 that what they're doing is actually a form of protected speech. Maybe the laws could be okay in those cases. So they sent it back down to the lower courts. They were really saying, you need to figure out exactly what these laws cover before you can decide whether to toss them out altogether. Otherwise, what you could do is say, well, they're unconstitutional if you try to apply them to Facebook and YouTube, but you still have to keep the rest of the law.