って can be for quotation or like topic marking right?

[![enter image description
here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/rvy7N.jpg)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/rvy7N.jpg)

お弁当作ってもらうってだけでも幸せなのに

Deepl Translation: I'm happy just to have someone make me lunch.

If this is like a topic marking use of って which I think it is, then why is
there no nominalization of もらう? Is the casualness of って making it so
nominalization is optional? Or is it a different use?
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-08-01T01:32:23.963
95633
2022-08-03T02:19:30.420
48639
question
particle-って
お弁当作ってもらうってだけでも幸せなのに - って Meaning
I guess your question is about the second って after もらう. This is a topic
marking use as you said, but you missed that だけ nominalizes お弁当作ってもらう. I feel
like it forms an adverb rather than a noun, though.

Examples:

> 考えるだけでぞっとする

> 食って寝るだけでお金がもらえる仕事はないですか?

> 2、3分外を歩くだけで頭がクラクラしてきた
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-08-02T06:40:46.967
95650
2022-08-02T06:40:46.967
19830
95633
answer
When `ってだけでも` is written down, it becomes `というだけでも`, which implies
`ということだけでも`. `だけ` here means "only" and `だけでも` means like "enough only with
something".

So, the given sentence represents like, "I'm already luck enough only with the
fact that `お弁当作ってもらう`, (but you're still surving me more.)"

It is similar to `というだけで`, which means "only because of the reason". They
provide a minimum condition.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-08-03T02:19:30.420
95661
2022-08-03T02:19:30.420
36794
95633
answer