<transcript><audio_180>professor lombardi you want to jump in i think that's very wise i did see one student ask whether they thought as that that constitutional amendment was as far off as as if everyone agreed that that that um constitutional amendment is</transcript><transcript><audio_181>unlikely in the next year or two um and so i would be interested if other people do agree i don't think it's impossible and i'd go to a different point which is and this i think this does fit on what what professor mannheim and professor nicholas were driving it if the situation becomes dire enough or</transcript><transcript><audio_182>for that matter if a a temporary a sort of fleeting uh super majority on in the congress and in the presidency um</transcript><transcript><audio_183>decides to threaten to do to to do significant make significant changes and significant changes in the number and personnel the judges maybe then more people would be willing to contemplate a compromise constitutional amendment we're really in uncharted</transcript><transcript><audio_184>territory and this is to go where professor manheim is talking about we haven't the 19th century was a very the supreme court was a very political institution much more so than it has been over the last 50 years</transcript><transcript><audio_185>but we're moving back into a period that no one who's alive today has seen um in in practice and i don't think we really can predict either what is legally possible or what</transcript> professor lombardi you want to jump in i think that's very wise i did see one student ask whether they thought as that that constitutional amendment was as far off as as if everyone agreed that that that um constitutional amendment is unlikely in the next year or two um and so i would be interested if other people do agree i don't think it's impossible and i'd go to a different point which is and this i think this does fit on what what professor mannheim and professor nicholas were driving it if the situation becomes dire enough or for that matter if a a temporary a sort of fleeting uh super majority on in the congress and in the presidency um decides to threaten to do to to do significant make significant changes and significant changes in the number and personnel the judges maybe then more people would be willing to contemplate a compromise constitutional amendment we're really in uncharted territory and this is to go where professor manheim is talking about we haven't the 19th century was a very the supreme court was a very political institution much more so than it has been over the last 50 years but we're moving back into a period that no one who's alive today has seen um in in practice and i don't think we really can predict either what is legally possible or what
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.0RimhAlWkNg|shard_10035_43|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.54|shard_10035|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.27|shard_10035|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.40", "params": {"id": "0RimhAlWkNg", "channel_id": "UCTjE2DIGhLlkjR4NU02bQCw", "duration": 2831, "view_count": 113, "age_limit": 0, "chapters": [{"start_time": 0, "end_time": 23.0, "title": "<Untitled Chapter 1>"}, {"start_time": 23.0, "title": "Mario Lamount Barnes", "end_time": 205.0}, {"start_time": 205.0, "title": "Elizabeth G. Porter", "end_time": 737.0}, {"start_time": 737.0, "title": "Lisa Marshall Manheim", "end_time": 1916.0}, {"start_time": 1916.0, "title": "Clark B Lombardi", "end_time": 2831}], "like_count": 2, "channel_follower_count": 621, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@gallagherlawlibrary9427", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_10035/0RimhAlWkNg.tar.gz"}}