 fairly obvious to anybody who's seen how censorship has worked in the past, that they'll pick something that maybe a few people could agree with. They always say that reasonable people can disagree on certain things. They come up with something that's sort of reasonable, and they'll establish a bureaucracy which is capable of conducting the heinous deed, in this case censorship. They'll set up some mechanism for conducting the censorship, and then it'll look for other things to do.