 I'm just saying I think the majority probably has the better of the argument when you consider all of the factors they listed to explain why they thought this couldn't cover gratuities, which includes, among other things, the fact that the penalty is exactly the same, even though gratuities are typically punished at a far less severe level than bribes. It's 15 years for a bribe, two years for a gratuity in the other federal statute. If this statute applied to gratuities, it would mean federal officials who take gratuities –