So this is my first time tying to convert handwriting to text, and its left me
with a few questions.

Line 6 Char 2; I would say is likely せ but I've not come across any instance
where stroke 3 can extend below stroke 2, nor can I find a Kanji that comes
closer. It this correct?

Line 5 char 4; I would say is likely 這, since I can find a font that has the
radical 言 with a vertical carrot on top instead of a bar, however that font
doesn't have 這. Is changing top bars to carrots common?

Line 4 char13; 石 is really small, so I would expect to radical attached to 亦
but as I fail to find a matching Kanji, I have to assume the tininess is just
inconstancy in Kanji size?

Did I get anything else wrong?

The Hand wring is from an authors response to a reader (typed) question.

![Nervous author response](https://i.stack.imgur.com/aFOcE.jpg)

Text version

```

    As Submitted                       As Corrected By Answers
    ブルマ！？                           ブルマ！？
    ブルマの魅カですか！？                 ブルマの魅カですか！？
    ブルマのすそがちょっとズして              ブルマのすそがちょっとズレて
    赤くなったフトモモのブル石亦              赤くなったフトモモのブル石亦 
    に舌む這ゆせたいです！                 に舌を這わせたいです！
    ふせの柔うかい肉体む                   少女の柔らかい肉体を
    舌先で、ブルマの尓の息触                舌先で、ブルマの布の感触
    む舌のサイドでじながう                   を舌のサイドで感じながら 
    思う存分舐め回したいです！               思う存分舐め回したいです！
    
```
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-23T18:23:53.337
15544
2014-04-23T20:50:38.270
2014-04-23T20:50:38.270
3010
5211
question
handwriting
Handwriting liberties
> Line 6 Char 2; I would say is likely せ but I've not come across any instance
> where stroke 3 can extend below stroke 2, nor can I find a Kanji that comes
> closer. It this correct?

You wrote ふせ. It should be 少女.

> Line 5 char 4; I would say is likely 這, since I can find a font that has the
> radical 言 with a vertical carrot on top instead of a bar, however that font
> doesn't have 這. Is changing top bars to carrots common?

I don't know why you're calling them "carrots" but yes, it's common.

> Line 4 char13; 石 is really small, so I would expect to radical attached to 亦
> but as I fail to find a matching Kanji, I have to assume the tininess is
> just inconstancy in Kanji size?

Yeah, this is strange. I'm hoping someone else will answer on this... It looks
like a radical attached to 亦, but like you I can find no such kanji. ブル石亦
doesn't make any sense either though lol. I would like to say that they just
mis-wrote it, but I would be more confident saying that if I could guess what
word they actually wanted to write.

EDIT: From the context in the following paragraph, I'm fairly sure they meant
to write ブル跡. It doesn't have any useful results on google, but it has a
precedent in ブラ跡 which is a common word (ブラジャーの跡→ブラ跡、、、ブルマの跡→ブル跡).

> Did I get anything else wrong?

這 **ゆ** せたい should be わ. Yes, writing the start of the 2nd stroke of わ、れ、ね
like this is common.

舌 **む** should be を.

柔 **う** かい should be 柔らかい.

肉体 **む** should be を too.

ブルマの **尓** should be 布{ぬの}.

息触む should be 感触を.

舌のサイドで **じながう** should be 感じながら.

Just like reading someone's handwriting in your native language, some of it
comes down to figuring it out from the surrounding context/word. The verb 這う
is never going to become 這ゆせる, 肉体む doesn't make any sense, etc.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-23T18:51:22.067
15545
2014-04-23T20:48:08.170
2014-04-23T20:48:08.170
3010
3010
15544
answer
Looking up the character `亦` on its own shows 1) it is a kanji variant of
`また（又)`, and 2) that it has several 人名 readings. So I'm gonna go out on a limb
and say `石亦` is possibly the name `いしまた` or `いしばた`.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-23T19:19:44.797
15546
2014-04-23T19:19:44.797
78
15544
answer