86625
I searched for other questions about nested relative clauses, and while they
seem possible, most examples seem to have particles inside the nested
structure:

> ワインが詳しい人と飲む機会がないので、楽しみにしています。

Here we have the particle と connecting two relative clauses 「ワインが詳しい人」 and
「飲む機会」

But can I say something like:

> この問題と関係ある飛んでいる（Githubの）イシューがあります。- There is an issue going around that is
> related to this problem.

Is **「関係ある飛んでいるイシュー」** a valid and grammatical sentence?

Or would I have to say it like this:

> この問題と関係あるイシューが飛んでいます。- The issue that is related to this problem is going
> around.

I feel like the meaning or maybe the nuance is not quite the same...

not a 100% sure how to translate 飛んでいる to english here as well.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-05-13T17:38:16.603
86613
2021-05-14T11:10:40.297
16104
question
grammar relative-clauses
Can relative clauses be nested without particles in between?
I think what you are looking for is something like this.

> 昨日テレビで見た、大ヒットした映画

映画 here was taken out of the following two sentences to be modified by both at
the same time.

> 昨日テレビで映画を見た。

> （その）映画は大ヒットした。

I don’t see it as a nested relationship, though. I see it as a sequential
relationship, where two relative clauses are placed one after the other.

If this is what you were looking for, yes, It is possible. However, care must
be taken. Although it’s not the case with the above example, ambiguity could
easily arise, as in the following example.

> 昨日食べた、お母さんが作った料理

Without the comma, the food could be interpreted as having been prepared by
昨日食べたお母さん. And this _is_ a nested relationship as I see it. The relative
clause 昨日食べたお母さん (with the particle が) is part of a bigger relative clause
that as a whole modifies the noun 料理.

Lastly, I would have little trouble understanding what you mean if you said
something like:

> この問題と関係のある、（今）飛び交っている障害

I’m not familiar with your use of 飛んでいる.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-05-14T11:10:40.297
86625
2021-05-14T11:10:40.297
43676
86613
answer