I casually used を in the sentence クマを会いました。I was corrected with
クマに会いました。Checking references and sample sentences I found no を examples. I
think there is something fundamental about を and に that I do not understand.
Can this be explained? And yes, I met a bear the other day.

I realize this is related to indirect objects. The bear is the indirect object
the "I" met. So に is used with certain verbs in indirect object sentences but
I think this is only part of the explanation. Comments welcome.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-08-14T19:39:13.827
88919
2021-12-30T01:40:11.520
2021-08-18T14:47:31.520
9831
46878
question
verbs particle-に particle-を transitivity
に versus を with 会いました verb
I cannot explain well, but I will give you some sample sentences.

I found a bear. 私はクマを見つけました。  
I ate a bear. 私はクマを食べました。

I talked to a bear. 私はクマに話しかけました。  
He looks like a bear. 彼はクマに似ています。

I guess, if the object and the subject are on equal terms, we use "に."
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-08-14T22:22:55.310
88920
2021-08-15T01:51:30.860
2021-08-15T01:51:30.860
9831
45389
88919
answer
It has to do with the etymology of the verb 会う. It has the same origin as 合う,
and its core image is that of something coming close to something else. (合う
describes a desirable result of that.) The particle に can be understood as
indicating the target of that somewhat directional movement.

By the way, if the other party is a person, you can also use と.

> 昨日、彼女 **と** 会いました。

This sounds like the meeting was prearranged by both parties, and therefore,
「昨日、クマ **と** 会いました」 sounds surreal. For the same reason, と is not suitable for
an accidental encounter with someone. It should be に as the target marker.

I don’t think you should doubt your understanding of を and に just because of
this. You should simply treat it as a special case where English and Japanese
express the same idea differently.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-08-15T00:30:57.470
88921
2021-12-30T01:40:11.520
2021-12-30T01:40:11.520
43676
43676
88919
answer