<transcript><audio_103>at a snapshot of the cases right after the the reconstruction amendments were enacted you look at them in the late 60s and you look at them today you might think you're reading cases from three different countries because the interpretation has changed dramatically over</transcript><transcript><audio_104>time even though um the court rarely overturns cases but what they do is they subtly re-characterize subtly shift uh the meaning of earlier precedence and um</transcript><transcript><audio_105>and unfortunately because so many of the decisions that were closely decided are very murky there's room in that mushiness of the decisions of actually shifting it one way or the other while not appearing to actually strike</transcript><transcript><audio_106>anything down finally i do want to point out that i've been alive for a long time and there's been many justices who have been described as the justice to overturn</transcript><transcript><audio_107>roe versus wade and someone always chokes at the last minute and i want to emphasize that part of why that is is someone is always going to want to be a swing justice let's just be honest</transcript><transcript><audio_108>about it there's a lot of power that you have as a justice when you are a swing if you're if you're kind of a clear vote on one end or the other you're not that interesting but you can actually can make a substantial impact on the court's uh um</transcript><transcript><audio_109>juris prudence if you're that swing vote so that's kind of my thinking on all of this but i'd like to hear from some of the other panelists as um may i just say that um i guess</transcript><transcript><audio_110>somebody always chokes in overturning roe versus wade but i think it's very possible that roe vs wade will be overturned um i guess the only i don't know what you would think um professor nicholas but i feel like um</transcript><transcript><audio_111>these judicial nominations have been planned for many years um with that particular item in mind not only the nomination of justice coney barrett for the supreme court but also many of the nominations to lower federal courts</transcript> at a snapshot of the cases right after the the reconstruction amendments were enacted you look at them in the late 60s and you look at them today you might think you're reading cases from three different countries because the interpretation has changed dramatically over time even though um the court rarely overturns cases but what they do is they subtly re-characterize subtly shift uh the meaning of earlier precedence and um and unfortunately because so many of the decisions that were closely decided are very murky there's room in that mushiness of the decisions of actually shifting it one way or the other while not appearing to actually strike anything down finally i do want to point out that i've been alive for a long time and there's been many justices who have been described as the justice to overturn roe versus wade and someone always chokes at the last minute and i want to emphasize that part of why that is is someone is always going to want to be a swing justice let's just be honest about it there's a lot of power that you have as a justice when you are a swing if you're if you're kind of a clear vote on one end or the other you're not that interesting but you can actually can make a substantial impact on the court's uh um juris prudence if you're that swing vote so that's kind of my thinking on all of this but i'd like to hear from some of the other panelists as um may i just say that um i guess somebody always chokes in overturning roe versus wade but i think it's very possible that roe vs wade will be overturned um i guess the only i don't know what you would think um professor nicholas but i feel like um these judicial nominations have been planned for many years um with that particular item in mind not only the nomination of justice coney barrett for the supreme court but also many of the nominations to lower federal courts
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.0RimhAlWkNg|shard_10035_43|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.54|shard_10035|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.27|shard_10035|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.40", "params": {"id": "0RimhAlWkNg", "channel_id": "UCTjE2DIGhLlkjR4NU02bQCw", "duration": 2831, "view_count": 113, "age_limit": 0, "chapters": [{"start_time": 0, "end_time": 23.0, "title": "<Untitled Chapter 1>"}, {"start_time": 23.0, "title": "Mario Lamount Barnes", "end_time": 205.0}, {"start_time": 205.0, "title": "Elizabeth G. Porter", "end_time": 737.0}, {"start_time": 737.0, "title": "Lisa Marshall Manheim", "end_time": 1916.0}, {"start_time": 1916.0, "title": "Clark B Lombardi", "end_time": 2831}], "like_count": 2, "channel_follower_count": 621, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@gallagherlawlibrary9427", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_10035/0RimhAlWkNg.tar.gz"}}