 So you're not allowed to say, well, he had improper motives. He was doing it for his own personal political reasons. Doesn't matter. The question is totally irrelevant. The question is whether or not for the question of immunity, it's whether or not the power being exercised or the thing he was doing was itself an official act, was part of his job. And if so, yes, then there's going to be at a minimum presumptive immunity.