 Could somebody come in and say, I'm going to argue because this discussion has come up because of trans and a lot of other things. You say, the wiring in my brain makes me sexually attracted to children. I'm a pedophile, but that's part of my status. You can't punish me for acting on my status. Would that argument logically flow out of the argument that the dissenters in this decision, the three justices, said, no, we've got to consider status? What if somebody says, I'm a pedophile, and you can't punish me for being that?