<transcript><audio_172>either the person is predicting at whatever level of accuracy what a court will say about this and is also assuming that society at large is then going to agree with the court and sort of accept the the the court has reached a</transcript><transcript><audio_173>definitive answer so either the person is basically um sort of predicting what a court would say or the person is essentially giving you their own views of what they think the law should say um when it comes to the first category um all these proposals many of them</transcript><transcript><audio_174>it's not clear whether or not they are quote constitutional because we can't predict what a court would do if a court would even be willing to sort of adjudicate some of these um questions number one and uh number two say that um there was some sort of uh scheme that congress dreamed up to</transcript><transcript><audio_175>try to um you know stagger turns and and strip jurisdiction from the court and expand the court et cetera and then the court's response to that was to say we think this is illegitimate we say that this is not legal would society as as a whole accept that verdict by the</transcript><transcript><audio_176>supreme court we don't know this is sort of outside of of the normal way we talk about whether something is constitutional or not then you get to the second category which is should it be constitutional should a court decide that way should society accept it now to be clear that second</transcript> either the person is predicting at whatever level of accuracy what a court will say about this and is also assuming that society at large is then going to agree with the court and sort of accept the the the court has reached a definitive answer so either the person is basically um sort of predicting what a court would say or the person is essentially giving you their own views of what they think the law should say um when it comes to the first category um all these proposals many of them it's not clear whether or not they are quote constitutional because we can't predict what a court would do if a court would even be willing to sort of adjudicate some of these um questions number one and uh number two say that um there was some sort of uh scheme that congress dreamed up to try to um you know stagger turns and and strip jurisdiction from the court and expand the court et cetera and then the court's response to that was to say we think this is illegitimate we say that this is not legal would society as as a whole accept that verdict by the supreme court we don't know this is sort of outside of of the normal way we talk about whether something is constitutional or not then you get to the second category which is should it be constitutional should a court decide that way should society accept it now to be clear that second
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.0RimhAlWkNg|shard_10035_43|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.54|shard_10035|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.27|shard_10035|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.40", "params": {"id": "0RimhAlWkNg", "channel_id": "UCTjE2DIGhLlkjR4NU02bQCw", "duration": 2831, "view_count": 113, "age_limit": 0, "chapters": [{"start_time": 0, "end_time": 23.0, "title": "<Untitled Chapter 1>"}, {"start_time": 23.0, "title": "Mario Lamount Barnes", "end_time": 205.0}, {"start_time": 205.0, "title": "Elizabeth G. Porter", "end_time": 737.0}, {"start_time": 737.0, "title": "Lisa Marshall Manheim", "end_time": 1916.0}, {"start_time": 1916.0, "title": "Clark B Lombardi", "end_time": 2831}], "like_count": 2, "channel_follower_count": 621, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@gallagherlawlibrary9427", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_10035/0RimhAlWkNg.tar.gz"}}