A recurrent problem I have with the word やはり (also やっぱり) is that when I apply
the various standard definitions for this word, I end up with translations
that are quite different from each other, and I don't know how to decide which
of these translations most fairly represents the original.

To see what I mean, suppose A and B are chatting about a common acquaintance
C. At some point, A claims that he/she (A) would have acted differently from
how C is acting. In reply, B explains away A's claim by pointing out that A's
and C's life situations are completely different.

Now, suppose that at this point A replies to B like this:

> もし自分がCの立場だったと仮定したら、 **やはり** そうするだろう。 (❶)

One possible translation, based on interpreting as やはり as "still, as before",
would render ❶ as A's _rebuttal_ of what B said:

> If I were in C's position, I would **still** act that way [i.e. the way I
> said before, and _differently_ from the way C is acting].

On the other hand, a translation of ❶ based on a different meaning of やはり
would render it as A's _concession_ of B's point:

> If I were in C's position, I would, **as one would expect** , act that way
> [i.e. _the same_ way C is acting].

Furthermore, in a context slightly different from the one I sketched above, I
can imagine A offering the following by way of _summation_ :

> If I were in C's position, I would, **after all** [apparent differences
> notwithstanding], act that way [i.e. the way C is acting].

Of course, I realize that what seems reasonable to my non-native ear may very
well strike native speakers as _way off_. In other words, it could be that,
contrary to what I just wrote, at most one (and maybe none!) of the
translations above corresponds to the way a native speaker would understand
sentence ❶.

So, to be specific: Which of the translations above is/are possible? Which
is/are likely? What's the basis for the difference? Is _yet another_
translation distinctly better than all the ones proposed above?
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-12-02T15:05:15.953
97479
2022-12-03T22:44:12.540
2022-12-02T15:20:28.590
1749
1749
question
translation
Different meanings of やはり produce very different, but plausible, translations
Hopefully the following helps clarify some of your doubts although it may not
directly answer your questions.

**still vs. after all**

I think these two are mostly the same
([大辞泉](https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/%E7%9F%A2%E5%BC%B5%E3%82%8A/#jn-222453)
#3) and it is a matter of translation (and contexts).

  * Apple製品は高価だが、自分はやはり好きだ.
  * Apple products are expensive, but I still like it.

Here I think using _after all_ doesn't change the meaning (or you could even
say _I still like it after all_ ).

If the context suggests:

  * The speaker likes Apple despite their ripping off, _still_ may be better;
  * The speaker tried other brands, _after all_ may be more precise.

It may depend also on the nature/tense/aspect of the verb (好き in this case)
which of _still_ and _after all_ is better.

**as expected**

This also isn't totally distinct from _still/after all_ , but one thing is
that usually the speaker also expects it, so in the case of your example

  * If I were in C's position, I would, as one would expect, act that way

is off in a strict sense (at least from my understanding of the translation).
_I would do it as I expect it_ makes little sense.

A more ordinary example would be:

  * 彼は忙しいと言っていたがやはり今日の会合に来なかった
  * He said he was busy and, as expected, he didn't come to today's meeting.

Here it is possible that やはり means _after all_ , e.g. in case the speaker
didn't think he was that busy. (Another point: probably using _still_ is
difficult here.)
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-12-03T05:40:41.577
97484
2022-12-03T22:44:12.540
2022-12-03T22:44:12.540
45489
45489
97479
answer