<transcript><audio_80> 4번입니다.</transcript><transcript><audio_81> 제3채무자는 이 병이 뭐가 되는 거죠? 제3채무자가 되는 거죠. 제3채무자는 채권자의 채무자에 대한 권리. 누구죠?</transcript><transcript><audio_82> 권리니까 요거죠 채권자의 채무자에 대한 권리가 시효로 소멸되었음을 원형할 수 있다 x 가 되구요 다음은 4번이 되는 거죠</transcript> Since you are asking for it, you cannot assume that the hospital is safe because you have to pay back the money regardless of whether the briefing session is completed or not. Now look, this is the 4th bar. Creditor Vs.  In the lawsuit, the 3rd party debtor becomes nothing and becomes the 3rd party. The 3rd party debtor has to pay 5 times for the creditor and the debtor, so it is easier for the creditor to manage the debtor, so it is Lawson 10.  The circular can be done as  You can claim it because the 30-frame frame is a person who acquired ownership after the mortgage was established. Therefore, this person is currently squeezing the ownership of the real estate for which the mortgage provisional registration has been established. He should be able to leave and claim cancellation. Is that right? It is an evil situation.  This is number 21. What is wrong with the explanation of Palais' attitude in relation to the number of extinguishment is that the CEO of the company knew of the completion of the co. The repayment after completion is currently the repayment of the debt. What is our precedent in English yet? It installs absolute extinguishment. Um, so uh.
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.0dU40lPfVjs|shard_100|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.42|shard_100|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.42", "params": {"id": "0dU40lPfVjs", "channel_id": "UC8okEeJcystaPjGYPyuC7WA", "duration": 1735, "view_count": 312, "age_limit": 0, "like_count": 1, "channel_follower_count": 8610, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@eduroad0249", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_100/0dU40lPfVjs.tar.gz"}}