<transcript><audio_228> Um ihre Mitmenschen auszubeuten und jedes Unrecht zu begehen. Eine ähnliche Immunität schützte das Eigentum der Geistlichen und auch sie gab zu flagranten Missbräuchen Anlass. Ebenso stark.</transcript><transcript><audio_229> Vers 4</transcript><transcript><audio_230> Dass dem tatsächlich so war, beweist die bei den Klerikern damals aufkommende Praxis. Zweifelhafte Schuldvergütung.</transcript><caption><image_231>The image is a crossword puzzle with the words "LICENSE" and "GAL" written on it. The puzzle is made up of red and white cubes arranged in a cross-like pattern. The cubes are arranged in the shape of the letters "L", "G", "A", and "L". The background is white and the text is written in black. The image appears to be a logo or icon for a website or app.</caption><transcript><audio_232> zu kaufen, um sie als dann vor den geistlichen Gerichtshöfen durchzusetzen. Eine Spekulation, die zwar von Konzilien verboten wurde, aber viel zu einträglich war, um unterdrückt werden zu können.</transcript><transcript><audio_233> denn schon mal gelesen, dass etwas zu einträglich war, als dass man es hätte verbieten können, obwohl es gegen römisch-katholisch-kanonisches Recht verstößt. Das hatten wir</transcript><transcript><audio_234> Am Anfang dieser Lesung schon mal gelesen. Und hier treffen wir das gleiche gleich wieder. In den Konzilien war es zwar verboten.</transcript><transcript><audio_235> viel zu einträglich, um unterdrückt werden zu können. Ein anderer Missbrauch, der zu lauten Klagen Anlass gab, bestand darin, dass man unglückliche Laien in demselben Verhältnis</transcript> only used their immunity to exploit their fellow human beings and to do injustice  A similar immunity protected the property of the clergy and it also gave rise to flagrant abuses. Likewise, in civil cases, the clergy had the right to be a plaintiff or sued negotiably judged in his favor so that the layman could hardly obtain justice, that this was actually the case, proves the practice that emerged among the clergy at that time of buying dubious debt claims from laypeople in order to then enforce them before the spiritual courts - a speculation that was forbidden by councils But it was far too profitable to be suppressed. Where have we ever read that something was too profitable to be banned even though it violated Roman Catholic canon law? That's what we had with our friends at the beginning This reading has already been read before and here we come, the same thing will happen again in the councils, although this speculation was forbidden, but it was far too profitable to be suppressed. Another abuse that gave rise to loud complaints was that there were unhappy laypeople  In the same case
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.-x2pObK0lAY|shard_10020_27|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.63|shard_10020|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.63|shard_10020|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.63", "params": {"id": "-x2pObK0lAY", "channel_id": "UCGYJKn-EzD3I06zKSjWLd_A", "duration": 3701, "view_count": 2079, "age_limit": 0, "like_count": 86, "channel_follower_count": 19200, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@joggler66", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_10020/-x2pObK0lAY.tar.gz"}}