59405
I'm having trouble to understand why the ni particle is being used here.

```

    ギルダが「情報源」？
    本当にギルダ…？
    
```

That's a part of Yakusoku no Neverland manga, when Emma (one of the main
characters) is doubting if Gilda is a spy.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-06-12T19:23:42.050
59404
2018-06-13T02:35:22.423
2018-06-12T19:32:05.643
30254
30254
question
grammar usage particles particle-に
What's the role of the に particle in this sentence?
本当に is equivalent of 'Oh really?'

While 本当 just means truth/real/proper

Therefore に particle adds extra doubt to the sentence

Good explanation from a [website](https://www.thoughtco.com/hontou-
meaning-2028352):

> Hontou Ni: The word Hontou Ni has the same meaning as Hontou. However, there
> is a stronger emphasis on the NI so it tends to be a stronger version of the
> word in verbal and written form. Examples of "really" in a Japanese formal
> conversation is: Hontou ni hajimete desuka? (Is it really your first time?);
> Hontou ni yoku nite iru! (She’s really like you!); Hontou ni sono saabisu wa
> tadadesuka? (So is your service really free?).
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-06-13T01:01:06.510
59405
2018-06-13T01:06:34.160
2018-06-13T01:06:34.160
55756
55756
59404
answer
[本当](https://www.weblio.jp/content/%E6%9C%AC%E5%BD%93) is a 名詞 (noun) or 形容動詞
(no-adjective).

[本当に](https://www.weblio.jp/content/%E6%9C%AC%E5%BD%93%E3%81%AB) is a 副詞
(adverb).

So you can say,

> 本当の話

= a true story

and

> それは本当にそうですか。

= is that _really_ the case?

The addition of に is not as an emphasizer. Instead, it's that it might be left
off in casual speech.

And that 本当に? by itself can be the equivalent of just asking "really?"

In your particular sentence, 本当にギルダー ... is an example of a clipped sentence.

It would mean is Gilda really [a spy]? (i.e. I can't believe it).
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-06-13T02:30:11.260
59407
2018-06-13T02:30:11.260
4091
59404
answer
> ギルダが情報源？ **本当に** ギルダ…？

Here 「 **本当に** ギルダ...？」 means 「本当にギルダが情報源(か)？」, "Is it **really** Gilda?" or
"Is Gilda **really**...(the information source)?", rather than "Really,
Gilda?" The omitted part is cut off.

本当 **に** functions adverbially and modifies the whole sentence 「ギルダが情報源(か)」.
You can't say 「本当ギルダ」 or 「本当ギルダが情報源(か)？」; you need to add に for 本当 to modify
「ギルダが情報源(か)？」

本当 is a noun (名詞) or a na-adjective (形容動詞) and can't modify anything by
itself:

> ほんとう【本当】［名・形動］ --
> [デジタル大辞泉](https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/jn/206299/meaning/m0u/)

> ほんとう【本当】〘名・形動〙 -- 明鏡国語辞典

明鏡国語辞典 also lists 本当に as an adverb (副詞).

本当に can function adverbially, but 本当 can't.  
(When you say 「本当？」, you'd translate it as "Really?". But the Japanese word 本当
is actually not an adverb. 「本当？」 literally means "(Is that) real?")
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-06-13T02:30:16.007
59408
2018-06-13T02:35:22.423
2018-06-13T02:35:22.423
9831
9831
59404
answer