 which was this revolutionary Second Amendment case, basically was a lone dissenter in Rahimi and said, well, you don't really understand what I wrote. And so that kind of undercuts the whole point of originalism, right? When you have the author of an opinion that received a majority vote by members of the United States Supreme Court saying to other people in the Supreme Court, you don't understand just a couple of years later what I actually meant, kind of ironically undercuts