Is it correct to think that the six conjugated forms listed
[here](http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%B4%BB%E7%94%A8) encompass a range of
ideas rather than having a inflection form directly linked to them?

For instance 未然形 is not only the negative/potential/causative that inflects to
a-sound like 食べる->食べられる 言う->言わない but also those that inflect to o-sound and
attach to the う auxiliary (or add よう, depending on whether it's a gr.1 or gr.2
verb) with probability and intention (食べよう, 言おう).

How should one generally go about distinguishing between these "forms", is it
based on general context rather than anything else (e.g. mizenkei for things
that haven't materialized yet)?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-15T10:12:48.503
24339
2015-10-15T04:53:08.377
2015-07-16T15:22:30.207
9771
question
grammar conjugations morphology
Making sense of inflections and conjugated forms
It was purely a form of inflection, but because of sound shift (食べむ → 食べよう、言はむ
→ 言おう) it collapsed.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-16T14:26:41.727
24363
2015-05-16T14:26:41.727
4092
24339
answer
Traditional conjugation chart was devised to explain Classical Japanese
grammar, so not optimal for Modern Japanese. The greatest problem is that it
no longer shows one-to-one mapping between categories and actual forms. I
think [this
one](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_verb_conjugation#Summary_of_verb_conjugations)
is much better for learning purpose.

The idea 未然形{みぜんけい} comes from Classical Japanese too, named after a usage
that you used to attach ば to this form to make hypothetical (yet to happen)
condition, in contrast with 已然形{いぜんけい}, described realized situation (the
cause of a result) with ば. So it's just a label rather than meaning.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-15T04:38:06.720
28022
2015-09-15T04:43:38.180
2015-09-15T04:43:38.180
7810
7810
24339
answer