<transcript><audio_22> considèrent qu'ils ne respectent pas leurs décisions. Ce fonctionnement de nos associations ressemble pas mal au fonctionnement des régimes parlementaires, qu'ils soient des monarchies ou des républiques, c'est-à-dire la grande majorité des pays d'Europe par exemple. Dans ces pays, comme dans nos associations,</transcript><transcript><audio_23> pour appliquer ses décisions, et peut-être renversé par le Parlement s'il prend des décisions qui ne lui conviennent plus. Mais le plus remarquable, c'est que ce fonctionnement nous semble tout aussi naturel et évident pour les associations que la Vème République nous semble naturelle et évidente</transcript><transcript><audio_24> pour les institutions françaises, alors que c'est un fonctionnement extrêmement différent. Un autre exemple, c'est le fonctionnement de la prise de décision dans les entreprises par actions. Cette fois, tous les membres de l'entreprise ne peuvent pas participer aux décisions. Il y a bien un conseil d'administration,</transcript><transcript><audio_25> mais il n'est pas élu par les gens qui participent à l'entreprise. Il est élu par l'Assemblée Générale des Actionnaires, les gens qui ont donné de l'argent à l'entreprise en ayant acheté des actions de l'entreprise. Et les membres de cette Assemblée Générale n'ont pas une voix chacun commune.</transcript><transcript><audio_26> les citoyens d'un pays ou les députés d'un parlement. Non, dans les entreprises, on a autant de droits de vote qu'on achète d'actions. Celui qui possède 3 actions a 3 voix, celui qui possède 100 000 actions a 100 000 voix, et bien sûr, celui qui possède 0 action</transcript><transcript><audio_27> qu'on obtient en l'achetant, c'est ce qu'on appelle une ploutocratie. Ensuite par contre, c'est comme dans les associations et les régimes parlementaires. Les dirigeants de l'entreprise sont élus par le conseil d'administration et peuvent être virés par le conseil d'administration s'ils ne lui conviennent</transcript> those who elected them consider that they do not respect their decisions. This functioning of our associations is quite similar to the functioning of parliamentary regimes, whether they are monarchies or republics.  that is to say the vast majority of countries of Europe for example in these countries as in our associations the government is elected by parliament to implement its decisions and can be overthrown by parliament if it makes decisions that no longer suit it but the most remarkable thing is that this  functioning seems to us just as natural and obvious for associations as the 5th republic seems to us natural and obvious for French institutions while it is an extremely different functioning another example is the functioning of decision-making in companies by  action this time not all members of the company can participate in decisions there is indeed a board of directors but it is not elected by the people who participate in the company it is elected by the general meeting of shareholders the people who gave money to the company  by having purchased shares of the company the members of this general assembly not one vote each like the members of an association the citizens of a country where the deputies of a parliament not in the companies we have as many rights of  vote that one buys a share who owns three shares with three votes  the one who owns one hundred thousand shares with one hundred thousand votes is of course the one who owns 0 shares with zero votes such power that one obtains by buying it is what we call a plutocracy then on the other hand it is as in  associations and parliamentary regimes the directors of the company are elected by the board of directors and can be fired by the board of directors if they no longer suit it,
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.03NtiW-NXcI|shard_10044_53|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.54|shard_10044|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.54|shard_10044|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.54", "params": {"id": "03NtiW-NXcI", "channel_id": "UC0yPCUmdMZIGtnxSnx5_ifA", "duration": 3128, "view_count": 40972, "age_limit": 0, "chapters": [{"start_time": 0.0, "title": "Introduction", "end_time": 46.0}, {"start_time": 46.0, "title": "Comment d\u00e9cider \u00e0 plusieurs", "end_time": 153.0}, {"start_time": 153.0, "title": "D'autres \u00ab \u00e9vidences \u00bb", "end_time": 363.0}, {"start_time": 363.0, "title": "Consensus", "end_time": 538.0}, {"start_time": 538.0, "title": "M\u00e9thodes de d\u00e9cision", "end_time": 649.0}, {"start_time": 649.0, "title": "1 Tirage au sort", "end_time": 756.0}, {"start_time": 756.0, "title": "2 Vote \u00e0 la proportionnelle", "end_time": 937.0}, {"start_time": 937.0, "title": "3 Vote \u00e0 la majorit\u00e9 relative", "end_time": 987.0}, {"start_time": 987.0, "title": "4 Vote \u00e0 la majorit\u00e9 absolue", "end_time": 1244.0}, {"start_time": 1244.0, "title": "5 Vote alternatif et m\u00e9thode de Coombs", "end_time": 1450.0}, {"start_time": 1450.0, "title": "6 M\u00e9thode Condorcet", "end_time": 1581.0}, {"start_time": 1581.0, "title": "7 Vote par approbation", "end_time": 1698.0}, {"start_time": 1698.0, "title": "8 M\u00e9thode Borda", "end_time": 1849.0}, {"start_time": 1849.0, "title": "9 Vote cumulatif", "end_time": 1904.0}, {"start_time": 1904.0, "title": "Options suppl\u00e9mentaires", "end_time": 2097.0}, {"start_time": 2097.0, "title": "Ma pr\u00e9f\u00e9rence", "end_time": 2278.0}, {"start_time": 2278.0, "title": "Jugement majoritaire", "end_time": 2634.0}, {"start_time": 2634.0, "title": "Ma d\u00e9mocratie", "end_time": 2980.0}, {"start_time": 2980.0, "title": "Pr\u00e9sentation du fichier Excel", "end_time": 3065.0}, {"start_time": 3065.0, "title": "Pr\u00e9sentation du site Borda", "end_time": 3090.0}, {"start_time": 3090.0, "title": "Conclusion", "end_time": 3128}], "like_count": 2261, "channel_follower_count": 51700, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@EspritCritique", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_10044/03NtiW-NXcI.tar.gz"}}