<transcript><audio_459>us published in the top journals or worse you know let's even keep everything but then let's change the hypothesis let's pretend that the hypothesis was something different in order to support what it is that we found so this is supposed to you know be</transcript><transcript><audio_460>conformatory but what you're doing when you're doing this sort of thing like you're you're making this exploratory but making it look as if it's conformatory saying i hypothesized this before even though you haven't really and then you have these two big problems</transcript><transcript><audio_461>of a publication bias so everything is positive how can everything be positive some things work something's done but when you look at the literature and you realize that oh everything is is positive then obviously we have a problem and then up</transcript><transcript><audio_462>until 2012 2015 we haven't been doing applications in some fields like management we still don't do replications in social psychology we started doing replications but not enough so uh for us in hku we're doing this in judgment decision making but there's not that many people</transcript><transcript><audio_463>around the world dedicated to doing replications it's still you know compared to novel and overall research considered to be less attractive every time i have a review people saying okay so you're doing replications but where is your real</transcript><transcript><audio_464>research so for me first of all replications are as worthy somebody needs to do replications and and you can learn things from applications that you didn't know from novel findings from the first time now</transcript><transcript><audio_465>um we already have papers that indicate problems in all of this so for example how many people are changing the hypothesis or selectively reporting 50 to 90 in 2012 this is unbelievable and this is</transcript> us published in the top journals or worse you know let's even keep everything but then let's change the hypothesis let's pretend that the hypothesis was something different in order to support what it is that we found so this is supposed to you know be conformatory but what you're doing when you're doing this sort of thing like you're you're making this exploratory but making it look as if it's conformatory saying i hypothesized this before even though you haven't really and then you have these two big problems of a publication bias so everything is positive how can everything be positive some things work something's done but when you look at the literature and you realize that oh everything is is positive then obviously we have a problem and then up until 2012 2015 we haven't been doing applications in some fields like management we still don't do replications in social psychology we started doing replications but not enough so uh for us in hku we're doing this in judgment decision making but there's not that many people around the world dedicated to doing replications it's still you know compared to novel and overall research considered to be less attractive every time i have a review people saying okay so you're doing replications but where is your real research so for me first of all replications are as worthy somebody needs to do replications and and you can learn things from applications that you didn't know from novel findings from the first time now um we already have papers that indicate problems in all of this so for example how many people are changing the hypothesis or selectively reporting 50 to 90 in 2012 this is unbelievable and this is
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.0lkjMtLpDZM|shard_10051_61|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.60|shard_10051|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.30|shard_10051|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.41", "params": {"id": "0lkjMtLpDZM", "channel_id": "UCP0U3Ily7OP2CmfBhcTBbzA", "duration": 9240, "view_count": 708, "age_limit": 0, "chapters": [{"start_time": 0.0, "title": "Introduction", "end_time": 150.0}, {"start_time": 150.0, "title": "Live demonstration of pre-registration on Open Science Framework", "end_time": 1760.0}, {"start_time": 1760.0, "title": "Live demonstration of data collection after pre-registration", "end_time": 1896.0}, {"start_time": 1896.0, "title": "Live demonstration of creating a JAMOVI data analysis pre-registration plan template", "end_time": 2209.0}, {"start_time": 2209.0, "title": "Live demonstration of data analysis on collected data according to pre-registration plan", "end_time": 2997.0}, {"start_time": 2997.0, "title": "Quick intro to replication/reproducibility crisis and credibility revolution", "end_time": 3874.0}, {"start_time": 3874.0, "title": "Pre-registration: Background", "end_time": 4905.0}, {"start_time": 4905.0, "title": "Pre-registration of secondary data and synthetic datasets", "end_time": 5720.0}, {"start_time": 5720.0, "title": "Registered Reports", "end_time": 7101.0}, {"start_time": 7101.0, "title": "Our team's experience with Registered Reports", "end_time": 7475.0}, {"start_time": 7475.0, "title": "Our Registered Reports and pre-registrations resources", "end_time": 8029.0}, {"start_time": 8029.0, "title": "Frequently Asked Questions about Registered Reports", "end_time": 9240}], "like_count": 11, "channel_follower_count": 836, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@GiladFeldmanScience", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_10051/0lkjMtLpDZM.tar.gz"}}