I have recently become aware of the difference between the English and
Japanese "sh" sounds, which I understand are formalized as the palato-alveolar
fricative [ʃ] and the voiceless alveolo-palatal fricative [ɕ]. I am trying to
correct my pronunciation from [ʃ] to [ɕ], but I can't seem to nail the right
sound. I discussed it with some Japanese friends and they suggested that I
pronounce it without opening my mouth as much (口の空間を狭くして) so that's what I
have been attempting, but it seems like that has somehow resulted in し often
being misheard as ひ (資料as肥料、代償as代表) and the like. I did some research online
and it seemed to reinforce what I was doing; I read somewhere that the
Japanese し is pronounced with a "flatter tongue," that is, the flat part of
the tongue behind the tip contacts the alveolar ridge. But the flatter I make
my tongue, the less sharp the "sh" sound becomes, and altogether it sounds
even more ひ-like.

Any thoughts, tips, or materials out there that could help me out? If I move
my tongue very close to the front of my mouth as I pronounce it I can produce
a much sharper "sh" sound, but is this correct? I feel like I"m using the tip
of my tongue more than the blade in this case but maybe I'm wrong? Any advice
you could provide me with would be incredibly helpful!
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-06-01T12:19:22.197
24704
2020-08-01T15:14:30.147
2015-09-15T04:29:16.470
10235
question
pronunciation phonetics
Native pronunciation of the character "し”
Shape of the tongue aside, what's important is that you're placing the tip of
your tongue against your lower teeth. Try placing the tip of your tongue right
where your lower teeth go into your gums. Thinking about the shape of the
tongue in the mouth makes little difference; it's more about where the tip is
in your mouth (as with all consonants).

![Position of tongue in ⟨ɕ⟩](https://i.stack.imgur.com/1CtpH.png)

Here's a picture. Don't focus on what the tongue looks like in the mouth (it's
just a blob, as tongues are, and won't help). Look at where it meets the
teeth. Try make a fricative there yourself, and compare yourself with native
pronunciation until you think the two match.

If you don't get it within minutes of practicing, that's generally not a huge
issue, as hearing the lanuage more will make the sounds easier to mimic, but I
think consonants are easy enough to figure out just by thinking about it
(vowels are usually how people sound the most "foreign" in a language, because
there's a lot more variation).
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-06-01T14:00:52.067
24705
2015-06-01T14:00:52.067
9185
24704
answer
This method may or may not work, and will probably work better if one be a
native speaker of some form of British English, but try saying “syi” as in the
onset of “suit”, when it be pronounced as “syoot” instead.

The British English realization of “sy”, as distinct from “sh” is actually
fairly close, and also shares the same underlying phonemic sequence with the
Japanese sound. Remember that “sh” is not considered a single sound in
Japanese, it is rather analysed as a sequence of two sounds that simply
assimilate into each other in pronunciation.

Speakers of dialects of English that lack “sy” and pronounce “suit” identical
to “soot” might find it difficult to pronounce “sy”, however — one's mileage
may vary.

_P.S._ : I did a spectogram of British English: “soot”, “suit” and “shoot” as
well as a Japanese “しゅ”:

[![enter image description
here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/FpEHN.jpg)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/FpEHN.jpg)

The part with the dark bands at the bottom is where the vowel starts, before
that is the sibilant-like sound in each language where the dark band is at the
top. As you can see; in English “s” the dark band is at the top, and in
English “sh”, it is in the middle, whereas in the Japanese sound, it is in
between both, as well as in the English “sy” in “suit”.

One thing of interest is that English “s” and “sh” are constant, whereas in
English “sy”, the dark band moves noticeably. In the Japanese sound the band
also moves, but to a lesser degree, indicative of that in both languages these
are actually two sounds, not one, that to some extent transition into each
other.

In English “syoo” however, the vowel seems to have elements of a diphthong, as
one can see a dark band flowing down, and transitions from something more “i”
like to something more “u” like. This is præsent in the Japanese to a far
lesser extend and can probably be omitted, but the Japanese vowel in “しゅ” does
still seem to slow some slight progression from a i-like vowel to a u-like
vowel. Whereas in English “soot” and “shoot”, the u-like vowel after it is
nigh completely constant.

I also cut out the sounds used for comparison by ear, in the same order:

<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aILXJ-oWIYFB6wvb5agIrGKmuX_jniwe/view>

I also now did a spectogram of one speaker's rendition of the “し” in “知らない”,
to satisfy my own curiosity more than anything:

[![enter image description
here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AWBEJ.jpg)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AWBEJ.jpg)

This also seems to indicate a mild transition during the fricative, indicating
that the tongue position isn't constant, but to a far lesser extend than in
“しゅ” and certainly the English sample of “suit”. There are also more dark
bands in the middle at the end than at the start here.

So lessons to be learned from this:

  * the Japanese “し” and “しゅ” sound seems to be somewhat in between the English “s” and “sh” sounds, probably closest to “sy”, but a bit more in the “sh” direction than “sy” normally is in English.

  * The English “syoo” sound shows a far more prominent set of transitions than the Japanese “しゅ” sound, which shows more than the Japanese “し” sound, but both still show transition whereas English “soo” and “shoo” are constant.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-07-31T23:14:08.600
79907
2020-08-01T15:14:30.147
2020-08-01T15:14:30.147
35937
35937
24704
answer