<transcript><audio_125> qui convient à la majorité, même si elle les satisfait un peu moins. Le problème de la méthode Condorcet le plus souvent évoquée, c'est qu'il arrive que l'on ne trouve pas d'option préférée. Par exemple, si A est préférée à B, qui est préférée à C, qui elle-même est préférée à A.</transcript><transcript><audio_126> Il existe alors de nombreuses variantes de cette méthode qui permettent quand même un choix dans le cas d'un paradoxe de Condorcet. On peut citer la méthode Schultz, le rangement par paire décroissante, ou la méthode Condorcet randomisée. Je ne vais pas détailler toutes ces méthodes qui peuvent être très utiles,</transcript><transcript><audio_127> très complexes et qui pour certaines ont déjà très bien été expliquées par d'autres vidéastes. Pour résoudre le paradoxe de Condorcet, on peut aussi départager les options arrivées en tête en appliquant l'une des autres méthodes de vote que j'évoque dans cette vidéo. Bref, retenez surtout que le</transcript><transcript><audio_128> n'est pas un obstacle insurmontable. Par contre, cette méthode est très laborieuse à comptabiliser au-delà de 3 ou 4 options, ce qui fait beaucoup de duels à simuler. Et puisque, là encore, il s'agit de simuler des votes majoritaires, le problème principal du vote majoritaire classique reste toujours...</transcript> nevertheless be the one which suits the majority even if it is not satisfied a little less the problem of the condorcet method most often mentioned is that it happens that we cannot find of preferred option for example if they had preferred to b which is preferred to those which itself is preferred to this is what we call the condorcet paradox there are then numerous variants of this method which still allow a  choice in the case of a condorcet paradox we can cite the schultz method of ordering by losing and increasing or the randomized condorcet method I will not detail all these methods which can be very complex and which for some have already been explained very well  by others videographer to resolve the condorcet paradox we can also decide between the options that come first by applying one of the other voting methods that I mention in this video. In short, we remember above all that the condorcet paradox is not an insurmountable obstacle on the other hand  this method is very laborious, counting beyond three or four options which means a lot of duels to simulate and since here again it is a question of simulating majority votes the main problem of voting  majority classics
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.03NtiW-NXcI|shard_10044_53|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.54|shard_10044|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.54|shard_10044|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.54", "params": {"id": "03NtiW-NXcI", "channel_id": "UC0yPCUmdMZIGtnxSnx5_ifA", "duration": 3128, "view_count": 40972, "age_limit": 0, "chapters": [{"start_time": 0.0, "title": "Introduction", "end_time": 46.0}, {"start_time": 46.0, "title": "Comment d\u00e9cider \u00e0 plusieurs", "end_time": 153.0}, {"start_time": 153.0, "title": "D'autres \u00ab \u00e9vidences \u00bb", "end_time": 363.0}, {"start_time": 363.0, "title": "Consensus", "end_time": 538.0}, {"start_time": 538.0, "title": "M\u00e9thodes de d\u00e9cision", "end_time": 649.0}, {"start_time": 649.0, "title": "1 Tirage au sort", "end_time": 756.0}, {"start_time": 756.0, "title": "2 Vote \u00e0 la proportionnelle", "end_time": 937.0}, {"start_time": 937.0, "title": "3 Vote \u00e0 la majorit\u00e9 relative", "end_time": 987.0}, {"start_time": 987.0, "title": "4 Vote \u00e0 la majorit\u00e9 absolue", "end_time": 1244.0}, {"start_time": 1244.0, "title": "5 Vote alternatif et m\u00e9thode de Coombs", "end_time": 1450.0}, {"start_time": 1450.0, "title": "6 M\u00e9thode Condorcet", "end_time": 1581.0}, {"start_time": 1581.0, "title": "7 Vote par approbation", "end_time": 1698.0}, {"start_time": 1698.0, "title": "8 M\u00e9thode Borda", "end_time": 1849.0}, {"start_time": 1849.0, "title": "9 Vote cumulatif", "end_time": 1904.0}, {"start_time": 1904.0, "title": "Options suppl\u00e9mentaires", "end_time": 2097.0}, {"start_time": 2097.0, "title": "Ma pr\u00e9f\u00e9rence", "end_time": 2278.0}, {"start_time": 2278.0, "title": "Jugement majoritaire", "end_time": 2634.0}, {"start_time": 2634.0, "title": "Ma d\u00e9mocratie", "end_time": 2980.0}, {"start_time": 2980.0, "title": "Pr\u00e9sentation du fichier Excel", "end_time": 3065.0}, {"start_time": 3065.0, "title": "Pr\u00e9sentation du site Borda", "end_time": 3090.0}, {"start_time": 3090.0, "title": "Conclusion", "end_time": 3128}], "like_count": 2261, "channel_follower_count": 51700, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@EspritCritique", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_10044/03NtiW-NXcI.tar.gz"}}