51680
I've read [Meaning and transitivity of
ゴミ袋を手に立ち上がる](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/20854/meaning-and-
transitivity-
of-%e3%82%b4%e3%83%9f%e8%a2%8b%e3%82%92%e6%89%8b%e3%81%ab%e7%ab%8b%e3%81%a1%e4%b8%8a%e3%81%8c%e3%82%8b)
before, but i'm looking to confirm some things where AをBに(して)is not the case.

> 彼女の視線 **を** 一身 **に** 浴びて、私は身が縮む思いだった。
>
> basking my body under her gaze, I feel my body shrink.

Basking with 彼女の視線 on 一身?Is there a more intuitive way to read this it
literally?

> 突如として、ザーザーと叩きつけるように降り出した雨は、これからの波乱 **を** 、私 **に** 予感させるに充分だった。
>
> all of a sudden, the disturbance following the sudden pouring rain,
> satisfies my premonitions.?

Simplifying as 波乱を、私に予感させるに充分だった... I am fairly sure 波乱を<-予感させる as 予感させる is
made to be transitive.

Am I to to interpret 予感させるに充分だった as 予感させるに(は)充分だった (for the purpose of 予感させる,
充分! ) ?.

波乱を、私に予感させるに充分だった = the disturbance, for me, predicting it(the disturbance) is
satisfactory?

Thanks for the help.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-07-23T04:56:06.843
51636
2017-07-24T06:08:47.937
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
22187
question
grammar particle-に
Clarifications regarding the AをBに。。。 construction
> [ゴミ袋を手に(adv phrase)] 立ち上がる (it)
>
> [視線を (DirectObject)] [一身に (IndirectObject)] 浴びる (tv)
>
> [波乱を (DirectObject)]、[私に (IndirectObject)] 予感させる (tv)

I am not very sure what you mean by saying "波乱を<-予感させる as 予感させる is made to be
transitive."

Isn't 予感させる transitive even if it's not in causative form? 波乱を予感する also
stands. It's in the causative form because it says 私に.  
波乱を **私に予感させる**  
波乱を **私が予感する**

> Am I to to interpret 予感させるに充分だった as 予感させるに(は)充分だった (for the purpose of
> 予感させる, 充分! ) ?.

Yes, 予感させるに（は）充分だった, meaning that it was enough for the purpose of making 'me'
predict it.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-07-24T06:08:47.937
51680
2017-07-24T06:08:47.937
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
22422
51636
answer