 Now, anyway, the ethics panel in Georgia looked into this, and they concluded that nothing Christina Peterson did made any sense. They said that the judge predetermined that the petitioner committed a criminal contempt, quote, issued the notice of the hearing without informing the petitioner that the criminal contempt matter should be adjudicated, ambushed the petitioner at the hearing by alleging that she had committed a crime, summarily found the petitioner guilty and sentenced her, and then lied about her actions and her testimony before the panel.