<transcript><audio_58> La verdad es que vemos que cambia el resto de los partidos en esta Cámara. Este es un debate nacional. Creo que la trascendencia de lo que hagamos va a ser pequeña, pero la debatimos.</transcript><transcript><audio_59> Y por eso hemos presentado una enmienda a la totalidad. En primer lugar, porque la moción, señora Soler dice, mantener el consenso parlamentario, pero con la decisión tomada de que ya los jueces sean elegidos por los jueces. Eso no es un consenso parlamentario.</transcript><transcript><audio_60> El consenso parlamentario sería que en el Congreso de los Diputados debatamos abiertamente, porque es verdad que existen dudas sobre cuál es el mejor sistema para la elección del Consejo General del Poder Judicial, pero la moción tal y como...</transcript><caption><image_61>The image shows a group of five people sitting at a long table in a large room with red walls. The table is covered with papers and microphones, and there are four people sitting on either side of the table. The person in the center is wearing a red jacket and appears to be speaking into a microphone. The other three people are listening attentively to the speaker. They are all dressed in formal attire and appear to be engaged in a discussion. The room is dimly lit, with a red curtain visible in the background.</caption><transcript><audio_62> consenso parlamentario sobre lo que yo digo. Muy bien, estupendo. La politización de la justicia en España no está vinculada al Consejo General del Poder Judicial. Está vinculada a la injerencia que desde el Poder Ejecutivo y algunas veces</transcript><transcript><audio_63> ...sobre determinados procedimientos judiciales que son la actualidad en este país. Por ejemplo, la jueza que está investigando el caso Auditorio es una jueza elegida por algo tan sencillo como un reparto absolutamente imparcial e independiente...</transcript><video><caption><image_64>The image shows a group of people sitting at a long table in a conference room. There are six people in the image, six men and one woman, all dressed in formal attire. The table is covered with papers and microphones, and there is a laptop on the table in front of them. The room appears to be a government or legislative chamber, as there are red walls and a red curtain in the background. The people at the table appear to be engaged in a discussion, with some of them looking intently at the laptop screen.</caption><caption><image_65>The image shows a group of people sitting at a long table in a large room with red walls. The table is covered with papers and appears to be a parliamentary chamber. There are six people in the image, three men and three women, all dressed in formal attire. The man on the left is wearing a suit and tie, the man in the center is holding a pen and writing on a piece of paper, and the woman on the right is looking at a laptop screen. The other three people are looking at the laptop screen and appear to be engaged in a discussion. The room is well-lit with natural light coming in from the windows on the walls.</caption><caption><image_66>The image shows a group of people sitting at a long table in a parliamentary chamber. There are six people in the image, three men and three women, all dressed in formal attire. The table is covered with papers and microphones, and there is a laptop on the table in front of them. The people appear to be engaged in a discussion, with some of them looking at the laptop screen and others looking at their phones. The room is dimly lit, with a red wall in the background. The image appears to be taken from a high angle, looking down on the people at the table.</caption><caption><image_67>The image shows a group of people sitting at a long table in a parliamentary chamber. The table is covered with papers and papers, and there is a laptop on the table in front of them. The people are dressed in formal attire, with some wearing suits and others wearing dresses. The room appears to be well-lit with red walls and a chandelier hanging from the ceiling. It seems like the people are engaged in a discussion or a meeting.</caption></video> socialist party and that in an absolutely curious way we see that it changes the  rest of the parties in this chamber. This is a national debate. I think that the significance here of what we do is going to be small, but well, we debate it. We believe that the criteria should be maintained and that is why we have presented an amendment in its entirety first.  place because the motion Mrs. Soler says to maintain the parliamentary consensus but with the decision made that the judges are already elected by the judges that is not a parliamentary consensus that is a parliamentary imposition the parliamentary consensus would be that in the congress of deputies we debate openly because it is true that there are doubts about what is the best system for the election of the General Council of the Judiciary, but the motion as it is presented closes the debate parliamentary consensus on what I say very well, great, eh, the politicization of justice  In Spain it is not linked to the general council of the judiciary, it is linked to the interference that the executive and sometimes the legislative branches make on certain judicial procedures that are current in this country. For example, the judge who is investigating the audit case is  a judge chosen by something as simple as an absolutely impartial and independent distribution,
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.17zfqxBZfrc|shard_10008_13|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.61|shard_10008|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.61|shard_10008|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.61", "params": {"id": "17zfqxBZfrc", "channel_id": "UCGWt3Hunyq2i8Qso_de8x5g", "duration": 2389, "view_count": 18, "age_limit": 0, "channel_follower_count": 1190, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@AsambleamurciaEs", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_10008/17zfqxBZfrc.tar.gz"}}