Japanese counters such as 一つ are adverbs even though they describe nouns such
as in the following sentence.

> りんごを一つ食べた

It is clear that 一つ refers to the amount of apples. However, what do adverbs
such as たくさん and ちょっと refer to when they are used, the amount of nouns the
verb was done to or the amount of the verb that was done? For example

> りんごをたくさん食べた

Does たくさん refer to the amount of apples eaten or does it refer to the amount
of the verb done such as how "a lot" describes how much running was done in a
sentence like "yesterday, I ran a lot"? Some other examples are

> 人がたくさん死んだ
>
> Many people died.
>
> 私はたくさん死んだ
>
> I died a lot.

I am not sure if these interpretations are correct, mainly because I don't
know if たくさん as an adverb describes the noun or the verb. The former has たくさん
seemingly describe the amount of nouns, but the latter has たくさん describe the
amount of the verb done. ちょっと is also confusing. りんごをちょっと食べた sounds natural,
but 人がちょっと死んだ doesn't sounds natural and does not feel like an opposite of
人がたくさん死んだ.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-10-31T04:30:21.833
28950
2017-03-12T08:39:45.863
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
7712
question
grammar adverbs quantifiers
How do adverbs denoting amounts such as たくさん and ちょっと work?
It has to do a lot with the particle used after the subject, but the thinking
is a little bit different than in English.

You can use just たくさん食べた without any subject before it, and it still works
depending on the context.

These kind of adverbs are ambiguous in nature. If there is a context then it
modifies the context, but if there isn't one, it's a verb modifier.

> ちょっと食べた
>
> (I) ate a little
>
> りんごをちょっと食べた
>
> (I) ate a little of the apple

Also, if you want to be less ambiguous, you should use these modifiers before
the subject (But be careful, not all modifiers can be used)

> りんごをたくさん食べた
>
> (I) ate a lot of apples (ambiguous)
>
> たくさんのりんごを食べた
>
> (I) ate a lot of apples (unambiguous)
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-11-04T05:32:06.960
29007
2015-11-04T05:32:06.960
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
11485
28950
answer
It's the excellent question! I've never thought it, but it is obviously
confusing.

> OK:子供が、りんごをたくさん食べた。＝子供が、たくさんのりんごを食べた。

"食べる" is a transitive verb, so it requires an object.  
The statement just "たくさん食べた" is incomplete, an object is required.

Even you can say "たくさん" of "たくさん食べた" modifies "食べた," but semantically "たくさん"
modifies the object of "食べた" or "りんご." Thus "りんごをたくさん食べた" means
"たくさんのりんごを食べた." "たくさん" semantically modifies "りんご."

OK:妹が、りんごを一つ食べた。＝妹が、一つのりんごを食べた。  
OK:私は、りんごをちょっと食べた。＝私は、ちょっとのりんごを食べた。

Actually we say "たくさんのりんご," "一つのりんご," but don't say "ちょっとのりんご." Even
"ちょっとのりんご" is an odd expression it could make sense as "small amount of
apples".

> OK: "人がたくさん死んだ" = "たくさんの人が死んだ"  
>  NG: "私はたくさん死んだ" = "たくさんの私は死んだ"  
>  "たくさんの私" doesn't make sense.

"死ぬ" is an intransive verb, it doesn't require an object. It requires a
subject.

In the senence "<主語>がたくさん死んだ," "たくさん" semantically modifies <主語> as
"たくさんの<主語>," then <主語> in this context has to have plural form. So we can take
"人", "魚{さかな}" or "兵士" as the subject of "たくさん死んだ", but we can't take "私."

I as a Buddhist can say "神がたくさんいます。" I can't say "妻がたくさんいます。"
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-10T08:13:20.197
43376
2017-02-10T08:13:20.197
19219
28950
answer