In an [IMABI article on 後](https://www.imabi.net/after.htm), the author
explains the difference between **～後には** and **～後にも** :

> It's also possible to see ～後には and ～後にも. The meanings of the individual
> particles do not behave any differently. **If you wish to emphasize that
> Action/State B occurs right after Action A, you use ～後にも. If you wish to
> emphasize that Action B/State B occurs right after Action A, then you use
> ～後には.**

I believe the author made a mistake in the bolded sentence, since he says the
same thing about both ～後には and ～後にも?

**Question:** What is the difference between the following 3 sentences? (I put
my guesses in parentheses).

  1. 嵐の **後に** 凪が来る。 ("After a storm comes the calm")
  2. 嵐の **後にも** 凪が来る。(" _Even_ after a storm comes the calm"?)
  3. 嵐の **後には** 凪が来る。("After _as little as a storm_ comes the calm"??)
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-11-04T02:12:38.583
97011
2022-12-07T14:03:15.520
2022-11-04T03:42:59.623
43676
51280
question
particle-は particle-も
Difference between 後にも and 後には?
* 嵐の後に凪が来る。 ("After a storm comes the calm") -> OK.
  * 嵐の後にも凪が来る。("Even after a storm comes the calm") -> OK
  * 嵐の後には凪が来る。 -> I think "A calm always comes after a storm"
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-11-06T08:30:46.597
97055
2022-11-07T13:42:53.050
2022-11-07T13:42:53.050
35230
54823
97011
answer
I am not an expert, so I could be wrong, but based on what I've seen (and my
general understanding of the particles involved too), I would interpret those
sentences as:

嵐の後に凪が来る。 "After the storm comes the calm" (suggesting a specific instance)  
嵐の後にも凪が来る。"After even a storm comes a calm" (in addition to other things that
calm comes after)  
嵐の後には凪が来る。"After a storm comes a calm" (in general)
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-11-06T18:36:17.487
97064
2022-11-06T18:36:17.487
35230
97011
answer