<transcript><audio_197> d'autres vont favoriser le deuxième objectif. La différence entre ces deux objectifs en fait, c'est de savoir si on s'intéresse d'abord au sort des gagnants ou au sort des perdants, au sort des majoritaires ou des minoritaires, ou pour utiliser des termes qui fâchent,</transcript><transcript><audio_198> Pour les gens qui s'intéressent surtout aux gagnants, aux majoritaires, aux dominants, le principal scandale d'un système de décision, ce sera si ce système ne permet pas d'assurer que la majorité décide. Ce qui semble scandaleux à cela dans le système français actuel de vote majoritaire,</transcript><transcript><audio_199> c'est que ce système ne permet pas réellement à la majorité de décider, puisqu'elle va les obliger à faire du vote stratégique. Ouh le vilain mot. Vous imaginez, alors que les gens sont majoritaires, ils vont devoir ne pas voter pour leur premier choix par stratégie.</transcript><transcript><audio_200> Les gens qui sont d'accord avec ça vont donc chercher quel système de vote permet avant tout d'assurer ce qui deviendra pour eux le principe essentiel de toute démocratie. La majorité doit pouvoir imposer ses choix à la minorité sans faire de compromis.</transcript><caption><image_201>The image is a digital illustration of a man standing in a dimly lit room with a full moon in the background. The man is wearing a white shirt and appears to be in his late twenties or early thirties. He has short dark hair and is looking off to the side with a serious expression on his face. On the right side of the image, there is a text in French that reads "Principe majoritaire de Condorcet : si un choix est préféré à tout autre par une majorite ou une autre, alors ce choix doit être élu." The text is written in a cursive font and is surrounded by a white border.</caption><transcript><audio_202> c'est aussi ce qu'on appelle le principe de Condorcet. Si un choix est préféré à tout autre par une majorité ou une autre, alors ce choix doit être élu. Ou dit plus simplement, la majorité doit toujours l'emporter. Évidemment, puisque c'est Condorcet qui a énoncé ce principe,</transcript> objective others will favor the second objective the difference between these two objectives in fact is to know if we are interested in  'first of all the fate of the winners or the fate of the losers the fate of the majority or the minority or to use terms which are annoying the fate of the dominant or the dominated for people who are especially interested in the winners in the majority in the dominant the main scandal of  'a decision system  will be if this system does not ensure that the majority decides what seems scandalous in the current French system of majority voting is that this system does not really allow the majority to decide since it will force them to do strategic voting where the bad word you imagine while people are in the majority they will have to not vote for their first choice by strategy the poor people who agree with that will therefore look for which voting system allows above all to  ensure what will become for them the principle  essential of any democracy the majority must be able to impose its choices on the minority without compromising choices on the minority without compromising this majority principle it is also what we call the principle of condorcet if a choice is preferred to any other by a majority or another then this  choice must be elected or said more simply the majority must always prevail obviously since it is condorcet who stated this principle
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.03NtiW-NXcI|shard_10044_53|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.54|shard_10044|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.54|shard_10044|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.54", "params": {"id": "03NtiW-NXcI", "channel_id": "UC0yPCUmdMZIGtnxSnx5_ifA", "duration": 3128, "view_count": 40972, "age_limit": 0, "chapters": [{"start_time": 0.0, "title": "Introduction", "end_time": 46.0}, {"start_time": 46.0, "title": "Comment d\u00e9cider \u00e0 plusieurs", "end_time": 153.0}, {"start_time": 153.0, "title": "D'autres \u00ab \u00e9vidences \u00bb", "end_time": 363.0}, {"start_time": 363.0, "title": "Consensus", "end_time": 538.0}, {"start_time": 538.0, "title": "M\u00e9thodes de d\u00e9cision", "end_time": 649.0}, {"start_time": 649.0, "title": "1 Tirage au sort", "end_time": 756.0}, {"start_time": 756.0, "title": "2 Vote \u00e0 la proportionnelle", "end_time": 937.0}, {"start_time": 937.0, "title": "3 Vote \u00e0 la majorit\u00e9 relative", "end_time": 987.0}, {"start_time": 987.0, "title": "4 Vote \u00e0 la majorit\u00e9 absolue", "end_time": 1244.0}, {"start_time": 1244.0, "title": "5 Vote alternatif et m\u00e9thode de Coombs", "end_time": 1450.0}, {"start_time": 1450.0, "title": "6 M\u00e9thode Condorcet", "end_time": 1581.0}, {"start_time": 1581.0, "title": "7 Vote par approbation", "end_time": 1698.0}, {"start_time": 1698.0, "title": "8 M\u00e9thode Borda", "end_time": 1849.0}, {"start_time": 1849.0, "title": "9 Vote cumulatif", "end_time": 1904.0}, {"start_time": 1904.0, "title": "Options suppl\u00e9mentaires", "end_time": 2097.0}, {"start_time": 2097.0, "title": "Ma pr\u00e9f\u00e9rence", "end_time": 2278.0}, {"start_time": 2278.0, "title": "Jugement majoritaire", "end_time": 2634.0}, {"start_time": 2634.0, "title": "Ma d\u00e9mocratie", "end_time": 2980.0}, {"start_time": 2980.0, "title": "Pr\u00e9sentation du fichier Excel", "end_time": 3065.0}, {"start_time": 3065.0, "title": "Pr\u00e9sentation du site Borda", "end_time": 3090.0}, {"start_time": 3090.0, "title": "Conclusion", "end_time": 3128}], "like_count": 2261, "channel_follower_count": 51700, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@EspritCritique", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_10044/03NtiW-NXcI.tar.gz"}}