<transcript><audio_225> à émerger sous les coups de butoir de Condorcet, la mienne n'était toujours pas morte. Borda et Condorcet sont contemporains, et ils se sont beaucoup disputés pour savoir lequel des deux systèmes était le plus juste. Mais tout ça n'a visiblement pas empêché Condorcet de présenter son principalité.</transcript><transcript><audio_226> une évidence, comme étant l'extension au cas général du principe démocratique le plus naturel possible. Naturel, comme dans le droit naturel. Ça vous rappelle un truc ? Bref, si les fans de la méthode Condorcet trouvent qu'elle correspond parfaitement à leur</transcript><transcript><audio_227> c'est parce qu'ils ont adopté la définition de la démocratie que Condorcet a lui-même forgé précisément pour correspondre à sa méthode. Je vous l'ai dit, l'ennemi à abattre pour les obsédés de la majorité, c'est le vote stratégique. Et c'est vrai que dans notre système de vote majoritaire à deux</transcript><transcript><audio_228> politique ne fait pas envie. On ne vote pas vraiment pour ce qu'on voulait au départ, on s'oblige à voter pour des gens qu'on aime pas pour faire barrage à des gens qu'on aime encore moins. Mais mon problème, c'est que la recherche de compromis et de consensus par la délibération collective aboutit</transcript><transcript><audio_229> vote stratégique. On ne vote pas non plus pour ce qu'on voulait vraiment au départ, on vote pour le compromis qu'on a trouvé avec les autres pour que le moins possible de gens soient mécontents. Et personnellement, je le trouve plutôt souhaitable ce vote stratégique là. Il consiste à</transcript> emerge under the blows of condorcet mine was still not dead bordas and condorcet his contemporary and they argued a lot about which of the two systems was the fairest but all that obviously did not prevent  condorcet to present its majority principle as obvious as being the extension to general cases of the most natural democratic principle possible as in natural law it reminds you of something brief if fans of the condorcet method find that it corresponds perfectly to  their vision of democracy is because they adopted the definition of democracy that Condorcet himself forgot precisely to correspond to his method I wanted to say the enemy to be destroyed for the obsessed of the majority is the  strategic voting and it is true that in  our two-round majority voting system, strategic voting is not desirable, we do n't really vote for what we wanted at the start, we force ourselves to vote for people we don't like to block people we don't like.  we still love me but my problem is that the search for compromise and consensus through collective deliberation is also successful, a strategic vote also does not vote for what we really wanted at the start, we vote for the compromise that we have  found with others so that as few people as possible are unhappy  and personally I find this strategic vote rather desirable, it consists of not
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.03NtiW-NXcI|shard_10044_53|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.54|shard_10044|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.54|shard_10044|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.54", "params": {"id": "03NtiW-NXcI", "channel_id": "UC0yPCUmdMZIGtnxSnx5_ifA", "duration": 3128, "view_count": 40972, "age_limit": 0, "chapters": [{"start_time": 0.0, "title": "Introduction", "end_time": 46.0}, {"start_time": 46.0, "title": "Comment d\u00e9cider \u00e0 plusieurs", "end_time": 153.0}, {"start_time": 153.0, "title": "D'autres \u00ab \u00e9vidences \u00bb", "end_time": 363.0}, {"start_time": 363.0, "title": "Consensus", "end_time": 538.0}, {"start_time": 538.0, "title": "M\u00e9thodes de d\u00e9cision", "end_time": 649.0}, {"start_time": 649.0, "title": "1 Tirage au sort", "end_time": 756.0}, {"start_time": 756.0, "title": "2 Vote \u00e0 la proportionnelle", "end_time": 937.0}, {"start_time": 937.0, "title": "3 Vote \u00e0 la majorit\u00e9 relative", "end_time": 987.0}, {"start_time": 987.0, "title": "4 Vote \u00e0 la majorit\u00e9 absolue", "end_time": 1244.0}, {"start_time": 1244.0, "title": "5 Vote alternatif et m\u00e9thode de Coombs", "end_time": 1450.0}, {"start_time": 1450.0, "title": "6 M\u00e9thode Condorcet", "end_time": 1581.0}, {"start_time": 1581.0, "title": "7 Vote par approbation", "end_time": 1698.0}, {"start_time": 1698.0, "title": "8 M\u00e9thode Borda", "end_time": 1849.0}, {"start_time": 1849.0, "title": "9 Vote cumulatif", "end_time": 1904.0}, {"start_time": 1904.0, "title": "Options suppl\u00e9mentaires", "end_time": 2097.0}, {"start_time": 2097.0, "title": "Ma pr\u00e9f\u00e9rence", "end_time": 2278.0}, {"start_time": 2278.0, "title": "Jugement majoritaire", "end_time": 2634.0}, {"start_time": 2634.0, "title": "Ma d\u00e9mocratie", "end_time": 2980.0}, {"start_time": 2980.0, "title": "Pr\u00e9sentation du fichier Excel", "end_time": 3065.0}, {"start_time": 3065.0, "title": "Pr\u00e9sentation du site Borda", "end_time": 3090.0}, {"start_time": 3090.0, "title": "Conclusion", "end_time": 3128}], "like_count": 2261, "channel_follower_count": 51700, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@EspritCritique", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_10044/03NtiW-NXcI.tar.gz"}}