63293
In Chinese, [控 means](http://www.zdic.net/z/1a/js/63A7.htm):

> 1. 告状，指出罪恶：～告。～诉。指～。被～。 (accuse of wrong doing)
>
> 2. 节制，驾驭：～制。遥～。 (to restrain/cause to move)
>
> 3. 开弓：弓不再～。 (to use a bow)
>
> 4. 投：～于地。(to throw something)
>
> 5. 人的头部朝下或使让残液流出容器的口朝下：～净。～一～。(to tip something down i.e. head/bottle)

I checked the Kangxi dictionary and it seems to that the definition was 1-4 as
well back then.

These largely match with the [Japanese definition for
控える](https://kotobank.jp/word/%E6%8E%A7%E3%81%88%E3%82%8B%E3%83%BB%E6%89%A3%E3%81%88%E3%82%8B-364405),
but the following don't seem at all related (along with every definition for
the intransitive use of the word):

> （他動詞）
>
> ④ すぐ近くにある、ということを他動詞的に表現する。
>
>   * ㋐ 近い関係にある。 「近くに有数の観光地を－・えた都市」 「代議士がバックに－・えている」
>
>   * ㋑ 時間的に間近にせまる。 「開会式を三日後に－・えて準備に忙しい」
>
>

>
> ⑤ 記録にとどめる。メモする。 「電話番号を手帳に－・える」

Where did these meanings come from? Was ひかえる a native word that meant "close
to" (or to take notes I suppose) already and just took on the kanji 控?
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-07T16:14:37.020
63288
2018-12-07T16:56:57.460
10045
question
etymology
How did 控える come to mean "close to"
## TL;DR:

You ask:

> Was [this] a native word that ... just took on the kanji?

In short, **yes**. :)

## The longer details

### Japanese etymologies

For any word in Japanese, you have to ask first, "is this a _kun'yomi_ native
Japanese term, a 大和言葉【やまとことば】? Or is this an _on'yomi_ borrowing from Middle
Chinese, a 漢語【かんご】? Or is it some combination?"

These three questions drill down to the history of the word. The oldest
Japanese words are (generally speaking) the _kun'yomi_. Borrowings from Middle
Chinese were brought over mostly in the 400s through around the 700s.
Combinations were later coinages in Japan, mixing and matching pieces from
these earlier two boxes.

The word _hikaeru_ is a native Japanese term. Consequently, we can ignore the
kanji: pretty much all kanji spellings for _kun'yomi_ words are after-the-fact
applications of a borrowed non-native writing system, and thus the kanji
spellings are not fully relevant to the origins of the term's derivations and
core meanings.

### General derivational patterns

There are many verbs in modern Japanese that end in _-aeru_. Many (but not
all) of these verbs originally derive from a base verb in the 未然形【みぜんけい】
("irrealis or incomplete form", for type 1 verbs this is the stem ending in
_-a_ ) + auxiliary verb ending ふ denoting repeated or continued action, or
ongoing state.

  * This auxiliary had the 下二段活用【しもにだんかつよう】 ("lower bigrade conjugation") pattern, where the different conjugations ended in either _-u_ or _-e_. These pretty much all simplified over time into just the _-e_ stem, with the terminal (sentence-ending) and attributive (noun-modifying) forms ending in _-eru_.
  * Many medial (mid-word) "f" sounds softened further to "w" and then vanished. 
    * → These two historical trends together mean that ancient auxiliary ふ later became へる, and then modern える.

So the key to understanding the many uses of these verbs is to look at the
base form.

### Specifics of 控【ひか】える

For 控【ひか】える, more detailed monolingual Japanese dictionaries show that this
has the older kana spelling ひかへる, and derives from the older form ひかふ. This
tells us that we're dealing with 未然形【みぜんけい】 + auxiliary ふ, so we can find the
base form by removing the _-aeru_ from the modern verb, which here leaves us
with _hik-_. This is the root of modern verb 引【ひ】く, "to pull, to draw close".
The auxiliary adds the shade of meaning of either "to be pulling, to be
drawing close" (as a repeated or continuous action), or "to keep close: to
have pulled, to have drawn close" (as an ongoing state as the result of the
action).
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-07T16:56:57.460
63293
2018-12-07T16:56:57.460
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
5229
63288
answer