56894
I have always been told that centuries of Japanese literature had been
successfully translated without keeping "san" or "chan" suffixes. Is it an
unbreakable rule or are there famous examples of such things in respectable
translations?

I remember seeing "chan" in an old French translation of a Tanizaki novel and
I was wondering if this practice was outdated.

If this rule is unbreakable, how to translate things like, for example,
「田中さんをまだ田中様と呼んでいた時代」?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-02-26T04:41:32.597
56890
2018-02-26T13:41:34.797
19376
question
translation honorifics
San, sama and other honorifics in translated literature
Since it is difficult to distinguish subtle differences between 様 and さん by
translation, I think that it is one translation method to translate the given
sentence in a commentary way as follows: _era when they had to strictly
distinguish honorific expressions that should be attached to surnames_
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-02-26T05:15:02.913
56891
2018-02-26T13:41:34.797
2018-02-26T13:41:34.797
20624
20624
56890
answer
If you prefer natural translation and such name suffixes are not particularly
important in the context, I think you may just rephrase them so that there is
a natural contrast in English (e.g., "Mr. Tanaka", "Master" or "President"
instead of "Tanaka-sama", "Taro" instead of "Tanaka-san"). You may even
rephrase the entire sentence, like "days when I was talking to you more
politely".

If you believe your audience understand those Japanese suffixes (for example
if you're doing an anime fansub), you may choose to directly use them. In rare
cases where the topic is the Japanese-specific name suffixes themselves, you
may have to familiarize readers with those suffixes anyway in some way or
another.

I doubt there is such a thing as "an unbreakable rule" in translation. It's up
to your decision.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-02-26T10:04:56.727
56894
2018-02-26T11:30:39.097
2018-02-26T11:30:39.097
5010
5010
56890
answer