<transcript><audio_61>trying to portray herself as kind of like justice scalia but ratchet up a bit um and i'll explain what i mean by that so um the judge has uh really made a concerted effort to um sort of define herself as being</transcript><transcript><audio_62>consistent with justice scalia and justice scalia's um understandings of the law at her uh the what i i should double check this i believe it was the rose garden ceremony that currently is is quite um prevalent in the news headlines um</transcript><transcript><audio_63>she said that uh justice scalia's judicial philosophy is mine too okay so this is definitely something she said in the last few weeks and what she means by that is um that like justice scalia she believes in an originalist interpretation of the</transcript><transcript><audio_64>constitution and she um believes in a textualist approach to statutory interpretation so we could spend some time if anybody wants to discussing exactly what that means um one way of thinking about the importance</transcript><transcript><audio_65>of both of those philosophies which overlap quite a bit is that under both the meaning of the constitution or the meaning of a statute is fixed in time it is not the case that it evolves</transcript> trying to portray herself as kind of like justice scalia but ratchet up a bit um and i'll explain what i mean by that so um the judge has uh really made a concerted effort to um sort of define herself as being consistent with justice scalia and justice scalia's um understandings of the law at her uh the what i i should double check this i believe it was the rose garden ceremony that currently is is quite um prevalent in the news headlines um she said that uh justice scalia's judicial philosophy is mine too okay so this is definitely something she said in the last few weeks and what she means by that is um that like justice scalia she believes in an originalist interpretation of the constitution and she um believes in a textualist approach to statutory interpretation so we could spend some time if anybody wants to discussing exactly what that means um one way of thinking about the importance of both of those philosophies which overlap quite a bit is that under both the meaning of the constitution or the meaning of a statute is fixed in time it is not the case that it evolves
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.0RimhAlWkNg|shard_10035_43|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.54|shard_10035|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.27|shard_10035|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.40", "params": {"id": "0RimhAlWkNg", "channel_id": "UCTjE2DIGhLlkjR4NU02bQCw", "duration": 2831, "view_count": 113, "age_limit": 0, "chapters": [{"start_time": 0, "end_time": 23.0, "title": "<Untitled Chapter 1>"}, {"start_time": 23.0, "title": "Mario Lamount Barnes", "end_time": 205.0}, {"start_time": 205.0, "title": "Elizabeth G. Porter", "end_time": 737.0}, {"start_time": 737.0, "title": "Lisa Marshall Manheim", "end_time": 1916.0}, {"start_time": 1916.0, "title": "Clark B Lombardi", "end_time": 2831}], "like_count": 2, "channel_follower_count": 621, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@gallagherlawlibrary9427", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_10035/0RimhAlWkNg.tar.gz"}}