 I think potentially the rules about when these things apply retroactively are very complicated. So I think it's kind of case by case. But you could definitely see some defendants who were earlier convicted for this now come back and try to get those convictions vacated. Well, thank you for adding some some light and some clarity, because it is very easy to be just enervated by this maddening ruling. But I'm glad to hear that maybe there is some sort of sense to it.