98583
The English sentence "I went east to Japan." is quite simple - a direction and
a destination together in a sentence. But it seems this is rather tricky to
translate into Japanese.

I asked [this Hinative question](https://hinative.com/questions/23525632?)
about how best to translate the sentence, and the answers are a bit
contradictory. My question is, in a nutshell: I want to know if 「私は東へ、日本に行った。」
is grammatically correct or not.

In the main answerer's second comment, they say that 「私は東へ、日本に行った。」 **would**
be grammatically correct, because it's considered to be a contraction of two
sentences: 「私は東へ向かった。日本に行った。」.

However, that strikes me as odd. Isn't that essentially how the directional へ
particle works all the time? If 「私は東へ、日本に行った。」 is grammatically valid, then
why wouldn't it be valid to say that you can include both "direction+へ" and
"destination+に" in sentences all the time?

Hoping to get a second opinion from the grammar experts in this group. Thanks
in advance!
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-02-13T05:44:02.250
98582
2023-02-13T23:50:01.463
4382
question
particles particle-に direction
Is it acceptable to include both direction (へ) and destination (に) in a sentence?
私は東へ日本に行った sounds very weird to my native ears. `place/direction + へ` and
`place/direction + に` occupy the same argument ("slot") of 行く, so they are
mutually exclusive. (Of course, something like 5時に or 桜を見に can be used
together with another へ/に for destination.)

To fix this, you need to paraphrase the sentence like so:

  * 日本に行くため東に向かった
  * 日本を目指して東へ出発した
  * ここから東にある日本へ行った
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-02-13T06:59:25.943
98583
2023-02-13T23:50:01.463
2023-02-13T23:50:01.463
5010
5010
98582
answer
As you said, it's a contraction of two sentences, so I don't see why it
wouldn't be valid because they are for different verbs.

Also I'm not a native, but I feel "東へ向かって、日本に行った。" would be more natural than
"東へ、日本に行った。"
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-02-13T09:33:52.777
98587
2023-02-13T09:33:52.777
55721
98582
answer