I was under the impression that は should be always used in negative sentences.
Is がない an exception to this rule? Does が add something special to the
negation?

> 仕事はありません。
>
> 仕事がない。

Do the above sentences have the same meaning?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-05-07T20:38:05.813
47167
2017-05-10T10:22:00.663
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
3371
question
grammar は-and-が
Why がない but はありません?
I think this が is が for _neutral description_.

  * [Can someone explain me the use of は and が in this sentence?](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/43213/5010)
  * [Why does 「電話は切れた」 sound more adversarial than 「電話が切れた」?](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/38639/5010)

> neutral description (ga) only works with action verbs, existential verbs,
> and adjectives/nominal adjectives that represent state change. "Sentences of
> neutral description present an objectively observable action, existence, or
> temporary state as a new event."

This type of が is not limited to がない.

>   * あの看板がよく見えない。 I can't see that signboard well.
>   * あれ？ パソコンが動かない。 Oh? This PC doesn't work.
>

When you say 仕事はない, you are saying it more or less as the plain fact that
holds true for the time being (e.g., you are unemployed). 仕事がない is used when
you have realized you have nothing to do for now, or you are _temporarily_
having trouble finding a good job.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-05-07T21:18:18.017
47169
2017-05-07T21:18:18.017
5010
47167
answer
It might be useful to picture them as being answers to different “questions”:

> Q1. (Is there a job? / Are there any jobs?)  
>  A1. 仕事 **は** ない
>
> Q2. (What do you not have? / Why are you broke? / Why are you at home?)  
>  A2. 仕事 **が** ない

You would never answer Q1 with A2, and vice versa.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-05-10T10:22:00.663
47244
2017-05-10T10:22:00.663
888
47167
answer