<transcript><audio_135> d'imposer un nombre minimum de bulletins à mettre dans l'enveloppe pour favoriser le compromis. Mais on perdrait alors la possibilité d'un vote blanc. Le vote blanc d'ailleurs, dans un vote par approbation, prend une signification bien plus claire et intéressante. Puisqu'on nous demande de faire la liste de toutes les opportunités</transcript><transcript><audio_136> Et à contrario, puisqu'il s'agit non pas de dire ce qu'on veut, mais ce qu'on accepte, je pense que beaucoup plus de gens auraient envie de voter, parce qu'actuellement, beaucoup ne votent pas parce qu'ils ont l'impression</transcript><caption><image_137>The image is a screenshot of a voting table in a game. The table is titled "Vote par approbation" which translates to "Vote for approval" in English. The background of the table is a night sky with a full moon and a city skyline in the background. 

The table is divided into three columns, each representing a different option. The first column is labeled "Option A", the second column is numbered "Option B", and the third column is colored in red, green, and yellow. The options are arranged in a grid-like pattern, with each option having a different color.

At the bottom of the image, there is a text that reads "Nombre l'acceptations" which is French for "Number of acceptations". Below the text, there are two buttons - Option A and Option B - and Option C - which can be used to select the option for the game. On the right side of the screen, there appears to be a button that says "Option E: 7".</caption><transcript><audio_138> complètement à un projet pour voter pour. En reprenant toujours le même exemple, avec le vote par approbation, on voit que cette fois l'option A est classée en dernière position, parce qu'elle est la plus rejetée. Et c'est la C qui l'emporte car personne ne la</transcript><transcript><audio_139> Contrairement à ce que son nom pourrait laisser penser, on peut donc dire que le vote par approbation a avant tout pour but d'éliminer les options les plus rejetées, et non pas de retenir les plus approuvées. Mais on peut être dérangé par le fait qu'elle ignore complètement les différents niveaux d'approbation entre les</transcript> could be to impose a minimum number of ballots to be put in the envelope to encourage compromise but we would then lose the possibility of  a blank vote the blank vote moreover in a vote by approval takes on a much clearer and more interesting meaning since we are asked to list all the options that we would accept no m no teeth envelop it clearly meant I n  'accepts none and has contrario since it is not a question of saying what we want but what we accept I think that many more people would want to vote because currently many do not vote because they have the impression of  having to completely support a project to vote for, always using the same example with voting by approval, we see that this time the option is ranked in last position because it is the most rejected and its laces which win because no one  do not refuse it contrary to what its name might let us think, we can therefore say that voting by approval aims above all to eliminate the most rejected options and not to retain the most to prove but we can be disturbed by the fact that it completely ignores the different levels of  approval between
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.03NtiW-NXcI|shard_10044_53|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.54|shard_10044|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.54|shard_10044|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.54", "params": {"id": "03NtiW-NXcI", "channel_id": "UC0yPCUmdMZIGtnxSnx5_ifA", "duration": 3128, "view_count": 40972, "age_limit": 0, "chapters": [{"start_time": 0.0, "title": "Introduction", "end_time": 46.0}, {"start_time": 46.0, "title": "Comment d\u00e9cider \u00e0 plusieurs", "end_time": 153.0}, {"start_time": 153.0, "title": "D'autres \u00ab \u00e9vidences \u00bb", "end_time": 363.0}, {"start_time": 363.0, "title": "Consensus", "end_time": 538.0}, {"start_time": 538.0, "title": "M\u00e9thodes de d\u00e9cision", "end_time": 649.0}, {"start_time": 649.0, "title": "1 Tirage au sort", "end_time": 756.0}, {"start_time": 756.0, "title": "2 Vote \u00e0 la proportionnelle", "end_time": 937.0}, {"start_time": 937.0, "title": "3 Vote \u00e0 la majorit\u00e9 relative", "end_time": 987.0}, {"start_time": 987.0, "title": "4 Vote \u00e0 la majorit\u00e9 absolue", "end_time": 1244.0}, {"start_time": 1244.0, "title": "5 Vote alternatif et m\u00e9thode de Coombs", "end_time": 1450.0}, {"start_time": 1450.0, "title": "6 M\u00e9thode Condorcet", "end_time": 1581.0}, {"start_time": 1581.0, "title": "7 Vote par approbation", "end_time": 1698.0}, {"start_time": 1698.0, "title": "8 M\u00e9thode Borda", "end_time": 1849.0}, {"start_time": 1849.0, "title": "9 Vote cumulatif", "end_time": 1904.0}, {"start_time": 1904.0, "title": "Options suppl\u00e9mentaires", "end_time": 2097.0}, {"start_time": 2097.0, "title": "Ma pr\u00e9f\u00e9rence", "end_time": 2278.0}, {"start_time": 2278.0, "title": "Jugement majoritaire", "end_time": 2634.0}, {"start_time": 2634.0, "title": "Ma d\u00e9mocratie", "end_time": 2980.0}, {"start_time": 2980.0, "title": "Pr\u00e9sentation du fichier Excel", "end_time": 3065.0}, {"start_time": 3065.0, "title": "Pr\u00e9sentation du site Borda", "end_time": 3090.0}, {"start_time": 3090.0, "title": "Conclusion", "end_time": 3128}], "like_count": 2261, "channel_follower_count": 51700, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@EspritCritique", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_10044/03NtiW-NXcI.tar.gz"}}