80155
> 実のある話はしないことにしています。 I'm not going to tell you anything substantive.

I found this in a bio of an author. after finding the meaning with the help of
an auto-translator I had a several questions,

  * I think 実のある話 is a set expression but does it make sense grammatically? my problem is specifically with 実のある. I remembered that the の particle can replace an unidentified noun after an adjective so that we can talk about a general noun in a sentence; like for example `白いのは好き。` is something similar happening here?

  * why is particles は used along the verb しない here? the use of は implies that there’s an action taken place that has to do with 実のある話. and that action should be talking, right? so why is しない used here instead of any other verb that conveys the meaning of talking; the first thing I can think of being 言う?

  * why did he chose to put it this way? this is the part that confuses me the most. why not just say for example:

> 実のある話のことを言いません

he used しないこと just so that he can later say しています which sounds extremely odd
to me. does 実のある話はしないこと imply a more specific meaning?
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-08-15T11:15:38.773
80153
2020-08-15T14:49:21.307
2020-08-15T14:49:21.307
5010
39807
question
grammar translation particle-は particle-の
please help me break down this confusing sentence involving the usage of は and の particle and also ことにする
That machine-translation is correct.

  * の after 実 is a **subject marker**. This 実のある is the same as 実がある, which is a relative clause that modifies 話. 実のある話 (=実がある話) literally means "a story where a fruit exists". This 実 ("fruit") figuratively refers to something meaningful. See: [How does the の work in 「日本人の知らない日本語」?](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/12825/5010)

(Note that の meaning "one" (as in 白いの) is not relevant because 実 is a noun,
not an adjective nor a verb.)

  * As for this は, it replaced を because this object (実のある話) has been topicalized. See the following questions:

    * ["は + verb" instead of "を + verb"?](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/17817/5010)
    * [Why can は and を sometimes be used interchangeably?](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/23378/5010)
  * As for your last question, you seem to have missed the ことにする / ことにしている construction? See [this page](https://japanesetest4you.com/flashcard/learn-jlpt-n3-grammar-%E3%81%93%E3%81%A8%E3%81%AB%E3%81%99%E3%82%8B-koto-ni-suru/), for example.

* * *

So let's break it down:

  * 実がある: "a fruit exists"

  * 実がある話: "a story where a fruit exists" → "something meaningful/substantial/useful/fruitful" (relative clause)

  * 実 **の** ある話: "something substantial" (ga-no conversion)

  * 実のある話 **を** する: "to say something substantial"

  * 実のある話 **は** する: "to say something substantial" (topicalized object)

(More literally, "as for something substantial, I'll say")

  * 実のある話はしない: "not to say something substantial"

  * 実のある話はしない **ことにしています** : "(I have decided that) I won't say anything substantial".
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-08-15T14:48:51.720
80155
2020-08-15T14:48:51.720
5010
80153
answer