46703
I encountered the following sentence in a book.

> 私は彼に今晩来る **の** か聞いた。

Okay, I guess the meaning is easy enough: _I asked him if he would come
tonight_. This の, however, was a slight surprise. Grammatically speaking,
since it comes after 来る, it has to be nominalization of some kind. But I have
no idea why か would require any kind of nominalization when it’s used for
indirect speech questions.

In fact, if I had to say something like this, I would most likely say:

> 彼に今晩来るかどうか聞いた。

Or even just:

> 彼に今晩来るか聞いた。

I thought of three (rather unsatisfying) explanations. First one: の (or のか) is
a common interrogation particle in casual speech, so one could say to a close
friend: 今晩来るの（か）？ However, I highly doubt that the の in the sentence is this
kind of の, since it does not sound like direct speech is quoted (at all).

My second idea would be that this の is an emphatic particle, just like when we
end a sentence with のだ・んだ. But why use it here? I have no idea.

The third option is regular nominalization, which is used here for some
reason. So the sentence would be (literally): _I asked him if the fact that he
will come is._ But then, why would this structure be used at all?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-17T08:29:38.230
46638
2017-04-19T13:30:56.643
question
particle-の questions quotes
Why is の used in this sentence?
This の is the same thing with のだ, as in your second option. The third one is
partially correct too, since the expression would be literally translated "it
is that".

The usage of のだ (non-question form of のか) has been a hot topic of debate,
despite, or because of its generality among Japanese utterance. The currently
widely agreed formulation is that using のだ indicates "relation" or "reference"
to existing shared premises in the context. This is a fairly vague idea, but
if you limit the scope down to _のだ with yes-no question_ , the explanation
would be greatly simplified.

> The simple yes-no question `V（ますか）？` asks the trueness of the fact, while
> のだ-fied yes-no question `Vの（ですか）？` that of the judgment.

For example:

> (You bring a bag of liquorice candies in front of your friends, and say...)  
>  ○ 食べる？ _Do you (wanna) eat?_  
>  × 食べるの？ _You (wanna) eat, is it true?_
>
> (You start to eat them by yourself, then notice that one of your friends is
> staring at you...)  
>  ○ 食べる？ _Do you (wanna) eat?_  
>  ○ 食べるの？ _You (wanna) eat, is it true (i.e. what I see in your face)?_
>
> (Finally they say they want to try them...)  
>  × 食べる？ _Do you (wanna) eat?_  
>  ○ 食べるの？ _You (wanna) eat, is it true (i.e. what I hear)?_

So, the implication of 彼に今晩来るのか聞いた is that you asked him in order to know if
you'd be able to take his attendance for granted for an already-known
schedule. Of course, it has little difference with 来るか（どうか）聞いた in usual
situations.

One thing is that using のだ in indirect speech doesn't necessarily reflect that
the speaker uses the word in real conversation, because the context base may
vary depending on the hearer:

> じゃあ、彼に今晩のパーティー来るのか聞いてみるね。  
>  _Okay, then I ask him if he'll come to **the** party tonight._
>
> ☎「もしもーし、今晩パーティーやるんだけど、来る（× の）？」  
>  _Hello, we gonna have **a** party tonight. Are you coming?_
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-19T13:30:56.643
46703
2017-04-19T13:30:56.643
7810
46638
answer