12824
Is it okay to use に to mark the caller when using 電話がかかる? i.e. A received a
call from B would be

> AはBに電話がかかった。

Google seems to indicate that から is a much more popular choice than に. I find
it a bit strange, since I thought (whenever both に and から are viable options)
に was preferred for agents and から for sources, and receiving a phone call
seems more like the former case.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-09-14T15:11:51.570
12822
2013-09-15T11:38:17.343
3848
question
particle-に particle-から
Use of に to mark the caller of 電話がかかる
In the sentence

> ◯◯に電話がかかった

に indicates the _recipient_ of the phone call. It would be very confusing if
you suddenly tried to indicate the _caller_ with に as well. に and から are not
both viable options to indicate the caller, because に is already used to
indicate the recipient.

If you used に to indicate the caller, it would be like trying to say "I got a
package from him" this way:

> 彼に荷物が届いた

which actually means "he received a package."

You can say "A got a call from B" like this:

> AにBから電話がかかった

or more commonly

> AにBから電話がかかってきた

If you are the recipient of the call, you can omit the に part and it will be
understood:

> Bから電話がかかってきた  
>  I got a call from B
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-09-14T20:41:16.243
12824
2013-09-14T21:09:49.813
2013-09-14T21:09:49.813
3794
3794
12822
answer
I think you need to look at the nature and type of verb.

かかる is an intransitive verb of direction ("virtual motion" in cyber space) and
the sentence describes the direction of the subject, the telephone call: It is
natural to describe the starting and finishing points with から and に.

It would be different if this were a transitive verb, or an action being done
by one person for/to another. In such cases に might be preferred to から,
particularly with a 〜てもらう（etc) type of construction.

Read "ThisSuitisBlackNot"'s answer with this in mind.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-09-15T01:28:32.093
12827
2013-09-15T11:38:17.343
2013-09-15T11:38:17.343
1556
1556
12822
answer