15145
The following sentence comes from 中上級の日本語 magazine for february:

> 新聞記事は、記者がコツコツと取材をしてデータを集め、それをもとに出来事を調べたり、関係者の話を聞いたりして書かれています。

It is grammatically correct but I find the change from active to passive
voice, ie from extensively describing journalists' activities in the active
voice to connecting those activities to the topic of newspaper articles in the
passive, quite jarring.

Is this just because I am not a native speaker, who would find this quite
natural, or is it just not very good writing? (Given that this is a magazine
for students of Japanese you would not expect bad writing in the explanatory
passages by the magazine's staff.)
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-03-30T07:59:09.533
15140
2014-03-30T13:09:33.067
2014-03-30T13:09:33.067
1556
question
grammar words
Grammatically correct but good writing?
Having read it several times, I could only say that that is good writing. It
contains no errors, ambiguity or unnaturalness; therefore, it would not cause
any misunderstanding among the readers.

Mixing active voice with passive voice in a sentence is nothing new in
English, is it? Consider the following sentence.

> "Tofu is made by coagulating soy milk and then pressing to remove the
> liquid. "

I find the structure of this English sentence similar to that of the Japanese
sentence in question. Only, the passive voice verb phrase "is made" (「書かれています」
in the Japanese) will come at the end of the sentence in the Japanese.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-03-30T09:25:45.520
15145
2014-03-30T09:25:45.520
15140
answer