30363
> 詩の生命は暗示にして単なる事象の説明には非ず。
> **かの筆にも言語にも言ひ尽し難き情趣の限なき振動のうちに幽かなる心霊の欷歔をたづね、縹渺たる音楽の愉楽に憧がれて自己観想の悲哀に誇る、これわが象徴の本旨に非ずや**
> 。されば我らは神秘を尚び... [full](http://www.nextftp.com/y_misa/kita/kita_j01.html)

Is it (syntax-wise) correct to
take（かの筆にも言語にも言ひ尽し難き情趣の限なき振動のうちに幽かなる心霊の欷歔をたづね、縹渺たる音楽の愉楽に憧がれて自己観想の悲哀に誇る）as a
clause that describes これ, and the whole sentence (in 口語) as something like
～るこれは わが象徴の本旨ではないよ。? I can't make sense of it, because taking it this way
contradicts the idea in the previous sentence (or seems to me this way).
CC BY-SA 4.0
2016-01-11T17:15:55.807
30357
2021-11-23T18:09:28.897
2021-11-23T18:09:28.897
30454
12127
question
syntax classical-japanese
かの筆にも言語にも言ひ尽し難き情趣の限なき振動のうちに幽かなる心霊の欷歔をたづね、縹渺たる音楽の愉楽に憧がれて自己観想の悲哀に誇る
Yes, これ refers to
かの筆にも言語にも言ひ尽し難き情趣の限なき振動のうちに幽かなる心霊の欷歔をたづね、縹渺たる音楽の愉楽に憧がれて自己観想の悲哀に誇る. Note that
かの…誇る does not modify これ, but かの…誇る and これ are in apposition.

What you got incorrectly is …に非ずや. や signifies a question, including a
rhetorical question, which is the case here. So …に非ずや literally means …ではないか
but it actually means …である.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-01-11T21:04:02.107
30363
2016-01-11T21:04:02.107
15
30357
answer