93705
A passage from the second chapter of 夜は短し歩けよ乙女 by 森見登美彦:

> ⁠
> 先ほどまで、ご主人は奥さんと一緒に本棚に囲まれた内側にいて、レジを打っていました。私と樋口さんが姿を見せると、あとを大学生のアルバイトに任せて出てきてくれました。そして案内されたのは店舗の背後にある木立の奥です。そこには
> **缶に入れた** 蚊取り線香の煙がふんわり漂い、小さなテーブルと椅子が置いてあって、午後のお茶会に好適な「森の隠れ家」になっていたのです。

I don't understand why 入れた was chosen over 入った. Does it imply that ご主人 put the
incense in the can after showing the narrator and 樋口さん to the back? Or does it
just neutrally mean "incense in a can"?

I feel comfortable with the phrase ～のことを書いた本 referenced by [this
question](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/53684/difference-
between-%EF%BD%9E%E3%81%AE%E3%81%93%E3%81%A8%E3%82%92%E6%9B%B8%E3%81%84%E3%81%9F%E6%9C%AC-
and-%EF%BD%9E%E3%81%AE%E3%81%93%E3%81%A8%E3%82%92%E6%9B%B8%E3%81%8B%E3%82%8C%E3%81%9F%E6%9C%AC).
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-03-13T05:44:13.993
93701
2022-03-13T07:34:58.913
902
question
relative-clauses transitivity
Choice of 入れた in 缶に入れた蚊取り線香
You can say 缶に入った蚊取り線香, but to me it sounds more like what you buy at the
store, i.e., 蚊取り線香 which is not yet used.

Normally you set fire on 蚊取り線香 (and put out the fire without completely
extinguishing it), then put it in some case/dish, for which can is often used.
This "put-in-a-case" action makes 入れた more natural, I suppose.

So the passage describes the scent of 蚊取り線香 put in a can (case) hanging in the
air.

* * *

The major 蚊取り線香 is sold in a can like the following (the rightmost picture is
a can case/dish; picture from
[here](https://www.kincho.co.jp/seihin/qa/qa_uzumaki.html))

[![katorisenko](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Nqz7S.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Nqz7S.png)

You can see [a variety of
them](https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=%20%E8%9A%8A%E5%8F%96%E3%82%8A%E7%B7%9A%E9%A6%99%20%E7%9A%BF)
by image search.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-03-13T07:34:58.913
93705
2022-03-13T07:34:58.913
45489
93701
answer