28502
An example of a regular announcement on a train:

> 次は本町 本町 中央線 御堂筋線 **は** お乗り換えです

My main concern here is the second は (in bold). It does not seem to be a topic
marker, it does not seem to be a binding particle (係助詞) as described in the
answer to [this
question](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/28303/grammatical-
construction-place%E3%81%AFsubplace-story-as-an-introduction), so what is the
function of は here?

Why isn't the announcement using a destination particle に which is the usual
particle used with the verb 乗り換える? Let's say something like this:

> 次は本町。本町は、中央線、御堂筋線 **に** お乗り換えです。

Also: where do the sentences in the original announcement start and end? Would
「中央線、御堂筋線はお乗り換えです」 be valid without a station name before? Or is it in fact
「次は本町。本町、中央線、御堂筋線はお乗り換えです」

Or ( _added later_ ) if 中央線、御堂筋線 were a subject why isn't it:

> 次は本町、本町。中央線、御堂筋線はお乗り換え先です。

* * *

Also I found that other train companies use the phrase:

> 次は大手町 大手町 丸の内線 半蔵門線 **は** お乗り換えください

I assumed these two patterns ◯◯はお乗り換えです and ◯◯はお乗り換えください follow the same rule?
Is there really a rule which would allow to freely replace ◯◯は(gerund)です with
◯◯は(imperative verb) and vice versa?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-10-03T11:12:17.843
28456
2015-10-08T20:54:43.840
2015-10-08T20:54:43.840
11104
11104
question
grammar particle-は
Grammar behind a train transfer announcement
It's a topic marker and the case of 中央線 and 御堂筋線 in the sentence is the
subject. It says those who use 中央線 or 御堂筋線 are to change the train.

The terminology in the link is not really correctly used. 係助詞 is a term to
categorize は も こそ as a group opposed to another group such as case particles:
が を に へ で から より（よ）. It's a different perspective from functions like topic
marker or such.

本町 called twice is just repetition.

Edit: I'm going to explain what "you can compose a sentence whose subject
doesn't have logical coherence with the predicate" means.

  1. The subject of the sentence doesn't have to be the agent of active voice or the recipient of passive voice. (Therefore, so called indirect passive is possible)
  2. The predicate itself can be a whole clause. (You may be able to regard this phenomenon as double subjects)

As a result, you can write a sentence or a clause like 中央線が 乗客が 乗り換えだったら, if
you need to specify the agent.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-10-03T19:12:12.273
28461
2015-10-04T22:59:20.793
2015-10-04T22:59:20.793
4092
4092
28456
answer
I'm not sure if this is what's throwing you off, but お乗り換え here is used more
like an adjective (“a transfer line”), not a verb (“you transfer here”). It's
like saying “中央線 and 御堂筋線 are transfers” instead of saying “Please transfer
for 中央線 and 御堂筋線”. The implications are the same, but the sentence is shorter.
It's also a little less direct, because you can tie an action to the subject
without explicitly asking the listener to act.

Phrases that feel similar to me:

  * ゴミはお持ち帰りです (instead of ゴミはお持ち帰りください)  
Trash is take-home vs. Take home your trash

  * 代金はレジでお支払いです (instead of 代金はレジでお支払いください)  
The charge is pay-at-the-register vs. Pay the charge at the register

  * チケットはお引き換えです (instead of チケットはお引き換えください)  
Tickets are exchange vs. Exchange your tickets

* * *

Above answer only covers the "A線はお乗り換えです" construct. But isn't
"丸ノ内線はお乗り換えください" a much more common way of using は? 詳細はお問い合わせください,
お食事はテーブルをご利用ください, 個室はご予約ください… (For the Marunouchi Line, transfer. For details,
ask. For dining, use the tables. For private rooms, make a reservation.)
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-10-06T09:18:31.033
28502
2015-10-08T12:39:01.963
2015-10-08T12:39:01.963
11104
888
28456
answer