62401
> 通常なら流せる発言も、あるいは飲み込める怒りも、慣れない自給自足の生活でささくれだった神経では不可能になる人間がいるのだと。

context is about a group of people, trapped in the wilderness for a while.

To be able to talk normally, or to to be able hold back anger, due to this
unaccustomed self-sufficient lifestyle, their nerves deteriorated, things are
like that became impossible for some of them.

> 彼女の心のどこかに、歪んだ贖罪の心がわき起こる。こんなになってしまった先生を受け容れるのが、私に出来る数少ない贖罪の方法なのではないかと。

Marginally related to the first context

...To accept this disheveled sensei’s demands, would one of the few ways she
can atone for her sins right?

Speaker a 3rd person narrator of the story for both sentences. Is this just to
express a degree of uncertainy as if the narrator only thinking "___" is the
case? The narrator is omniscient, is this just to tease the reader?
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-10-24T19:36:27.620
62395
2018-10-25T02:26:05.043
2018-10-25T02:26:05.043
22187
22187
question
particle-と quotes
sentence ending と for third person narrators
The first one (人間がいるのだと) is probably an example of 倒置法 ("hyperbaton"), the use
of reversed word order for a dramatic effect. You should be able to find the
verb that corresponds to this quotative-と in the _previous_ context (考え直した,
気づいた, etc). Brackets are often omitted like this in Japanese even when direct
speech is used. と is an explicit quotation marker, so there is nothing wrong
if the third person narrator uses it.

  * [Ending sentences with "、と。"](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/62152/5010)
  * [Direct and indirect quotes](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/30584/5010)

The second one (贖罪の方法なのではないかと), it's still a quotative-と, and it explains
something in the previous sentence. It can be rephrased as:

> 彼女の心のどこかに、「こんなになってしまった先生を受け容れるのが、私に出来る数少ない贖罪の方法なのではないか」という、歪んだ贖罪の心がわき起こる。

Or you may think 思った/感じた is omitted after this と.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-10-25T02:05:42.330
62401
2018-10-25T02:17:09.417
2018-10-25T02:17:09.417
5010
5010
62395
answer