<transcript><audio_117> de las asociaciones profesionales y con mecanismos o sistemas de votación proporcional que permitan una representatividad adecuada de toda la carrera judicial, no solo de las opciones mayoritarias. Solo así se conseguirá que los docentes</transcript><transcript><audio_118> Gracias.</transcript><transcript><audio_119> determinados mecanismos de control a modo de vacuna de afinidades políticas. Y eso es lo que defendemos. En ese sentido, apunta nuestra enmienda de mi grupo parlamentario.</transcript><transcript><audio_120> apoyar la moción presentada por el Grupo Popular si se acepta nuestra enmienda. En caso contrario, no estaríamos apostando por un sistema realmente orientado a obtener la máxima independencia judicial. Por otra parte, la enmienda a la totalidad del Grupo Socialista y</transcript><transcript><audio_121> señora Gígnez. Sí, gracias, señora presidenta. Que ISTA, que los 20 vocales sigan siendo elegidos por mayorías cualificadas en el Parlamento, no nos parece adecuada, pues permite que la lógica de partido siga inundando el Poder Judicial y, por lo que no podemos</transcript><transcript><audio_122> mantener la situación actual. Muchas gracias. Gracias. En el turno general de intervenciones por el Grupo Parlamentario Ciudadanos Partido de la Ciudadanía tiene la palabra</transcript> decisive influence from professional associations and with proportional voting systems that allow adequate representation of the entire judicial career, not only the majority options, only in this way will it be possible for the 12 members to represent who they have to represent, which are the judges and magistrates as such, not because of their political ideology, that is why the proposal of the popular group does not seem to us to be the right one.  best for impartiality among the members of the judicial career can be called into question if certain control mechanisms are not activated as a vaccine for political affinities and that is what we defend in that sense, our amendment as my parliamentary group points out, so  We will only be able to support the motion presented by the popular group if our amendment is accepted, otherwise we would not be betting on a system truly aimed at obtaining maximum judicial independence. On the other hand, the amendment to the entire socialist group has to be concluded, Madam. Yes, thank you.  Madam President who urges that the 20 members continue to be elected by qualified majorities in Parliament does not seem appropriate to us because it allows party logic to continue flooding the judiciary and therefore we cannot support it since it would mean maintaining the current situation Thank you very much thank you  In the general turn of interventions by the parliamentary group, Citizens Party, Mr. Sánchez López has the floor.
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.17zfqxBZfrc|shard_10008_13|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.61|shard_10008|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.61|shard_10008|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.61", "params": {"id": "17zfqxBZfrc", "channel_id": "UCGWt3Hunyq2i8Qso_de8x5g", "duration": 2389, "view_count": 18, "age_limit": 0, "channel_follower_count": 1190, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@AsambleamurciaEs", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_10008/17zfqxBZfrc.tar.gz"}}