 but they're gonna try and figure out a way to fashion that presidential immunity still exists. So what's the test that allows the court to go forward and get him on these, or at least pursue these actions, without getting rid of presidential immunity entirely? Because we do not want presidents sued or pursued criminally for everything they've done in office like they do in the third world countries and so forth. It's an interesting needle to thread. It's gonna be a fascinating outcome. I still think it pales in comparison