52681
This sentence was translated as "a cat that has eyes of different color". Now
using my Spanish speaking mind I wouldn't phrase that sentence that way, it
would be `猫の目の色が違う.`

So how come it is `目の色が違う猫`?

Is the way I wrote it also valid, or it is syntactically wrong or unnatural?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-08-24T21:02:27.570
52677
2017-08-25T07:50:50.043
2017-08-25T07:50:50.043
9878
question
relative-clauses
Why is 猫 at the end of this sentence "目の色が違う猫"
> 目の色が違う猫

Here, Spanish is in an opposite order to Japanese. Where in Spanish you might
say "Un gato con ojos de colores diferentes" (A cat with different colored
eyes), Japanese normally places its adverbs, adjectives, and noun
modifications before the noun. In a literal sense, think of this structure in
this form:

> 目の色が違う猫  
>  "eye's colors are different" cat  
>  "el color de los ojos es diferente" gato

This is somewhat closer to English's construction of placing descriptions
before nouns. If we change the descriptive sentence of 目の色が違う to something
simple like 黒い, for example, this might make a bit more logical sense:

> 黒い猫 -> "black" cat (un gato negro)  
>  白い猫 -> "white" cat (un gato blanco)  
>  きれいな猫 -> "clean/pretty" cat (un gato limpio/bonito)  
>

Japanese continues this sort of logical construction where in English it
changes when adding verbs, using the "that" or "which" connection:

> 走っている猫 -> a cat which is running (un gato que corre)  
>  寝ている猫 -> a cat that is sleeping (un gato que duerme)

... or using the "with" connection when talking about features:

> 尻尾が白い猫 -> a cat with a white tail (un gato con cola blanca)  
>  目が青い猫 -> a cat with blue eyes (un gato con ojos azules)  
>  目の色が違う猫 -> a cat with different colored eyes (un gato con ojos de colores
> diferentes)

EDIT: As for the other sentence structure you mentioned:

> 猫の目の色が違う

This is a simple, standard sentence. It means "The eye color of the cat is
different/wrong/changed"

Let's parse both sentences to see why this is:

> [ (目の色) が違う] 猫  
>  [ (eye color) is different ] cat  
>  [ (color de ojo) es diferente ] gato

This is describing the cat. The cat's eye colors are different (from one
another).

> [ 猫の (目の色) ] が違う  
>  [ cat's (eye color) ] is different  
>  [ del gato (color de ojo) ] es diferente

This is describing the difference. What is different? The cat's eye colors
(not from one another, but from something else or a different time.)

EDIT 2: Added Spanish into the examples.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-08-24T23:14:33.417
52681
2017-08-24T23:30:10.617
2017-08-24T23:30:10.617
21684
21684
52677
answer
> 猫の目の色が違う＝The cat has eyes in a different color. The color of the eyes of the
> cat is different.

This is a sentence.

> 目の色が違う猫="A cat that has eyes in different color"

This is a noun **clause**. Not a (complete) sentence.

> 私は、目の色が違う猫を 見たことがありません。 ＝I haven't seen cats that have eyes in different
> colors.

For example, this is a sentence that has the noun clause.

I just wonder if there is no (noun) **clause** in Spanish grammar, but I don't
think so.

Hope this helps!
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-08-24T23:23:53.823
52682
2017-08-24T23:29:41.923
2017-08-24T23:29:41.923
52677
answer