<transcript><audio_117>and uh who he draws directly on to talk about what the rain gap is while he tries to rework it in this circulation so i think there's a lot there that we need to recover that's as much about the circulation of capital as it is about um gentrification and such and i guess that</transcript><transcript><audio_118>comes to this question of the see-saw motion of capital and it's where the question that i have for you lisa that is uh one of the the arguments that i think neil makes that i know he makes when he's talking</transcript><caption><image_119>The image shows two men sitting in a lecture hall with black chairs. They are engaged in a conversation, with one man holding a microphone and the other holding a piece of paper. The man holding the microphone is pointing towards something on the paper, while the other man is looking at him attentively. There are other people in the background, some of whom are also sitting in the lecture hall. The room appears to be empty, with no people visible in the image.</caption><transcript><audio_120>about that is that uh he argues that um investment in one area necessarily entails disinvestment in another area so where where are the that's the seesaw</transcript><transcript><audio_121>right where are the processes of disinvestment the active disinvestment within um the seoul cityscape going on or elsewhere in the country there's nothing that says that capital being invested in seoul has to be you know the</transcript><transcript><audio_122>invested the investment correlate doesn't have to be there it could be it could be in ho chi minh city it could be in all kinds of places right and so where is the disinvestment that's the flip side of the investment that you're</transcript> and uh who he draws directly on to talk about what the rain gap is while he tries to rework it in this circulation so i think there's a lot there that we need to recover that's as much about the circulation of capital as it is about um gentrification and such and i guess that comes to this question of the see-saw motion of capital and it's where the question that i have for you lisa that is uh one of the the arguments that i think neil makes that i know he makes when he's talking about that is that uh he argues that um investment in one area necessarily entails disinvestment in another area so where where are the that's the seesaw right where are the processes of disinvestment the active disinvestment within um the seoul cityscape going on or elsewhere in the country there's nothing that says that capital being invested in seoul has to be you know the invested the investment correlate doesn't have to be there it could be it could be in ho chi minh city it could be in all kinds of places right and so where is the disinvestment that's the flip side of the investment that you're
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.1Uvn5fsXv2k|shard_1000_4|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.49|shard_1000|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.49|shard_1000|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.49", "params": {"id": "1Uvn5fsXv2k", "channel_id": "UC9a4rOBePS1wS8sfgAVeFXg", "duration": 2883, "view_count": 275, "age_limit": 0, "like_count": 1, "channel_follower_count": 142, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@hkcgghk", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_1000/1Uvn5fsXv2k.tar.gz"}}