46692
I came across the expression あいにくの天気.

According to the dictionary あいにく can be a na-adjective, an adverb, a noun and
a no-adjective.

So, why is の used in the above expression (instead of な)?

In this and other such words that can be both na-adjectives and no-adjectives,
how does one choose whether to use the na-form or the no-form?
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-18T20:12:28.973
46690
2020-09-12T16:49:05.850
19511
question
adjectives
How to choose between a na- and a no-adjective form of a word that takes both?
This is a very good question.  
According to the Question and Answer on the Internet
<https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1189040481> ,  
your question is very difficult to explain grammatically even to
Japanese（＝日本人）.

The only things that can be clearly stated are:

  1. That あいにくの occurs more frequently than あいにくな as an adjective.
  2. In some set phrases such as あいにくなことに, the な form is commonly used.

By your question and by Felipe Oliveira's comment to my answer, I could
realize the difficulty of the correct usage of a particular adjective which
have both attributes of ノ-adjective and ナ-adjective. I could understand the
difficulty that a non-native Japanese may confront in studying Japanese
earnestly.

I searched on the Internet for what may help your question. I found some
research papers on this theme.

I'll show you some extracts from the two papers.

In the first paper titled 「ナ形容詞とノ形容詞のイメージ」 you could find adjective samples
showing the priority between の and な in table 4 (表｛ひょう｝４).

In the second paper titled 「日本語教育における形容動詞の扱い」 the researcher tells that this
kind of problem is hard for non-native Japanese.

[![enter image description
here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/CeIsy.jpg)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/CeIsy.jpg)

[![enter image description
here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/maKyH.jpg)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/maKyH.jpg)

[![enter image description
here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/daMTH.jpg)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/daMTH.jpg)

[![enter image description
here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/flPdI.jpg)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/flPdI.jpg)
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-18T21:06:56.207
46692
2017-04-19T05:07:34.090
2017-04-19T05:07:34.090
20624
20624
46690
answer
The basic difference is that な is gradable and の is not. For example, consider
the word 最低. It has two meanings: “the lowest” and “(to have) terrible
character”.

You cannot say 最低な to mean “the lowest” (a clearly binary attribute: it is
either the lowest or not), it can only mean “terrible” (a potentially gradable
attribute: there are degrees of terribleness). So *最低な点数 is weird (barring
really odd scenarios).

最低の on the other hand works with both meanings. This means that the "terrible"
meaning can be accessed with _both_ 最低の and 最低な. I think if you say 最低の男 with
the “terrible” meaning it feels a bit more like “ **the** worst guy ever”, as
opposed 最低なやつ which feels a bit more like “ **a** guy with a terrible
personality”. That said, it’s a faint difference.

This works with other の/な-compatible 最 adjectives like 最高 too. Is it **the**
best (binary, の) or **awesome** (gradable, な).

I think it’s best to understand this as an evolution, where the words started
as の adjectives, with only their literal “lowest” and “highest” meanings, then
they took on the extra meanings which feel more gradable, and as a result
started accepting な as well, but the の also remained usable.

* * *

With other adjectives like あいにく, it’s not quite as clear, because there's only
a single meaning to the word, but I think the same distinction holds. And
importantly, I feel like an extension of the distinction is that 〜な, due to
being gradable, feels more like making a judgment call about something — it’s
more of an opinion or feeling. 〜の feels more like a “fact”, because it’s
claiming that the referent is 100% that attribute.

So taking two examples from 大辞林, 「あいにくなお天気です」 feels more like “ah the weather
is too bad isn’t it” (too bad = opinion) while 「あいにくの雨で一歩も外へ出られなかった」is more
like “due to the (unequivocally) unfortunate rain, I couldn’t take even a
single step outside”, where there is little room for discussion about whether
the rain was unfortunate — it was 100% unfortunate from the perspective of the
speaker.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-12T14:28:19.127
80624
2020-09-12T16:49:05.850
2020-09-12T16:49:05.850
3097
3097
46690
answer