<transcript><audio_93> Et si on recherche une approbation à 60 ou 75%, là ça devient carrément plus</transcript><transcript><audio_94> même avec seulement deux options possibles. Pour permettre quand même d'intégrer au vote plus que deux options dans un vote à la majorité absolue, la solution qu'on retient le plus souvent, c'est de faire plusieurs tours de vote. En général, on en fait deux, mais on peut très bien en faire plus, voire en faire en</transcript><transcript><audio_95> jusqu'à ce qu'on ait une majorité qui se dégage. Lors de ces autres tours, on peut éliminer les options les moins choisies au tour précédent pour ne garder que les plus populaires. Là encore, c'est un mécanisme qui nous semble évident, mais qu'on peut questionner. Pourquoi éliminer les options qui ont reçu le moins de</transcript><transcript><audio_96> Est-ce qu'on suppose que, simplement parce qu'ils sont les moins nombreux, l'avis de ceux qui ont voté pour ces options n'a aucune importance ? Est-ce qu'on suppose que, simplement parce qu'ils sont moins nombreux, alors ils devraient être ceux qui accepteront le plus de changer leur vote au tour suivant ? Je ne vois pas vraiment ce qui nous permettrait d'affirmer ça.</transcript> more nuanced answers it is the fact that we have basically chosen a majority voting system if we chose another voting system we could very well have added  options and if we are looking for 60 or 75% approval then it becomes much rarer to obtain it even with only two possible options to still allow more than two options to be included in the vote in an absolute majority vote the solution  that we remember the most  often it is to do several rounds of voting in general we do two but we can very well offer more or even iron in unlimited number until we have a majority which emerges during our other rounds we can eliminate  the least chosen options in the previous round to keep only the most popular ones again this is a mechanism which seems obvious to us but which we can question why eliminating the options which received the least votes is what we suppose  simply because they are the least numerous the lives of those who have  voted for these options has no importance is what we suppose that simply because there are fewer of them then they should be the ones who will most agree to change their vote in the next round most agree to change their vote in the next round I don't really see what would allow us to  'to affirm that if it is
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.03NtiW-NXcI|shard_10044_53|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.54|shard_10044|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.54|shard_10044|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.54", "params": {"id": "03NtiW-NXcI", "channel_id": "UC0yPCUmdMZIGtnxSnx5_ifA", "duration": 3128, "view_count": 40972, "age_limit": 0, "chapters": [{"start_time": 0.0, "title": "Introduction", "end_time": 46.0}, {"start_time": 46.0, "title": "Comment d\u00e9cider \u00e0 plusieurs", "end_time": 153.0}, {"start_time": 153.0, "title": "D'autres \u00ab \u00e9vidences \u00bb", "end_time": 363.0}, {"start_time": 363.0, "title": "Consensus", "end_time": 538.0}, {"start_time": 538.0, "title": "M\u00e9thodes de d\u00e9cision", "end_time": 649.0}, {"start_time": 649.0, "title": "1 Tirage au sort", "end_time": 756.0}, {"start_time": 756.0, "title": "2 Vote \u00e0 la proportionnelle", "end_time": 937.0}, {"start_time": 937.0, "title": "3 Vote \u00e0 la majorit\u00e9 relative", "end_time": 987.0}, {"start_time": 987.0, "title": "4 Vote \u00e0 la majorit\u00e9 absolue", "end_time": 1244.0}, {"start_time": 1244.0, "title": "5 Vote alternatif et m\u00e9thode de Coombs", "end_time": 1450.0}, {"start_time": 1450.0, "title": "6 M\u00e9thode Condorcet", "end_time": 1581.0}, {"start_time": 1581.0, "title": "7 Vote par approbation", "end_time": 1698.0}, {"start_time": 1698.0, "title": "8 M\u00e9thode Borda", "end_time": 1849.0}, {"start_time": 1849.0, "title": "9 Vote cumulatif", "end_time": 1904.0}, {"start_time": 1904.0, "title": "Options suppl\u00e9mentaires", "end_time": 2097.0}, {"start_time": 2097.0, "title": "Ma pr\u00e9f\u00e9rence", "end_time": 2278.0}, {"start_time": 2278.0, "title": "Jugement majoritaire", "end_time": 2634.0}, {"start_time": 2634.0, "title": "Ma d\u00e9mocratie", "end_time": 2980.0}, {"start_time": 2980.0, "title": "Pr\u00e9sentation du fichier Excel", "end_time": 3065.0}, {"start_time": 3065.0, "title": "Pr\u00e9sentation du site Borda", "end_time": 3090.0}, {"start_time": 3090.0, "title": "Conclusion", "end_time": 3128}], "like_count": 2261, "channel_follower_count": 51700, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@EspritCritique", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_10044/03NtiW-NXcI.tar.gz"}}