<transcript><audio_520>rejections from my usual the regular articles but everything that we submitted as a registered report got through and got the in principle acceptance which is amazing so you get accepted in the first journal that you submit to the rejection rates are much lower</transcript><transcript><audio_521>and then it also turns out that these are much more better cited because people perceive them to be more reliable and less and less biased so there's all these questions about so is this is this really helping</transcript><caption><image_522>The image is a screenshot of a presentation slide with three images. On the left side of the slide, there is a title that reads "Does Pre-registration/Registered Reports really help? IT DOES". On the right side, there are three images of a man and a woman sitting on a couch. The woman is wearing a white dress and is holding a baby in her arms. The man is looking at the camera and appears to be explaining the presentation.

In the center of the image, there appears to have a graph or chart that shows the relationship between preregistration and registered reports. The graph is divided into three sections, each with a different color. The first section shows a line graph, the second section shows two graphs, and the third section shows three graphs. The graphs are labeled "Pre-Registration" and "Registered Reports" and the text on the slide explains that the presentation is about pre-registering and reporting reports.</caption><transcript><audio_523>so you claim that this is helping you're saying that this is helping is it really helping so i'm going to show you some brief examples of why this is some evidence that this is working so for example money priming which was published in science</transcript><transcript><audio_524>2006 there's all sorts of evidence but if you know something about a meta-analysis and you look at this plot over here what you realize very fast even if there is an effect from the 174 public studies</transcript><transcript><audio_525>so the cohen's deal of 0.35 you can see some indications of first of all it's very very messy and there's some indications for our publication bias over here so there's a bunch of things that we would expect here because everything is supposed to kind of fall under this</transcript><transcript><audio_526>triangle so there's a bunch of findings here that have never been published and all of these are kind of just below 0.05 so people were kind of like maybe pushing this a little bit to to get just over the threshold so this is not a good</transcript> rejections from my usual the regular articles but everything that we submitted as a registered report got through and got the in principle acceptance which is amazing so you get accepted in the first journal that you submit to the rejection rates are much lower and then it also turns out that these are much more better cited because people perceive them to be more reliable and less and less biased so there's all these questions about so is this is this really helping so you claim that this is helping you're saying that this is helping is it really helping so i'm going to show you some brief examples of why this is some evidence that this is working so for example money priming which was published in science 2006 there's all sorts of evidence but if you know something about a meta-analysis and you look at this plot over here what you realize very fast even if there is an effect from the 174 public studies so the cohen's deal of 0.35 you can see some indications of first of all it's very very messy and there's some indications for our publication bias over here so there's a bunch of things that we would expect here because everything is supposed to kind of fall under this triangle so there's a bunch of findings here that have never been published and all of these are kind of just below 0.05 so people were kind of like maybe pushing this a little bit to to get just over the threshold so this is not a good
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.0lkjMtLpDZM|shard_10051_61|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.60|shard_10051|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.30|shard_10051|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.41", "params": {"id": "0lkjMtLpDZM", "channel_id": "UCP0U3Ily7OP2CmfBhcTBbzA", "duration": 9240, "view_count": 708, "age_limit": 0, "chapters": [{"start_time": 0.0, "title": "Introduction", "end_time": 150.0}, {"start_time": 150.0, "title": "Live demonstration of pre-registration on Open Science Framework", "end_time": 1760.0}, {"start_time": 1760.0, "title": "Live demonstration of data collection after pre-registration", "end_time": 1896.0}, {"start_time": 1896.0, "title": "Live demonstration of creating a JAMOVI data analysis pre-registration plan template", "end_time": 2209.0}, {"start_time": 2209.0, "title": "Live demonstration of data analysis on collected data according to pre-registration plan", "end_time": 2997.0}, {"start_time": 2997.0, "title": "Quick intro to replication/reproducibility crisis and credibility revolution", "end_time": 3874.0}, {"start_time": 3874.0, "title": "Pre-registration: Background", "end_time": 4905.0}, {"start_time": 4905.0, "title": "Pre-registration of secondary data and synthetic datasets", "end_time": 5720.0}, {"start_time": 5720.0, "title": "Registered Reports", "end_time": 7101.0}, {"start_time": 7101.0, "title": "Our team's experience with Registered Reports", "end_time": 7475.0}, {"start_time": 7475.0, "title": "Our Registered Reports and pre-registrations resources", "end_time": 8029.0}, {"start_time": 8029.0, "title": "Frequently Asked Questions about Registered Reports", "end_time": 9240}], "like_count": 11, "channel_follower_count": 836, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@GiladFeldmanScience", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_10051/0lkjMtLpDZM.tar.gz"}}