 Because if you look at the way she reacted to the arguments during the hearing, she seemed to suggest that she would go along with the other courts in the way that special counsels had been appointed over the years because there was a longstanding precedent over many years and many different administrations to appoint special counsels in this way. And yet we now have this decision, which really has stunned the legal community because it has thrown out a precedent that has been in existence for at least 20 or 25 years with regard to the appointment of special counsel.