<transcript><audio_231> que haga tablero por una calidad de estación es que se ha movido pero vamos como le recomendemos se ha movido el cuadrito rojo pero debería estar abajo estos números son negativos</transcript><transcript><audio_232> nuestro cliente que con una creditación 14 haga tablero pues lo vamos a llevar a una pérdida, a un déficit de 12,14 créditos por este año ¿vale? Si aumentamos la precipitación a 350, bueno pues si</transcript><transcript><audio_233> quiere hacer astilla bioenergía, pues va a ganar 131, pero como va a hacer tablero, pues va a seguir perdiendo 9 créditos a lo largo del turno.</transcript><transcript><audio_234> Bueno, pues a esta cuestión, que es la que ya todos conocemos, hay que añadirle la que hemos visto antes, la de la vulnerabilidad. Ojo, encima de que tú</transcript><transcript><audio_235> Pues no me lo pongas en la zona roja que es que además se nos van a sacar los árboles. Yo animo a que esta información se tenga en cuenta.</transcript><transcript><audio_236> Somos técnicos, tenemos que ofrecer soluciones de garantía a largo plazo. Hay que incluir el cambio climático,</transcript><transcript><audio_237> utilizar con rigor la información de siempre, la información de calidad de estación, crecimientos, etc. De esa manera estaremos en condiciones de ofrecer a nuestros clientes</transcript> how do we recommend that our client make a board for a station quality is that it has moved but let's go as we recommend the little red square has moved but it should be down these numbers are  They are negative if we recommend to our client that with a cal station 14 he makes a board because we are going to lead him to a loss a deficit of 12.14 credits per hear of year okay okay if we increase the precipitation to 350 Well then if only that same C  of station he wants to do he wants to do sliver bioenergy because he is going to win 131 but since he is going to make a board he is going to continue losing nine nine credits eh throughout the turn that is to say that project is not viable Well then to this question which is the one that already  We all know that we have to add the one that we have seen before, the one about vulnerability, to say be careful that your project is not viable, so don't put it in the Red Zone, which is that our trees are also going to dry out. Okay then, well, eh, I  I encourage this information to be taken into account, we are technicians, we have to offer things that and we must include climate change in our projects and also rigorously use the same quality information.  the quality information of Station growths etcetera etcetera is valid in that way because we will be in a position to offer our
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.0lh4Ffm8CnU|shard_10052_62|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.56|shard_10052|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.56|shard_10052|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.56", "params": {"id": "0lh4Ffm8CnU", "channel_id": "UC0ZRdNesZrOlNnn09aYHDzw", "duration": 4244, "view_count": 60, "age_limit": 0, "release_timestamp": 1728032421, "like_count": 0, "channel_follower_count": 1790, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@colmontes", "release_date": "20241004", "release_year": 2024, "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_10052/0lh4Ffm8CnU.tar.gz"}}