I have seen that the verb 困る, an intransitive verb, is translated in English
as "to have trouble", "to be troubled" or even "to have a hard time". These
are grammatically correct in English, but could you suggest a translation that
would make me understand how Japanese people understand the verb, in non-
grammatical English (like how 分かる can be translated as "to do
understandable/to do discernible" instead of "to understand", explaining it's
が particle in phrases, or how 寿司が好きです doesn't mean "I like sushi" but more
"sushi are likeable", in terms of grammar)?

The reason I am asking is because I am observing different phrases that make
it hard to understand the verb with the English translations mentionned above.
I have seen for example:

"彼女はお金を困っています"

Considering 困る is intransitive, if 彼女 is the grammatical subject (is it?) of
困っています, why is there a を particle after お金 (and not a に as in "僕はしばしばお金に困る"
which makes more sense to me). It looks here as if the grammatical subject is
doing the action on the object "お金".

Furthermore, in a phrase like "彼が来なかったらこまるね", would the subject here be the
null が particle (aka me, the speaker)?

I would like to be able to understand how 困る works in all types of sentences
(sentences with 困る, 困っている and 困った) rather than memorise English translations
for specific context phrases. There are a lot of questions in this post, but
an explanation would really help me grasp how this expression works... Feel
free to provide examples, thank you for reading this post!
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-02-26T08:56:56.447
98710
2023-02-26T10:57:03.047
54803
question
grammar translation transitivity subjects
The grammatical subject associated with 困る
I think you already understand the basic meaning of 困る well enough. Some
Japanese intransitive verbs have no good intransitive equivalent in English,
and you have to use other types of expression (e.g. a passive form) to
understand them. 驚く is another classic example of this; it's hard to explain
the meaning of this intransitive verb without using a passive form ("to be
surprised").

What's really wrong is that example sentence. 彼女はお金 **を** 困っています is plain
ungrammatical, and it's a kind of mistake a native speaker almost never makes.
The correct sentence is 彼女はお金 **に** 困っています or 彼女はお金 **で** 困っています. If you've
really seen this on a learning site, you may need to check its credibility.

As for 彼が来なかったら困るね, the implicit subject of 困る is the speaker ("I"). 彼が is the
subject of only the subordinate clause (if-clause) part.

> 彼が来なかったら(私は)困るね。  
>  If **he** doesn't come, **I** will be in trouble.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-02-26T10:44:08.967
98713
2023-02-26T10:57:03.047
2023-02-26T10:57:03.047
5010
5010
98710
answer