24101
Recently I've been trying to wrap my head around the Tobira textbook grammar
point on というのは and from my understanding [Aというのは Bのことだ/ということだ] essentially
means [A means B]. However, I can't seem to understand the nuances of the
sentence ending のこと/ということ.

> ｢関東地方」というのは東京のことですか。  
>  Does Kanto Region mean Tokyo?

Why is 「のことですか。」 used here? Would ｢関東地方」というのは東京ですか。 and ｢関東地方」というのは東京ということですか。
also be appropriate? Do all three mean the same thing? When would one form be
more appropriate over the other?
CC BY-SA 4.0
2015-05-02T20:10:41.820
24092
2022-01-12T22:34:39.663
2022-01-12T22:34:39.663
30454
4385
question
meaning phrases
Providing definitions/explanations with というのは　～のこと/ということだ
The last example, at least, is very bulky and most people would not bother
saying "という" twice as it is redundant. The other two seem fine to me.The
second is a bit more concise. I do not see any great difference. If I were to
translate, 1 is By Kanto, are you talking about Tokyo? 2. is roughly By Kanto,
do you mean Tokyo? 3. is roughly By Kanto, do you mean the location known as
Tokyo?

Especially since I doubt anyone has not heard of Tokyo, 3 would feel a little
less nice. Nonetheless, all would function and serve their purpose.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-03T03:41:47.990
24100
2015-05-03T03:41:47.990
9995
24092
answer
AはBのことだ is "A means B". Aというの is "what's called A".

So, ｢関東地方」というのは東京のことですか is "Does what's called Kanto Region mean Tokyo?".
(Incidentally, the answer is no)

｢関東地方」というのは東京ということですか can mean the same thing as …東京のこと… but that という(こと) is
more likely to denote a clause. It sounds like 東京(にいる)ということ or "By saying
'Kanto Region', do you mean you've been to Tokyo?".
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-03T04:40:44.257
24101
2015-05-03T04:40:44.257
4092
24092
answer