68795
I saw all occurrences. To me '魅力(noun)+が+ある'(simplified clause) + 人(noun)
sounds more correct.

Can someone help on the differences: 魅力ある人 魅力がある人 魅力のある人
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-06-11T00:26:47.103
68794
2019-06-11T02:32:04.663
32689
question
nouns
"魅力ある人" vs "魅力がある人" vs "魅力のある人"
魅力のある人 and 魅力がある人 are interchangeable because there is a grammatical rule
called ga-no conversion. Note that this only applies when 魅力がある works as a
relative clause modifying a noun. 彼には魅力がある is fine but 彼には魅力のある is
ungrammatical. See: [How does the の work in
「日本人の知らない日本語」?](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/12825/5010)

魅力ある人 is relatively less common but correct. It sounds a little literary
because it uses the grammar of old Japanese, where the subject marker が was
rarely used. There are some fixed, literary, adjective-like expressions in the
form of `noun + ある` ("-ful") or `noun + なき/ない` ("-less"):

  * 心ある人 hearty person
  * 心なき人／心ない人 heartless person
  * 形ある物 material/tangible thing
  * 形なき物 immaterial/intangible/formless thing
  * 家なき子 _Sans Famille_ (novel) / homeless child
  * 余りある食料 a great abundance of food (more than necessary)

These are basically fixed adjective-like expressions, and new ones are rarely
coined. You have to remember which noun can take this form one by one.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-06-11T02:05:31.310
68795
2019-06-11T02:32:04.663
2019-06-11T02:32:04.663
5010
5010
68794
answer