<transcript><audio_0> 소멸시효에 관한 다음 질문 중 옳지 않은 것은 1번 민법체 163조 제2호 소정의 의사의 치료에 관한 채권에 있어서는 특약이 없는 한 그 개개의 진료가 종료될 때마다</transcript><caption><image_1>The image shows a young man standing in front of a green chalkboard. He is wearing a purple collared shirt and glasses and appears to be speaking into a microphone. He has short dark hair and is holding a yellow object in his hand. The background is blurred, but it seems like he is standing in a classroom or a classroom setting. The man seems to be giving a presentation or lecture.</caption><transcript><audio_2> 필요한 비용의 여행기가 도래하여 그에 대한 시효가 진행한다. 맞는 질문이고요. 유의하실 것은 퇴원했을 때를 기준으로 퇴원했을 때</transcript><transcript><audio_3> 2번 금전 채무 이행 지출에 발생한 지연손해금은 민법 제163조 제1호 소정 후 3년간 단기 소멸시효의 대상이다. X가 됩니다.</transcript><caption><image_4>The image shows a man sitting at a desk in front of a green chalkboard. He is wearing a purple shirt and glasses and appears to be in a classroom or lecture hall. He has short black hair and is gesturing with his right hand as if he is explaining something. The background is blurred, but it seems like he is focused on the task at hand.</caption><transcript><audio_5> 다시 말하면 이거는 별도의 금전 채무죠. 따라서 10년의 소멸시효가 걸리는 것이지 단기 소멸시효가 걸리는 것이 아니라는 것이 우리 판례입니다.</transcript><transcript><audio_6> 2번이 되는 거죠. 3번 소멸시효 중단 사유로서의 승인은 소멸시효의 진행이 개시된 이후에만 가능하고 그 이전에 승인을</transcript> Now, it is number 14 on page 255. Which of the following questions regarding the number of extinguishments is not correct is number 1. Mil Law Che 120 Article 163 In the case of a bond regarding treatment by a prescribed doctor, unless there is a special agreement, each madam's claim is made when the individual treatment is terminated.  The story of the cost required for the party's advancement has arrived, and the c5 vassal is responsible for it. arrived, and the c5 vassal is responsible for it. It is a correct question. Yes, the treatment is not carried out from the time of Taewon based on the time of discharge from the hospital.  It is important to remember that it is easy to handle it individually. The delay damages resulting from the entire non-fulfillment expenditure of this money are subject to short-term extinction benefits for 3 years as prescribed by Article 163, No. 1 of the Civil Code. What is the answer? Give it this time.  Ah, in other words, what is the separate thing? It takes 20 years to extinguish the demand, not the short-term sketching week. Since it is a repale position, the next buzzer is the third reason for stopping the statute of limitations.  It is only possible when the statute of limitations has started, and even if you win before then, the
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.0dU40lPfVjs|shard_100|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.42|shard_100|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.42", "params": {"id": "0dU40lPfVjs", "channel_id": "UC8okEeJcystaPjGYPyuC7WA", "duration": 1735, "view_count": 312, "age_limit": 0, "like_count": 1, "channel_follower_count": 8610, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@eduroad0249", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_100/0dU40lPfVjs.tar.gz"}}