76493
> 「危機対応融資」は、災害や金融危機などで一時的に業績が悪化した場合に、融資を受けられる制度です。

I don't think it make sense if "悪化した場合" is interpreted as past tense in this
sentence.

Will the original meaning be altered somehow if it is updated into "悪化する場合"?
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-04-11T00:08:11.277
76488
2020-04-11T04:51:46.717
2020-04-11T01:01:43.600
34004
34004
question
grammar
What is the difference between "悪化した場合" and "悪化する場合"?
Yes,悪化した does make sense in the past tense and should maintain so. In fact it
is the non-past tense (i.e.悪化する) that doesnt make sense.

To put it simply, 悪化した and not 悪化する because bussiness perfmance has been
worsened (悪化した), not will be worsened(悪化する).

It only make sense to provide 危機対応融資 to bussiness whose performance has been
worsened by natural disaster or financial crisis. Therefore, 悪化 is a thing in
the past and should be in past tense
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-04-11T04:51:46.717
76493
2020-04-11T04:51:46.717
17942
76488
answer