I have a sentence like this:

> 今はその解決に色々とアプローチをかけとる **感じでして**
>
> 試作機のテストをCら共々 手伝わせてもろてる **感じなんです**

It's a part of dialogue where A is giving a report to person B about progress
on her project. Although this is a bit in media res, as in we cut into this
conversation right at this line.

But anyway. I'm wondering what 感じでして and 感じなんです (which is probably 感じなのです) are
meant to convey. I imagine it's supposed to mean that A thinks/feels these
things? Like

> Right now, I feel trying various approaches to solving the problem (will
> help?)
>
> and I also feel all of C to help with prototype testing (will help?)

I assume the help bit is to be assumed from context, since they are talking
about a project?

What I'm also wondering is, is she PROPOSING this course of action? Or is she
saying, like, that she feels geting C's aid in testing is helping them?

Oh and of course is there a meaning difference between 感じなんする, 感じでして?

Like the former is more of a statement of feeling, but the later?
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-01-11T12:32:49.497
55863
2020-12-26T02:33:30.140
2020-12-26T02:33:30.140
37097
26839
question
translation meaning kansai-ben
感じなんです, 感じでして meaning and translation issues
These instances of 感じ don't contribute much to the content of the sentence.
They are almost like fillers, like the English "like". Hence this translation:

> Right now, I'm, like, trying various approach to solving the problem and,
> like, helping with the prototype testing, with C and others, you know.

The meaning wouldn't change if they were removed and the sentence went like
this:

> 今はその解決に色々とアプローチをかけとりまして
>
> 試作機のテストをCら共々 手伝わせてもろてるんです

except that now the speaker would sound less like a person who's not totally
sure about what she's talking about.

The usual semantic difference between ～(な)んです and ～です (of which ～でして is the
te-form) is the that former has an explanatory tone (meaning it indicates a
statement is offered as an explanation for a given state of affairs), which
the latter doesn't have.

But in this case the difference in form is due to the fact that the sentence
in question consists of two coordinate clauses and only the latter needs to be
in the なんです form to give the whole sentence an explanatory tone.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-01-11T15:30:45.750
55870
2018-01-11T15:30:45.750
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
11575
55863
answer