12947
(This might be a quick easy question but sometimes the answers to these are
unexpected.)

What is the subject in the following sentences？ I've given my best efforts for
the examples 1-4 below. (I am increasingly in favour of my alternative answer
but still not sure.)

>   1. 1か月を経ても音沙汰{おとさた}がない｜A month has passed [elapsed] and we have had no
> news.
>   2. なす事もなく日を経る｜spend [pass] one's days in idleness
>   3. 事故以来3年を経た｜It has been three years since the accident.
>   4. 2年を経て彼らは結婚した｜They got married [two years later / after two years
>

* * *

For what they are worth, my initial answers were: 1\. 時, 2\. 彼／私／自分, 3\. 時
(same as 1) , 4\. 彼ら

But alternatively perhaps they are all 時 as in the sentence:

> 時は止まる ことなく 流れる。 Time passes with out stopping (equivalent to "Time waits for
> noone")

In sentence 2 there is a clause modifying 日 and in 4 we have two separate
clauses.

This is because:

Although the clause is transitive in Japanese (or at least has a "spatial を"
as in 鳥が湖を飛ぶ, the bird flies over the lake), the English equivalent has a
specified period as the subject with an intransitive verb (as in "two years
passed")
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-12-27T21:47:58.960
9863
2013-10-04T03:56:35.637
2013-09-27T04:32:51.740
119
1556
question
grammar usage
What is the subject when time passes in a narrative (eg １ヶ月を経る）
「経る」or「経つ」can be used two ways.

  1. (時)が経つ・経る
  2. (時)を経つ・経る

In the first case, the time is obviously the subject. In the second case, the
person who is passing the time is the subject. Some (complex) examples

  1. 彼は長い時間を経て、悟りを啓いた。
  2. 色も香も同じ昔に咲くらめど年[経]{ふ}る人ぞ改まりける。
  3. ビルが10年の歳月を経てぼろぼろになった。

_(the last two refer more to aging than time passing)_

So for your sentences, the subjects would be the people involved

  1. Implied we (e.g. 我らが）
  2. Implied "one" (e.g. 人)
  3. Implied person who had the accident (e.g. 私が or 彼が etc)
  4. 彼らは
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-01-18T01:06:09.870
11003
2013-01-18T01:06:09.870
3087
9863
answer
Japanese is arguably a [topic prominent
language](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topic-prominent_language) and is often
said that the notion of "subject" is unnecessary to describe the language. So
there's no point in identifying the "subject" of a sentence because there is
no such thing as the subject of a sentence in Japanese. It's certainly useful
to consider a hypothetical subject for educational purposes. But if something
doesn't add up when dealing with the "subject" of a Japanese sentence, you
might want to relax a bit and simply move on because you're asking for
something that probably doesn't exist.

If you want to learn a little bit more on this, I think [this Japanese
Wikipedia
article](http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E8%AA%9E#.E6.96.87.E3.81.AE.E6.A7.8B.E9.80.A0)
is good for general audiences (assuming your reading skill is good enough).
According to this article, those who say there is a subject in Japanese are
the minority in academia.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-09-26T16:04:41.860
12947
2013-10-04T03:56:35.637
2013-10-04T03:56:35.637
9863
answer