 This obstruction statute is ambiguous. If we construe it the way the government wants us to, in the future, they might prosecute innocent lobbyists or peaceful protesters who stand up during the committee hearing and shout some kind of protest before they're escorted out. And, you know, we can't give prosecutors that kind of power. They'll make the same kind of argument about trivial future cases that in the real world would never be brought, but they'll use it as a way to narrow the statute. This time, though, I think they would really be violating the clear language of the statute, and it would be