6170
In my textbook 「日本語総まとめN２」, they list the two vocabulary words 「余計に」 and
「余分に」. I am almost unable to differentiate between their appropriate usage.

Here are the example sentences from the book:

> 他人より余計に勉強する - "study more than others"
>
> いつもより余分に食事を作る - "cook more than usual"

I looked up the definitions for
[余分](http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/jn2/228281/m0u/%E4%BD%99%E5%88%86/?SH=1)
and [余計](http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/srch/jn/%E4%BD%99%E8%A8%88/m0u/).
However, even the entry for 余分 lists 余計 as a definition.

I asked a friend who is a native whether the first example sentence could be
replaced with 「余分」instead of「余計」. She mentioned that it could, but she was not
able to tell me the reason. She also was unsure of the difference between
them.

When should either of these words be used and what are the differences between
them?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-07-18T01:53:19.953
6169
2012-07-18T03:41:45.730
1328
question
words jlpt word-choice
What is the difference between 「余計に」and 「余分に」?
I think 余分 can be used only when the exceeding quantity manifests as a
property of some real object such as weight, length, etc.

In your second example, the result manifests as the meal, which is an object,
and the quantity in question is the amount of it. Hence you can use 余分 (as
well as 余計). With your first sentence, in the most salient interpretation, the
quantity in question is the duration, and is not an object, so you cannot use
余分 with it. However, if you add context so that the quantity in question
becomes, say the number of pages read, then you can use 余分. So actually, the
following two sentences mean different things:

> 他人より余計に勉強する  
>  'study longer than other people.' (salient interpretation)  
>  'go on with more pages/solve more questions than other people with
> studying.'
>
> 他人より余分に勉強する  
>  'go on with more pages/solve more questions than other people with
> studying.'

There are clearer cases where you can use 余計 but not 余分.

> 家族が留守な上に、友達も出掛けているので、余計に寂しかった。  
>  * 家族が留守な上に、友達も出掛けているので、余分に寂しかった。

Here, the quantity in question is loneliness, which is clearly not an object,
so you cannot use 余分.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-07-18T02:18:40.090
6170
2012-07-18T02:55:33.913
2012-07-18T02:55:33.913
6169
answer
My feeling is that 余計, unlike 余分, implies uselessness. In your sentences, I
have the impression that one studies more than others for no gain, while one
cooks more but doesn't necessarily spoil food.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-07-18T03:41:45.730
6172
2012-07-18T03:41:45.730
356
6169
answer