 Well, in my view, your science is another reason to declare a global climate emergency, to apply every break we can on human greenhouse gas emissions. And if we allow the possibility of multiple instabilities in natural systems, well, we have to take the science at some point, and we have to take it to government leaders and to people who are consuming fossil fuels and say, okay, we may have to change our urgency and message. Do you feel that's the case with the science that you're bringing up?