 Basically, what you described is what happened here. The mayor goes to them later and says, hey, how about that solid I did for you? Can you give me some money? Yeah, they did it. That doesn't violate this one particular statute. That doesn't mean it's OK. And it doesn't mean that the local and state officials can't bring charges for that very same thing. Does this ruling at the court on Wednesday, does it open up the possibility that other plaintiffs who were convicted under this statute might seek a rehearing or see their cases overturned?