 everybody's attention. There was a little noticed concurrence by Justice Clarence Thomas in which he said, yeah, I agree with the majority of the president's immune. But by the way, he said, you know, Jack Smith was illegally appointed and we need to look into that issue as well. Nobody else joined him on that. So does that mean he's going to be kind of a lone wolf if this gets back up to the U.S. Supreme Court? It takes four justices to vote out of the nine to vote to take up a case. So we don't really know if he's got three colleagues on the court that would agree with him that this matter