50557
> 授業は粛々と進行している。音 **と** といえば、黒板にチョークを走らせる音や、教科書をめくる音だけ。

音と vs just 音? Feels redundant if followed by といえば.

> A: 『宗教倫理』っていうのが時間割にあるけど、それは初めてだけどね
>
> B: それは普通の道徳 **と** 捉えていただいて結構よ。ミッション系としての特色はありますけどね

_Speaker asked about a religious morals class_

> As for the class, if you grasp normal morals (for us/the school) , that
> would be great ?? , ...

普通の道徳と... vs 普通の道徳が... ? hard to fit it as the quotative particle here.

The conditional usage feels similarly clunky for both sentences.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2017-07-20T02:53:01.523
50551
2021-10-11T16:52:51.057
2021-10-11T16:52:51.057
30454
22187
question
particle-と
Use of と in 「音とといえば」 and 「普通の道徳と捉えていただいて結構」
音とといえば is a simple typo. You don't need two と here. The sentence should be:

> 音といえば、黒板にチョークを走らせる音や、教科書をめくる音だけ。

* * *

> それは普通の道徳と捉えていただいて結構よ。  
>  You can think of it as a normal (i.e., not particularly Christianity-
> related) moral class.

  * **～と捉える** : "to regard (something) as ～", "to think of (something) as ～". This と is just a quotative particle. It's used with many verbs for thinking/regarding/interpreting (～と見なす, ～と解釈する, ...)
  * **(te-form) + 結構です** : "It's okay to ～", "Feel free to ～".
  * 道徳 here is one of the subjects taught at school, like 算数 (math), 体育 (PE) and 音楽 (music). See: [School subjects in Japan](https://ryohkei.tumblr.com/post/140237115829/school-subjects-in-japan)
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-07-20T05:46:35.220
50557
2017-07-20T05:46:35.220
5010
50551
answer