14490
In the chapter [Things that should be a certain
way](http://www.guidetojapanese.org/learn/grammar/should) of Tae Kim's guide,
the author states that in order to express the expectation of something not
happening, one should use something like 「～はずがない」. I was wondering if the
Japanese language distinguishes phrases like "I don't expect him to come" vs.
"I expect him not to come"? In other words, are both of these acceptable:

  * 彼は来るはずがない
  * 彼は来ないはずだ

If not, are there other constructs to express this?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-14T10:59:12.407
14484
2020-12-06T04:58:58.660
3527
question
grammar
Using negative verb forms with はず
I think those two sentences are equally acceptable. As for the other way,
彼が来るはずはない. In 彼は来るはずがない, "he" is the point of attention, and this expression
implies other persons except him will come, like 彼女は来るはず. In 彼は来ないはずだ, "won't
come" is the point of attention, and this implies he will do other actions,
like 彼は他の場所へ行くだろう. In 彼が来るはずはない, "彼がくるはず" is a noun clause.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-14T15:28:38.590
14486
2014-02-14T15:28:38.590
14484
answer
Both are acceptable.

But note that each of them has a different meaning. And these meanings are
subtly different.

> 彼は来ないはずです。

= We have the expectation that he won't come.

> 彼は来るはずがない。

= We do not have an expectation that he is coming.

The difference here is that we are stating our expectation in the first case.
In the second, we are negating an expectation. In the first the expectation is
negative. In the second, the expectation is positive. Turned into a chart:

```

                        ～ないはず       ～はずがない      ～ないはずではない
    
    Expectation         -                +                  -
    Statement           +                -                  -
    Net Statement       -                -                  +
    
```

来るはずがない is understood to be stronger than 来ないはずです in terms of the strength of
our belief he wont' come by native speakers.

* * *

> 彼は来るわけがない。

= We have no reason to expect he will come.

But

> どうりで彼は来ないわけです

= It's no wonder he doesn't come
CC BY-SA 4.0
2014-02-15T04:07:30.263
14490
2020-12-06T04:58:58.660
2020-12-06T04:58:58.660
30454
4091
14484
answer
I am going to offer a simpler explanation making reference to the previous
answers and comments (avoiding any consideration of changing は or が ) :

Both are acceptable, both indicate the actor is not expected to visit but
there is a difference which can be shown by the following which are quite
close to the normal translation of はず into standard English:

> 彼は来ないはずです。| I expect he won't come.
>
> 彼は来るはずがない。| I have no expectation of him coming [at all].

As explained by 明鏡国語辞典 (in Snailplane's comment), the second case is much
stronger because the speaker is excluding any possiblity of the actor coming.
(皆無＝＞"There is no chance he is coming.")

**わけ＜＝＞はず**

This was not part of the question but it is a worthwhile comparison:

はずがない and わけがない are taught as interchangeable. I rationalise this on the basis
that わけ is used to convey circumstances or a reason, as follows:

彼は来るわけがない。

He has no reason to come.

or

He is not coming under any circumstances.

(~There are no circumstances under which he will come.)

=> I have no expectation of him coming [at all].

The expression 「彼は来ないわけです。」, on the other hand, might be used to explain:
"That is because he is not coming.", or depending on the situation: "Yes but
he is not coming."
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-15T17:26:50.160
14499
2014-02-15T18:25:29.083
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
1556
14484
answer