Would both of these sentences be correct? Do they both have the same meaning?

> たくやの後ろに **彰が** 座っています。Akira is sitting behind Takuya.
>
> **彰は** たくやの後ろに座っています。Akira is sitting behind Takuya.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-04-23T22:42:03.050
33753
2016-04-24T01:35:54.043
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
14245
question
grammar meaning syntax particle-は particle-が
Would both of these sentences be correct?
They are both natural-sounding Japanese sentences, given the right context, so
they are both 'correct'. Whether or not they have the same meaning depends on
how you define 'meaning'. Do they describe the same state? Yes. Are they
interchangeable for each other? Very much no.

The difference regards how the information is presented - which part is
information the listener already knows, and which part is the information the
sentence is meant to convey. The difference is marked partly by word order (a
thing I'm pretty sure all natural languages do) and partly by Japanese's role-
marking particles*.

First, let's break the sentence up into subparts:

> [たくや] (の後ろに)
>
> [彰]
>
> [座っています]

Your first sentence orders them like this:

> **[たくや]** の後ろに **[彰]** _が_ [座っています]

In this sentence, 彰 is placed second, and additionally marked with が - both of
which indicate that it is the _focus_ of the sentence†. This means that 彰 is
being presented as new information - we haven't been talking about him before.
たくや is placed first, suggesting he's the _topic_ - he's been mentioned
already. (He's not marked for topic with は, probably because that would sound
more like contrastive topic, where we've talked about what's behind someone
else and now we're talking about what's behind たくや.)

This sentence sounds like it could be introducing 彰 as a new subject for
discussion (you could imagine this being the introduction sentence for a new
character in a book - we've mentioned his friend たくや, now we're focusing on
him himself). Alternatively, it could be the next entry in a list of people
sitting in rows - behind someone is たくや, and behind たくや is 彰.

Your second sentence gives the opposite ordering:

> **[彰]** _は_ **[たくや]** の後ろに [座っています]

In this case, 彰 comes first, and is marked with は, indicating that he's the
topic - we've been talking about him already. たくや (or I suppose the space
behind him) is now the focus - the new information. We know _who_ 彰 is; what
we want to know is _where_ he is.

My immediate interpretation of this sentence makes it sound like the answer to
a question - 「彰はどこですか？」「たくやの後ろに座っています」. You could strengthen this sense of
response by replacing は with なら, making it more like 'if it's 彰 you're looking
for, he's behind たくや.' It could also be the 'contrastive' focus mentioned
above (this guy is here, and 彰 is behind たくや), or it could be setting a new
scene with characters we already know (imagine the first paragraph of a new
chapter - '...We're all gathered around to listen. 彰 is behind たくや...').

So as much as these two sentences do describe the same physical reality, the
contexts you'd use them in are really quite different.

_(*They're probably clitics, not particles, but that doesn't matter here_ )

_(†Technically it's not so much that が marks focus, it's more like leaving a
main clause subject unmarked for topic implicitly marks it for focus. There
doesn't seem to be a way to just leave a subject unmarked for topic/focus
status unless topic and focus are both explicitly assigned to other things.)_
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-04-23T23:28:52.273
33755
2016-04-23T23:37:12.210
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
3639
33753
answer