<transcript><audio_91> Gracias.</transcript><transcript><audio_92> Sin ser parte del Ministerio de Justicia, creemos que debe seguir teniendo ese origen y esa legitimidad parlamentaria. Podemos mejorar el sistema y creemos que existen opciones para debatir en ese consenso parlamentario que no debería estar cerrado.</transcript><transcript><audio_93> La moción para perfeccionar, objetivizar, hablar de mérito, de capacidad, que como usted ha dicho ahora se mejoró con el acuerdo que hicimos. Treinta y seis jueces sobre los que luego elige el Parlamento son profesionales.</transcript><transcript><audio_94> un sistema que, sin perder de vista y termino, Presidenta, la legitimidad que creemos que tiene que seguir manteniéndose parlamentaria en el Consejo General del Poder Judicial no tiene por qué confundirse con la politización. Lo contrario</transcript><caption><image_95>The image shows a large conference room with a long wooden table in the center. The room is filled with people sitting at the long table, facing the front of the room. The table is covered with papers and microphones, and there is a podium in front of it. On the left side of the image, there are several people sitting in chairs, and on the right side, there is another person standing at the podium. The walls are decorated with banners and flags, and the room appears to be well-lit with natural light coming in from the windows. The image appears to have been taken from a high angle, giving a bird's eye view of the conference room.</caption><transcript><audio_96> Y eso es lo que nosotros vamos a seguir defendiendo. Muchas gracias.</transcript> which is not foreign to this  case will occur. We believe, therefore, that if Justice emanates from the people, if the governing body does not impart justice and therefore does not decide, and we believe that it is a body that is within the executive without being part of the Ministry of Justice, we believe that  must continue to have that origin and that parliamentary legitimacy, we can improve the system and we believe that there are options to debate in that parliamentary consensus that should not be closed to what the motion says to perfect, objectify, talk about merit of capacity that, as you have said, is now  It improved with the agreement that we made. 36 judges who are then elected by parliament are professionals. Well, that is a system that without losing sight of the legitimacy that we believe must continue to remain parliamentary in the general council of the judiciary. Why get confused with politicization, otherwise we want you to take a step back and that is what we are going to continue defending. sir, in the moment of presentation of the partial amendment formulated by the parliamentary group, we can have
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.17zfqxBZfrc|shard_10008_13|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.61|shard_10008|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.61|shard_10008|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.61", "params": {"id": "17zfqxBZfrc", "channel_id": "UCGWt3Hunyq2i8Qso_de8x5g", "duration": 2389, "view_count": 18, "age_limit": 0, "channel_follower_count": 1190, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@AsambleamurciaEs", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_10008/17zfqxBZfrc.tar.gz"}}