<transcript><audio_9> samar-samar gitu yang ketiga yang keempat objek perjanjian ini halal atau tidak melanggar hukum kira-kira seperti itu dia jadi ada masalah</transcript><transcript><audio_10> pertama tadi sepakat kedua cakep dia yang ketiga jelas dia objeknya tertentu dia</transcript><transcript><audio_11> tidak menanggalkan hukum atau halal dia kalau keempat-empat ini memenuhi barulah dinyatakan perjanjian itu sah artinya perjanjian itu benar tapi</transcript><transcript><audio_12> ada satu yang gak pas itu dia gak benar perjanjiannya nah kalau misalnya sudah terlanjur bagaimana caranya bang kita membatalkannya ya rekan-rekan perhatikan ya rekan-rekan</transcript><transcript><audio_13> jadi begini, saya kasih contoh ya misalnya anda mau membangun rumah lalu mendatangi arsitek si arsitek ini anda pikir dia orang yang profesional lalu membangun</transcript><transcript><audio_14> membuat konsep dan membuat arsitek rumah Anda ternyata belakangan Anda tahu bahwa dia bukan ahlinya tapi sudah terlanjur artinya kan kena dia di perserta</transcript><transcript><audio_15> Itu bisa.</transcript> this agreement, it is clear, it's not that vague, colleagues. Third, the fourth object of this agreement is that it is halal or does not violate the law, roughly  that's how he is. So there are four colleagues, the first one agreed, the second said he, the third, uh, it was clear that he had a certain object, he, then the fourth did not violate the law or was halal, fulfilled, then it is declared valid, meaning the agreement  That's true, but if there's one thing missing that doesn't fit, then the agreement isn't correct. Well, if for example it's already been done, bro, how do we cancel it, friends, pay attention to this, friends, so I'll give you an example, friends. For example, if you want build a house then go to the architect, yes, this architect, you think he is a professional person, then make an agreement for ee to organize, create a concept and EE to make your house architect, it turns out later you found out that he is not an expert, but it has already happened, which means that he has met the requirements, you don't  If you agree, that's it. Well, it can be
{"source": "grass-yt-cc-by.1V-J7QBCBIM|shard_10_2|create_multimodal_data.extract_yt_and_generate_transcripts.33|shard_10|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.33|shard_10|create_multimodal_data.generate_captions.33", "params": {"id": "1V-J7QBCBIM", "channel_id": "UCDlJ3Ij8G_jNP0ejc42esjw", "duration": 454, "view_count": 25954, "age_limit": 0, "like_count": 505, "channel_follower_count": 789000, "license": "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", "uploader_id": "@ElangMaut_Indonesia", "yt_tar_file": "/leonardo_work/EUHPC_E03_068/audio/fixed_download/grass-yt-cc-by//shard_10/1V-J7QBCBIM.tar.gz"}}