47519
The sentence in question is from the text in exercise 8, line 3-5
<https://www.docdroid.net/RgiQk0x/img-20170517-0001-new.pdf.html>

僕の時計が「7時だよ。おはよう。おきろ」と、起こしてくれるのだが、無意識に止めて、また寝てしまう。

First, the と in bold. First I thought it is related to the quotation, but in
context of the whole text this clearly has to be a conditional clause. so the
と言う was omitted completely here I guess?

Second, I feel a bit uncertain about the subject of 起こしてくれる in bold. I guess
it is the alarm clock? It is a transitive verb according to the dictionary,
and there’s nothing that would make it intransitive here (at least not to my
knowledge). And if I understand the concept of て-form + もらう、くれる etc.
correctly, then it wouldn’t make sense that the narrator here „gives waking up
to himself“. There’s also some uncertainty about the tense. 起こしてくれるのだが should
be in the past related to 無意識に止めて、また寝てしまう But there is no verbal form
indicating a past tense. On the other hand, it works just fine to say it in
present tense. I just wanted to mention it because it feels a bit off to me,
so maybe there’s more to this than I see right now.

So, I would translate the sentence like this: “When my clock says ‘it’s seven
o clock. Good morning. Rise and shine!’, even though it wakes me up, I
unconsciously turn it off and unfortunately go to sleep again.”
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-05-17T14:07:46.440
47516
2017-05-17T14:55:25.143
2017-05-17T14:20:31.960
4091
20172
question
grammar
Questions about 僕の時計が「7時だよ。おはよう。おきろ」と、起こしてくれるのだが、無意識に止めて、また寝てしまう
My attempt at the translation from yours: “Even though my clock wakes me up,
saying ‘it’s seven o clock. Good morning. Rise and shine!’, I unconsciously
turn it off and unfortunately go to sleep again.”

> so the と言う was omitted completely here I guess?

Yes, but と言 _って_

> 起こしてくれるのだが should be in the past related to 無意識に止めて、また寝てしまう

It's fine in the present or basic tense because it's saying about a habitual
practice.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-05-17T14:43:07.287
47517
2017-05-17T14:43:07.287
22087
47516
answer
The と you're asking about is in fact a quotation marker of sorts. You can use
it without 言う or 思う and it will produce the idea of saying something or
thinking something that adds details or explanation to the main clause. Eg.

> おかしいなあと、ドアをゆっくり開けた
>
> Thinking to myself "Now isn't that strange", I slowly opened the door.

In this case it's personifying the clock by giving it some imaginary dialogue.

> 僕の時計が「7時だよ。おはよう。おきろ」と...
>
> My clock, saying "It's seven! Good morning! Get up!", ...

As for 起こしてくれる, the subject of the sentence is still 僕の時計 (my clock) so you
were right to view the expression as "my clock wakes me up" (gives me the
action of waking me up). This shows a slight but significant amount of
gratitude.

The のだ is explaining the situation by telling us readers what circumstances
the writer is under, and the が is "but".

So, I believe that your translation is quite accurate.

> “When my clock says ‘it’s seven o clock. Good morning. Rise and shine!’,
> even though it wakes me up, I unconsciously turn it off and unfortunately go
> to sleep again.”
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-05-17T14:44:47.527
47519
2017-05-17T14:55:25.143
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
22133
47516
answer