<transcript><audio_11>would it be plainly erroneous for the agency to interpret this to mean 250 pounds the kaiser court now tells us don't be fooled by the plainly erroneous</transcript><caption><image_12>The image is a blackboard with white text written on it. The text reads "Nutrition statute uses the term "normal adult weight" and "Would it be "impermissible" for the agency to interpret this to mean 250 lbs?" The text is written in a bold, sans-serif font and is centered on the blackboard. The background of the image is black.</caption><transcript><audio_13>language an unreasonable interpretation does not survive what is tempting now to call our step two the dissent was not satisfied with the majority's weakening</transcript><caption><image_14>The image shows a man sitting at a desk in a courtroom. He is wearing a suit and appears to be deep in thought. The desk is made of wood and there is a quote on the left side of the image that reads, "Today's decision is more a stay of execution than a pardon. The Court cannot muster even five votes to say that Auer is lawful or wise. Instead, a majority retains Auer only because of stare decision." The quote is attributed to Kiefer C. Wilkie.</caption><transcript><audio_15>of our justice gorsuch wrote today's decision is more a stay of execution than a pardon the court cannot muster even five votes to say that our is lawful or wise</transcript><transcript><audio_16>instead a majority retains our only because of one of the examples justice kagan gives in her plurality opinion</transcript> would it be plainly erroneous for the agency to interpret this to mean 250 pounds the kaiser court now tells us don't be fooled by the plainly erroneous language an unreasonable interpretation does not survive what is tempting now to call our step two the dissent was not satisfied with the majority's weakening of our justice gorsuch wrote today's decision is more a stay of execution than a pardon the court cannot muster even five votes to say that our is lawful or wise instead a majority retains our only because of one of the examples justice kagan gives in her plurality opinion
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.0akV_5H9kOQ|shard_10016_22|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.32|shard_10016|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.22|shard_10016|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.22", "params": {"id": "0akV_5H9kOQ", "channel_id": "UCbi2rUBrZdy0_1cpSuC5T9w", "duration": 167, "view_count": 29, "age_limit": 0, "like_count": 1, "channel_follower_count": 279, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@WilliamAEdmundson", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_10016/0akV_5H9kOQ.tar.gz"}}