 Their answer was no. I think based on the way that statute was written, that's a reasonable outcome. Well, she keeps underscoring the plain text of the 666, which is, you know, something that this particular court, the textualists say that, oh, when there's a question about a law, you go back to the text of the simple reading of the text. And she keeps referring to that, the plain text that, you know, it's unlawful to accept payments, quote, intending to be influenced or rewarded.