74150
I am just a beginner and am currently reading particles. I came across a
thought of using に instead of は in a certain example and I couldn't find the
difference in the usage and the context as well.

E.g. 君の出身地はどこですか？ and 君の出身地にどこがありますか？

In the above example, both the sentences mean "Where is your hometown?". So,
my questions are

  1. Is there any difference between the two?

  2. Can に replace は if we talk about the description of the place like where a thing is or likewise? If yes, could you please explain?

* * *
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-01-30T13:37:41.037
74149
2020-01-30T14:17:54.593
2020-01-30T13:52:05.900
22352
36729
question
grammar particles particle-に particle-は
Could you please tell the difference between particle は and に in case of description of a place of existence
> 君の出身地にどこがありますか？

I'm sorry to say that this sentence (using に) is not grammatically correct. に
is a particle that indicates:

  1. Direction of movement.
  2. Place of existence
  3. Destination
  4. Result of Change
  5. Object of a verb
  6. Source (of a verb)
  7. Specific time
  8. The Japanese equivalent of the English 'per' (as in 'three meals per day')

You can read more about the に particle at [this source,](https://www.wasabi-
jpn.com/japanese-grammar/japanese-particle-ni-clear-up-all-doubts-you-may-
have/) but for now I will focus on why this particular usage is not
grammatically correct. So let's break it down real quick.

**君の** -- Your

**出身地** -- birthplace

**に** -- ? (I don't know what this could be here since it is not grammatically
correct)

**どこ** -- where

**が** -- topic marker (this is another grammar mistake)

**ありますか** -- does it exist?

Breaking it down, we can see that 出身地 should actually be the _subject_ of the
sentence marked by は. Further, because どこ is _not_ a topic in this sentence,
but rather a place of existence, I would replace it with に, making the end
result:

> 君の出身地 **は** どこ **に** ありますか？

But this still feels clunky to me because using the existence verb ある in this
case is too repetitive. The birthplace exists because _you_ exist, so why
question its existence? It would sound much more natural as:

> 君の出身地はどこですか？

Which is your first sentence.

So to answer your first question, the difference is that the second of your
two examples is not grammatically correct, while the first one is.

The answer to your second question is simply that に and は are **not**
interchangeable. The source I listed above (and [here](https://www.wasabi-
jpn.com/japanese-grammar/japanese-particle-ni-clear-up-all-doubts-you-may-
have/)) shows particles that can be exchanged with に, and in what
circumstances it is allowable. You will note that は is _not_ one of them.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-01-30T14:09:58.320
74150
2020-01-30T14:17:54.593
2020-01-30T14:17:54.593
22352
22352
74149
answer
「は」 marks topic, while 「に」 marks direction (「海{うみ}に行{い}きます」) or place of
existance (「この町{まち}に映画館{えいがかん}がありますか」), [and a lot of other
things](https://jisho.org/word/%E3%81%AB). So 「君の出身地はどこですか」 means "Speaking of
your birth place, where is it?", while 「君の出身地にどこですか」I guess sounds something
like "About what's in your birthplace, where is it?", if anything at all,
which doesn't really means anything, it sounds quite unnatural.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-01-30T14:14:18.720
74151
2020-01-30T14:14:18.720
35362
74149
answer