 to change that if they don't like it, not to have activist judges doing so, you know, legislating from the bench. Isn't that essentially what the court's so-called conservative majority is doing in this case? Absolutely, absolutely. But that's not illegitimate to me. I mean, the idea with when we're doing statutory interpretation, that's a reasonable response. In other words, you say, this is what we think the statute says. Our best analysis of what we think the statute says, if we are wrong...