23825
Trying to make sense of this sentence:

> 自分は死ぬ前に一目{ひとめ}思う女に逢｛あ｝いたいと云った。

~~Daijirin lists 一目 as a noun. However, it doesn't connect with 思う according
to normal rules (there is no particle).~~ To connect with 思う or 逢う, it must be
an adverb. As it came before 思う, I thought the whole sentence to mean:

> I explained that before I died, I'd like to see to see a woman **with whom I
> fell in love at first sight.** // **who I knew only through a glance** etc

However, the actual translation goes:

> I explained that before I died, **if only for a moment, I wanted to see**
> the woman I loved.

Clearly, this interprets 一目 as an adverb that applies to 逢う (tai).

In other words, I have 2 questions:

1) is 一目 really an adverb?

2) how does it work in this sentence, grammar-wise?

3) if it's a set phrase I'm fine with no explanation other than "it just
works", I'd just like to make sure what's happening here
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-17T11:55:30.510
23824
2020-01-04T03:11:44.000
2015-04-17T12:38:27.990
9771
9771
question
grammar adverbs nouns
How does 一目 work in this sentence?
> 「[自分]{じぶん}は[死]{し}ぬ[前]{まえ}に[一目思]{ひとめおもう}う[女]{おんな}に[逢]{あ}いたいと[云]{い}った。」

The part that you are misreading is 「一目思う女に逢いたい」, which can be rephrased as
「思う女に一目逢いたい」.

「一目」 modifies「逢いたい」, and not 「思う」. In fact, it is impossible to "一目思う a
person" in the first place; It just makes no sense.

「一目会いたい/逢いたい」 is a common set phrase meaning "to want to see someone even for
one second".

Thus, the translation " **I explained that before I died, if only for a
moment, I wanted to see the woman I loved**." is a very accurate one.

> is 一目 really an adverb?

No, it is a noun, strictly speaking, but it can function adverbially because
it expresses a frequency. 「一目会いたい」 is as correct as
「2[回見]{かいみ}た」、「3[度行]{どい}った」, etc.

> how does it work in this sentence, grammar-wise?

As I said above, 「一目」 just modifies 「逢いたい」. The fact it had another verb (思う)
in between seems to have confused you.

> if it's a set phrase I'm fine with no explanation other than "it just
> works", I'd just like to make sure what's happening here

It is a set phrase but it would take a lot of experience to spot it. I assume.
Your careful approach to comprehension is pretty impressive.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2015-04-17T12:36:54.997
23825
2020-01-04T03:11:44.000
2020-01-04T03:11:44.000
23824
answer