<transcript><audio_67> 원래 채권이 10년이라면 손해배상채권도 뭐가 돼요? 10년이 되는 거죠. 2번 판례에 의하면 부당하게 파면된 직원이 제기한 파면초분 무효수는</transcript><transcript><audio_68> 5번 판례는 절대적 소멸서를 취하면서 변론주의 원칙상 소멸시 완성을 원형하여 한다고 한다. 다시 말하면 이런 얘기입니다. 용익물건은 소멸시 완성을 원형하여 한다고 한다.</transcript><transcript><audio_69> 완성되는 순간 용의 물건은 소멸합니다. 뭐하지 않아도 말소 등기하지 않아도 이게 기본적으로 절대적 소멸인 거죠. 다시 말하면 소멸시효가 완성됐다는 이유로 등기가 말소되어야 비로소 권리가 소멸되는 것이 아니라</transcript><caption><image_70>The image shows a man standing in front of a green chalkboard with mathematical equations written in Korean. The equations are written in white chalk and appear to be related to mathematics. The man is wearing a purple shirt and glasses and is looking at the equations with a serious expression on his face. The background is blurred, but it appears to be a classroom or a classroom setting.</caption><transcript><audio_71> 자동으로 소멸된다 용인물권에 대한 말소 등기 없이 자동으로 소멸되게 되거든요 이게 우리 판례가 제외하고 있는 절대적 소멸서류예요 다만 우리 판례는 소멸수요가 완성되었으니까</transcript><transcript><audio_72> 그것을 주장해야지만 고려해준다. 이 변론주를 취하고 있기 때문에 요거는 뭐죠? 맞는 질문이죠. 4번. 채권자의 대의소송의 제3채무자죠. 자 이런 문제입니다. 이게 무슨 말인지만 알면 쉬워요. 을이 갑에게 1억을 빌려줘서 1억을 빌려줬어요.</transcript> depends on the number of extinguishment rights to the original benefit claim. In other words, the original bond is 20 years.  If so, what happens to the compensation claim and it lasts 10 years? According to this precedent, resolving the confirmation of invalidity of dismissal filed by an employee who was unfairly dismissed is easy for 5 wage claims if it is urgent. It means that it has the effect of suspension, but I said it is not important. 5 times 8 It is said that while taking an absolute cotton speech, it is said to invoke the completion of the cerebellum poem in principle around the argument. If I say it so far, it is like this. When the extinction number is completed for the reason that it has been completed, Yongyu's real rights are extinguished at the moment of completion. Even if the ex-son of Uwa does not register the cancellation, e is basically done with the enemy's hand. In other words, the right is extinguished as a result of the extinction show being completed. other words, the right is extinguished as a result of the extinction show being completed. Rather, the moment the breath is completed, the water right is automatically extinguished. It automatically becomes 20 years old without registering the cancellation of the water right. It is absolutely a novel that we are doing together. absolutely a novel that we are doing together. However, in our case law, the water tight demand is completed, so it is an issue in the trial.  If it is, you have to claim it and take it into consideration. Since you are taking this line of argument, what are the requirements? Please tell me if they are correct. Even the 3rd party debtor in the 4th creditor's lawsuit is like this. It's easy if you know what I mean. Now, let's lend 100 million to A.
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.0dU40lPfVjs|shard_100|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.42|shard_100|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.42", "params": {"id": "0dU40lPfVjs", "channel_id": "UC8okEeJcystaPjGYPyuC7WA", "duration": 1735, "view_count": 312, "age_limit": 0, "like_count": 1, "channel_follower_count": 8610, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@eduroad0249", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_100/0dU40lPfVjs.tar.gz"}}