<transcript><audio_262>than in the than in the originals so what you can see here below is the one case study that i i teach in my in the first class in my courses this is about ego depletion so the first</transcript><transcript><audio_263>one in 2016 i think 20 24 labs found nothing very very awake effects and then their original authors uh so kathryn vos over here said that you they didn't know how to do this</transcript><transcript><audio_264>correctly so if they would do it then they would find something and it took them two more years to finish their own replications and then once again they found a very very very weak effect so both together very disappointing</transcript><transcript><audio_265>findings for one of our biggest biggest findings in social psychology so ego depletion at least to me is no longer a phenomenon that i that i trust to to replicate well to work and if anything is in there it's a</transcript><transcript><audio_266>very weak effect much much smaller than anything that we have in our books or we tell our students or practitioners so that's really disappointing so if we try to summarize this thank you brian osek um you can see the replication rate is about 47</transcript><caption><image_267>The image is a screenshot of a LinkedIn profile page with a photo of a person on the top right corner. On the left side of the image, there is a text that reads "Brian Nosek's Summary: Prediction markets seem accurate. We have fairly good inquiries about what would replicate." Below the text, there are two profile pictures of the person, one of whom is Brian Nosek and the other is a profile picture of a scientist. 

On the top left corner of the page, there appears to be a link to his LinkedIn profile. The profile picture is of a young man with dark hair and a beard, and he is wearing a suit and tie. He is looking directly at the camera with a serious expression on his face. The text on the page is in black and white and is in a modern font.

The image appears to have been edited, as there are no other elements in the image.</caption><transcript><audio_268>now i don't know what you feel about this but you need to take into consideration that we expected higher and we especially expected higher because all these journals psychological science jpsp science and nature and all these classic</transcript><transcript><audio_269>findings especially ego depletion we expected close to to 100 i know that's not realistic because you know randomness of the universe all sorts of noise in there different labs doing different things but we definitely did not expect 47 and we did not expect</transcript> than in the than in the originals so what you can see here below is the one case study that i i teach in my in the first class in my courses this is about ego depletion so the first one in 2016 i think 20 24 labs found nothing very very awake effects and then their original authors uh so kathryn vos over here said that you they didn't know how to do this correctly so if they would do it then they would find something and it took them two more years to finish their own replications and then once again they found a very very very weak effect so both together very disappointing findings for one of our biggest biggest findings in social psychology so ego depletion at least to me is no longer a phenomenon that i that i trust to to replicate well to work and if anything is in there it's a very weak effect much much smaller than anything that we have in our books or we tell our students or practitioners so that's really disappointing so if we try to summarize this thank you brian osek um you can see the replication rate is about 47 now i don't know what you feel about this but you need to take into consideration that we expected higher and we especially expected higher because all these journals psychological science jpsp science and nature and all these classic findings especially ego depletion we expected close to to 100 i know that's not realistic because you know randomness of the universe all sorts of noise in there different labs doing different things but we definitely did not expect 47 and we did not expect
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.0lkjMtLpDZM|shard_10051_61|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.60|shard_10051|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.30|shard_10051|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.41", "params": {"id": "0lkjMtLpDZM", "channel_id": "UCP0U3Ily7OP2CmfBhcTBbzA", "duration": 9240, "view_count": 708, "age_limit": 0, "chapters": [{"start_time": 0.0, "title": "Introduction", "end_time": 150.0}, {"start_time": 150.0, "title": "Live demonstration of pre-registration on Open Science Framework", "end_time": 1760.0}, {"start_time": 1760.0, "title": "Live demonstration of data collection after pre-registration", "end_time": 1896.0}, {"start_time": 1896.0, "title": "Live demonstration of creating a JAMOVI data analysis pre-registration plan template", "end_time": 2209.0}, {"start_time": 2209.0, "title": "Live demonstration of data analysis on collected data according to pre-registration plan", "end_time": 2997.0}, {"start_time": 2997.0, "title": "Quick intro to replication/reproducibility crisis and credibility revolution", "end_time": 3874.0}, {"start_time": 3874.0, "title": "Pre-registration: Background", "end_time": 4905.0}, {"start_time": 4905.0, "title": "Pre-registration of secondary data and synthetic datasets", "end_time": 5720.0}, {"start_time": 5720.0, "title": "Registered Reports", "end_time": 7101.0}, {"start_time": 7101.0, "title": "Our team's experience with Registered Reports", "end_time": 7475.0}, {"start_time": 7475.0, "title": "Our Registered Reports and pre-registrations resources", "end_time": 8029.0}, {"start_time": 8029.0, "title": "Frequently Asked Questions about Registered Reports", "end_time": 9240}], "like_count": 11, "channel_follower_count": 836, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@GiladFeldmanScience", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_10051/0lkjMtLpDZM.tar.gz"}}