27877
There is a phrase 罪を着せる translated (J-to-E) as "charge someone with a crime",
"pin a crime to someone", "assign guilt to someone". So a crime has been
committed and one takes actions to attribute blame for the committed crime to
someone else.

But ALC also shows 罪を着せる when searching for "to frame someone" (E-to-J). Here
the English phrase could also be used in a situation where someone takes
actions before the actual crime was committed, so that blame would fall to a
target person.

Can I use Japanese 罪を着せる in the latter situation (meaning something like
将来の罪を着せる)?

If not what would be the proper Japanese phrase to describe setting someone
else up, framing somebody? たくらむ feels to broad for this meaning, doesn't it?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-06T23:35:13.150
27862
2015-09-07T15:51:48.477
2015-09-07T00:29:38.047
11104
11104
question
word-choice
Can I use 罪を着せる to describe actions before a crime was committed?
Yes, you can say something like this:

>   * 彼に罪を着せるために、あらかじめ彼のスーツに香水の臭いを付けておいた。
>   * その電話は、彼女に罪を着せようとして仕掛けられた罠だったのです。
>
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-07T08:48:05.107
27868
2015-09-07T08:48:05.107
5010
27862
answer
When someone does [罪]{つみ}を[着]{き}せる, if there is no 罪, it's impossible to do
着せる, so 罪 is supposed to exist. However, it's possible that 罪を着せる is used to
express actions related with prospective 罪, as mentioned by narutoさん in the
answer.

The expression 罪を着せる does not specify what someone actually does. So, the
actual action of 罪を着せる could be lying, remaining silent, blaming someone else
without proof, destroying real evidences, inventing fake evidences or things
like that.

But whatever s/he does, the point of 罪を着せる is that s/he "puts the blame on
someone who is innocent" or "sets someone up to take the fall."

It doesn't matter much who is guilty of the crime actually. Almost anyone can
be the subject of the idiom 罪を着せる. For example, let's say, there are four
people here and a crime occurred. No one, except the culprit and the witness,
knows who did that.

A: is guilty of the crime and keeps it secret.

B: is the witness and knows A did that.

C: is innocent and does not know anything about the crime.

D: is also innocent and does not know anything about the crime.

> 「ＡはＤに罪を着せた。」
>
> 「ＢはＤに罪を着せた。」
>
> 「ＣはＤに罪を着せた。」

These are all grammatical and valid usage of 罪を着せる.

The synonyms of 罪を着せる are

> 「[罪]{つみ}を[被]{かぶ}せる」
>
> 「[濡]{ぬ}れ[衣]{ぎぬ}を[着]{き}せる」
>
> etc.

If you want to express "deceiving" nuance rather than "blaming" nuance,
「仕立て上げる」 can be more suitable, I think.

> 「たまたまそこにいる[大学生]{だいがくせい}を、[犯人]{はんにん}に[仕]{し}[立]{た}て[上]{あ}げる。」
>
> 「いじめっ[子]{こ}が、いじめられっ子を、[悪者]{わるもの}に仕立てあげた。」

These examples are too sad if really happened. But both sentences are
grammatical, and both「犯人に仕立てあげる」 and 「悪者に仕立て上げる」 are common usage of 仕立て上げる.

In some situations, 「はめる」 and 「[罠]{わな}にかける」 can be used to describe a similar
nuance, as mentioned by user4092さん in the comment. 「[陥]{おとしい}れる」 can also
imply a similar meaning. These expressions mainly imply "deceive and drive
someone into an awful situation." So I guess that 罪を着せる can be one way of はめる,
罠にかける, or 陥れる, but it's not the only way to achieve them.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-07T15:51:48.477
27877
2015-09-07T15:51:48.477
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
10484
27862
answer