 And I think everybody who kind of sees this has a kind of an intuitive sense that proportionality is an essential feature of the criminal law, and that this was a wildly disproportionate case. And so what happened is, even though it was only, I guess, 5-4, it was clearly the kind of thing in which the only reason why you would sustain the conviction against Fisher was because you knew out of the corner of your eye that it's the same provision that you're using against Trump. But it was an outrageous choice to do that.