52500
I thought intransitive meant there is no actor/the thing is happening like on
its own. But playing is done by a person, right? Yet the dictionary says it is
intransitive...

I believe there are other examples of such verbs which would seem transitive
to me but actually work as intransitive verbs. I'm confused. Do you have an
explanation for these?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-08-19T14:36:48.833
52495
2017-08-20T15:39:24.580
20379
question
transitivity
Why is 遊ぶ intransitive?
For a really good answer, please see
[this](https://www.tofugu.com/japanese/transitive-intransitive-verbs/) site.
My answer comes from it as well as the answer to
[this](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/48246/is-%E5%A3%8A%E3%82%8C%E3%82%8B-%E3%81%93%E3%82%8F%E3%82%8C%E3%82%8B-already-
in-pasive-form-%E5%8F%97%E8%BA%AB%E5%BD%A2/48247#48247) question. Transitive
and intransitive verbs can be hard so research is always the best course of
action.

Transitive verbs take someone to do then. They do not happen on their own.
There is a subject doing the action, and an object that receives it. Here are
some examples:

> I broke my phone.
>
> I moved the car.

Intransitive verbs do not have an object. There is, of course a subject, but
these verbs happen on their own since there is not an object. For example:

> The car moved.
>
> My phone broke.

* * *

So why is 遊ぶ intransitive? You do that on your own. To play, you don't
necessarily need an object. Sure, you can play with the ball, but play is
still intransitive here. If we were to use play as a transitive verb, it would
be:

> I play the ball.

That is a transitive usage of play, and it doesn't make sense in English. In
Japanese, there is no transitive counterpart for 遊ぶ because it wouldn't make
sense even if it did exist.

Just as a side note, playing an instrument (like the piano) is a different
word in Japanese, ひく。
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-08-19T15:24:32.207
52500
2017-08-20T15:39:24.580
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
22352
52495
answer