<transcript><audio_20> 문제는 법의 규정이 위반했다는 이유로 취소가 됐다면 가압류 안 한 것이죠. 따라서 시효 중단 효력이</transcript><transcript><audio_21> 2번 채권자가 확정 판결에 의한 채권</transcript> go to the middle, but the problem is that if it was canceled because it violated the provisions of the law, the provisional seizure was not done.  It is easy and the space that is effective in the middle will be  It's the same as
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.0dU40lPfVjs|shard_100|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.42|shard_100|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.42", "params": {"id": "0dU40lPfVjs", "channel_id": "UC8okEeJcystaPjGYPyuC7WA", "duration": 1735, "view_count": 312, "age_limit": 0, "like_count": 1, "channel_follower_count": 8610, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@eduroad0249", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_100/0dU40lPfVjs.tar.gz"}}