 because it's an ambiguous term. Everyone will take that in a completely different way. But here's an important concession made by the United States at oral arguments. Elizabeth Prelogger, the Solicitor General, stood up in front of the justices, and she said, there will be very, very few situations in which EMTALA's reading will conflict with Idaho's law. Now, saying that, I think she has narrowed the level of conflict between federal and state law.