<transcript><audio_235> L'important, c'est d'affirmer quel est le but recherché, de ne pas le présenter.</transcript><transcript><audio_236> d'accepter qu'on n'a pas tous le même et de commencer la discussion en disant clairement si ce que vous voulez, c'est que la majorité puisse imposer son avis à la minorité ou que le moins possible de gens souffrent de nos décisions collectives. Si vous voulez aller plus loin</transcript><caption><image_237>The image is a screenshot of a spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel. The spreadsheet is divided into columns and rows, with each row representing a different color scheme. The colors range from red, orange, yellow, green, blue, pink, and purple. The rows are arranged in a grid-like pattern, with columns for each row and column.

At the top of the spreadsheet, there is a title bar that reads "Salesforce" and below it, there are several tabs for different categories such as "Sales", "Productivity", "Analytics", and "Sales". The tabs are labeled with numbers and letters, indicating the different categories of sales. The user interface of the software is visible in the top right corner of the image, with a green toolbar and a white background.</caption><transcript><audio_238> trouverez en lien dans la description de cette vidéo un fichier Excel à télécharger qui permet de simuler des votes de 10 votants devant choisir entre 5 options et de voir quelles seraient les options gagnantes avec les mêmes bulletins de vote selon le vote alternative</transcript><transcript><audio_239> la méthode Condorcet, le jugement majoritaire et bien sûr, selon mes préférés, le vote par approbation et la méthode Borda. Attention, pour chaque bulletin de vote et chaque option, il faudra indiquer à la fois un classement, qui sera utilisé pour calculer les résultats de presque toutes</transcript><transcript><audio_240> également des appréciations verbales nécessaires pour pouvoir calculer le résultat d'un vote au jugement majoritaire. En cherchant un peu, vous trouverez facilement des cas où ces méthodes donnent des résultats très différents. Et spoiler, aucun d'entre eux n'est objectivement le bon résultat.</transcript><transcript><audio_241> cas-là, c'est à vous de choisir quel serait le résultat le plus souhaitable selon vos buts personnels et votre vision de la démocratie. Et si l'un de ces systèmes de vote donne gagnante l'option qui, selon vous, devrait gagner, alors c'est le système de vote qu'il vous faut. Mais vous</transcript> disadvantages of the different  voting systems don't act like it's a purely scientific question  was not trying to reduce a debate on the true definition of democracy in reality we don't care about the word the important thing is to affirm that it is the desired goal not to present it as evidence of  accept that we do not all have the same and start the discussion by clearly stating whether what you want is for the majority to be able to impose its opinion on the minority or for as few people as possible to suffer from our collective decisions if  you want to go further in the reflections you will find in link  in the description of this video an excel file to download which allows you to simulate the votes of ten voters having to choose between five options and to see which would be the winning options with the same ballot papers according to the alternative vote the kums method the condorcet method the majority judgment and of course according to my favorites the vote by approval and the bordas method attention for each ballot and each option it will be necessary to indicate both a classification which will be used to calculate the results of almost all the methods but also the assessments  verbal necessary for being able to calculate the result of a majority judgment vote by searching a little you will easily find cases where these methods give very different results and spoiler none of them is objectively the right result in these cases it is up to  you to choose what would be the most desirable outcome depending on your personal goal is your vision of democracy and if one of its voting systems gives winner than the option which according to you should win then that is the voting system that  you need but
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.03NtiW-NXcI|shard_10044_53|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.54|shard_10044|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.54|shard_10044|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.54", "params": {"id": "03NtiW-NXcI", "channel_id": "UC0yPCUmdMZIGtnxSnx5_ifA", "duration": 3128, "view_count": 40972, "age_limit": 0, "chapters": [{"start_time": 0.0, "title": "Introduction", "end_time": 46.0}, {"start_time": 46.0, "title": "Comment d\u00e9cider \u00e0 plusieurs", "end_time": 153.0}, {"start_time": 153.0, "title": "D'autres \u00ab \u00e9vidences \u00bb", "end_time": 363.0}, {"start_time": 363.0, "title": "Consensus", "end_time": 538.0}, {"start_time": 538.0, "title": "M\u00e9thodes de d\u00e9cision", "end_time": 649.0}, {"start_time": 649.0, "title": "1 Tirage au sort", "end_time": 756.0}, {"start_time": 756.0, "title": "2 Vote \u00e0 la proportionnelle", "end_time": 937.0}, {"start_time": 937.0, "title": "3 Vote \u00e0 la majorit\u00e9 relative", "end_time": 987.0}, {"start_time": 987.0, "title": "4 Vote \u00e0 la majorit\u00e9 absolue", "end_time": 1244.0}, {"start_time": 1244.0, "title": "5 Vote alternatif et m\u00e9thode de Coombs", "end_time": 1450.0}, {"start_time": 1450.0, "title": "6 M\u00e9thode Condorcet", "end_time": 1581.0}, {"start_time": 1581.0, "title": "7 Vote par approbation", "end_time": 1698.0}, {"start_time": 1698.0, "title": "8 M\u00e9thode Borda", "end_time": 1849.0}, {"start_time": 1849.0, "title": "9 Vote cumulatif", "end_time": 1904.0}, {"start_time": 1904.0, "title": "Options suppl\u00e9mentaires", "end_time": 2097.0}, {"start_time": 2097.0, "title": "Ma pr\u00e9f\u00e9rence", "end_time": 2278.0}, {"start_time": 2278.0, "title": "Jugement majoritaire", "end_time": 2634.0}, {"start_time": 2634.0, "title": "Ma d\u00e9mocratie", "end_time": 2980.0}, {"start_time": 2980.0, "title": "Pr\u00e9sentation du fichier Excel", "end_time": 3065.0}, {"start_time": 3065.0, "title": "Pr\u00e9sentation du site Borda", "end_time": 3090.0}, {"start_time": 3090.0, "title": "Conclusion", "end_time": 3128}], "like_count": 2261, "channel_follower_count": 51700, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@EspritCritique", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_10044/03NtiW-NXcI.tar.gz"}}