 And the otherwise then talks about various kinds of influences and activities. And if you read that standing alone, you may be able to say that some of the stuff that was done by either Fischer or by Trump was caught by the statute. But usually, in effect, if you have a statute which has the first part in a savings clause, you don't want the savings clause to be larger than the initial clause and go far off from anything that has to do with Sarbanes-Oxley.