be perfect, but it should occasion no confusion or
> merriment among his listeners.
>
>   3. He should be able to read Japanese (newspapers, weekly magazines, and
> letters in the semi-cursive 行書 style), with only an occasional reference to
> a dictionary.
>
>

He goes on to propose that a test for fluency in the language should require
the test taker to:

>   1. Translate a newspaper article
>
>   2. Speak in Japanese on the telephone, as a test of accent.
>
>   3. Write a letter in Japanese.
>
>   4. Interpret a taped conversation between two Japanese.
>
>   5. Comprehend a newscast.
>
>   6. Identify five major dialects.
>
>   7. Read a letter written in 行書.
>
>   8. Take a dictation test involving the writing of fifty 漢字 (kanji) from
> among the 当用漢字 (daily-use kanji) and give the principal readings of each.
>
>   9. Give the meanings of one hundred technical words or phrases (twenty
> each from the fields of medicine, law, economy, science, and the arts), to
> be selected by the testing committee as being understood by the average
> Japanese college graduate.
>
>   10. Walk down the street and read the first twenty signs to be sighted.
>
>   11. Give a ten-minute, impromptu talk about an everyday topic of
> conversation (sports, politics, travel, traffic, etc.), the topic to be
> selected by lottery.
>
>

BTW, much of the book is dated now, but is still a great source for
understanding Japanese culture and language, and it's also very funny.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-06-01T14:16:20.393
325
2014-01-04T12:10:21.450
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
85
303
answer
Well i don't know if you will find this info useful, but here goes:

[Daniel Levitin](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Levitin) claims:

> The emerging scientific picture is that 10,000 hours of practice is required
> to achieve the level of mastery associated with being a world-class expert
> in anything. In study after study, of composers, basketball players, fiction
> writers, ice skaters, concert pianists, chess players, master criminals, and
> what have you, this number comes up again and again.

[Malcolm Gladwell](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcolm_Gladwell) also claims
that the key to success in any field is, to a large extent, a matter of
practicing a specific task for a total of around 10,000 hours.
([Outliers](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outliers_%28book%29))

So if it [only takes around 900 hours](http://www.j-os.com/JLPT.html) to pass
JLPT 1, then we have not even reached 10% of the 10,000 hours requirement to
mastery....
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-06-26T23:49:38.343
1539
2014-01-05T05:02:00.823
2014-01-05T05:02:00.823
264
264
303
answer
My opinion: No. Speaking is not tested and the Japanese you're tested on is
not stuff you'll encounter in business or in daily conversation.

I've passed JLPT 1級 and received J1 on the Business Japanese Test
(<http://www.kanken.or.jp/bjt/>). Studying for the latter was much more useful
to me professionally and felt like a better gauge of working Japanese.

Background: I've worked in Japan for five consecutive years now. Three years
in Japanese companies in a management position. Two years as a host in clubs
in both Kabukicho and Minami while attending college here.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-01-04T12:35:14.760
14042
2014-01-04T12:35:14.760
1808
303
answer
There is some useful information on this on the official website
<http://www.jlpt.jp/>:

  * a summary of what organizers consider required for passing N1, and
  * a self evaluation of what successful candidates think they can do.

**Summary of linguistic competence required for N1**

> The ability to understand Japanese used in a variety of circumstances.
>
> Reading
>
> ・ One is able to read writings with logical complexity and/or abstract
> writings on a variety of topics, such as newspaper editorials and critiques,
> and comprehend both their structures and contents.
>
> ・ One is also able to read written materials with profound contents on
> various topics and follow their narratives as well as understand the intent
> of the writers comprehensively.
>
> Listening
>
> ・ One is able to comprehend orally presented materials such as coherent
> conversations, news reports, and lectures, spoken at natural speed in a
> broad variety of settings, and is able to follow their ideas and comprehend
> their contents comprehensively. One is also able to understand the details
> of the presented materials such as the relationships among the people
> involved, the logical structures, and the essential points.

(<http://www.jlpt.jp/e/about/levelsummary.html>)

**Can-Do self evaluation**

The following is an excerpt of what candidates who barely pass N1 think they
can do in Japanese:

Listening:

  * Less than one in four of those who barely pass N1 think they can understand the main points of TV news about politics, economics and similar topics.
  * Less than one in four think they can understand the general content when joining a conversation on a current topic currently covered by the media.
  * Between one and two in four think they can understand the general content of speeches in formal situations such as welcome parties.
  * Two to three in four think they can follow discussions when participating in school or work meetings.
  * More than three in four think they can understand the general content of small talk.

Speaking:

  * One to two in four believe they can express their opinion in a logical manner when joining discussions on topics they care about.
  * Two to three in four believe they can give a brief summary of the plot of a movie they have seen or a book they have read recently.
  * More than three in four believe they can give walking directions and directions for public transportation to locations they know well.

Reading:

  * One to two in four believe they can understand the main points in newspaper articles about politics or economics.
  * Two to three in four believe they can understand the main ideas in scientific and technical texts on topics they care about.
  * More than three in four believe they can understand the definitions given in a Japanese-Japanese dictionary.

(<http://www.jlpt.jp/e/about/candolist.html>)

I think this list makes it clear that passing N1 is far from being at native
equivalent levels. The Japanese language school I attended considers N1 to be
roughly comparable to B2 of the
[CEFR](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_European_Framework_of_Reference_for_Languages).
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-01-05T00:59:52.907
14062
2014-01-05T00:59:52.907
2964
303
answer